High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition dismissed.

W.P.(Crl.) 202/23

Case / Petition Number:WP(Crl.) No. 202 of 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Bechu Kurian Thomas
Judgment Date
2023-04-03
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner is ordered to pay costs of Rs.25,000 to the Kerala Legal Services Authority within 30 days. If not paid, the authority may recover the amount by appropriate steps under law.
Final Disposition
Writ petition dismissed.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Asif Azad

Respondents

  • Union of India
  • State of Kerala
  • VP Joy
  • TK Jose
  • PK Aravintha Babu
  • K R Jyothilal
  • Anil Kant
  • Manoj Abraham
  • Vijay S Sakhare
  • Shaik Darvesh Saheb
  • Krishnakumar B
  • G Sparjan Kumar
  • R Nishanthini
  • Divya V Gopinath
  • A Nasim
  • Babu
  • Ajesh V
  • Anil Kumar
  • Manoj
  • Jyotish U
  • Rajesh Kumar
  • Jibi
  • NISAM
  • Ajith Kumar
  • Shafi
  • Anil Kumar (Public Relations Officer)
  • Gita Gopalakrishnan
  • Binu Sreedevi
  • Jinu Ju
  • Praveen JS
  • Vishnu
  • Balram Kumar Upadhyay
  • Biju U
  • Gopakumar G
  • Hari CS
  • Suneesh Babu
  • Rajesh
  • Robert Francis

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Asif Azad (Party-In-Person)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri P. Narayanan, Public Prosecutor
  • • S. Manu (DSGI)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition (criminal) under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Kerala High Court by Asif Azad, party-in-person, challenging the conduct of public servants and seeking drastic reliefs against the Union of India, the State of Kerala, and several police officers. The petitioner prayed for a writ of mandamus directing suspension of respondents 3–38 from official duties on grounds of undue influence, disobedience of law, and violation of constitutional oath, and also sought directions to the Registrar of the High Court not to intervene in constitutional rights, while insisting writ petitions be registered purely on merits, irrespective of nomenclature. Allegations included influencing others to destroy his life, forged signatures on government security documents, and alleged influence inside the court, with Ext. P2 (order of a Magistrate dismissing a complaint) referenced to bolster the narrative. The pleadings, however, were found vague, lacking specific acts by the respondents, and bereft of substantiation of any concrete right infringed. The court noted the petitioner had prior filings and alleged similar matters, and observed that access to justice cannot be misused as a license to file frivolous petitions. Citing a Supreme Court principle, the court held the petition to be without merit, dismissing it with costs of Rs.25,000 to the Kerala Legal Services Authority. Corrigendum clarifies terminology of Kerala court rules. The petition is thus dismissed.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226, Constitution of IndiaRules of the High Court of Kerala, 1971 (as corrected by Corrigendum to 'Rules of the High Court of Kerala, 1971')Rule 15, Rules of the High Court of Kerala, 1971Rule 50, Rules of the High Court of Kerala, 1971

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • No litigant has a right to unlimited use of the court's time and public money to prosecute his affairs; easy access to justice should not be misused as a license to file misconceived or frivolous petitions.
  • Access to justice, though a fundamental right, cannot be extended to a right to file misconceived and frivolous petitions.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that respondents 3–38 are public servants who wield undue influence to destroy his life and obstruct justice. He seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Union of India and the State Government to suspend these officers from official duties for disobeying directions and violating the Constitution and oath. He also asks that the Registrar not intervene and that writ petitions be registered on merits irrespective of nomenclature. The pleadings allege forged signatures on government securities and insist on influence within the court, citing Ext. P2 and prior petitions. He asserts a constitutional right to approach the court under Article 226 and argues against registry defects impinging on his rights. The petition contends it seeks protection of his rights against alleged high‑level interference. While urging immediate relief, the petitioner fails to articulate concrete acts or rights necessarily infringed, rendering the reliefs vague and unsustainable.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents submit that the petition is vague, lacks concrete rights or specific acts, and seeks unwarranted reliefs like suspension of officers without substantiation. They contend that Rules 15 and 50 of the Kerala High Court Rules empower the Registry to notice defects, and that the petition’s defects are a matter for the Registry’s scrutiny rather than a denial of rights. The respondents emphasize that the petition is repugnant to orderly litigation and that the reliefs would undermine the process of filing writ petitions. They urge dismissal of the petition as frivolous, with costs, since no actionable infringement of rights is demonstrated.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Dr. Buddhi Kota Subbarao v. K Parasaran and Others[(1996) 5 SCC 530]Mentioned OnlyCited to support the proposition that easy access to justice should not be misused for misconceived or frivolous petitions; used as a guiding observation rather than binding precedent in this context.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W.P.(Crl.) 202/23 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

**W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** **1** ## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 3[RD] DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1945** ## **WP(CRL.) NO. 202 OF 2023** ## **PETITIONER:** **ASIF AZAD AGED 30 YEARS DARUSSALAM PARAYATHUKONAM P.O KIZHUVILAM, PIN - 695104 BY ADV ASIF AZAD(Party-In-Person)** |**RESPONDENTS:**|**RESPONDENTS:**| |---|---| |**1**|**UNION OF INDIA**| ||**REPRESENTED BY JOINT SECRETARY,**| ||**MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK,**| ||**NEW DELHI, INDIA, PIN - 110001**| |**2**|**STATE OF KERALA**| ||**REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,**| ||**HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031**| |**3**|**VP JOY**| ||**CHIEF SECRETARY, CHIEF SECRETARY OFFICER,**| ||**GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001**| |**4**|**TK JOSE**| ||**HOME SECRETARY, ROOM NO. 357,**| ||**MAIN BLOCK, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,**| ||**SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001**| |**5**|**PK ARAVINTHA BABU**| ||**LAW SECRETARY, ROOM NO. 375,**| ||**MAIN BLOCK, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,**| ||**SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001**| |**6**|**K R JYOTHILAL**| **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** 2 **SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, ROOM NO. 394, MAIN BLOCK, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001** - **7 ANIL KANT DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VELLAYAMBALAM CITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010** - **8 MANOJ ABRAHAM ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VELLAYAMBALAM CITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010** **9 VIJAY S SAKHARE ADDITIONAL GENERAL OF POLICE (LAW AND ORDER), POLICE TRAINING COLLEGE, NEAR GOVERNMENT GUEST HOUSE, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014** - **10 SHAIK DARVESH SAHEB ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (CRIME BRANCH), CRIME BRANCH OFFICE, EANCHAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695008** - **11 KRISHNAKUMAR B SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPECIAL CELL, STATE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VELLAYAMBALAM CITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010** **12 G SPARJAN KUMAR COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, POLICE GROUND, CV RAMAN PILLAI RD, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014** **13 R NISHANTHINI DEPUTY GENERAL OF POLICE, IG OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM RANGE, BAKERY JUNCTION ROAD, NANDAVANAM, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695034** **14 DIVYA V GOPINATH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL POLICE, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS,** |**W.P.(Crl.)**|**202/23**<br>3| |---|---| ||**PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033**| |**15**|**A NASIM**| ||**DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,**| ||**OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,**| ||**POLICE GROUND, CV RAMAN PILLAI ROAD,**| ||**THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014**| |**16**|**BABU**| ||**SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**THUMBA POLICE STATION,**| ||**CITY-THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695022**| |**17**|**AJESH V**| ||**CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**THUMBA POLICE STATION,**| ||**CITY-THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695022**| |**18**|**ANIL KUMAR**| ||**ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,**| ||**KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION,**| ||**POST OFFICE ROAD, KAZHAKOOTTAM,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582**| |**19**|**MANOJ**| ||**CIVIL POLICE OFFICER,**| ||**MANNANTHALA POLICE STATION**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, INDIA, PIN - 695015**| |**20**|**JYOTISH U**| ||**SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101**| |**21**|**RAJESH KUMAR**| ||**CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101**| |**22**|**JIBI**| ||**SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101**| |**23**|**NISAM**| ||**CIVIL POLICE OFFICER-6580,**| ||**ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL,**| **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** 4 ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101**| |---|---| |**24**|**AJITH KUMAR**| ||**CIVIL POLICE OFFICER-3316,**| ||**ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101**| |**25**|**SHAFI**| ||**ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101**| |**26**|**ANIL KUMAR**| ||**PUBLIC RELATION OFFICER,**| ||**ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101**| |**27**|**GITA GOPALAKRISHNAN**| ||**CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER, TECHNOPARK,**| ||**KAZHAKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582**| |**28**|**BINU SREEDEVI**| ||**CIVIL POLICE OFFICER,**| ||**KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION,**| ||**POST OFFICE ROAD, KAZHAKOOTTAM,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582**| |**29**|**JINU JU**| ||**SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION,**| ||**POST OFFICE ROAD, KAZHAKOOTTAM,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582**| |**30**|**PRAVEEN JS**| ||**CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION,**| ||**POST OFFICE ROAD, KAZHAKOOTTAM,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582**| |**31**|**VISHNU**| ||**SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,**| ||**KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION,**| ||**POST OFFICE ROAD, KAZHAKOOTTAM,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582**| |**32**|**BALRAM KUMAR UPADHYAY**| ||**COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,**| ||**OFFICER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,**| ||**POLICE GROUND, CV RAMAN PILLAI RD,**| **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** 5 ## **THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014** **33 BIJU U CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION, POST OFFICE ROAD, KAZHAKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582 34 GOPAKUMAR G KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION, POST OFFICE ROAD, KAZHAKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582 35 HARI CS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION, POST OFFICE ROAD, KAZHAKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582 36 SUNEESH BABU DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTINGAL DYSP OFFICE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101 37 RAJESH ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATTINGAL DYSP OFFICE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101 38 ROBERT FRANCIS JOINT SECRETARY, CHIEF MINISTERS COMPUTER CELL, 4TH FLOOR, NORTH BLOCK, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695001 BY ADV S.MANU, DSGI** ## **SRI.P.NARAYANAN, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON** **17.03.2023, THE COURT ON 03.04.2023 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** 6 ## **“C.R.” BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. -------------------------------W.P.(Crl.) No.202 of 2023 ---------------------------------** Dated this the 3[rd] day of April, 2023 ## **JUDGMENT** Since the reliefs claimed for in this writ petition are curious, the same are extracted at the threshold itself. They are: _“1. To issue any order in favour of the petitioner for the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying petitions, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble High Court may graciously pass a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 and 2 to suspend respondent no.3 to 38, public servants, from their official duties due to their undue influence, for violating the Constitution of India, for disobeying the directions of law and for the violation of oath._ _2. To issue any order in favour of the petitioner for the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying petitions, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble High Court may graciously pass a writ of mandamus to be issued to direct the Registrar of the High Court to not intervene in the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and to register the writ petitions based on their merits and substance, without being influenced by nomenclature or prayer._ _3. To allow this petition with cost.”_ ## 2. Respondents 3 to 38 are public servants. They include the Chief Secretary, the Home Secretary, the Law Secretary, the Director General 7 ## **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** of Police, the Additional Director Generals of Police and various Police Officers of different ranks. As evident from relief No.1, petitioner requires the Union Government and the State Government to suspend these officers. As far as relief No.2 is concerned, petitioner desires for a direction to the Registrar of this Court not to intervene in the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and to register the writ petitions based on their merits without being influenced by the nomenclature or the prayers. 3. Petitioner alleges that respondents 3 to 38 are influencing others to destroy his life and is even deceiving this Court multiple times. Supporting his claim, it is alleged that, petitioners signature has been forged in some government security documents and respondents 3 to 38 had disobeyed the directions of law and violated his fundamental rights. Petitioner also alleges that respondents 3 to 15 and 35 and 36 are influencing others and destroying the course of justice. Allegations are levelled against Government Pleaders of this Court alleging that they are arguing for the accused and pointing out defects. The pleadings also refer to the petitioner noticing the influence of respondents 3 to 38 even inside this Hon’ble Court when he saw government pleaders arguing for accused. Exhibit P3 affidavit filed by the petitioner in another writ petition- W.P (Crl) No. 719/2022 is also produced, wherein wanton allegations have been levelled against a government pleader. Though **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** 8 detailed pleadings have been made, there is no reference to any specific act as committed by respondents 3 to 38 for even seeking directions to suspend them. 4. A reading of the pleadings in the writ petition reveals nothing but vagueness, insufficient to grant any of the reliefs sought for. Despite the abstruse nature of the pleadings, it is revealed that petitioner has filed W.P.(C) No.22643 of 2022, Crl.Rev.Pet. No.761 of 2022, W.P.(C) No. (filing No.) 37719 of 2022 and W.A. No.41 of 2023, which according to him, as is pleaded in paragraph 1, are all similar matters. Notwithstanding the filing of earlier writ petitions for the same relief, being a bar on subsequent writ petitions, petitioner, who appeared as party-in-person, insisted on this writ petition being allowed. 5. Shorn of all the confusing and unnecessary factual narratives in the pleadings to the writ petition, petitioner makes wanton allegations against the respondents. Though petitioner repeatedly alleges in his pleadings that respondents 3 to 38 have failed to act according to the duty bestowed upon them, no material is produced to justify such allegations. Aimless allegations are raised against public functionaries without any supporting material. 6. Ext.P2 is an order dismissing a complaint filed by the petitioner against respondents 3 to 38 herein and others, who are arrayed as accused 1 to 48. The learned Magistrate, after considering the statement 9 ## **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** on oath given by the complainant and based on the materials produced before it, came to the conclusion that there are no sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused therein. Ext.P1 is the affidavit filed in support of Crl.Rev.Pet. No.761 of 2022, which is preferred against the order in Ext.P2. 7. When the petitioner has initiated a challenge against Ext.P2, which he is legally entitled to, filing this writ petition with the nature of reliefs sought amounts to abuse and misuse of the provisions of Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 8. As far as relief No.2 is concerned, the petitioner during his arguments submitted that the Registry of this Court had noted defects on the petitions filed by him and such noting of defects is affecting his rights guaranteed under the Constitution. 9. This Court is unable to comprehend how the defects noted by the Registry of this Court in the writ petitions filed can be attributed with allegations of violating fundamental rights. One of the functions bestowed upon the Registry is to scrutinize the petitions filed before the Court. Rule 15 and Rule 50 of the Kerala High Court Rules 1971 confer power upon the Registry to notice defects if any, in the petitions or applications filed before the Court. 10. As mentioned earlier, the reliefs claimed by the petitioner are odious and repugnant to the orderly filing of writ petitions. The proclivity **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** 10 to file writ petitions without any basis and to threaten the system into ridicule cannot be permitted under any count. Access to justice, though a fundamental right, cannot be extended to a right to prefer misconceived and frivolous petitions. The nature of reliefs claimed for and the nebulous pleadings are indicative of absence of any particular right of the petitioner having been infringed. 11. Apart from the above, in the absence of violation of any specific right, a person cannot approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The nature of pleadings and the reliefs claimed for reveals that the writ petition is filed on an experimental basis and in bad taste.The manner in which the petitioner has raised his pleadings in the writ petition and the nature of reliefs sought compels this Court to visit the petitioner with costs as a disincentive for indulging in such frivolous writ petitions. 12. In this context the observation of the Supreme Court in **Dr. Buddhi Kota Subbarao v. K Parasaran and Others** [(1996) 5 SCC 530] is pertinent to be borne in mind. It was observed therein that “ _No litigant has a right to unlimited drought on the courts time and public money in order to get his affairs settled in the manner as he wishes. Easy access to justice should not be misused as a license to file misconceived or frivolous petitions_ ”. 13. In the above circumstances, I find no merit in this writ **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** 11 petition. Due to the frivolous nature of this writ petition, it is dismissed with costs of Rs.25,000/- payable by the petitioner to the Kerala Legal Services Authority. If the costs imposed are not paid by the petitioner within 30 days from today, the Kerala Legal Services Authority shall be entitled to initiate proceedings to recover the same by resorting to appropriate steps in accordance with law. The writ petition is dismissed. **Sd/JUDGE** **BECHU KURIAN THOMAS** vps ## **Corrigendum** dated 10.04.2023 The words “ Kerala High Court Rules 1971” shown in the 9[th] paragraph of this judgment shall stand corrected and read as “ Rules of the High Court of Kerala, 1971”. **Sd/-** **BECHU KURIAN THOMAS** **JUDGE** vps **W.P.(Crl.) 202/23** 12 ## **APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 202/2023** **PETITIONER’S/S’ EXHIBITS** **Exhibit P 1 PHOTOCOPY OF CRL.M.APPL 1/2023 IN CRL.REV.PET 761/2022 DATED 16.02.2023 Exhibit P 2 PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP 1467/2022 OF HONOURABLE JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT 5, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 20.10.2022 Exhibit P 3 PHOTOCOPY OF IA 3/2023 IN WP(CRL) 719/2022 DATED 21.01.2023**