High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeBail allowed; petitioner to be released on bail.

ZAINUL ABIDHEEN v. STATE OF KERALA and THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT

Case / Petition Number:BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C.S. Dias
Judgment Date
2024-04-04
Court Decision / Holding
The application is allowed. The petitioner is to be released on bail on a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two solvent sureties of like amount, to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, subject to conditions: (i) appearance before IO every Saturday 9–11 a.m. till final report; (ii) no inducement or tampering with witnesses or facts; (iii) no offence on bail; (iv) surrender of passport (or affidavit if none); (v) court may cancel bail on violation; (vi) court may entertain modifications to conditions; and (vii) IO may continue investigation and effect recoveries if necessary while on bail, as per Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another (2020 (1) KHC 663).
Final Disposition
Bail allowed; petitioner to be released on bail.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • ZAINUL ABIDHEEN

Respondents

  • STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA
  • THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • P.M.ZIRAJ
  • • IRFAN ZIRAJ

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT SHYNNIMOL V.O., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case Synopsis & Summary

Zainul Abideen moved Bail Application No. 2571 of 2024 under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail in Crime No. 369/2024 of the Valanchery/Valancherry Police Station, Malappuram, for alleged offences under Section 379 IPC and Sections 20 and 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. The petitioner, aged 44, was arrested on 21 March 2024 after being seen driving a lorry KL 46A 0774 carrying river sand without a license. The prosecution states the offences as charged; the investigation is reportedly complete with recoveries effected, and a final report was laid before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tirur, on 26 March 2024. The petitioner contends innocence and false implication, arguing there are no materials linking him to the crime. He notes Annexures 2–5 showing orders granting pre-arrest bail to similarly situated accused. The Public Prosecutor opposed bail but conceded the investigation is complete. After considering the submissions and record, the Court found that continued detention is unnecessary, given custody since 21 March 2024, completed investigation, and final report. Consequently, the bail application was allowed with specified bond and conditions, balancing liberty with integrity of the investigation.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973Section 379 of the Indian Penal CodeSections 20 and 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that he is totally innocent and falsely implicated. There are no materials linking him to the alleged offence. He has been in judicial custody since 21.03.2024, and the investigation is practically complete with recoveries effected. Annexures 2–5 show pre-arrest bail orders in similarly situated cases, suggesting a practice of granting bail. He seeks release on bail to avoid unnecessary detention, stressing his right to liberty until final report is laid. He submits that there is no reasonable likelihood of逃逃absconding or tampering with evidence; bail conditions can ensure presence for investigation.

Contentions of Respondents

The State, through the Public Prosecutor, opposes bail on grounds of the serious nature of the offence and need for ongoing scrutiny, but concedes the investigation is complete and a final report was laid on 26.03.2024 before the JFMC Tirur. While acknowledging gravity, the State does not oppose bail in principle if appropriate conditions are imposed to ensure presence and protect the course of justice.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another2020 (1) KHC 663PositiveCited to support that police can continue to investigate and effect recoveries even when the accused is on bail; used to justify ongoing investigation and actions during bail.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against ZAINUL ABIDHEEN v. STATE OF KERALA and THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS ``` ``` THURSDAY, THE 4[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024 ``` ``` CRIME NO.369/2024 OF Valanchery Police Station, Malappuram ``` ``` --------------- ``` ## **`PETITIONER :-`** ``` ZAINUL ABIDHEEN, AGED 44 YEARS SON OF SAMBASIVAN NADESHAN, PARAPPURATH HOUSE, KALPAKANCHER, MALAPPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 676 551 ``` ``` BY ADVS. P.M.ZIRAJ IRFAN ZIRAJ ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS :-`** - **`1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031`** - **`2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 552`** ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ## **`PP SMT SHYNIMOL P O`** ``` THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024 ``` 2 ## **Dated this the 4th day of April, 2024** ## **O R D E R** The application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the sole accused in Crime No.369/2024 of the Valanchery Police Station, Malappuram, registered against him for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code (in short, 'IPC') and Sections 20 and 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. The petitioner was arrested on 21.03.2024. 2. The essence of the prosecution case is that: on 13.03.2024 at around 4.30 hours, the accused was seen driving a lorry bearing No.KL 46A 0774 carrying river sand in it without any license or permission. Thus, the accused has committed the above offences. ``` BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024 ``` 3 3. Heard; Sri.P.M.Ziraj, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Shynimol V.O., the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is totally innocent of the accusations leveled against him. He has been falsely implicated in the crime. There are no materials to link the petitioner's involvement in the case. In any given given case, the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 21.03.2024, the investigation in the case is practically complete and recovery has been effected. Likewise, this Court by Annexures 2 to 5 orders have granted orders of prearrest bail to similarly situated accused. Therefore, the petitioner's further detention is unnecessary. Hence, the application may be allowed. ``` BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024 ``` **==> picture [7 x 9] intentionally omitted <==** 5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. Nonetheless, she conceded to the fact that the investigation in the case is complete and the final report has been laid on 26.03.2024 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Tirur. 6. After bestowing my anxious consideration to the facts, the rival submissions made across the Bar and the materials placed on record, especially considering the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 21.03.2024, that the investigation in the case is practically complete, recovery has been effected and the final report has been laid, I am of the view that the petitioner's further detention is unnecessary. Hence, I am inclined to allow the bail application. ``` BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024 ``` 5 In the result, the application is allowed, by directing the petitioner to be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, which shall be subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every Saturday between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m till the final report is laid. He shall also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever; ``` BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024 ``` 6 (iii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while he is on bail; (iv) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the court below at the time of execution of the bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to the effect before the court below on the date of execution of the bond; (v) In case of violation of any of the conditions mentioned above, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law. (vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall be moved and entertained by the court below. ``` BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024 ``` 7 (vii) Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in _**Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another** [2020 (1) KHC 663]_ . Sd/- **C.S.DIAS, JUDGE** jvt/04.04.24 ``` BAIL APPL. NO. 2571 OF 2024 ``` 8 ## **`APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 2571/2024`** ## **`PETITIONER ANNEXURES`** ``` Annexure 1 ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NUMBER 369 OF 2024 OF VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT ``` - **`Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31.12.2021 IN BA NO. 9571 OF 2021`** - **`Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 23.11.2023 IN B.A 9429 OF 2023`** - **`Annexure 4 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 25.01.2024 IN B.A NO.360 OF 2024`** - **`Annexure 5 TRUE COPY OF THE BAIL APPLICATION NO.2445 OF 2024 BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE COURT`** ``` Annexure 6TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 23.03.2024 IN C.M.P NO.986 OF 2024 BEFORE THE LEARNED JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE- I, TIRUR ```