High Court of KeralaDivision BenchDisposition: The writ petitions are disposed of...

W.P.(C) Nos. 15455/2023, 15707/2023, 15723/2023, 15746/2023, 16068/2023, 1931/2024, 12242/2024, In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) Nos. 15455/2023, 15707/2023, 15723/2023, 15746/2023, 16068/2023, 1931/2024, 12242/2024

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • A. Muhammed Mustaque
  • M.A. Abdul Hakhim
Judgment Date
2024-04-05
Court Decision / Holding
i. The State holds executive power to regulate summer vacation. However, this cannot be done solely by the KER calendar for non-KER schools; the State must balance academic interests with the child’s right to rest and recreation in a delicate equilibrium. ii. We permit all schools not governed by the KER calendar to hold vacation classes from 7:30 AM to 10:30 AM, subject to future executive orders governing vacation classes. iii. The judgment in I.S.S. English Medium (supra) is not to be followed as good law. iv. W.P.(C).No.16068/2023 (a KER-recognised school) must follow the KER calendar; action can be initiated against managers of Kerala Education Rules/Act schools not following the KER calendar. v. W.P.(C).Nos. 1931/2024, 15455/2023, 15707/2023, 15723/2023, 15746/2023, and 12242/2024 are disposed of as above. vi. W.P.(C).No.16068/2023 is dismissed to the extent of the related challenge. The matters are disposed of in terms consistent with the above.
Final Disposition
Disposition: The writ petitions are disposed of as follows: (i) The State’s executive power to regulate summer vacation stands, but not by applying the KER calendar to non-KER schools; (ii) Non-KER schools may hold vacation classes from 7:30 AM to 10:30 AM, subject to future executive orders; (iii) The ISS (English Medium) decision is not to be followed as good law; (iv) W.P.(C).No.16068/2023 (a KER-recognised school) must follow the KER calendar; action can be taken against managers of non-KER schools under KER where applicable; (v) The remaining connected petitions are disposed of in terms consistent with these conclusions; (vi) The detailed Appendix exhibits are part of the record. }

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Kerala CBSE School Management Association
  • St. John’s School, Keerukuzhy, Thumpamon, Pathanamthitta
  • Vidyadhiraja Vidhaya Peedom Central School, Ponnaramthottam, Mavelikkara
  • St Thomas Senior Secondary School, Punalur
  • Jeevass CMI Central School / Jeevass CMI Educational & Charitable Trust
  • The Springs International School, Tan A, Malappuram District (Chitra Kala. K., Principal)
  • Marygiri English Medium School (Bro. Regy Scaria, Principal)
  • Pragati Academy represented by its Manager
  • Ebenezer Higher Secondary School, Nellad
  • Peevees Model School (Dr. A. M. Antony, Principal)
  • The Council for CBSE Schools Kerala
  • The Manager, Pragati Academy (as applicable)

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Chief Secretary to Government, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • Kerala State Commission for Protection of Child Rights represented by its Registrar
  • Director of General Education, Jagathy, Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram
  • Regional Officer, Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)
  • Regional Director, Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)
  • Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations represented by its Secretary
  • Central Board of Secondary Education represented by its Secretary (as applicable)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • P. Mohandas
  • • K. Sudhinkumar
  • • Sabu Pullan
  • • Gokul D. Sudhakaran
  • • R. Bhaskara Krishnan
  • • K. P. Satheesan (Sr.)
  • • A. C. Venugopal
  • • Vidya A. C
  • • M. R. Venugopal
  • • Dhanya P. Ashokan (Sr.)
  • • S. Muhammad Alikhan
  • • K. Vidyasagar
  • • K. Vidyasagar (additional)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Thoufeek Ahamed
  • • Nirmal S
  • • T. B. Hood (Spl. G.P. to A.G.)

Case Synopsis & Summary

These connected writ petitions challenge the calendar/regulatory regime for summer vacation classes in Kerala schools and seek authorisation to hold vacation classes for syllabus completion, particularly for CBSE/ICSE affiliated or non-KER schools. The petitioners argue that the calendar mandated under the Kerala Education Rules (KER) cannot automatically bind schools not governed by KER, and stress the right of the child to rest and leisure (Article 31 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child) and the State’s parens patriae duty to protect children’s welfare. They contend that the state’s executive power to regulate summer vacations must balance academic needs with children’s best interests, and that rigidly applying KER calendars to non-KER institutions would be inappropriate. The respondents rely on the KER framework to regulate school calendars and emphasize protecting children’s welfare through established statutory structures, while acknowledging the state’s general duty to regulate vacation practices in light of best interests. The Division Bench disagrees with the earlier I.S.S. (English Medium) decision, clarifies the panoply of authority, and lays down a nuanced framework to harmonize academic aims with children’s welfare across different types of schools.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Education ActKerala Education Rules (KER)Rule 1, Chapter VII of KERSection 2(8) of the Kerala Education ActArticles 38, 39 and 39-A of the ConstitutionPreamble to the Constitution and Directive Principles of State PolicyUnited Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 31

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Parens patriae
  • Best interests of the child

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contended that: (i) the academic calendar under the Kerala Education Rules cannot bind CBSE/ICSE or non-KER schools; (ii) there is a legitimate need to complete syllabi and address time constraints, especially for board exam cohorts; (iii) children’s right to rest and leisure must be protected and cannot be sacrificed for exclusive emphasis on academic pursuits; (iv) parens patriae empowers the State to protect the welfare of children, and the Government should balance competing interests rather than rigidly applying KER calendars to non-KER institutions; (v) executive action and policy instruments can be used to regulate vacation classes while safeguarding children’s welfare; (vi) the decision to permit vacation classes should reflect a balancing of interests, safety, and well-being.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argued that the Government retains executive power to regulate summer vacations and protect children’s welfare within the framework of KER and related statutory schemes; they emphasized that recognized schools under KER must follow the KER calendar and that non-KER institutions should operate within the state’s overarching regulatory structure; they asserted the necessity of protecting children’s rights while maintaining orderly educational calendars; and they highlighted that any relaxation should be subject to future executive orders and appropriate regulatory safeguards. They also argued for procedural consistency and enforcement against non-compliant managers where applicable.

Cited Precedents (7)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
I.S.S (English Medium) Senior Secondary School, Perinthalmanna v. State of Kerala2018 (2) KHC 849DistinguishedThe bench disagreed with the law propounded in this earlier decision and held that it is not good law to follow for regulating summer vacation classes for non-KER schools.
Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India(1990) 1 SCC 613PositiveUsed to articulate the parens patriae doctrine and the State’s protective duties towards citizens, including children.
Ram Saroop v. S.P. Sahi(1959) Supp. 2 SCR 583; AIR 1959 SC 951PositiveCited for the historical development of parens patriae doctrine in Indian law.
Budhkaran Chaukhani v. Thakur Prosad ShahAIR 1942 Cal 331; 46 CWN 425Mentioned OnlyReferenced in the parens patriae discussion but not treated as controlling law.
Banku Behary Mondal v. Banku Behary HazraAIR 1943 Cal 203; 47 CWN 89Mentioned OnlyCited in historical context of parens patriae; not treated as binding in current reasoning.
Medai Dalavoi T. Kumaraswami Mudaliar v. Medai Dalavoi RajammalAIR 1957 Mad 563; (1957) 2 MLJ 211Mentioned OnlyReferenced for historical background rather than as binding authority.
Words and Phrases Permanent Edition—Mentioned OnlyCited as a legal reference for definitional/interpretive context; not a case precedent.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W.P.(C) Nos. 15455/2023, 15707/2023, 15723/2023, 15746/2023, 16068/2023, 1931/2024, 12242/2024, In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM ``` ``` FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 15455OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONERS:`** - **`1 KERALA CBSE SCHOOL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (REGD) REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY P.S. RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, REG.NO. 174/1996, PENTA TOWER, 7TH FLOOR, KALOOR, KOCHI, PIN - 682017`** - **`2 PRINCIPAL ST: JOHN'S SCHOOL, KEERUKUZHY, THUMPAMON, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689502`** - **`3 PRINCIPAL VIDYADHIRAJA VIDHAYA PEEDOM CENTRAL SCHOOL, PONNARAMTHOTTAM, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690101`** ``` 4SENIOR PRINCIPAL ST: THOMAS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, PUNALUR, KOLLAM, PIN - 691305 BY ADVS. ``` ``` P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) K.SUDHINKUMAR SABU PULLAN GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:2:-`** ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695001`** - **`2 KERALA STATE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TC NO. 14/2036, VANROSS JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695034`** - **`3 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION DIRECTORATE OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014`** - **`4 THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, BSNL RTTC CAMPUS, KAIMANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695040`** - **`5 THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIKAS MARG, C BLOCK, PREETHI VIHAR, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110062 BY ADVS. THOUFEEK AHAMED Nirmal S SHRI.T.B.HOOD, SPL.G.P. TO A.G.`** ``` DR.K.P.SATHEESAN, SR.ADVOCATE ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON ``` ``` 04.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).1931/2024, 15707/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 05.04.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:3:-`** # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ``` PRESENT ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM ``` ``` FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 1931 OF 2024 ``` ## **`PETITIONER(S):`** ## **`PRINCIPAL`** ``` JEEVASS CMI CENTRAL SCHOOL JEEVASS CMI EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST, R.S. ROAD, NEAR RAILWAY STATION ALUVA. (BY ITS PRESENT PRINCIPAL MRS.PREETI GEORGE), PIN - 683101 ``` ``` BY ADVS. ``` ``` ISAAC KURUVILLA ILLIKAL BABY ISSAC ILLICKAL ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** ``` 1STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 ``` - **`2 PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001`** W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:4:-`** - **`3 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION DIRECTORATE OF GENERAL EDUCATION JAGATHI, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014`** - **`4 COUNCIL FOR THE INDIAN SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PRAGATI HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR, 47- 48 NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110019 BY ADVS. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA SHRI.T.B.HOOD, SPL.G.P. TO A.G.`** ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).15455/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 05.04.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:5:-`** # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM ``` ``` FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 15707OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` CHITRA KALA. K. PRINCIPAL, THE SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, TANA, MAMPAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676542 BY ADV K.VIDYASAGAR ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** ``` 1STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 3THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION STATE OF KERALA, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHI, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695014 ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:6:-`** ``` 4KERALA STATE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS SREE GANESH, VANROSS JUNCTION, NEAR BAKERY JUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN - 695034 5THE REGIONAL OFFICER CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, BLOCK - B, 2 ND FLOOR, LIC DIVISIONAL OFFICE CAMPUS, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004 6THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, BSNL RTTC CAMPUS, KAMMANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695040 BY ADVS. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA Nirmal S SHRI.T.B.HOOD, SPL.G.P. TO A.G. ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).15455/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 05.04.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:7:-`** ``` IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ``` ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE ``` ``` & ``` ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM`** ``` FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 15723OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` BRO. REGY SCARIA AGED 45 YEARS ``` ``` PRINCIPAL, MARYGIRI ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL KOOTTUMUGHAM(P.O.), SREEKANDAPURAM KANNUR, PIN - 670631 BY ADVS. A.C.VENUGOPAL VIDHYA. A.C ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** ``` 1THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETRIAT, ANNEXE-II THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION DIRECTORATE OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695014 ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:8:-`** - **`3 CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION VIKASMARG, C.BLOCK, PREETH VIHAR, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110062`** - **`4 JOINT SECRETARY AND REGIONAL OFFICER CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE) II FLOOR, BLOCK B, LIC DIVISIONAL OFFICE CAMPUS, PATTOM, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695003`** - **`5 KERALA STATE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR T.C.14/2036, VANROOSS JUNCTION P.O., KERALA UNIVERSITY, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695034 BY ADVS. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA Nirmal S SHRI.T.B.HOOD, SPL.G.P. TO A.G.`** ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).15455/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 05.04.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:9:-`** ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM ``` ``` FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 15746OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER :`** ``` DR. A. M. ANTONY PRINCIPAL, PEEVEES MODEL SCHOOL, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679329 BY ADV K.VIDYASAGAR ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001`** - **`2 SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001`** - **`3 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION STATE OF KERALA, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHI, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014`** W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:10:-`** ``` 4KERALA STATE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS, SREE GANESH, VANROSS JUNCTION, NEAR BAKERY JUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN - 695034 5THE REGIONAL OFFICER CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, BLOCK - B, 2 ND FLOOR, LIC DIVISIONAL OFFICE CAMPUS, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695004 6THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, BSNL RTTC CAMPUS, KAMMANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695040 BY ADVS. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA Nirmal S SHRI.T.B.HOOD, SPL.G.P. TO A.G. ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2024,, ALONG WITH WP(C).15455/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 05.04.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:11:-`** ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE ``` ``` & ``` ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM`** ``` FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 16068 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` THE MANAGER, EBENEZER HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL NELLAD PO, VEETTOOR, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADVS. ``` ``` K.MOHANAKANNAN D.S.THUSHARA ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001`** - **`2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014`** - **`3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM.`** - **`4 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, SATHRAKUNNU, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 686673`** - **`5 ADDL.R5 PARENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION EBENEZER HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, NELLAD PO,`** W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ``` -:12:- ``` ``` VEETTOOR, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686669 (REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT) ``` ``` ADDITIONAL R5 IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER ON 1/2023 DATED 5/4/2024. ``` ``` BY ADVS. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA K.MOHANAKANNAN SHRI.T.B.HOOD, SPL.G.P. TO A.G. ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).15455/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 05.04.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:13:-`** ``` IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ``` ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM ``` ``` FRIDAY, THE 5[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 12242 OF 2024`** ## **`PETITIONERS:`** ``` 1PRAGATI ACADEMY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER P.B. NO. 38, FERN HILLS, POOPANI ROAD, KARATTUPALLIKKARA, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683542 ``` ``` 2THE COUNCIL OF CBSE SCHOOLS KERALA (REGISTER NO. EKM/TC/376/2019), REPRESENTED BY ITS PATRON, DR. INDIRA RAJAN, VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE PARK, THENGODE POST, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682030 ``` ``` BY ADVS. M.R.VENUGOPAL DHANYA P.ASHOKAN (SR.) S. MUHAMMAD ALIKHAN ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 ``` ``` 2THE REGIONAL OFFICER CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, BLOCK - 8, 2ND ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:14:-`** ``` FLOOR, LIC DIVISIONAL OFFICE CAMPUS, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004 ``` ``` 3KERALA STATE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS SREE GANESH, VANROSS JUNCTION, NEAR BAKERY JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN - 695034 ``` ``` 4THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695014 BY ADVS. ``` ``` ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA SHRI.T.B.HOOD, SPL.G.P. TO A.G. ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2024,, ALONG WITH WP(C).15455/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 05.04.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ``` -:15:- ``` **==> picture [51 x 10] intentionally omitted <==** ## **`A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, JJ.`** ``` ------------------------------------------------ ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ``` ------------------------------------------------ ``` ``` Dated this the 5[th] day of April, 2024 ``` **==> picture [108 x 9] intentionally omitted <==** ## **`A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.`** ``` These matters are placed before us based on a reference order of the learned Single Judge. The matter is related to conducting vacation classes during summer vacation of the schools in the State. The learned Single Judge in the reference order doubted the law propounded in I.S.S (English Medium) Senior Secondary School, Perinthalmanna v. State of Kerala [2018 (2) ``` ``` KHC 849].wherein the learned Single Judge of this Court opined that if there is no objection from the parents, teachers and students, the special classes can be conducted during the summer vacation on a condition that the school authorities will provide basic facilities. In the reference order, the learned Single ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ``` -:16:- ``` ``` Judge disagreed with the views in the judgment in I.S.S. (English Medium) (supra) as the children require time for leisure and recreation during summer holidays. ``` ``` 2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel Dr.K.P.Satheesan, Senior Counsel Smt.Dhanya P.Ashokan and Shri Isaac Kuruvilla Illikal for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel Shri S.Nirmal and learned Special Government Pleader Shri T.B.Hood. ``` ``` 3. There are two sets of cases before us - one, the schools which are having affiliation with Boards other than State Board such as affiliation with CBSE, ICSE Boards and the other is schools having recognition under the Kerala Education Rules (KER). ``` ``` 4. Apparently, the question in this context arises as the State attempted to justify their actionwith reference to Rule 1 of Chapter VII of KER. Rule 1 Chapter VII states that all schools shall be closed for the summer vacation every year on the last working day of March and reopen on the first working day of June unless otherwise notified by the Director. We are of the view that as far as the schools are not the schools recognised under KER, they are not bound by the calendar provided ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 **==> picture [44 x 10] intentionally omitted <==** ``` under KER. The calendar of the schools under KER would be applicable only to schools that have obtained recognition from the Government under the KER. See the definition of ‘recognised schools’ under Section 2(8) of the Kerala Education Act vis-a- vis “a private school recognised by the Government under this Act”. In respect of the schools not covered under the Kerala Education Rules or Act, cannot be dealt under the same. It is up to the affiliated body to decide on the calendars, school working time etc. Therefore, the school calendar prescribed under KER cannot be extended to CBSE, ICSE schools, etc. Merely for the reason that for the purpose of affiliation, CBSE insisted recognition or NOC from the State Government, that alone will not bring such schools as a recognised school under KER. Such schools will not be considered recognized under the KER unless established or recognized in accordance with the Kerala Education Act or Rules. Therefore, they are not obliged to follow the calendar framed under KER. ``` ``` 5. However, we find that the Government has executive power to protect the best interest of children. The parens patriae is the jurisdiction of the State cannot be overlooked ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:18:-`** ## `here. The Apex Court in` **`Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India,`** ## **`[(1990) 1 SCC 613];`** `para.35 therein reads as follows:` ``` 35. There is the concept known both in this country and abroad, called parens patriae. Dr B.K. Mukherjea in his “Hindu Law of Religious and Charitable Trust”, Tagore Law Lectures, Fifth Edition, at page 404, referring to the concept of parens patriae, has noted that in English law, the Crown as parens patriae is the constitutional protector of all property subject to charitable trusts, such trusts being essentially matters of public concern. Thus the position is that according to Indian concept parens patriae doctrine recognized King as the protector of all citizens and as parent. In Budhkaran Chaukhani v. Thakur Prosad Shah [AIR 1942 Cal 331 : 46 CWN 425] the position was explained by the Calcutta High Court at page 318 of the report. The same position was reiterated by the said High Court in Banku Behary Mondal v. Banku Behary Hazra [AIR 1943 Cal 203 : 47 CWN 89] at page 205 of the report. The position was further elaborated and explained by the Madras High Court in Medai Dalavoi T. Kumaraswami Mudaliar v. Medai Dalavoi Rajammal [AIR 1957 Mad 563 : (1957) 2 MLJ 211] at page 567 of the report. This Court also recognized the concept of parens patriae relying on the observations of Dr Mukherjea aforesaid in Ram Saroop v. S.P. Sahi [1959 Supp 2 SCR 583 : AIR 1959 SC 951] at pages 598 and 599. In the “Words and Phrases” Permanent Edition, Vol. 33 at page 99, it is stated that parens patriae is the inherent power and authority of a legislature to provide protection to the person and property of persons non sui juris, such as minor, insane, and incompetent persons, but the words parens patriae meaning thereby ‘the father of the country’, were applied originally to the King and are used to designate the State referring to its sovereign power of guardianship over persons under disability. (emphasis supplied) Parens patriae jurisdiction, it has been explained, is the right of the sovereign and imposes a duty on sovereign, in public ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:19:-`** ``` interest, to protect persons under disability who have no rightful protector. The connotation of the term parens patriae differs from country to country, for instance, in England it is the King, in America it is the people, etc. The Government is within its duty to protect and to control persons under disability. Conceptually, the parens patriae theory is the obligation of the State to protect and takes into custody the rights and the privileges of its citizens for dischargings its obligations. Our Constitution makes it imperative for the State to secure to all its citizens the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and where the citizens are not in a position to assert and secure their rights, the State must come into picture and protect and fight for the rights of the citizens. The Preamble to the Constitution, read with the Directive Principles, Articles 38, 39 and 39-A enjoin the State to take up these responsibilities. It is the protective measure to which the social welfare state is committed. It is necessary for the State to ensure the fundamental rights in conjunction with the Directive Principles of State Policy to effectively discharge its obligation and for this purpose, if necessary, to deprive some rights and privileges of the individual victims or their heirs to protect their rights better and secure these further. ``` ``` 6. The petitioners are the management association and certain schools who want to conduct classes during vacation to make up syllabus, especially, for the students who are attending board exams during the next academic year. They experienced a shortage of time to complete syllabus and prepare the students for the next academic year. We find there is a legitimate concern for school authorities. But at the same time, it should ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:20:-`** ``` not be at the cost of the best interest of the child. The best interest of the child includes right of the child for rest and leisure. It is appropriate to refer to Article 31 in Part 1 of the United Nations Convention of Rights of the Child. ``` ## `Article 31` ``` 1. States Parties recognize the right of the child to rest and leisure, to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age of the child and to participate freely in cultural life and the arts. ``` ``` 2. States Parties shall respect and promote the right of the child to participate fully in cultural and artistic life and shall encourage the provision of appropriate and equal opportunities for cultural, artistic, recreational and leisure activity. ``` ``` 7. The parents cannot barter away their child’s right to rest and leisure in exchange to focus exclusively on studies. There is a prevailing belief that prioritising academic studies would protect the best interest of the child. However, growth of child is ensured not solely based on knowledge but also through recreational activities. The child is also having equal right to engage in cultural, artistic, leisure activities. This cannot be compromised. The State also cannot ignore the fact that that the child cannot forgo their ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 **==> picture [44 x 10] intentionally omitted <==** ``` academic pursuits. However, how to balance children’s academic pursuits and their right to recreational activities is a matter to be considered by the State. We also cannot overlook the exposure of the children to summer heat during vacation. The State also need to address this concern as well. The present regulation apparently is invoking power under the Kerala Education Act and Rules. That power cannot be utilised to govern a competing interest and rights of the child and their welfare. The executive Government alone can address the issue. The statutory authorities under KER are incompetent to decide such issues. In this matter, admittedly, they invoked statutory power under KER which according to us cannot be extended to schools other than those recognised under the Kerala Education Act and Rules. ``` ``` 8. We find that the judgment of the learned Single Judge ISS English Medium (supra) is not correct enunciation of law. As rightly noted by the learned Single Judge in reference order, recreational rights cannot be overlooked by parental authority to decide on academical pursuits. Therefore, State can devise its own mechanisms. ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 **==> picture [44 x 10] intentionally omitted <==** ``` 9. In the light of the discussions as above, we hold as follows: ``` ``` i. The State holds executive power to regulate summer vacation. However, this cannot be done based on the calendar prescribed in KER for non-KER schools. The State will have to balance academic interest of the child and their right to recreational activities in a delicate equilibrium. ``` ``` ii. Taking note of the ensuing vacation, we permit all the schools other than the schools governed by KER calendar to hold vacation classes between 7.30 AM till 10.30 AM. Provided, this arrangement will be subject to future executive orders governing vacation classes. ``` ``` iii. We also find that law laid down in I.S.S. (English Medium) case (supra) is not a good law to be followed. ``` ``` iv. In regard to W.P.(C).No.16068/2023, we find this school is a recognised school under KER. This school will have to follow calendar under KER. Regarding the schools governed by the Kerala Education Rules and Act which does not follow the KER calendar, action can be initiated against the Manager. In the ``` W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ``` -:23:- ``` ``` absence of any challenge to the Rule in KER, no relief can be granted. Therefore, W.P.(C).No.16068/2023 is dismissed. ``` ``` v. W.P.(C).Nos. 1931/2024, 15455/2023, 15707/2023, 15723/2023, 15746/2023, & 12242/2024are disposed of as above. ``` Sd/- ``` A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ``` Sd/- ``` M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, JUDGE ``` ms W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:24:-`** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1931/2024`** |**`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`**|| |---|---| |**`Exhibit P1`**|**`A PHOTOCOPY OF THE COUNCIL FOR INDIAN`**| ||**`SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION RULES FOR`**| ||**`AFFILIATION`**| |**`Exhibit P2`**|**`A PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 3RD`**| ||**`RESPONDENT DATED 03.05.2023`**| |**`Exhibit P3`**|**`A PHOTOCOPY OF THE CIRCULAR`**| ||**`NO.H4/26488/2017/DPI DATED 28.04.2017`**| |**`Exhibit P4`**|**`A PHOTOCOPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY`**| ||**`THIS HON'BLE COURT IN PRINCIPAL, PLACID`**| ||**`VIDHYA VIHAR SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL .V.`**| ||**`STATE OF KERALA IN W.P (C) NO.10076/2018`**| ||**`DATED 16.04.2018`**| |**`Exhibit P5`**|**`A PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS`**| ||**`HON'BLE COURT IN PRINCIPAL, PLACID VIDHYA`**| ||**`VIHAR SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL .V. STATE OF`**| ||**`KERALA IN W.P (C) NO. 10076/2018 DATED`**| ||**`17.07.2018`**| |**`Exhibit P6`**|**`A PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED`**| ||**`04.05.2018 IN W.P (C) NOS.14822 OF 2018 &`**| ||**`CONNECTED CASES (REPORTED AS I.S.S`**| ||**`(ENGLISH MEDIUM) SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL,`**| ||**`PERINTHALMANNA .V. STATE OF KERALA & ORS`**| ||**`2018 (2) KHC 849)`**| |**`Exhibit P7`**|**`A PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS`**| ||**`HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C) NO.7177/2017`**| ||**`DATED 17.03.2017`**| |**`Exhibit P8`**|**`A PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)`**| ||**`NO.4773/2018 DT.12.02.2018`**| W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:25:-`** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15707/2023`** |**`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`**|| |---|---| |**`Exhibit-P1`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFILIATION ISSUED BY`**| ||**`THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION`**| ||**`TO THE ABOVE SAID SCHOOL.`**| |**`Exhibit-P2`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.04.2017`**| ||**`PASSED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN CRMP`**| ||**`NO.2922/11/LA2/2017/KeSCPCR.`**| |**`Exhibit-P3`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED`**| ||**`17.03.2017 IN W.P(C) NO.7177/017.`**| |**`Exhibit-P4`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED`**| ||**`08.02.2018 IN W.P.(C) NO.3689/2018.`**| |**`Exhibit-P5`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION`**| ||**`NO.H4/7002/2023/D.G.E DATED 03.05.2023`**| ||**`ISSUED BY THE 2 ND RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit-P6`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR`**| ||**`NO.H(4)/26488/2017/DPI DATED 28.04.2017`**| ||**`ISSUED BY THE 2 ND RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit-P7`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.4.2018 IN`**| ||**`W.P(C).13089/2018 AND CONNECTED CASES ON`**| ||**`THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.`**| |**`Exhibit-P8`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF`**| ||**`THE PTA MEETING HELD ON 03.05.2023 AT THE`**| ||**`PETITIONER'S SCHOOL.`**| |**`Exhibit-P9`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE`**| ||**`MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF THE SCHOOL`**| ||**`AUTHORIZING THE PETITIONER TO FILE A CASE`**| ||**`BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT.`**| |**`Exhibit-P10`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 28.4.2023`**| ||**`SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 5TH`**| ||**`RESPONDENT`**| |**`Exhibit-P11`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED`**| ||**`09.05.2023 IN W.P(C) NO.15455/2023 ON THE`**| ||**`FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.`**| W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:26:-`** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15723/2023`** |**`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`**|| |---|---| |**`Exhibit P1`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF`**| ||**`AFFILIATION DATED 11.11.2014 ISSUED TO THE`**| ||**`SCHOOL`**| |**`Exhibit P2`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.`**| ||**`H(4)26488/2017/D.P.I. DATED 28-04-2017`**| ||**`ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT`**| |**`Exhibit P3`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR`**| ||**`NO.G3/138/2019/G.EDN. ISSUED BY THE 1ST`**| ||**`RESPONDENT DATED 29.3.2019`**| |**`Exhibit P4`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED`**| ||**`07.05.2019 IN W.P.(C) NO.13074/2019 OF`**| ||**`THIS HON'BLE COURT`**| |**`Exhibit P5`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.`**| ||**`H4/7002/2023/D.G.E DATED 03-05-2023 ISSUED`**| ||**`BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT`**| |**`Exhibit P6`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE`**| ||**`PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED`**| ||**`10.05.2023`**| |**`Exhibit P7`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY`**| ||**`THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P(C)NO. 15455/2023`**| W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:27:-`** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15746/2023`** |**`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`**|| |---|---| |**`Exhibit-P1`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFILIATION ISSUED BY`**| ||**`THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION`**| ||**`TO THE SCHOOL.`**| |**`Exhibit-P2`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.04.2017`**| ||**`PASSED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN CRMP`**| ||**`NO.2922/11/LA2/2017/KeSCPCR.`**| |**`Exhibit-P3`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED`**| ||**`17.03.2017 IN W.P(C) NO.7177/017.`**| |**`Exhibit-P4`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED`**| ||**`08.02.2018 IN W.P.(C) NO.3689/2018.`**| |**`Exhibi-P5`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION`**| ||**`NO.H4/7002/2023/D.G.E DATED 03.05.2023`**| ||**`ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit-P6`**|**`A TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR`**| ||**`NO.H(4)/26488/2017/DPI DATED 28.04.2017`**| ||**`ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit-P7`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.4.2018 IN`**| ||**`W.P(C).13089/2018 AND CONNECTED CASES ON`**| ||**`THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.`**| |**`Exhibit-P8`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE`**| ||**`PETITIONER DECLARING THAT THE PETITIONER'S`**| ||**`INSTITUTION IS HAVING SUFFICIENT`**| ||**`FACILITIES AS PER THE CBSE NORMS FOR THE`**| ||**`SMOOTH CONDUCT OF VACATION CLASSES DURING`**| ||**`MAY, 2023.`**| |**`Exhibi-P9`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.34 PASSED`**| ||**`BY THE PTA MEETING HELD AT PEEVEES MODEL`**| ||**`SCHOOL, NILAMBUR ON 15.03.2023 AND`**| ||**`31.03.2023.`**| |**`Exhibit-P10`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 27.4.2023`**| ||**`SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 5TH`**| ||**`RESPONDENT.`**| |**`Exhibit-P11`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED`**| ||**`09.05.2023 IN W.P(C) NO.15455/2023 ON THE`**| ||**`FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.`**| W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:28:-`** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16068/2023`** |**`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`**|| |---|---| |**`Exhibit P1`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILS OF THE STUDENTS`**| ||**`OF THE SCHOOL`**| |**`Exhibit P2`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.H(4)-`**| ||**`26488/2017/DPI DATED 28-4-2017`**| |**`Exhibit P3`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION`**| ||**`NO.H4/7002/2023/DGE DATED 3-5-2023 ISSUED`**| ||**`BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE HEAD OF THE`**| ||**`INSTITUTION OF THE STATE`**| |**`Exhibit P4`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION`**| ||**`NO.A5/594/2023 DATED 15-5-2023 SENT BY THE`**| ||**`4TH RESPONDENT TO THE HEAD MASTER`**| |**`Exhibit P5`**|**`TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 9-5-2023`**| ||**`IN WRIT PETITION NO.15455/2023`**| W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:29:-`** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12242/2024`** |**`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`**|| |---|---| |**`Exhibit P1`**|**`TRUE COPY OF EXTENSION OF GENERAL`**| ||**`AFFILIATION NO: CBSE/930149/EX-00649-`**| ||**`2324/2023-24/ DATED 31/12/2022`**| |**`Exhibit P2`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/04/2017`**| ||**`PASSED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN CRMP`**| ||**`NO.2922/11/LA2/2017KESCPCR ALONG WITH`**| ||**`LEGIBLE COPY`**| |**`Exhibit P3`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION`**| ||**`NO.H4/7002/2023/D.G.E DATED 03/05/2023`**| ||**`ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT`**| |**`Exhibit P4`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.`**| ||**`H(4)26488/2017/DPI DATED 28/04/2017 ISSUED`**| ||**`BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT`**| |**`Exhibit P5`**|**`TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED`**| ||**`09/05/2023 IN WP(C) NO.15455 OF 2023`**| W.P.(C).Nos. 15455/ 2023, 15707/ 2023, 15723/ 2023, 15746/ 2023, 16068/ 2023, & 1931/ 2024, 12242/ 2024 ## **`-:30:-`** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15455/2023`** ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. H(4)/26488/2017/D.P.I. DATED 28-04-2017 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit-P2TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 16-04-2018 IN W.P.(C)NO. 12948/2018 Exhibit-P3TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 8-2-2018 IN W.P.(C)NO.3689/2018 Exhibit-P4TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. H4/7002/2023/D.G.E DATED 3-5-2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT RESPONDENT ANNEXURES Annexure R3True Copy of the Circular No. 22475/J1/14/GEdn. dated 05.05.2015 issued by the first respondent ```