High Court of KeralaDivision BenchWrit appeal disposed of; directions modified; o...

Writ Appeal No. 669 of 2021: The Manager, National College of Pharmacy, Manassery v. Ahmed Sharooq S.M. and Others

Case / Petition Number:WA No. 669 of 2021

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • S. Manikumar, Chief Justice
  • Shaji P. Chaly, J.
Judgment Date
2021-09-08
Court Decision / Holding
Writ appeal disposed of. The court declines to uphold the college’s broad retention rights and affirms that original certificates cannot be retained as security for liquidated damages. It directs that the petitioner be entitled to the Transfer Certificate issued by the college (not the Transfer Certificate from the Secondary School) and to have the original documents released within three weeks of receipt of this judgment. The court sustains the learned Single Judge’s directions in principle but refines the relief: the transfer certificate to be released is that issued by the appellant college, along with original documents, within the specified period, and the petitioner may pursue lawful claims for any amount due in accordance with law.
Final Disposition
Writ appeal disposed of; directions modified; original documents and Transfer Certificate to be released within three weeks; reliance on Neethu J and Robin for non-security nature of original certificates.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • The Manager, National College of Pharmacy, Manassery P.O., Mukkom, Kozhikode-673 602

Respondents

  • Ahmed Sharooq S.M., (Writ petitioner in WP(C) No.6527/2021)
  • The State of Kerala represented by the Secretary to the Department of Health and Family Welfare
  • The Kerala University of Health Sciences represented by its Registrar

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • K.M. Jamaludheen
  • • Smt. Latha Prabhakaran

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Adv. George Sebastian (for Ahmed Sharooq S.M.)
  • • Sri K.P. Harish, Sr. Government Pleader (for State of Kerala)
  • • Sri P. Sreekumar, Senior SC (for Kerala University of Health Sciences)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ appeal challenges a Single Judge’s order directing the National College of Pharmacy (a self-financing college affiliated to the Kerala University of Health Sciences) to return the original certificates submitted by the writ petitioner at the time of admission for a Pharm.D course. The petitioner, who had to discontinue in the second year due to medical reasons ( evidenced by Exhibit P6, a medical certificate dated 09.03.2021), sought release of the original documents to pursue further studies and prospects. The college contends that, under its 2013-14 admission prospectus, it is entitled to retain documents until it is compensated for alleged damages caused by discontinuation, and that it must issue a Transfer Certificate (TC) only when the course is discontinued. The Single Judge permitted release of the originals within two weeks, leaving open the possibility of recovering amounts due in accordance with law. The Division Bench, while not accepting the college’s expansive retention claim, cites two earlier Kerala decisions—Neethu J v. State of Kerala and Others and Robin v. KMCT Law College—which held that original certificates are not collateral and cannot be withheld to compel payment of liquidated damages, treating them as personal documents. The court modifies the order to restrict relief to issuing/return of the college TC (not the secondary school TC) and requires release of original documents within three weeks. Thus, the writ appeal is disposed of with directions for prompt release of documents.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The appellant college contends that it is entitled to retain documents until it is compensated for alleged damages arising from the writ petitioner’s discontinuation of the course. Relying on the 2013-14 prospectus, the college argues that retaining original certificates functions as security for liquidated damages and that the Transfer Certificate cannot be released because TC issuance is the college’s obligation upon discontinuation. It argues that the writ petitioner’s medical condition (supported by Exhibit P6) and the absence of explicit disease-disclosure requirements in the prospectus do not entitle the student to the return of original documents before any damages are proved and adjudicated. The college also maintains that the court’s intervention should be limited to ensuring the Transfer Certificate is managed properly while preserving the college’s rights to recover amounts due, if any.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argue that original documents are personal property of the student and cannot be retained as collateral security to coercively secure payment of damages. They contend that withholding originals defeats the student’s right to pursue further studies and professional prospects, and that the role of the documents is not to secure a debt but to enable education and career. They rely on the principle reflected in Neethu J and Robin v. KMCT Law College that original certificates should not be treated as mortgage or security and should be returned to the student, subject to any lawful claims after due process.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Neethu J v. State of Kerala and Others2019(2)KHC 669 = 2019 (2) KLT 129PositiveThe court expressly relies on this decision to hold that original certificates are not mortgage security and cannot be retained to compel payment of liquidated damages; originals are personal documents that must be available to the student.
Robin v. KMCT Law College2019(3) KLT 481PositiveCited alongside Neethu J to support the principle that original certificates should not be used as security for damages and should be returned to the student.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Writ Appeal No. 669 of 2021: The Manager, National College of Pharmacy, Manassery v. Ahmed Sharooq S.M. and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR** ## **&** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY** **WEDNESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 17TH BHADRA, 1943 WA NO. 669 OF 2021** **AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6527/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA** ## **APPELLANT:** **THE MANAGER, NATIONAL COLLEGE OF PHARMACY MANASSERY P.O., MUKKOM, KOZHIKODE-673 602.** **BY ADVS.** **K.M.JAMALUDHEEN SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN** ## **RESPONDENTS:** - **1 AHMED SHAROOQ S.M. AGED 23 YEARS S/O.MEETHIAN, SRAMBIKKAL HOUSE, RAYONPURAM, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 542.** - **2 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, SOUTH BLOCK, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.** - **3 THE KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, TRISSUR-680 596.** **BY ADVS.** - **Adv.GEORGE SEBASTIAN FOR R1 SHRI.P.SREEKUMAR, SC, KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES FOR R3** **SRI.K.P.HARISH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R2** **THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.A.No.669 of 2021 2 ## **JUDGMENT** Dated this the 8[th] day of September, 2021 ## **SHAJI P.CHALY,J.** This appeal is preferred by the 3[rd] respondent in W.P.(C) No.6527 of 2021, challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 8.4.2021, whereby the learned Single Judge directed the appellant to return the original certificates submitted by the writ petitioner while taking admission in the college, however left open the liberty of the appellant to make any claim with regard to any amount due from the writ petitioner, in accordance with law. It is thus challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment, this appeal is preferred. 2. Material facts for the disposal of the writ appeal are as follows; writ petitioner secured admission for Pharm.D course in the appellant college for the period from 2013 to 2019. Appellant is a Self Financing college, affiliated to the Kerala University of Health Sciences. While securing admission, various certificates and mark lists were produced by the writ petitioner before the Principal of the college. Apparently due to medical reasons, writ petitioner had to discontinue the course in the 2[nd] year. Exhibit P6 is the certificate dated 9.3.2021 issued by the Dhanya W.A.No.669 of 2021 3 Doctors Chamber and signed by Dr.Aswin Krishnan Ajit, Consultant Psychiatrist. According to the writ petitioner, due to the treatment that had to be undertaken by the writ petitioner, he could not pursue his studies, however, when an application was filed seeking to release the original documents, appellant college has failed to release the documents stating that writ petitioner was duty bound to pay the course fees to the college on account of discontinuation of the studies by him and the college suffering damages, and in absentia of payment of liquidated damages, the documents would not be returned. 3. The college has also filed a counter affidavit basically contending that as per the prospectus for admission to B.Pharm and D.Pharm Courses 2013-2014, the college is entitled to retain the documents till such time the college is compensated. The learned Single Judge, after assimilating the factual and legal situations, has issued directions to release the original documents to the petitioner, on the petitioner approaching the respondents, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. 4. We have heard learned counsel for appellant Sri.Jamaludheen, learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala University of Health Sciences Sri.P.Sreekumar, learned counsel Sri.George Sebastian for the writ W.A.No.669 of 2021 4 petitioner, learned Senior Government Pleader Sri.Tek Chand for the State and perused the pleadings and materials on record. 5. The issue in question was considered by one of us (Justice Shaji P. Chaly) in **Neethu J v. State of Kerala and Others** [2019(2)KHC 669 =2019 (2) KLT 129] and **Robin v. KMCT Law College** [2019(3) KLT 481] and held that the original certificate is not having the characteristics of a mortgage and the Principal of the college is holding the original certificates for and on behalf of the students as a trustee and further that, the original certificates cannot be retained so as to coerce the students to pay the course fees to the college. It was also held in **Neethu.J** supra that the original documents of the student are not given by her as collateral security for ensuring payment of liquidated damages and that the documents produced by the student are required for the student for pursuing her professional and career prospectus and that those are all personal documents, which will not earn any amount to the college and further that, it cannot be utilised by the college for the purpose of realizing the liquidated damages by selling, mortgaging or in any manner providing the same as a security. 6. In our considered view, there is no doubt that the situations raised in the writ petition are similar in nature. Even though the learned W.A.No.669 of 2021 5 counsel for appellant Sri.Jamaludheen submitted that the writ petitioner has not disclosed the disease stated to have suffered by him and, if it was disclosed, that would have dis-entitled the writ petitioner to join in the course. However, learned counsel for the appellant could not point out any provisions in the prospectus or a rule anywhere else to substantiate that a candidate submitting an application to secure admission to a course is duty bound to disclose any disease suffered by him. Therefore, we are unable to agree with the contention so advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant. More over the damages alleged to be suffered is a factual aspect to be proved by the appellant by adducing cogent evidence in that regard before a fact finding legal fora, and the appellant can never take up the task of an adjudicator of its own cause, power for which is conferred only on a competent court of law . However, learned counsel for appellant has submitted that the original Transfer Certificate submitted by the writ petitioner cannot be returned since the Transfer Certificate is to be issued by the appellant college on discontinuance of the course by the writ petitioner. 7. We are in absolute agreement with the submission so made by learned counsel for the appellant. In that view of the matter, we decline to interfere with the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the W.A.No.669 of 2021 6 impugned judgment, however, we modify the judgment that the writ petitioner is entitled only to receive the Transfer Certificate issued by the appellant college and not the Transfer Certificate submitted by the writ petitioner issued from the Secondary School concerned. Writ appeal is disposed of as above. But, since the time granted by the learned Single Judge has already elapsed, we direct the appellant college to release the original documents and the Transfer Certificate, as is observed above, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- smv **S. MANIKUMAR, CHIEF JUSTICE.** Sd/- **SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.** W.A.No.669 of 2021 7 ## **APPENDIX OF WA 669/2021** ## **PETITIONER EXHIBITS** - **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS OF THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION DATED 27.05.2013 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER.** - **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19.07.2013 ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.02.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.02.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.02.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.** - **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 09.03.2021 SHOWING THE PETITIONERS DISEASE ISSUED BY DR.ASWIN KRISHNAN AJIT.** - **EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION.** - **EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIOT DATED 15.2.2021** - **EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE TRACKING REGISTER SHOWING THE DELIVERY OF THE POSTAL ARTICLE ON 18.2.2021** - **EXHIBIT R3(a) TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE** W.A.No.669 of 2021 8 ## **COLLEGE** **EXHIBIT R3(b) TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PROSPECTUS ISSUED BY THE KERALA STATE SELF FINANCING PHARMACY COLLEGE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2013-2014.**