High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of

WP(C) Nos. 14763/2023 & 14769/2023 - Master Abhishek (minor) by mother; and Smt. Rincy M.R. vs District Legal Services Authority, Thalassery, Kannur

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) Nos. 14763/2023 & 14769/2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Devan Ramachandran
Judgment Date
2023-09-12
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to DELSA to reconsider the petitioners’ claims strictly from the angle of escalation of the amounts already granted, after affording them a hearing. A fresh order on the escalation aspect should be issued as expeditiously as possible, but no later than four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Master Abhishek (minor), represented by mother Rincy M R
  • Rincy M R

Respondents

  • DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, represented by its Secretary, THALASSERY, Kannur, PIN – 670141
  • DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, represented by Secretary, THALASSERY, Kannur, PIN – 670101

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Ipsita Ojal
  • • Mariyamma A.K.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Harindranath B G
  • • Amith Krishnan H.
  • • M. Gopikrishnan
  • • Lejo Joseph George

Case Synopsis & Summary

Two writ petitions (WP(C) Nos. 14763/2023 and 14769/2023) from acid-attack survivors seeking enhanced compensation under the Kerala Victim Compensation Scheme. The petition by minor Master Abhishek, represented by his mother, and by Smt. Rincy M.R. allege grievous burn injuries from an acid attack. They challenge the District Legal Services Authority (DELSA) awards of Rs. 5,00,000 to Rincy and Rs. 2,50,000 to Master Abhishek as grossly inadequate in light of the injuries suffered: Rincy has more than 50% burns on her face; Abhishek bears facial, neck and back scars and is a permanently disabled child with mental retardation and seizure disorder. They pray for setting aside the impugned orders and directing DELSA to reconsider, with escalation of the awarded amounts, after due opportunity of hearing. DELSA contends the orders reflect consideration of all relevant factors but expresses willingness to reconsider if the Court so desires, citing Laxmi v. Union of India and Parivartan Kendra v. UOI for affirmative declarations. The Court acknowledges the severity of injuries and emphasizes that reparation must be adequate and commensurate, directing DELSA to reassess solely from the escalation perspective, with a hearing, and issue a fresh order expeditiously but within four months of receipt of the judgment.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Victim Compensation Scheme

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that they were attacked by acid, sustaining grievous injuries, and that the awards under the Kerala Victim Compensation Scheme are grossly inadequate (Rs. 5,00,000 to Smt. Rincy and Rs. 2,50,000 to Master Abhishek). They seek setting aside of the impugned orders and a directions to DELSA to reconsider the claim from the perspective of escalation, with opportunity of hearing, so as to award compensation commensurate with the detriment suffered, especially considering Rincy’s >50% facial burns and Abhishek’s permanent disability and seizure disorder.

Contentions of Respondents

DELSA argues the impugned orders reflect careful consideration of relevant factors; however, if the Court deems fit, DELSA is willing to reconsider, relying on Laxmi v. Union of India and Parivartan Kendra v. UOI, and notes that some amounts have already been disbursed. The respondents emphasize measured reconsideration and request adherence to proper procedure while allowing for escalation if directed.

Cited Precedents (3)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Laxmi v. Union of India(2014) 4 SCC 427PositiveAffirmative declarations cited by the Court to underscore the principle that compensation under victim schemes must be adequate and commensurate with detriment.
Parivartan Kendra v. UOI(AIR 2015 SCW 6597)PositiveAffirmative declarations cited to support the stance that compensation should reflect the severity of harm and need for proper reparation.
SC 782 of 2017SC 782 of 2017Mentioned OnlyExhibit P2 comprises a judgment copy; its holdings are not discussed or applied in the reasoning, thus treated as Mentioned Only.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against WP(C) Nos. 14763/2023 & 14769/2023 - Master Abhishek (minor) by mother; and Smt. Rincy M.R. vs District Legal Services Authority, Thalassery, Kannur and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** # **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 12[TH] DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 21ST BHADRA, 1945 ``` ``` WP(C) NO. 14763 OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` MASTER ABHISHEK (MINOR), AGED 14 YEARS REPRESENTED BY MOTHER RINCY M R, MADATHIL HOUSE, EMBETE, PARIYARAM, KODAMPATH, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN – 670141 ``` ``` BY ADVS. IPSITA OJAL MARIYAMMA A.K. ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** ``` DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY THALASSERY, KANNUR, PIN – 670141 ``` ``` BY ADVS. HARINDRANATH B G AMITH KRISHNAN H.(K/000666/2015) M.GOPIKRISHNAN(K/000841/2017) LEJO JOSEPH GEORGE(K/357-C/2017) ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.09.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C)NO.14769/2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` WPC 14763 & 14769/23 2 # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 12[TH] DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 21ST BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 14769 OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` RINCY M R, AGED 38 YEARS, D/O. ROBERT, MADATHIL HOUSE, EMBETE, PARIYARAM, KODAMPATH, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN – 670141 ``` ``` BY ADVS. IPSITA OJAL MARIYAMMA A.K. ``` ## **`RESPONDENT:`** ``` DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY THALASSERY, KANNUR, PIN – 670101 ``` ``` BY ADVS. HARINDRANATH B G AMITH KRISHNAN H.(K/000666/2015) M.GOPIKRISHNAN(K/000841/2017) LEJO JOSEPH GEORGE(K/357-C/2017) ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.09.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C)NO.14763/2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` WPC 14763 & 14769/23 3 ## JUDGMENT ``` [WP(C) Nos.14763/2023, 14769/2023] ``` These matters are being disposed of together taking note of the analogous factual circumstances presented and the similarity in the reliefs sought for. 2. WP(C)No.14769/2023 has been filed by Smt.Rincy M.R.; while, WP(C)No.14763/2023 has been filed by her minor child Master Abhishek - being represented by her. 3. The petitioners say that they were both attacked by an individual with acid and have consequently suffered very grievous and vicious burn injuries. Their grievance is that even though they had applied for compensation under the Kerala Victim Compensation Scheme before the respondent, an Award has been issued in their favour only to a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- and Rs.2,50,000/- in favour of Smt.Rincy and Master Abhishek respectively, which is egregiously insufficient going by the nature of injuries sustained by them. They thus pray that the impugned orders be set aside, to the extent to which they are assailed; and that the respondent – District Legal Services Authority, Thalassery WPC 14763 & 14769/23 4 (DELSA), be directed to reconsider their case in its proper perspective. 4. In response to the afore submissions made by Smt.Ipsita Ojal – learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri.B.G.Harindranath – learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that the impugned orders were issued taking note of all relevant and germane aspects; but that if this Court is so inclined, his client is willing to reconsider the matter, particularly taking note of the affirmative declarations of the Honourable Supreme Court in Laxmi v. Union of India [(2014) 4 SCC 427] and Parivartan Kendra v. UOI (WP(C)No.867 of 2013) (AIR 2015 SCW 6597). 5. I have examined the impugned orders and there is no doubt that the DELSA has found full empathy and concern for the plight of the petitioners. The only question is whether they were obliged to give larger compensation to the petitioners, or whether the amounts now awarded are sufficient and apposite. 6. I have gone through the nature of injuries sustained by the petitioners and it is indubitable that they are vicious and extremely grave. Smt.Rincy has suffered more than 50% burn WPC 14763 & 14769/23 5 injuries on her face; while Master Abhishek is living with serious scars on his face, neck and back. To exacerbate, Master Abhishek is a permanently disabled child suffering from mental retardation and seizure disorder; and am hence, certain that all these aspects ought to have been adverted to by the DELSA in its proper perspective, while issuing the impugned orders. 7. The law relating to reparation is now well-settled. It has to be adequate and commensurate to the detriment caused to the parties. A specific finding to this effect, based on all necessary and crucial aspects ought to have found place in the orders impugned; but to that extent, I am of the view that it is wanting. I do not propose to speak any further because, am certainly of the view that the entire matter requires to be reconsidered by the DELSA in its true perspective. 8. That said, this Court is aware that the amounts awarded have already been disbursed to the petitioners; and therefore, what is now remaining is consideration of escalation, if found eligible. In the afore circumstances and for the reasons above, I WPC 14763 & 14769/23 6 order this Writ Petition and direct the DELSA to reconsider the claim of the petitioners strictly from the angle of escalation of the amounts already granted, adverting to all relevant aspects and after affording them necessary opportunity of being heard; thus culminating in an appropriate fresh order on this aspect alone, as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. ``` Sd/- ``` ``` RR ``` ``` DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE ``` WPC 14763 & 14769/23 7 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14769/2023`** ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NUMBER 1374 OF 2015 WAS REGISTERED BY THE PARIYRAM MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION OF KANNUR DISTRICT ON 25-12-2015 ``` ``` Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN SC 782 OF 2017 DATED 7-9-2019 OF THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR THE TRIAL OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN, THALASERRY Exhibit3TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5-4-2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT Exhibi P4TRUE COPY OF THE ACCIDENT CUM WOUND CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE PARIYARAM MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL DATED 24-12-2015 Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER Exhibit P6TRUE COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE DATED 28-03-2018 Exhibit P7TRUE COPY OF THE FUTURE TREATMENT PLAN DATED 13-02-2023 ISSUED BY DR.SUBRAMANIA IYER, PROFESSOR & HOD, PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AT AMRITHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, ERNAKULAM Exhibit P8TRUE COPY OF THE ESTIMATE CERTIFICATE DATED 13-02-2023 Exhibit P9TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONER ``` WPC 14763 & 14769/23 8 ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14763/2023`** |`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`|| |---|---| |`Exhibit P1`|`CRIME NUMBER 1374 OF 2015 WAS REGISTERED`| ||`BY THE PARIYRAM MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE`| ||`STATION OF KANNUR DISTRICT ON 25-12-2015`| |`Exhibit P2`|`TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN SC 782 OF`| ||`2017 DATED 7-9-2019 OF THE COURT OF`| ||`SPECIAL JUDGE FOR THE TRIAL OF OFFENCES`| ||`AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN, THALASERRY`| |`Exhibit P3`|`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5-4-2022`| ||`PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT`| |`Exhibit P4`|`TRUE COPY OF THE ACCIDENT CUM WOUND`| ||`CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE SECOND`| ||`RESPONDENT BY THE PARIYARAM MEDICAL`| ||`COLLEGE HOSPITAL DATED 24-12-2015`| |`Exhibit P5`|`TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE`| ||`ISSUED BY FATHER MULLERS MEDICAL`| ||`COLLEGE, MANGALORE TILL 29-01-2016`| |`Exhibit P6`|`TRUE COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE`| ||`ISSUED BY THE MEDICAL BOARD OF THE`| ||`GOVERNMENT DISTRICT HOSPITAL KANNUR`| |`Exhibit P7`|`TRUE COPY OF THE FUTURE TREATMENT PLAN`| ||`DATED 13-02-2023 ISSUED BY DR.SUBRAMANIA`| ||`IYER, PROFESSOR & HOD, PLASTIC AND`| ||`RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AT AMRITHA`| ||`INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, ERNAKULAM`| |`Exhibit P8`|`TRUE COPY OF THE ESTIMATE ASSESSMENT OF`| ||`EXPENDITURE FOR PETITIONER ISSUED BTY`| ||`AMRITA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND`| ||`RESEARCH CENTRE ON 13-02-2023`|