High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petitions allowed; impugned notices and pe...

W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh
Judgment Date
2023-08-08
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petitions allowed; impugned notices and penalty orders quashed to the extent they rest on challenged assessments; assessments to be finalised in light of the Kerala Finance Act, 2017 amendment and the directions in the Josco Fashion Jewelers decision (W.P.(C) No.32456 of 2016 (F)), i.e., in accordance with the 2017 ruling and subsequent directions.
Final Disposition
Writ petitions allowed; impugned notices and penalty orders quashed; the authorities to finalise assessments in line with the directions in the 2017 decision (W.P.(C) No.32456 of 2016 (F)) and the Kerala Finance Act, 2017 amendments.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • P.K.AYMU HAJI; Moideen Kutty; K. Jaleel

Respondents

  • The State of Kerala represented by the Additional Chief Secretary (Taxes), Taxes Department, Thiruvananthapuram; The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes; The Commercial Tax Officer – 1, Mannjeri, Malappuram District (and other CT officers in connected petitions)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • K. Shaj
  • • Renjit George

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Arun Ajay Sankar (Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

These writ petitions challenge assessment orders under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for the assessment years starting 2013-2014 and subsequent years, issued by the Department of Commercial Taxes. The petitioners—P.K. Aymu Haji; Moideen Kutty; and K. Jaleel (the applicants)—seek quashing of notices demanding purchase tax and penalties, and contest short-remittance allegations, arguing that the regime for compounded tax under Section 8(f) was clarified by the Kerala Finance Act, 2017. They rely on a coordinate bench decision in W.P.(C) No.32456 of 2016 (F) (Josco Fashion Jewelers v. State of Kerala and others) and submit that, in light of the amendment, dealers paying compounded tax are not liable to pay tax under Section 6(2) from 1 April 2013 for the goods in question. The State contends that the assessments and penalties are valid and should be upheld, with finalisation of revenue matters in accordance with law. On 8 August 2023, the court notes that the petitioners do not press prayer F and that the core issue is governed by the 2017 amendment and the Josco Fashion Jewelers judgment. The judge allows the petitions, quashes the impugned notices and penalty orders to the extent they rely on the challenged assessments, and directs the authorities to reframe the assessments consistent with the directions in the 2017 decision, i.e., to finalise assessments in line with the amendment.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Section 6(2)(a); Section 6(2); Section 8(f); Section 25(1)Kerala Finance Act, 2017 - amendment to Section 6(2)(a) (insertion of proviso)Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 - Form 1B (Exhibit P7 etc.)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The applicants submitted that the contentious assessment actions fall within the ambit of the post-2017 amendment clarifications under the KVAT regime, particularly for dealers paying tax on a compounded basis under Section 8(f). Relying on the coordinate bench ruling in W.P.(C) No.32456 of 2016 (F) (Josco Fashion Jewelers), they urged quashing of notices/assessments that demanded purchase tax for 2013-14 and related penalties; the claim was that the amended Section 6(2) (as clarified by the Finance Act, 2017) exempts such goods from purchase tax from 1.4.2013 onward, and requires final assessments be framed in line with the 2017 judgment. Respondents: The State contended the notices and assessments are legally valid under KVAT and that penalties and demands must stand unless expressly quashed by the court, urging that the department should proceed to finalize assessments consistent with the applicable statutes and decisions.

Contentions of Respondents

The State argued that the assessment orders and penalties are valid and that the department should be allowed to finalize revenue matters in accordance with KVAT and the 2017 amendment, noting that the provisions of the KVAT Act govern taxation on compounded tax and that the authorities must complete proceedings according to law.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Josco Fashion Jewelers v. State of Kerala and othersW.P.(C) No.32456 of 2016 (F)PositiveThe judgment recognizes the 2017 amendment’s effect and follows the earlier Josco Fashion Jewelers decision to quash impugned notices and assessments, guiding finalisation of assessments per the 2017 directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TUESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 37366 OF 2016`** ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** - `1 P.K.AYMU HAJI, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O KUTTIALI HAJI, PATTARAKADAVAN HOUSE, PATTARAKADAVAN P.O., MALAPPURAM -676519. (PROPRIETOR, M/S. SAHARA GOLD PARK, 24/4 B, KOTTAPADI, MALAPPURAM)` - `2 MOIDEEN KUTTY, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O ALIKUTTY HAJI, NAJATH GOLD SUPER MARKET,KOTTAPPADY, VALAMNANGALAM,MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. (PROPRIETOR M/S. NAJATH GOLD SUPER MARKET,MM 17/426C, MASJID COMPLEX, KOTTAPPADI, MALAPPURAM)` ``` 3K. JALEEL, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O ADBULLAKUTTY,NTK HOUSE, MANJERI, MADANGODE-676122. (PROPRIETOR, M/S N.T.K. JEWELLERS,MM 20/134, MANJERI) ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.RENJIT GEORGE ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** - `1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY(TAXES), TAXES DEPARTMENT, ABOVE OLD ASSEMBLY HALL,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695001.` - `2 THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, 9TH FLOOR, TAX TOWERS, KILLIPPALAM, KARAMANA PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695002.` - `3 THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER – 1, OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, MANJERI,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 676121.` ``` BY ADV. ARUN AJAY SANKAR-GP ``` **2** ## **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.08.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).40242/2016, 40481/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **3** ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TUESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 40242 OF 2016 ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` M/S KAVITHA GOLD AND DIAMONDS, OTTAPALAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, T.P.RAJAGOPAL, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.KUTTIRAMAN, RAJAPRASTHAM, KOONATHARA, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ``` ``` BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V.MENON ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (TAXES), TAXES DEPARTMENT, ABOVE OLD ASSEMBLY HALL, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. ``` ``` 2THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, 9TH FLOOR, TAX TOWERS, KILLIPPALAM, KARAMANA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 002. ``` ``` 3THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OTTAPALAM - 679 101. ``` ``` BY ADVS. ARUN AJAY SANKAR (GOVERNMENT PLEADER) ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.08.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).37366/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **4** ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TUESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 40481 OF 2016`** ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` M/S. PONNANI GOLD PVT. LTD KUTTIKKAD, CHANDAPPADI, PONNANI REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR IBRAHIMKUTTY, S/O HYDROSE MUSLIYAR, AGED 33 YEARS, PALASSERY HOUSE, VALIYORA P.O. VIA VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 676 304. ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHAJ SMT.ANJU MOHAN SRI.RENJIT GEORGE ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (TAXES), TAXES DEPARTMENT, ABOVE OLD ASSEMBLY HALL, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. ``` ``` 2THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, 9TH FLOOR, TAX TOWERS, KILLIPPALAM, KARAMANA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 002. ``` - `3 THE COMMERCIAL TAXE OFFICER-1, OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PONNANI- 679 583.` ``` BY ADV. ARUN AJAY SANKAR (GOVERNMENT PLEADER) ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.08.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).37366/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **5** ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TUESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1945 ``` ## **`WP(C) NO. 40690 OF 2016`** ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` M/S.RAJADHANI GOLD, THALIPARAMBA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.C. MOIDEEN, S/O.AHAMMED KUTTY, AGED 62 YEARS, KARATTUCHALIL HOUSE, KAMBLAKKAD P.O, WAYANAD. ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.RENJIT GEORGE ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY(TAXES), TAXES DEPARTMENT, ABOVE OLD ASSEMBLY HALL, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. ``` ``` 2THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, 9TH FLOOR, TAX TOWERS, KILLIPPALAM, KARAMANA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695002. ``` ``` 3THE COMMRCIAL TAX OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAX, THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT -670141. ``` ``` BY ADV ARUN AJAY SANKAR (GOVERNMENT PLEADER) ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.08.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).37366/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **6** ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TUESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 41008 OF 2016 ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` M/S. MINAR GOLD PVT. LTD., KANHANGAD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JAMEESHMASAD A.K., AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.ASSANKOYA C.P., MARINA HOUSE, CHERIYALINGALPARAMBA, M.M.ALI ROAD, KOZHIKODE - 673 002. BY ADV. K.SHAJ ADV. RENJIT GEORGE ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (TAXES), TAXES DEPARTMENT, ABOVE OLD ASSEMBLY HALL, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, 9TH FLOOR, TAX TOWERS, KILLIPPALAM, KARAMANA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 002. 3THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, HOSDURG - 671 312. BY ADV. ARUN AJAY SHANKAR (GOVERNMENT PLEADER) ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.08.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).37366/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **7** ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TUESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 41025 OF 2016 ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` M/S.EDAKKARA GOLD PRIVATE LIMITED, EDAKKARA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, IBRAHIMKUTTY PALASSERI, S/O HYDROSE MUSLIYAR, AGED 33 YEARS, PALASSERI HOUSE,VALIYORA PO, VIA VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 676304. ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.RENJIT GEORGE ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** - `1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY(TAXES), TAXES DEPARTMENT, ABOVE OLD ASSEMBLY HALL, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695001.` ``` 2THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, 9TH FLOOR, TAX TOWERS, KILLIPPALAM,KARAMANA PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695002. ``` - `3 THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, EDAKKARA – 679101.` ``` BY ADV. ARUN AJAY SANKAR (GOVERNMENT PLEADER) ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.08.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).37366/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **8** # **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TUESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 41510 OF 2016 ``` ## **`PETITIONER/S:`** ``` M/S.PEARL JEWELLERS, THRISSUR – 680 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, RAJAN P.B, AGED 64 YEARS,S/O.BALAN, PERUMBILLESSERIL HOUSE, PALAKKAL, PALISSERY POST, THRISSUR-680 027. ``` ``` BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.RENJIT GEORGE ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` 1STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY(TAXES), TAXES DEPARTMENT, ABOVE OLD ASSEMBLY HALL, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001. ``` ``` 2THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, 9TH FLOOR, TAX TOWERS, KILLIPPALAM,KARAMANA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 002. ``` ``` 3THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER-I (1ST CIRCLE), OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, 1ST CIRCLE, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 004. ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.08.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).37366/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **9** ## **JUDGMENT** 1. The present bunch of writ petitions has been �led against the assessment orders passed for the assessment year 2013-2014 onwards under the Kerala Value Added Taxes Act, 2003. In W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 there is an extra prayer i.e., prayer ‘F’, which is as follows; “ **F** . to declare that the third petitioner's partnership concern has not made a short remittance of Rs.96,410/- for the year 2013-2014 and that the compounded tax payable by the third petitioner’s partnership concern was 115% for the respectively �nancial years and not 125% as stated in Exhibit P-5 notice and that the demand for short remittance amounts as stated in Exhibit P-5 notice are bad in law and to quash the same on this ground too.” 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing for prayer ‘F’ and as well as in respect of other prayers there is no dispute that the issue involved in the writ petitions is covered by the judgment of the coordinate bench of this Court in _**W.P.(C) No.32456 of 2016 (F) M/s. Josco Fashion Jewelers v. State of Kerala and others and connected cases dated 10.07.2017**_ . The operative portion of the judgment reads as under; “ **2.** During the pendency of these writ petitions, the Kerala Finance Act, 2017, was enacted with e?ect from 1.4.2017. Through the said Act, Section 6(2) of the KVAT Act was amended by inserting the following proviso to Section 6(2)(a), namely, **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **10** _“provided that notwithstanding anything contained in clause (f) of Section 8, a dealer paying compounded tax for the goods mentioned in that clause, shall not be liable to pay tax under this sub section on such goods with e�ect from 1 st April, 2013”._ The amendment aforementioned has the e?ect of clarifying that, dealers paying tax on compounded basis under Section 8(f), need not pay tax under Section 6(2) of the KVAT Act, on the goods in question, with e?ect from 1.4.2013. In view of the amendment with e?ect from 1.4.2013, these writ petitions are allowed, by quashing the impugned notices that propose an assessment to purchase tax, the impugned orders, to the extent, they con�rm a demand of purchase tax and the impugned penalty orders, to the extent, they are based on the aforementioned assessment orders. The respondent shall do the needful in �nalising the assessments and penalty proposals in relation to the petitioners on the basis of the observations in this judgment.” 3. In view of the aforesaid judgment of the Coordinate Bench of this Court, these writ petitions are allowed and the impugned notices that proposed an assessment to purchase tax, the impugned orders to the extent they con�rm a demand of purchase tax and the impugned penalty orders to the extent they are based on the aforementioned assessment orders are hereby quashed. The **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **11** assessment orders need to be passed keeping in mind the directions issued by this Court in the judgment in _**W.P.(C) No.32456 of 2016 (F) dated 10.07.2017 and connected cases (supra).**_ **Sd/DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE** Svn **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **12** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37366/2016`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 6.9.2016 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE FIRST PETITIONER'S PARTNERSHIP CONCERN COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 ``` - `EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 20.9.2016 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE SECOND PETITIONER'S PARTNERSHIP CONCERN COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014` ``` EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 20.9.2016 ISSUED BY THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE THIRD PETITIONER'S PARTNERSHIP CONCERN COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 ``` - `EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 20.9.2016 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE THIRD PETITIONER'S PARTNERSHIP CONCERN COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015` ``` EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 20.9.2016 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE THIRD PETITIONER'S PARTNERSHIP CONCERN DEMANDING ALLEGED EVADED TAX FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **13** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40481/2016`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 01-09-2016 UNDER SECTION 25(1) COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER COMPANY ``` ``` EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 01-09-2016 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER COMPANY ``` ``` EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 15-11-2016 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER COMPANY ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **14** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40690/2016`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COY OF NOTICE COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER ``` ``` EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY NOTICE COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **15** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41008/2016`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 17/11/2016 AND DEMAND NOTICE COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER COMPANY ``` ``` EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 17/11/2016 AND DEMAND NOTICE COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER COMPANY ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **16** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41025/2016`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.11.2016 AND DEMAND NOTICE COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER COMPANY ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **17** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41510/2016`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 31.08.2016 UNDER FORM 1B OF THE KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX RULES, 2005 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FIRM BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT. ``` ``` EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE COMPOUNDING ORDER DATED 28.09.2016 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. ``` **W.P.(C) No.37366 of 2016 and connected cases** **18** ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40242/2016`** ## **`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`** ``` EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 19-11-2016 AND DEMAND NOTICE COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FIRM ``` ``` EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 19-11-2016 AND DEMAND NOTICE COVERING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FIRM ```