High Court of KeralaSingle JudgePetitions disposed of in part: those undergoing...

WP(C) Nos. 1477/2023, 10432/2023, 10438/2023

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) Nos. 1477/2023, 10432/2023, 10438/2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Shaji P. Chaly
Judgment Date
2023-03-24
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petitions are disposed to the extent that petitioners undergoing ART as on 25.01.2022 shall be permitted to continue their treatment. In all other respects, the directions issued in the Nandini K. judgment are applicable to the facts of these cases, and the National Board should examine the need to modify the upper age limit and to include a transitional provision, with compliance within three months of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Final Disposition
Petitions disposed of in part: those undergoing ART as on 25.01.2022 may continue treatment; directs adherence to Nandini K. v UoI for other aspects, and directs National Board to re-examine the upper age limit with transitional provisions; Board to comply within three months.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sasidharan M.V.
  • Rajalakshmi V. R.
  • A. Vasanta
  • K. B. Harirajan
  • Subaida N
  • Abubacker Ch.

Respondents

  • Union of India represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
  • State of Kerala represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
  • The District Reproductive and Child Health (RCH) Officer, Ernakulam
  • Sabine Hospital and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • N. M. Madhu
  • • C. S. Rajani
  • • Akash S.
  • • Girish Kumar M S
  • • V. S. Varalekshmi
  • • Devika Jayaraj

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Dee​pa Narayanan
  • • Jose Antony
  • • S. Manu
  • • Reshmi K. M.

Case Synopsis & Summary

The captioned writ petitions, though individually styled, are materially connected in challenging Section 21(g) of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 (the ART Act, 2021). The petitioners allege infertility and reliance on assisted reproductive technology (ART); the central challenge is the upper age limit prescribed for ART treatment (women up to 50 years, men up to 55 years). The matter has been linked to a prior decision in Nandini K. v. Union of India and Others, 2023 (1) KLT 426, where this Court, after examining Section 5 of the Act, directed the National Board to address the liberty implications of the age cap, to permit ongoing ART in certain cases, and to consider transitional provisions. The Court in the present petitions notes that similar writ petitions have been disposed of in line with those directions, emphasizing that the issue is under consideration before the Supreme Court. The respondent government counsel urged delaying resolution until the Apex Court pronounces its view, but the Court finds it just to apply the earlier directions to the present cases as well. Consequently, the petitions are allowed to the extent that petitioners undergoing ART as on 25.01.2022 shall be permitted to continue treatment, with other directions and considerations to apply as in Nandini K. This ensures continued access to ART while awaiting policy reconsideration.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 21(g) of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021Section 5 of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that the horizontal bar of the upper age cap under Section 21(g) of the ART Act, 2021 violates their liberty to seek ART treatment for infertility. They assert they are either undergoing treatment or are ready to commence ART, and insist on continuity or access regardless of age, or at least seek a favorable interim order until the Apex Court resolves the constitutional questions. They rely on the Nandini K. decision to urge preservation of ART treatment rights and to press for a transitional arrangement.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents urge caution, highlighting that the constitutionality of the age cap is under review by the Supreme Court. They request that the writ petitions be kept in abeyance pending the Apex Court's ruling, noting that the National Board and the Central Government may revisit policy considerations.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Nandini K. v. The Union of India and Others [2023 (1) KLT 426][2023 (1) KLT 426]PositiveThe court expressly references and adopts the directives from the Nandini K. decision, applying similar remedies and framework to the present petitions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against WP(C) Nos. 1477/2023, 10432/2023, 10438/2023 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY`** ## **`FRIDAY, THE 24[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1945`** ## **`WP(C) NO. 1477 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** - `1 SASIDHARAN M.V., AGED 53 YEARS S/O. V.M. SREEDHARAN NAIR, GOKULAM, GANDHI NAGAR, PERAMBRA, CHALAKKUDI, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680689` - `2 RAJALAKSHMI V. R., AGED 51 YEARS W/O. SASIDHARAN M.V., GOKULAM, GANDHI NAGAR, PERAMBRA, CHALAKKUDI, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680689 BY ADVS.` - `N.M.MADHU` - `C.S.RAJANI` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** - `1 THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, SASTHRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001` - `2 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE , SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001` - `3 THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY FORMED U/S.12 OF THE ART (R) ACT, 2021, REPRESENTED BY VICE CHAIRPERSON DR. PREETHI, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES (FW), PALAYAM - AIRPORT ROAD, NEAR GENERAL HOSPITAL ROAD JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695035` - `4 THE DISTRICT REPRODUCTIVE AND CHILD HEALTH (RCH) OFFICER, DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, PARK AVENUE, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682011` - `5 SABINE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE (P) LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, PEZHAKKAPPILLY POST, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN - 686673` ``` SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN,SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSE ANTONY, CGC ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.03.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).10432/2023, 10438/2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023 ``` ``` -2- ``` ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 24[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1945`** ## **`WP(C) NO. 10432 OF 2023`** ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** - `1 A. VASANTHA, AGED 51 YEARS WIFE OF K B HARIRAJAN, 'KUNDUMARIL', THENUR PO, PARLI -I, TENUR, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678612` ``` 2K.B. HARIRAJAN, AGED 59 YEARS SON OF BALAN, 'KUNDUMARIL', THENUR PO, PARLI -I, TENUR, PALAKKAD - 678 612, PIN - 678612 BY ADVS.AKASH S. GIRISH KUMAR M S V.S.VARALEKSHMI DEVIKA JAYARAJ ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** - `1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, SASTHRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001` - `2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001` - `3 THE DISTRICT REPRODUCTIVE & CHILD HEALTH ("RCH") OFFICER, DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, PARK EVE, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN - 682011` - `4 SABINE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PVT. LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, PEZHAKKAPPALLY PO, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN – 686673` ## **`WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023`** ``` -3- ``` ``` R1 BY SRI. S.MANU, DSGI R2 & R3 BY SMT. RESHMI K.M., SR.GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.03.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).1477/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023 ``` ``` -4- ``` ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 24[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 10438 OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** - `1 SUBAIDA N, AGED 48 YEARS WIFE OF ABUBACKER, 'CHULLIYIL HOUSE', NEAR KINS PARK, VATTAMAVU, KADAVALLUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680543` - `2 ABUBACKER CH, AGED 64 YEARS, SON OF CHULLIYIL HYDROSE, 'CHULLIYIL HOUSE', NEAR KINS PARK, VATTAMAVU, KADAVALLUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680543 BY ADVS.AKASH S. GIRISH KUMAR M S V.S.VARALEKSHMI DEVIKA JAYARAJ` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** - `1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, SASTHRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001` - `2 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001` - `3 THE DISTRICT REPRODUCTIVE & CHILD HEALTH ("RCH") OFFICER, DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, PARK EVE, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN - 682011` - `4 SABINE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PVT. LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, PEZHAKKAPPALLY PO, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN – 686673` ``` R1 BY SIR. MANU S., DSGI ``` ## **`WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023`** ``` -5- ``` ``` R2 & R3 BY SMT. RESHMI K.M., SR. GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.03.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).1477/2023 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023 ``` ``` -6- ``` ## **JUDGMENT** ## **[WP(C) Nos.1477/2023, 10432/2023, 10438/2023]** The captioned writ petitions are materially connected in respect of a challenge made to Section 21(g) of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 (for short ‘the Act, 2021’). The case of the petitioners in common are that, though they are living as husband and wife, they are suffering from infertility issues and therefore, their only alternative is to seek refuge for Assisted Reproductive Technology by undergoing treatment. In so far as Section 21(g) of the Act, 2021 is concerned, it prescribes an age limit to undergo the treatment for a woman aged above 50 years and a man aged above 55 years. The petitioners’ case is that, either of them have exceeded the prescribed age limit. The validity of the above provision was considered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in _**Nandini K. v. The Union of India and Others [2023 (1) KLT 426]**_ and has rendered a judgment dated 19.12.2022, and disposed of the writ petitions holding as follows:- “14. As rightly pointed out by the amicus curiae, Section 5 of the Act confers the National Assisted ``` WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023 ``` ``` -7- ``` Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Board with the power to advice the Central Government on policy matters relating to assisted reproductive technology. In my opinion, the impact of the prescription of upper age limit on the liberty of individuals is a matter which the National Board should bring to the notice of the Central Government, so as to effectuate a detailed discussion on the subject and pave the way for necessary amendments. Based on the above discussions, the following directions are issued; (i) Those among the petitioners who were undergoing ART services as on 25.01.2022 shall be permitted to continue their treatment. (ii) The National Board shall alert the Central Government about the need for having a re-look at the upper age limit prescribed in Section 21(g) of the Act. (iii) The National Board shall also bring to the notice of the Central Government the requirement of including a transitional provision in the ART Act. (iv) The above directions shall be complied by the National Board within three months of receipt of a copy of this judgment. ## **`WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023`** ``` -8- ``` (v) Those among the petitioners who are yet to commence their ART treatment shall await the decision of the Central Government on the upper age limit and the transitional provision. (vi) The liberty of the petitioners to approach this Court at a later stage, if so necessitate, is reserved.” 2. Therefore, the submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioners is that they are all undergoing treatment and they may be permitted to do so, failing which, irreparable loss and mental distress would be suffered by them. 3. On the other hand, learned Central Government Counsel has submitted that the issue with respect to the constitutionality of the age limit fixed under Section 21(g) of the Act, 2021, is under consideration before the Hon’ble Apex Court and therefore, the writ petitions may be kept pending, till such time a decision is taken by the Apex Court. 4. In my considered opinion, since already similar writ petitions are disposed of by issuing directions as extracted above, these writ petitions can be disposed of in similar lines, failing which, the petitioners would be put to serious prejudice. Therefore, petitioners ``` WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023 ``` ``` -9- ``` who are undergoing treatment for Assisted Reproductive Technology as on 25.01.2022 shall be permitted to continue their treatment. In all other respects, the directions contained in the above cited judgment would squarely apply to the facts and figures of these cases also. The writ petitions are allowed to the above extent. ``` Sd/- SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE ``` uu 25.03.2023 ## **`WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023`** ``` -10- ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10432/2023`** ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAAR CARD OF THE 1ST PETITIONER Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAAR CARD OF THE 2ND PETITIONER Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORDS OF THE TREATMENT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER AT THE RAJIV GANDHI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL ON 07.03.2021 Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORDS AT RAJIV GANDHI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL, MONITORING THE PROGRESS OF THE 1ST PETITIONER'S ENDOMETRIUM, LAST DATED 20.01.2022 Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DOCTOR AT RAJIV GANDHI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL DATED 18.03.2023 Exhibit P6TRUE COPY OF TEH RELEVANT PAGES OF THE 'NATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ACCREDITATION, SUPERVISION AND REGULATION OF ART CLINICS IN INDIA' ("NATIONAL GUIDELINES"), PREPARED BY THE INDIAN COUNCIL FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ("ICMR") AND NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (NAMS), ON BEHALF OF THE UNION MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, OF THE YEAR 2005 ``` ## **`WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023`** ``` -11- ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10438/2023`** ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAAR CARD OF THE 1ST PETITIONER Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAAR CARD OF THE 2ND PETITIONER Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONERS, BY THE SAMASTHA SUNNI MAHAL FEDERATION, WAYANAD, DATED 18.10.2017 Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE USG SCAN ON THE ABDOMINAL AND PELVIC AREA OF THE 1ST PETITIONER, ISSUED BY ANSAR HOSPITAL, THRISSUR, DATED 11.05.2021 Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE USG SCAN ON THE PELVIC AREA OF THE 1ST PETITIONER AT THE OXYGEN HEALTHCARE, KECHERI, DATED 26.05.2021 Exhibit P6TRUE COPY OF THE USG SCAN ON THE PELVIC AREA OF THE 1ST PETITIONER AT THE OXYGEN HEALTHCARE, KECHERI, DATED 26.10.2021 Exhibit P7TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORDS ISSUED BY THE OXYGEN HEALTHCARE, KECHERI DATED 27.10.2021 Exhibit P8TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF THE 1ST PETITIONER ISSUED BY MOTHER HOSPITAL, THRISSUR, DATED 01.11.2021 Exhibit P9TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE 'NATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ACCREDITATION, SUPERVISION AND REGULATION OF ART CLINICS IN INDIA' ("NATIONAL GUIDELINES"), PREPARED BY THE INDIAN COUNCIL FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ("ICMR") AND NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (NAMS), ON BEHALF OF THE UNION MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, OF THE YEAR 2005 ``` ``` WP(C) NOS. 1477, 10432 &10438 OF 2023 ``` ``` -12- ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1477/2023`** ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1TRUE COPIES OF THE MEDICAL REPORTS ISSUED BY THE AMRITA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH CENTRE, KOCHI Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 02.11.2022 ISSUED BY THE SABINE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE (P) LTD, MUVATTUPUZHA Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 23.01.2023 ISSUED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT ```