High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions to dispose of S.M.2...

Yasoda v. Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T)
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-25
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.218/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri, with no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions to dispose of S.M.218/2021 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri; No costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Yasoda, aged 71 years W/o GOPALAN, Vettukad House, Mannalur, Thenkurissi-II Village, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Pattambi, Palakkad-679104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • V. A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Yasoda, a 71-year-old petitioner, seeks a mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M. No.218/2021 pending before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, concerning the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and the issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms Rules, 1970. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal based on a Village Officer’s report in Thenkurissi-II Village, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. The petitioner argues that the petitioner’s senior citizen status warrants priority in disposal and that the Tribunal should follow the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, which emphasized seniority-based disposal and expeditious handling of such cases, including six months for senior citizens and eighteen months as outer limits for others. The respondent contends that disposal must be in strict conformity with law and the established seniority principle to avoid derailing the process and unnecessary delays. The court, after considering submissions, directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M. No. 218/2021 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority-based disposal of cases before Land Tribunals is to be maintained.
  • Expeditious disposal of cases, with six months for senior citizens and an outer limit of eighteen months for others, should be observed.
  • Do not derail the process by arbitrary or out-of-turn consideration; follow established directions and laws.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner submits that a writ of mandamus is necessary to secure expeditious inquiry and disposal of S.M.218/2021, ensuring timely processing of the case given the petitioner’s status as a senior citizen and the need for a predictable, rule-based timeline; reliance is placed on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision emphasizing seniority-based disposal and the use of village officers as conduits to expedite information. The petitioner contends that delay undermines access to purchase certificates under the Land Reforms Act and may jeopardize financial arrangements requiring a timely loan, and thus seeks a time-bound disposal within the guidelines laid down by this Court.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent contends that the Land Tribunal must adhere to the seniority-based system and ensure that cases are disposed of within the prescribed outer limits; the government seeks to avoid arbitrary or out-of-turn processing that could derail the established process. The respondent emphasizes that expeditious disposal must occur without compromising the due process requirements and that any prioritization should be consistent with the judgments and orders directing that seniority be respected and that delays be minimized through efficient means as per the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as controlling precedent for expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases and seniority-based disposal; the judgement adopts directions from Narayanan Namboodiri.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Yasoda v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1943 WP(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **YASODA, AGED 71 YEARS W/O.GOPALAN, VETTUKAD HOUSE, MANNALUR, THENKURISSI-II VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.218/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.1470 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.319/16 in Block No.20 of Thenkurissi-II Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thenkurissi-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.218/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 17.02.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 71 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.218/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.218/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.7751 OF 2021(T) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 17.02.2021.**