High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petitions disposed of with the above direc...

W.P.(C) Nos. 9301/2015, 24375/2015, 26067/2015 & 30502/2015, High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) Nos. 9301/2015; 24375/2015; 26067/2015; 30502/2015
Neutral Citation:/null

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Murali Purushothaman
Judgment Date
2024-04-01
Court Decision / Holding
The petition is disposed of with a declaration that the petitioners are not liable to pay EPF contributions for headload workers, and all impugned orders and review petitions directing such contributions are set aside. The court held that Kerala Headload Workers Act, being a later special enactment under Article 254(2) of the Constitution, prevails in Kerala until Parliament enacts legislation under the proviso thereto. The decision effectively shields KSCSC and related bodies from EPF contribution obligations for headload workers engaged in KSCSC depots.
Final Disposition
Writ petitions disposed of with the above direction; petitioners not liable to EPF contributions for headload workers; impugned orders set aside; matter closed in favor of KSCSC and KHWWB authorities.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Manager, KSCSC Kanhangad Depot, Kasaragod District
  • Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation represented by its Managing Director, Mavelikkara (Cochin)
  • Depot Manager, KSCSC Taluk Depot, Cherthala, Alappuzha District
  • Shibu R., Chengannoor
  • Vijayakumar M.K., Chengannoor
  • E.K. Raveendran Pillai, Chengannoor
  • Sunil Kumar R., Chengannoor
  • Ajayan K.N., Chengannoor
  • Surej C.R., Chengannoor
  • Assistant Manager, KSCSC Taluk Depot, Mavelikkara
  • Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation represented by its Managing Director, Mavelikkara

Respondents

  • Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (C&R) Sub Regional Office, Kannur
  • Chairman, Kerala Headload Workers Welfare Board, Kanhangad (Kassargod)
  • Manager, Federal Bank, Kanhangad
  • Kerala Headload Workers Welfare Board represented by its Chief Executive
  • State of Kerala represented by Secretary to Government
  • Union of India represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Labour & Employment

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SMT. MOLLY JACOB - SC
  • • SRI.C.M.EBRAHIM
  • • SRI.PRAMOD KOCHUTHOMMEN.E.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SRI K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR – SC, EPFO
  • • SRI C.A. MAJEED, SC, KHWWB
  • • SRI K.J. CHACKOCHAN
  • • SRI GEORGE VARGHESE MANACHIRACKEL
  • • SMT. SALI P. MATHEW MUNNAR
  • • SRI THOMAS ABRAHAM, SC, KHWWB
  • • SRI SYAMANTHAK – GP
  • • DR. ABRAHAM P. MEACHINKARA
  • • SRI N.N. SUGUNAPALAN (SR.)
  • • SRI S.KRISHNA MOORTHY (ERNAKULAM)
  • • SRI V.E. ABDUL GAFOOR
  • • SMT. T.N. GIRIJ(A) – SC, EPFO
  • • SRI DHEERAJ - GP
  • • SRI S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.)
  • • SRI KOSHY GEORGE, SC, KHLWWB
  • • SRI C.S. AJITH PRAKASH, SC, KHWWB
  • • SRI S.PRASANTH – SC, EPFO
  • • SRI DHEERAJ - GP

Case Synopsis & Summary

These batch writ petitions challenge orders under Section 7A and 7B of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, directing the petitioners, the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation (KSCSC), to remit Provident Fund contributions for headload workers engaged at KSCSC depots. The petitioners contend that the EPF Act is not applicable to headload workers because they are covered under a welfare scheme framed under the Kerala Headload Workers Welfare Act, 1978, a later, special statute. They urge that Article 254(2) of the Constitution requires the Kerala Act to prevail over the EPF Act where there is inconsistency, and that Parliament may legislate under the proviso to Article 254(2). The petitioners rely on a binding precedent, Regional Provident Fund Finance Commissioner, Kochi v. Kerala Small Industries Development Corpn., TVM and Others (2016 (4) KHC 412; 2016 (3) KLT 893), which held that the EPF Act and its scheme are not applicable to headload workers engaged by SIDCO. The court notes that the Kerala Headload Workers Act provides welfare measures, including provident fund, and, as a later special enactment, prevails until Parliament legislates. Consequently, the impugned orders directing EPF contributions are set aside, and the petitions are disposed with a declaration that the petitioners are not liable to EPF contributions for headload workers. The decision clarifies the interaction of central and state welfare legislation in Kerala.

Provisions of Law Cited

Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Section 7AEmployees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Section 7BConstitution of India, Article 254(2)Kerala Headload Workers Welfare Act, 1978

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Later special enactment prevails over earlier general enactment when inconsistent (Kerala Headload Workers Act, 1978 prevailing over EPF Act under Article 254(2))
  • Constitutional supremacy in concurrent legislation; Article 254(2) governs when central and state acts collide

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The applicants contend that the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, including Sections 7A and 7B, is not applicable to headload workers engaged by KSCSC. They argue that the Kerala Headload Workers Welfare Act, 1978, provides welfare measures, including provident fund, for headload workers, and is a later, special enactment; under Article 254(2) of the Constitution, the Kerala Act prevails over the EPF Act where there is inconsistency. They rely on the decision in Regional Provident Fund Finance Commissioner v. Kerala Small Industries Development Corpn., TVM and Others (2016 (4) KHC 412) to show EPF applicability is barred in this context. They urge that the EPF orders and review directives be set aside and that KSCSC be relieved from compliance with EPF contributions for headload workers.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argue that the EPF Act applies generally to employees, including workers engaged by KSCSC; they contend that welfare schemes under the Kerala Headload Workers Welfare Act do not nullify EPF obligations, and that the Centre and State must act in accordance with constitutional mandates. They submit that a scheduled welfare board framework does not automatically exempt headload workers from EPF contributions and that EPF compliance cannot be ignored without clear statutory primacy. They rely on statutory provisions and administrative orders to justify contribution demands, and emphasize the need for uniform enforcement of EPF provisions across the state.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Regional Provident Fund Finance Commissioner, Kochi v. Kerala Small Industries Development Corpn., TVM and Others2016 (4) KHC 412; 2016 (3) KLT 893PositiveThe Kerala High Court in that decision held that the EPF Act provisions are not applicable to headload workers engaged by SIDCO, as the Kerala Headload Workers Act provides welfare measures including provident fund, and the provisions of EPF Act are inconsistent with the Kerala Act; thus the Kerala Act prevails per Article 254(2). The present court relies on this dictum to reach a similar conclusion.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W.P.(C) Nos. 9301/2015, 24375/2015, 26067/2015 & 30502/2015, High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN`** ``` MONDAY, THE 1[ST] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 9301 OF 2015`** ## **`PETITIONERS:`** - **`1 MANAGER, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION KANHANGAD DEPOT, KASARGOD DISTRICT.`** - **`2 KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGR, COCHIN - 682 020.`** ``` BY ADV SMT.MOLLY JACOB - SC ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (C&R) SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, P.B.NO.117, V.K.COMPLEX, 4TH ROAD, KANNUR - 670 001.`** - **`2 CHAIRMAN, KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD SUB OFFICE, PRIYADARSINI BUILDING KOTTACHERY, KANHANGAD - 671 316, KASSARGOD DISTRICT.`** - **`3 MANAGER, FEDERAL BANK KANHANGAD - 671 316.`** - **`4 KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE SRM ROAD, COCHIN - 682 018.`** - **`5 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.`** ``` SRI. K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR – SC, EPFO SRI. C.A.MAJEED, SC, KHWWB SRI. K.J.CHACKOCHAN SRI. GEORGE VARGHESE MANACHIRACKEL SMT. SALI. P. MATHEW MUNNAR SRI. THOMAS ABRAHAM, SC, KHWWB SRI. SYAMANTHAK – GP DR. ABRAHAM P. MEACHINKARA ``` ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 2 ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).24375/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 3 ``` ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN MONDAY, THE 1[ST] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 24375 OF 2015 ``` ## **`PETITIONERS:`** - **`1 DEPOT MANAGER, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, TALUK DEPOT, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.`** - **`2 KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, COCHIN – 682 020.`** ## **`BY ADV SMT.MOLLY JACOB - SC`** ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER © SUB REGIONAL OFFICE BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, KOCHI – 682 017.`** - **`2 CHAIRMAN KERALA HEAD LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, MUNICIPAL GANDHI BAZAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, T.D ROAD, CHERTHALA – 683 524.`** - **`3 KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE ROAD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE, SRM ROAD, COCHIN – 682 018.`** - **`4 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, LABOUR & REHABILITATION DEPT., SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001.`** ``` BY ADVS. SRI. N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI. S.KRISHNA MOORTHY(ERNAKULAM) SRI. V.E.ABDUL GAFOOR SMT. T.N.GIRIJA – SC, EPFO ``` ## **`WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015`** ``` 4 ``` ## **`SRI. SYAMANTHAK - GP`** ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).9301/2015, 26067/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 5 ``` ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN MONDAY, THE 1[ST] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 26067 OF 2015 ``` ## **`PETITIONERS:`** - **`1 SHIBU R. AGED 36 YEARS MELATHETHUNDIYIL, LAKASSERY, CHENGANNOOR.`** - **`2 VIJAYAKUMAR M.K VAZHE VADAKKETHIL, KEEZHCHERIMEL, CHENGANNOOR.`** - **`3 E.K.RAVEENDRAN PILLA MANTHURUTHIL HOUSE, MUNDANKAVU, CHENGANNOOR.`** - **`4 SUNILKUMAR R. KALLUMADATHU PALLATHU KODIYATTUKARA, CHENGANNOOR.`** - **`5 AJAYAN K.N KOOTTAPPARAYIL KEEZHCHERIMEL, CHENGANNOOR.`** - **`6 SUREJ C.R CHANNATHUMKALAYIL KEEZHCHERIMEL, CHENGANNOOR.`** ``` BY ADVS. SRI.C.M.EBRAHIM SRI.PRAMOD KOCHUTHOMMEN.E. ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 DEPOT MANAGER, SUPPLYCO TALUK DEPOT CHENGANNOOR – 689 121.`** - **`2 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (C) SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017.`** ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 6 ``` - **`3 ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT COMMITTEE KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, THATHAMPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 013.`** - **`4 KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE SRM ROAD, COCHIN - 682 018.`** - **`5 KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI - 682 020.`** - **`6 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA LABOUR AND REHABILITATION DEPT., SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 001.`** ``` BY ADVS. DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.) SRI. KOSHY GEORGE, SC, KHLWWB SRI. C.S. AJITH PRAKASH, SC, KHWWB SRI. S.PRASANTH - SC, EPFO SRI. SYAMANTHAK – GP R5 - SMT. MOLLY JACOB - SC ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).24375/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 7 ``` ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN MONDAY, THE 1[ST] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 30502 OF 2015 ``` ## **`PETITIONERS:`** - **`1 ASSISTANT MANAGER`** - **`KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, TALUK DEPOT, POOKADA JUNCTION, MAVELIKKARA.`** - **`2 KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, COCHIN - 682 020.`** ``` BY ADV SMT.MOLLY JACOB – SC, SUPPLYCO ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (C) SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017.`** - **`2 CHAIRMAN KEALA HEAD LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, SUB OFFICE, KAYAMKULAM, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, THATHAMPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 013.`** - **`3 KEALA HEAD LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE, SRM ROAD, COCHIN - 682 018.`** - **`4 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, LABOUR AND REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.`** - **`5 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI.`** ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 8 ``` ``` BY ADVS. DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.) SRI. C.A.MAJEED SMT. VANDANA P. CGC SRI. KOSHY GEORGE, SC, KHLWWB SRI. S.PRASANTH – SC,EPFO SRI. DHEERAJ - GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).24375/2015 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 9 ``` ## **`JUDGMENT`** All these writ petitions except W.P.(C) No.26067 of 2015 are filed by the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation (for short, ‘KSCSC’) challenging the order of the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Kochi passed under Section 7A of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short, ‘the EPF Act’) and the order rejecting the review petition filed under Section 7B of the EPF Act, and directing the petitioners to remit contributions towards the Provident Fund of the Head Load Workers engaged by them in their depot. W.P.(C) No.26067 of 2015 is filed by the Head load Workers working in the depot of the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation against direction to remit the contribution towards Employees’ Provident Fund. The orders under ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 10 ``` Sections 7A and 7B of the EPF Act are challenged on the ground that the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation has no jurisdiction to direct the Corporation to remit the amount towards Provident Fund contribution of Head load Workers. According to the petitioners, the Headload Workers are covered under the Welfare Scheme framed under the Kerala Headload Workers Act, 1978 and therefore, being a special legislation exclusively for the welfare of the Head load Workers, the EPF Act cannot be applied in their case. It is contended that the Kerala Headload Workers Act prevails over the provisions of the EPF Act. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the judgment of this Court in **Regional Provident Fund Finance Commissioner, Kochi v. Kerala Small Industries Development Corpn.,** **Tvm and Others,** [2016 (4) KHC 412 : 2016 (3) KLT 893], wherein this Court has held that the provisions ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 11 ``` under the EPF Act and Scheme framed thereunder are not applicable in the case of the Head load Workers engaged by SIDCO. Paragraph 27 of the judgment reads as follows:- “27. In the instant case, both the EPE Act, 1952 and the Kerala Headload workers Act, 1978 have been enacted by the Central and State Legislatures respectively, acting under the legislative powers available to it under Entries 23 and 24 of the Concurrent List in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The Kerala Headload Workers Act received the Presidential assent on 28/09/1980. It is not in dispute before us that, the Kerala Headload Workers Act and the Scheme framed thereunder provide for welfare measures to headload workers, including provident fund, and that the headload workers registered under Clause 6A of the Said Scheme have a right to avail such benefits. It is also not in dispute before us that, the provisions of the EPF Act are inconsistent with the provisions of the Kerala Headload Workers Act and the Scheme framed thereunder. In such circumstances, conclusion is irresistible that, in view of the mandate of Clause (2) of Article 254 of the Constitution, the provisions of the Kerala Headload Workers Act, which is a later special enactment, which received Presidential assent on 28/09/1980 shall prevail in the State of Kerala, till the Parliament legislates under the proviso to Clause (2) of Article 254 of the Constitution. In that view of the matter, we find no infirmity in the reasoning and conclusion of the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment that, in the teeth of Clause (2) of Article 254 of the Constitution and the ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 12 ``` provisions of the Kerala Headload Workers Act and the Scheme framed thereunder, it may not be legal to call upon SIDCO to conform to the mandate of the EPF Act.” 3. In the light of the dictum laid down by this Court in the above decision, it will not be legal to call upon KSCSC to conform to the mandate of EPF Act. It is declared that the petitioners are not liable to pay contribution under the provisions of the EPF Act. Accordingly, all impugned orders and consequential orders, if any, are set aside. These writ petitions are disposed of with the above direction. Sd/- ## **`MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN`** ``` JUDGE ``` SPR ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 13 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9301/2015`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :-`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.18.2.2015 FROM THE CHAIRMAN,KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD TO THE DEPOT, KSCSC, KANHANGAD. EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.15.1.2015 ISSUED BY THE CHAIRMAN,KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD TO THE 'W' POOL LEADER. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 15 WORKERS BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.6.2.2015 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 (a)TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.10.03.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.4.3.2015 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. ``` ``` RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. ``` ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 14 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24375/2015`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :-`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.17.12.2014 ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION U/S 7B OF THE EMPLOYEES PROVISIONS ACT FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT AT THE TIME OF PERSONAL HEARING. EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.12.06.2015 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. ``` ``` RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. ``` ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 15 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26067/2015`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :-`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 13.01.2015. EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.02.2015 OF THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD 27.05.2015 OF THE CHAIRMAN, HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, ALAPPUZHA TO THE ASST.MANAGER, TALUK DEPOT, CHENGANNOOR. EXHIBIT P4RECEIPT DTD. 30.06.2015. EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE PROHIBITORY ORDER OF THE RECOVERY OFFICER & ASST. P.F COMMISSIONER OF EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION DTD. 16.09.2015. EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 22.09.2015 ISSUED BY THE DEPOT MANAGER CHENGANNOOR. ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.`** ``` WP(C).Nos.9301, 24375, 26067 & 30502 OF 2015 ``` ``` 16 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 30502/2015`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :-`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16/7/2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 2/6/2015 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF SUPPLYCO TALUK DEPOT MAVELIKKARA SHOWING THE HANDLING CHARGE FROM 26/7/2015 TO 24/8/2015. EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE INDIAN BANK REGARDING THE REMITTANCE OF THE AMOUNT AS PER EXT.P3. ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.`**