High Court of KeralaDivision BenchDisposed of with directions to conduct fresh el...

Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021

Case / Petition Number:WA 1658 of 2021; WP(C) 26919 of 2021
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • P.B. Suresh Kumar, J.
  • C. S. Sudha, J.
Judgment Date
2021-12-21
Court Decision / Holding
The Court disposed of the petition and the writ appeal by directing that the Administrator shall immediately prepare a member list in accordance with Rule 35A(4), adopt a resolution to conduct fresh elections within ten days, and forward it to the Election Commission. The Departmental officers must ensure the resolution reaches the Election Commission within a week. The Election Commission is directed to notify the election within a week thereafter and to complete the process at the earliest possible time. The decision emphasizes compliance with Rule 35A(4) to ensure a fair election and affirms redress through the election mechanism rather than prolonging the existing process.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions to conduct fresh elections in compliance with Rule 35A(4) of the Rules, including preparing a compliant voters list, notifying the Commission, and completing the process at the earliest possible time.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Ramla C.A.
  • Shaju George P.
  • Anil Kumar T.T.

Respondents

  • The Kerala State Co-Operative Election Commission
  • The Electoral Officer appointed for conduct of election to the Managing Committee of Thrissur District Co-Operative Bank Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd. No.R 236, Thrissur (Assistant Registrar, (General) of Co-operative Societies, Thrissur)
  • The Returning Officer appointed for conduct of election to the Managing Committee of Thrissur District Co-Operative Bank Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd. No.R 236, Thrissur (Unit Inspector, Thrissur Unit, Office of the Assistant Registrar (General) of Co-operative Societies, Thrissur)
  • The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), O/o the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thrissur
  • The Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), O/o The Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thrissur
  • Thrissur District Co-Operative Bank Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd.No.R 236, Thrissur, represented by its Secretary

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • B.Ashok Shenoy
  • • Arjun Raghavan
  • • Pooja Pankaj
  • • P.S.Gireesh
  • • K.V.George
  • • Arjun R Naik
  • • Lakshmi Narayanan, SC
  • • V.K.Sunil, SR.GP

Counsels for Respondents

  • • George Poonthottam (Sr.)
  • • Arjun Raghavan
  • • Nisha George
  • • Arun Chandran
  • • Pooja Pankaj
  • • Lakshmi Narayanan
  • • V.K.Sunil, SR.Govt. Pleader
  • • George Poonthottam for R6

Case Synopsis & Summary

This joint disposition deals with WA 1658 of 2021 and WP(C) 26919 of 2021 challenging Ext.P2 (resolution dated 18-10-2021) and Ext.P5 (03-11-2021) notifications for conducting elections to the Managing Committee of Thrissur District Co-operative Bank Employees Co-operative Society Ltd No.R 236, Thrissur. The petitioners contested the final voters list Ext.P9 prepared for the election, arguing it violates Rule 35A(4) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Rules by omitting essential particulars (admission number, name, father/husband, address), thereby compromising a fair election. The Election Commission’s notification and subsequent steps had progressed, and petitioners sought rescission of Ext.P2 and redressal through the election process. The respondents contended that interference at this stage would derail an ongoing process and that petitioners could seek relief in the election court if there were flaws. The Court, citing Joseph v. Kothamangalam Co-op. M. Society Ltd. (1994 KHC 176) and Velloor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., Kottayam v. State of Kerala (2014 KHC 866), held that a final voters list lacking Rule 35A(4) particulars cannot guarantee a fair election and that a fresh process is required. The judgment disposes of the petition and appeal with directions to prepare a proper voters list under Rule 35A(4), adopt a fresh resolution for elections within ten days, transmit it to the Election Commission within a week, and for the Commission to notify and conclude the process promptly. The bench comprises Justices P.B. Suresh Kumar and C.S. Sudha (Division Bench).

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, Rule 35A(4)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners challenge Ext.P2 (resolution dated 18-10-2021) and Ext.P5 (election notification dated 03-11-2021), asserting Ext.P9 final voters list is not prepared in accordance with Rule 35A(4) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Rules, which requires admission number, name, father/husband, and address to be included. They argue the absence of these particulars makes identification difficult and undermines the electorate’s right to object; they seek rescission of the Ext.P2 resolution and stay of the election process in favor of recalibrating the list. They rely on established precedents that emphasize a fair and transparent electoral process and the need for compliance with statutory rules to maintain legitimacy.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that the election process has commenced and should not be interfered with at this stage; even if Ext.P9 contains defects, redress lies in the electoral forum, not in halting the process; it is alleged that petitioners wield political influence and that stopping the election would prejudice the conduct of governance. They argue existing orders and administrative steps (appointment of Administrator, etc.) are necessary to ensure orderly electoral conduct and that fairness can be addressed through post-election challenges.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Joseph v. Kothamangalam Co-op. M. Society Ltd.1994 KHC 176PositiveCited to support that a final voters list not in accordance with Rule 35A(4) jeopardizes fairness and can justify interdicting or reconsidering the election process.
Velloor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., Kottayam v. State of Kerala2014 KHC 866PositiveCited to support that fairness requires compliance with Rule 35A(4) and that elections must be conducted afresh if the list is non-compliant, as affirmed by a Division Bench.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA ``` ``` TUESDAY, THE 21[ST] DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, ``` ## **`1943`** ``` WA NO. 1658 OF 2021 ``` ``` AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 26919/2021 OF HIGH ``` ## **`COURT OF KERALA`** ## **`APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:`** - **`1 RAMLA. C.A., AGED 49 YEARS MEMBER, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR.`** - **`2 SHAJU GEORGE P. MEMBER, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR.`** - **`3 ANIL KUMAR T.T. THOTTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, SREYAS NAGAR, SNRA-44, OLLOOKKARA P.O., THRISSUR-680 655.`** - **`BY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN`** ## **`RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 3RD FLOOR, COBANK TOWERS, VIKAS BHAVAN PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.`** - **`2 THE ELECTORAL OFFICER APPOINTED FOR CONDUCT OF ELECTION TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THRISSUR DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR (ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR)680 003.`** - **`3 THE RETURNING OFFICER APPOINTED FOR CONDUCT OF ELECTION TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF ELECTION TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE`** Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..2.. ``` BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR (UNIT INSPECTOR, THRISSUR UNIT, O/O THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR)-680 003. ``` - **`4 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), O/O THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR-680 003.`** - **`5 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES`** - **`(GENERAL), O/O THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR-680 003.`** - **`6 THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236 THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-680 001.`** ``` BY ADVS. B.ASHOK SHENOY ARJUN RAGHAVAN POOJA PANKAJ P.S.GIREESH K.V.GEORGE ARJUN R NAIK LAKSHMI NARAYANAN, SC V.K.SUNIL, SR.GP GEORGE POONTHOTTAM FOR R6 ``` ## **`OTHER PRESENT:`** ## **`SR.GP.V.K.SUNIL`** ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.12.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).26919/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..3.. # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA TUESDAY, THE 21[ST] DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, ``` ``` 1943 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 26919 OF 2021`** ## **`PETITIONERS:`** - **`1 RAMLA C.A., AGED 44 YEARS MEMBER, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR.`** - **`2 SHAJU GEORGE.P., MEMBER, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR.`** - **`3 ANIL KUMAR.T.T., THOTTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, SREYAS NAGAR, SNRA RR, OLLOOKKARA P.O., THRISSUR-680 655. BY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN`** ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION,`** - **`REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 3RD FLOOR, CO-BANK TOWERS, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695 033.`** - **`2 THE ELECTORAL OFFICER APPOINTED FOR CONDUCT OF ELECTION TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THRISUSRDISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR, (ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR-680 003.`** Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..4.. - **`3 THE RETURNING OFFICER, APPOINTED FOR CONDUCT OF ELECTION TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF ELECTION TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR (UNIT INSPECTOR, THRISSUR UNIT, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIEITES, THRISSUR-680 003.`** - **`4 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERLA), OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR-680 003.`** - **`5 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR-680 003.`** - **`6 THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.R 236, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-680 001.`** - **`7 ADDL.R7.N.A.SABU S/O. AUGUSTINE, AGED 50 YEARS, NADEPARAMBIL HOUSE, PATTORE.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN680581.`** - **`8 ADDL.R8 C.N.VENUGOPALAN S/O. NARAYANAN, AGED 51 YEARS, CHIRAKKAL HOUSE, PERUMBILLISSERY, CHERPPU.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680561.`** - **`9 ADDL.R9.ANURAG.C.S S/O. C.K.SANKARANKUTTY, CHITTATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUTHUVARA, PUZHAKKAL.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680553.`** - **`(ADDL.R7 TO ADDL.R9 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 3-12-2021 IN IA 2/2021 IN WP(C) 26919/2021).`** - **`10 ADDL.R10. THE ADMINISTRATOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LID. NO.R 236, THRISSUR.`** - **`ADDL.R10 IS IMPLEADED SUO MOTU AS PER ORDER DATED 21.12.2021.`** ## **`BY ADVS. GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.) ARJUN RAGHAVAN`** Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..5.. ``` NISHA GEORGE ARUN CHANDRAN POOJA PANKAJ LAKSHMI NARAYANAN V.K.SUNIL, SR. GOVT.PLEADER GEORGE POONTHOTTAM FOR R6 ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.12.2021, ALONG WITH WA.1658/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..6.. ## **P.B.SURESH KUMAR & C.S.SUDHA, JJ. ----------------------------------------------Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021** **& W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021** **-----------------------------------------------** ## **Dated this the 21[st] day of December, 2021** ## **JUDGMENT** ## **P.B.Suresh Kumar, J.** Writ appeal No.1658 of 2021 is one preferred challenging the interim order dated 07.12.2021 in W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021, in terms of which the interim order dated 30.11.2021 earlier passed in the said case was vacated. When the writ appeal came up for hearing on 10.12.2021, this Court felt that in order to resolve the dispute between the parties effectively and completely, it is necessary to decide the writ petition itself. Accordingly, in terms of the interim order dated 10.12.2021 in the writ appeal, W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 was withdrawn to this Court. 2. Since the writ petition has been withdrawn to this Court, it is unnecessary to deal with the writ appeal and it Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..7.. is suffice to deal with the writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent, the learned Government Pleader as also the learned Senior Counsel for the party respondents. 4. The petitioners 1 and 2 are two among the members of the Managing Committee of the sixth respondent Co-operative Society (the Society) registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (the Act). The third petitioner is a member of the Society. The term of the Managing Committee is due to expire on 16.12.2021. As such, on the basis of Ext.P2 resolution dated 18.10.2021, the Managing Committee of the Society decided to conduct election to form a new Managing Committee, on 11.12.2021. On the basis of the said resolution, the Kerala State Co-operative Election Commission (the Election Commission) has issued Ext.P5 notification on 03.11.2021 for conducting the election. According to the petitioners, Ext.P2 resolution is contrary to the provisions of the Act. The petitioners therefore preferred a representation to the fourth respondent, the jurisdictional Joint Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..8.. Registrar of Co-operative Societies requesting to rescind Ext.P2 resolution. The said representation was turned down by the Joint Registrar in terms of Ext.P7 order. In the meanwhile, the Electoral Officer appointed by the Election Commission published the final voters list for the election pursuant to Ext.P5 notification. Ext.P9 is the final voters list published by the Electoral Officer in this regard. According to the petitioners, Ext.P9 does not contain the mandatory particulars of the voters insisted in terms of Rule 35A(4) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Rules (the Rules). The petitioners have therefore challenged in the writ petition Ext.P2 resolution, Ext.P5 election notification, Ext.P7 order as also Ext.P9 voters list. 5. As indicated in the opening paragraph, though this Court stayed the election pursuant to Ext.P5 notification in terms of the interim order dated 30.11.2021, the same was later vacated on 07.12.2021. 6. The main argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners was that Ext.P9 final voters list is not one prepared in terms of Rule 35A(4) of the Rules and if an Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..9.. election is permitted to be conducted on the basis of such a voters list, the same may not be a fair one. The learned counsel has relied on the decisions of this Court in **Joseph v. Kothamangalam Co-op. M. Society Ltd.,** 1994 KHC 176, and **Velloor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., Kottayam v. State of Kerala,** 2014 KHC 866, in support of his contention that Ext.P9 final voters list is not in tune with Rule 35A(4) of the Rules. 7. Per contra, the learned Senior Counsel for the party respondents contended that insofar as the election process has already commenced and is nearing completion, this Court may not be justified in interfering with the same even if it is found that the final voters list published by the Electoral Officer is defective in any manner, and the petitioners shall be relegated to the election court for redressal of their grievance concerning the election. The learned Senior Counsel has also submitted that petitioners are persons who are having political clout, and if the election process is interdicted at their instance, they will ensure that the election does not take place in near future. Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..10.. 8. We have examined the contentions put forward by the learned counsel for the parties on either side. 9. Going by the mandate of Rule 35A(4) of the Rules, the voters list duly approved by the committee and submitted to the Electoral Officer in order to publish the preliminary voters list shall contain the admission number, name of the member, the name of the father or husband and the address of such member. The object sought to be achieved by the publication of a preliminary voters list and calling for objections, if any, is to ensure that the said list does not contain persons ineligible to vote and that all persons eligible to vote are included therein. The publication of a preliminary voters list in terms of Rule 35A(4) of the Rules, containing among other particulars, the fathers or husbands name of a member and the address of such member is highly essential in order to ensure that the members of the Society are afforded with a reasonable opportunity to exercise their statutory right of objecting to the preliminary voters list in a fruitful manner. The said statutory right would be rendered nugatory, if identification of the members is not possible as to Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..11.. the preliminary voters list. In the case on hand, Ext.P9 final voters list published by the Electoral Officer does not contain any particulars of the voters other than the membership number and the name. The said voters list cannot be construed as one prepared in accordance with Rule 35A(4) of the Rules. We have no doubt in our mind that a fair election cannot be conducted based on such a voters list. As pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners, in an identical situation, a learned Single Judge of this Court upheld the decision of the Election Commission to interdict an election proposed on the basis of such a voters list for starting the election process afresh from the stage of publication of the preliminary voters list, and the said decision has been affirmed by the Division Bench in **Velloor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd** . 10. In the course of hearing, it has come to the notice of this Court that since the election to the Managing Committee of the Society is not likely to take place before the expiry of the term of the last elected committee, an Administrator has been appointed in the Society. The Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..12.. Administrator was accordingly, impleaded as an additional respondent in the writ petition. 11. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, especially in the light of the decision of the Division Bench in **Velloor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd** , the writ petition and the writ appeal are disposed of with the following directions: 1. The additional tenth respondent in the writ petition shall prepare forthwith a list of members of the Society in tune with Rule 35A(4) of the Rules. He shall also adopt a resolution for conducting election to the Managing Committee of the Society afresh within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and forward the same immediately thereafter to the Election Commission through the concerned officers of the Department. 2. The concerned officers of the Department shall ensure that the resolution adopted by the Administrator reaches the Election Commission Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..13.. within a week from its date of despatch. 3. The Election Commission shall, within a week thereafter, notify the election and complete the process within the minimum possible time. **Sd/P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.** **Sd/C.S.SUDHA, JUDGE.** ds 14.12.2021 Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..14.. ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26919/2021`** ## **`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`** ``` Exhibit P1 ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07.10.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. ``` ``` Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.17 DATED 18/10.2021. ``` - **`Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 28.10.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.`** - **`Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28.10.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE JOINT REGISTRAR.`** - **`Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 03.11.2021.`** - **`Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.25333/2021 DATED 17.11.2021.`** - **`Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.JRGTSR/2223/2021/CRB DATED 23.11.2021 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.`** - **`Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 07.`10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`** - **`Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL VOTERS LIST PUBLISHED ON 17.11.2021 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`** - **`Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLIANT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 23.11.2021 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`** ## **`RESPONDENT EXHIBITS`** ``` Exhibit R6(A) ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.11.2021 IN WPC NO.25333 OF 2021 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT. ``` Writ Appeal No.1658 of 2021 & W.P.(C) No.26919 of 2021 ..15.. ``` Exhibit R6(B) ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE NOTITIFICATION BEARING G.O.(P) NO.149/2021-CO-OP DATED 04.10.2021 PUBLISHED IN THE KERALA GAZETTE ON 06.10.2021. ``` ``` Exhibit R6(c)TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 08.11.2021 IN WPC NO.23331 OF 2021 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT. ``` - **`Exhibit R7(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 08/11/2021 PUBLISHED ALONG WITH THE PRELIMINARY VOTERS LIST.`** - **`Exhibit R7(b) A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BEARING NO.2738/2021 DATED 15/11/2021, ISSUED BY THE ELECTORAL OFFICER ALONG WITH OBJECTION.`** - **`Exhibit R7(c) A COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED 16/11/2021 SUBMITTED BY THE SOCIETY TO THE ELECTORAL OFFICER,`** - **`Exhibit R7(d) A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION DATED 17/11/2021.`** - **`Exhibit R7(e) A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY A MEMBER DATED 15/11/2021.`** - **`Exhibit R7(f) A TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION WITH RESPECT TO HE FINAL LIST OF CANDIDATES DATED 26/11/2021.`** ``` Exhibit R7(g)A TRUE COY OF THE DECLARATION DATED 09/11/2021 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY. ```