W.P.(C) Nos.42057 & 42373 of 2023
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- ANIL K. NARENDRAN
- G. GIRISH
- Judgment Date
- 2023-12-18
- Court Decision / Holding
- Disposed of by setting aside Ext.R2(a) order dated 11.12.2023 granting permission for Nava Kerala Sadas in Kadakkal Devaswom land; The District Collector, Kollam, is directed to remove temporary constructions forthwith. The Court noted that the venue for the Nava Kerala Sadas scheduled for 20.12.2023 had already been shifted and directed consideration of the earlier decision in light of Jayakumar J. and other authorities.
- Final Disposition
- Writ petitions disposed of; Ext.R2(a) permission set aside; District Collector, Kollam, directed to remove temporary structures forthwith; Court notes that the Nava Kerala Sadas venue had already been shifted for 20.12.2023; jurisdiction and prior decisions cited for guidance.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- BABU.PK (MANNUR BABU)
- SANKU T DAS
Respondents
- State of Kerala represented by the Principal Secretary to Government, Government Revenue (Devaswom) Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram, PIN 695001
- Travancore Devaswom Board represented by its Secretary, Devaswom Board Headquarters, Nanthancode, Kawdiar P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, PIN 695003
- The President, Travancore Devaswom Board, Nanthancode, Kawdiar P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, PIN 695003
- The Administrative Officer Kadakkal Peedika Devi Temple Kadakkal P.O., Chadayamangalam, Kollam District, PIN 691536
- The Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board Nanthancode Kawdiar P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, PIN 695003
- The Assistant Devaswom Commissioner Travancore Devaswom Board Punalur Group Kollam, PIN 691305
- The Sub Group Officer Travancore Devaswom Board Kadakkal Group Chakkuvalli Kollam, PIN 691536
- The District Collector Kollam Collectorate Civil Station Kollam PIN 691013
- The Station House Officer Kadakkal Police Station Kollam PIN 691536
- The Superintendent of Police Kollam Kollam District PIN 691001
- The Secretary Revenue (Devaswom Department), Government of Kerala Secretariat Thiruvananthapuram PIN 695001
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • V.S.Chandrasekharan
- • M.V.Das
- • S.Jayakumar
- • Lekshmi Swaminathan
- • N.K.Ramachandran
- • C.A.Sabitha
- • Shahim Bin Aziz
- • C.Dinesh
- • Sinu.G.Nath
- • Anu Prabakar
- • Prasoon.K.P
Counsels for Respondents
- • Ashok M.Cherian - Addl Advocate General
- • G.Santhosh Kumar - Standing Counsel - Travancore Devaswom Board
Case Synopsis & Summary
These writ petitions challenge the Travancore Devaswom Board’s permission to conduct the ‘Nava Kerala Sadas’ at Kadakkal Peedika Devi Temple, a temple under the Travancore Devaswom Board. WP(C) No.42057, filed by a devotee residing near the temple, seeks a writ of mandamus commanding the Travancore Devaswom Board and its President to consider a representation dated 11.12.2023 and to prohibit the temple premises from hosting the Nava Kerala Sadas. WP(C) No.42373, filed by another devotee, seeks certiorari to quash the Board’s decision permitting the event on 18.12.2023, a mandamus directing the State to refrain from such an arrangement, and a declaration that the decision violates Article 25 of the Constitution. The petitions rely on statutory provisions under the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Act and Rules, and jurisprudence emphasizing that temple premises should be used for worship and not for political or non-worship activities. The Court notes the Board’s statutory duties under Sections 15A and 31, and finds the Ext.R2(a) permission violative of these provisions and the applicable rules. It cites decisions in Major Vellayani Devi Temple Advisory Committee, Hindu Seva Kendram, K.B.Sumodh, G.Vysan, and Jayakumar J. for guiding principles, and disposes of the petitions by setting aside the permission and directing immediate removal of temporary structures, while acknowledging that the venue had already been shifted for the event.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners contend that the permission granted by the Travancore Devaswom Board for conducting Nava Kerala Sadas on temple premises is violative of statutory provisions governing Devaswom land and temple worship, and is not within the objects of the trust. They seek mandamus to compel the Board to consider the representation dated 11.12.2023 and to refrain from permitting the event at Kadakkal temple, asserting constitutional protections under Article 25.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents argue that the Board, as trustee of Devaswom properties, may permit cultural activities that are consistent with temple management and trust objects. They contend the event was being organized under lawful authority, subject to conditions, and that shifting the venue was being considered; they rely on statutory provisions and previous decisions to justify permitting such cultural activities within temple grounds while balancing worship with permissible non-worship activities.
Cited Precedents (6)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major Vellayani Devi Temple Advisory Committee | 2023 (2) KHC 290 | Positive | Cited to support the proposition that politics should not influence daily worship, ceremonies, or temple festivals. |
| Hindu Seva Kendram v. State of Kerala and others | 2023 (3) KHC 258 | Positive | Cited to reinforce that cultural or social activities unconnected with temple worship have no role in temple festivals. |
| K.B.Sumodh v. Commissioner, Cochin Devaswom Board | 2023:KER:25530 | Positive | Cited for the view that Thekkinkadu Maidan is Devaswom land, to be used strictly in accordance with the Trust's objects. |
| G.Vysan and another v. State of Kerala and others | 2023:KER.52256 | Positive | Cited for the principle that temple premises cannot be used for mass drills or weaponry training by devotees. |
| Jayakumar J. and another v. State of Kerala and others | 2023:KER:80455 | Positive | Cited as a guiding precedent in the present decision; the Court relied on the approach taken in that decision. |
| W.P.(C) 28906/2023 | WPC 28906/2023 | Mentioned Only | Exhibit P3 refers to this judgment (dated 05.09.2023) for context; used for reference rather than as a binding ruling in the current matter. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W.P.(C) Nos.42057 & 42373 of 2023 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.