High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petitions disposed of. Ext.P4 set aside. T...

WP(C) Nos. 21982/2023, 21987/2023, 22003/2023, 22075/2023 and 22111/2023

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) Nos. 21982/2023; 21987/2023; 22003/2023; 22075/2023; 22111/2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • N. Nagareesh
Judgment Date
2023-07-11
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petitions disposed of. Ext.P4 communications set aside. Tahsildar to consider Ext.P3 applications and re-assess basic tax in the light of Thomas George and other cited precedents (District Collector v. Fr. Jose Uppani; LLMC Kizhakkambaklam Grama Panchayat v. Mariumma; M/s Sealand Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Revenue Divisional Officer) and the provisions of the KLU Order and the 2008 Act. The pre-cut-off relief under S.6A and revision of BTR entries is acknowledged where applicable.
Final Disposition
Writ petitions disposed of. Ext.P4 set aside. Tahsildar to re-examine Ext.P3 applications and re-assess basic tax in light of the cited precedents and the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 and the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008; relief under S.6A of the Kerala Land Tax Act permitted where applicable.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Punnoose George
  • Shibu Punnon
  • Shera Mathew
  • Jossy Abraham
  • Mini Susan John

Respondents

  • Revenue Divisional Officer / Sub Collector, Kottayam Revenue Divisional Office
  • Tahsildar (LR), Kottayam Taluk
  • Village Officer, Nattakom Village

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • P. K. Soyuz
  • • E. V. Babychan

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT. Sarojini-GP
  • • SMT. DeviSree-GP
  • • SMT. DeviSree-GP
  • • SMT. DeviSree-GP
  • • SMT. DeviSree-GP

Case Synopsis & Summary

These batch of writ petitions by landowners from Nattakom Village, Kottayam Taluk, challenge orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer granting permission to convert land for non-agricultural use under the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 (KLU). Petitioners had filed Form-A/R6(2) applications prior to 31-12-2017 seeking to change land use; the RDO issued Ext.P2 permissions in 2023. Subsequently, they sought reassessment of basic tax under the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 (S.6A) to reflect the changed land use. Tahsildar issued Ext.P4 notices invoking Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, compelling compliance with the 2008 Act. The petitioners contended that post-cut-off date amendments should not apply where pre-cut-off KLU orders exist and relied on this Court’s decision in Thomas George v. State of Kerala, which held that such pre-cut-off orders should be considered under the pre-2008 framework and can be followed by Section 6A relief. The Government pleaded that post-cut-off amendments are applicable. The Court set aside Ext.P4, directed the Tahsildar to re-examine Ext.P3 applications, and to re-assess basic tax in light of precedents (District Collector v. Fr. Jose Uppani; LLMC Kizhakkambaklam; Sealand Builders) and the 2008 Act provisions, disposing of the petitions accordingly.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 (Clause 6)Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (Section 27A)Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 (Section 6A)Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 (R.6(2))

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Finality and inter partes effect of judgments and orders
  • Entitlement to relief under pre-2008 framework where KLU orders were obtained before the cut-off date
  • Strict interpretation of R.6(2) in the context of pre-cut-off approvals and subsequent reassessment under S.6A

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners argued that where permissions under the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 were granted prior to 31.12.2017, they should not be subjected to the rigorous procedures or higher fees under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, particularly Section 27A. Relying on Thomas George v. State of Kerala, they contended that pre-cut-off orders should be applied under the pre-2008 framework and that they could simultaneously pursue Section 6A relief to re-assess basic tax, with appropriate entries in the Basic Tax Register to reflect changed land use without paying under the amended Act. They urged disposal of Ext.P4 and prompt consideration of Ext.P3 applications. Respondents’ stance was that post-cut-off provisions (the 2008 Act) apply to changes in land use after 30.12.2017, and that these petitions should be dismissed or restricted, since KLU permissions granted after the cut-off date must comply with the 2008 Act.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contended that from 30.12.2017, changes in land use in revenue records must follow the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, including Section 27A, and that the petitioners cannot bypass the amended regime by relying on pre-cut-off orders. They argued the Petitions are not tenable as the orders post-date the cut-off and require compliance with the 2008 Act, and that the Government’s interpretation should hold, leading to dismissal.

Cited Precedents (4)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Thomas George v. State of Kerala2020 (4) KLT 650PositiveCourt relied on this judgment to hold that pre-cut-off KLU orders can be considered under the pre-2008 framework, enabling Section 6A relief and re-assessment of land tax.
District Collector v. Fr. Jose Uppani2020 (4) KLT 612PositiveCited in support for the re-assessment and relief framework under pre-2008 provisions.
LLMC Kizhakkambaklam Grama Panchayat v. Mariumma and another2015 (2) KLT 516PositiveCited as authority for the relief and interpretation of existing orders under the pre-2008 regime.
M/s Sealand Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. The Revenue Divisional Officer2020 (5) KLT 56PositiveCited regarding consequences of KLU orders and basic tax/reassessment considerations.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against WP(C) Nos. 21982/2023, 21987/2023, 22003/2023, 22075/2023 and 22111/2023 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH`** ``` TUESDAY, THE 11[TH] DAY OF JULY 2023 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 22075 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` PUNNOOSE GEORGE AGED 62 YEARS S/O GEORGE , KOTTUKULATH HOUSE, MUTTAMBALAM P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT ,, PIN – 686 004. ``` ``` BY ADVS. P.K.SOYUZ E.V.BABYCHAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - `1 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 001.` ``` 2THE TAHSILDAR (LR) KOTTAYAM TALUK, TALUK OFFICE , MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 001. ``` ``` 3THE VILLAGE OFFICER NATTAKOM VILLAGE , MARIYAPILLY P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT., PIN – 686 013. BY ADV SMT.DEVISREE-GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.07.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).21982/2023, 21987/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 2 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH`** ## **`TUESDAY, THE 11[TH] DAY OF JULY 2023 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1945`** ## **`WP(C) NO. 21982 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` SHIBU PUNNAN AGED 61 YEARS S/O PUNNAN , KOTTUKULATH HOUSE, THRIKOTHAMANGALAM P.O, CHANGANACHERRY , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 011. ``` ``` BY ADVS. P.K.SOYUZ E.V.BABYCHAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - `1 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE ,MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,, PIN – 686 001.` ``` 2THE TAHSILDAR (LR) KOTTAYAM TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 001. ``` ``` 3THE VILLAGE OFFICER NATTAKOM VILLAGE , MARIYAPILLY P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 013. ``` ``` BY ADV ``` ``` SMT.SAROJINI-GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.07.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).22075/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 3 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH ``` ``` TUESDAY, THE 11[TH] DAY OF JULY 2023 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 21987 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` SHERA MATHEW AGED 55 YEARS ``` ``` D/O MATHEW , CHAKKALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHANANGADI, KOTTAYAM P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 001. ``` ``` BY ADVS. ``` ``` P.K.SOYUZ ``` ``` E.V.BABYCHAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - `1 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 001.` - `2 THE TAHSILDAR (LR) KOTTAYAM TALUK, TALUK OFFICE , MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O ,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 001.` ``` 3THE VILLAGE OFFICER NATTAKOM VILLAGE , MARIYAPILLY P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT., PIN – 686 013. ``` ``` BY ADV ``` ``` SMT.DEVISREE-GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.07.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).22075/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 4 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH`** ``` TUESDAY, THE 11[TH] DAY OF JULY 2023 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 22003 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` JOSSY ABRAHAM AGED 62 YEARS D/O ABRAHAM MATHEW , THARAPPIL HOUSE, MARANGATTUPILLY P.O, PALA , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 635. ``` ``` BY ADVS. P.K.SOYUZ E.V.BABYCHAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** ``` 1REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB COLLECTOR , KOTTAYAM ,REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 001. 2THE TAHSILDAR (LR) , KOTTAYAM TALUK, TALUK OFFICE , MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,, PIN – 686 001. 3THE VILLAGE OFFICER NATTAKOM VILLAGE , MARIYAPILLY P.O KOTTAYAM DISTRICT., PIN – 686 013. ``` ``` BY ADV SMT.DEVISREE-GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.07.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).22075/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 5 # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH ``` ``` TUESDAY, THE 11[TH] DAY OF JULY 2023 / 20TH ASHADHA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 22111 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` MINI SUSAN JOHN AGED 55 YEARS D/O JOHN PALLIPATTU HOUSE, MUTTAMBALAM.P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT ,, PIN – 686 004. ``` ``` BY ADVS. P.K.SOYUZ E.V.BABYCHAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - `1 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,, PIN – 686 001.` - `2 THE TAHSILDAR (LR) KOTTAYAM TALUK, TALUK OFFICE , MINI CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,, PIN – 686 001.` ``` 3THE VILLAGE OFFICER NATTAKOM VILLAGE , MARIYAPILLY P.O KOTTAYAM DISTRICT., PIN – 686 013. ``` ``` BY ADVS ``` ``` SMT.DEVISREE-GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.07.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).22075/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 6 ## **JUDGMENT** **Dated this the 11th day of July, 2023** **[W.P.(C) Nos.21982, 21987, 22003, 22075 and 22111 of 2023]** The petitioners in all these writ petitions hold property in Nattakom Village in Kottayam Taluk of Kottayam District. The petitioners submitted Ext.P3 applications to the Revenue Divisional Officer for permission to use their land for non-agricultural purposes. Such applications were filed invoking Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967. 2. The petitioners state that considering Ext.P3 applications, the Revenue Divisional Officer has now passed Ext.P2 orders granting permission to the petitioners to use the land for non-agricultural purposes. 3. As the petitioners had to change the nature of the land in Revenue Record in the light of the KLU orders, the petitioners submitted applications invoking the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 seeking to revise the rate of basic tax of the land and to make W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 7 necessary additions in the Basic Tax Register and other Revenue Records. 4. The petitioners state that acting upon such Form-A applications, the Tahsildar has now issued Ext.P4 communications stating that the petitioners have to comply with the provisions of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. 5. Counsel for the petitioners urged that since the petitioners have obtained orders under the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967, the petitioners cannot be driven to satisfy the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. The issue has been decided by this Court in the judgment in _**Thomas George v. State of Kerala** [2020 (4) KLT 650]._ 6. Government Pleader entered appearance for the respondents and resisted the writ petitions. The Government Pleader denied all the allegations made by the petitioners in the writ petitions. On behalf of the respondents, the Government Pleader submitted that on and from 30.12.2017, if any applications W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 8 are to be made for changing the nature of the land in Revenue Records, the provisions of the Act, 2008 will apply and the petitioners will have to resort to the provisions of the Act, 2008. This is not a case where the Orders under KLU were passed prior to the introduction of Section 27A in the Act, 2008. Therefore, the stand taken by the Tahsildar is justified. The writ petitions are liable to be dismissed, contended the Government Pleader. 7. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader representing the respondents. 8. In these writ petitions, it is an admitted position that the applications for permission to use land for non-agricultural purposes were submitted under the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 prior to 31.12.2017, before the introduction of Section 27A in the Act, 2008. Orders were passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer in the year 2023. This Court considered the issue as to whether in such circumstances the applicants should be driven to resort to the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. In _**Thomas George**_ (supra), in paragraph 10 of the judgment, this Court held as follows: W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 9 “So also, the directions and orders in Ext.P2 judgment have also become final and conclusive _inter partes_ . Even in a case where R.6(2) application is filed before the cut of date of 30.12.2017, then notwithstanding the fact that orders may not have been passed on such application before the cut of date, still this Court has held that such a party is legally entitled to get such an application filed prior to the cut of date of 30.12.2017 considered strictly in accordance with the provisions contained in R.6(2) of the K.L.U. Order and in such a case the party cannot be mulcted to face the rigorous procedure and to pay the higher amounts as conceived as per the amended provisions of the 2008 Act including S.27A thereof and the amended Rules framed thereunder. In such a case, this Court has also held consistently that where the party gets orders or permission under R.6(2) of the K.L.U. Order, then he is equally entitled to maintain an application under S.6A of the Kerala Land Tax Act to get the subject property re-assessed in terms of that statutory provision to secure additional entries in the BTR to show correctly the change of nature of the land as garden land/purayidom instead of the earlier BTR entries as nilam/paddy land and without such a party having to pay any amounts as conceived as per the amended provisions of the 2008 Act and the amended Rules framed thereunder.” 9. From the above judgment, it is clear that when applications under the KLU order were submitted prior to 31.12.2017 and when final permissions were given after that day, the parties cannot be mulcted to face the rigorous procedure and to pay fees as conceived as per the amended provisions of the Act, 2008 including Section 27A therein. This Court also held that in such circumstances the parties can invoke Section 6A of the Kerala W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 10 Land Tax Act to get the subject property re-assessed to basic tax and to make additional entries in the Basic Tax Register. In view of the above, the petitioners are also entitled to relief in these writ petitions. 10. Ext.P4 Communications in all these writ petitions are set aside. The Tahsildar is directed to consider Ext.P3 applications and re-assess the basic tax making necessary additions in revenue records in the light of the judgments in _**District Collector v. Fr. Jose Uppani** [2020 (4) KLT 612],_ _**LLMC Kizhakkambaklam Grama Panchayat v. Mariumma and another** [2015 (2) KLT 516] and_ _**M/s Sealand Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. The Revenue Divisional Officer** [2020 (5) KLT 56_ ] **.** Writ petitons are disposed of as above. **Sd/N.NAGARESH JUDGE** AMR W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 11 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21982/2023`** ``` PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS ``` ``` ExhibitP1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP C NO. 9713 OF 2023 DATED 04.04.23 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ExhibitP2TRUE COPY OF THE KLU ORDER DATED 08.06.2023 PASSED BY THE 1 ST RESPONDENT. ExhibitP3TRUE COPY OF THE FORM NO. A APPLICATION DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ExhibitP4TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23.06.2023 SENT BY THE 2 ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 12 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21987/2023`** ``` PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS ``` ``` ExhibitP1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP C NO. 9666 OF 2023 DATED 04.04.23 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ``` ``` ExhibitP2TRUE COPY OF THE KLU ORDER DATED 08.06.2023 PASSED BY THE 1 ST RESPONDENT. ExhibitP3TRUE COPY OF THE FORM NO. A APPLICATION DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ExhibitP4TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23.06.2023 SENT BY THE 2 ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 13 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22003/2023`** ``` PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS ExhibitP1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP C NO. 7080 OF 2023 DATED 03.03.2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ExhibitP2TRUE COPY OF THE KLU ORDER DATED 08.06.2023 PASSED BY THE 1 ST RESPONDENT. ExhibitP3TRUE COPY OF THE FORM NO. A APPLICATION DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ExhibitP4TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22.06.2023 SENT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 14 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22111/2023`** ``` PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS ExhibitP1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP C NO. 9675 OF 2023 DATED 04.04.2023 , OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ExhibitP2TRUE COPY OF THE KLU ORDER NO B1- 1055/2023/KDIS DATED 08.06.2023 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION , ALONG WITH FORM NO'A APPLICATION DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED NIL TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ExhibitP4TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO TLKKTM/3093/2023 K4 DATED 23.06.2023 SENT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. ``` W.P(C) Nos. 21982 of 2023 and Con.Cases 15 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22075/2023`** |`PETITIONER’S`|`EXHIBITS`| |---|---| |`ExhibitP1`|`TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP C`| ||`NO.10080 OF 2023 DATED 04.04.2023 OF THIS`| ||`HON'BLE COURT.`| |`ExhibiPP2`|`TRUE COPY OF THE KLU ORDER DATED`| ||`08.06.2023 PASSED BY THE 1 ST RESPONDENT`| ||`NO B1 1304/2023/K DIS.`| |`ExhibitP3`|`TRUE COPY OF THE FORM NO. A APPLICATION`| ||`DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO`| ||`THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`| |`ExhibitP4`|`TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22.06.2023`| ||`SENT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE`| ||`PETITIONER NO TLKKTM/3092/2023 K4.`|