High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions for e...

WP(C) No.13768 of 2024

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) No.13768 of 2024

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • N.NAGARESH
Judgment Date
2024-04-04
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioners to approach the Screening Committee seeking exemption from surrendering arms. If the petitioners file an exemption application within two days from receipt of the judgment, the Screening Committee shall pass appropriate orders within seven days. Respondents 7 and 8 shall release the firearms depending on the Screening Committee’s decision.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions for exemption applications to be considered by the Screening Committee within specified timeframes; arms to be released subject to Committee’s decision.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Varghese Chacko
  • V.D. Thomas
  • V.C. Josekutty
  • K. Thankappan
  • P.K. Philip
  • Saji O.M.

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • The Election Commission of India
  • The Chief Electoral Officer, Vikasa Bhavan, Thiruvananthapuram
  • The District Collector, Kannur
  • The Additional District Magistrate Collectorate, Kannur
  • The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Kannur
  • The Station House Officer, Kudiyaanmala Police Station
  • The Station House Officer, Cherupuzha Police Station

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv Thomhstine K. Augustine

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Adv Deepu Lal Mohan, Standing Counsel
  • • Sri. Sreejith V.S., Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition, filed in the Kerala High Court, challenges a directive requiring the petitioners to deposit their licensed firearms during the impending Lok Sabha Elections, 2024. The six petitioners allege their licenses were issued for life and crop protection against wild animals, and surrender would nullify the protective purpose, with eligible retrieval only after election results, typically two months later. They contend that no procedure mandated by Ext.P14 Circular was followed before directing surrender, rendering the order unlawfully imposed. The court recalls the principle from Joseph K. A. v. District Collector, Kottayam and others (2019) that, in the election-period context, weapons deposits must comply with Ext.P14 Circular. The respondents present that a Screening Committee has been constituted to review exemptions, and that licensees may seek exemption if retention is essential. Given time constraints and to avoid infructuous proceedings, the judge decides not to prolong pleadings, and directs that petitioners may apply for exemption to the Screening Committee. If an application is filed within two days, the Committee must pass orders within seven days, after which respondents 7 and 8 are to release the arms depending on the Committee’s decision. The petition is disposed of with these interim directions, preserving the petitioners’ rights while ensuring election-compliance scrutiny.

Provisions of Law Cited

Ext.P14 Circular (Election Commission guidelines for surrender of arms during elections)Circular dated 1.9.2009 issued by the Election CommissionJoseph K. A. v. District Collector, Kottayam and others, 2019 (1) KLT 1034Judgment dated 29/3/2021 in WP(C) No.8228/2021

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that their arms licenses were issued for life and for protection against threats to life and crops from wild animals. Requiring surrender during elections would deprive them of essential protection, with retrieval only after election results, causing irreparable harm and defeating the license’s purpose. They allege non-compliance with Ext.P14 Circular and rely on the Joseph K. A. decision to assert that any order to deposit must follow the Circular’s procedures. They seek exemption from surrender through the Screening Committee.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that a Screening Committee has been constituted to examine exemption requests. They argue that the directive is a legitimate administrative measure during elections and that the possibility of exemption exists for licensees; if so, the committee will decide. They maintain that compliance with guidelines is essential and that the process should prevent security gaps during elections. They submit that the petition was premature for full adjudication and that a phased approach via exemption requests is appropriate.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Joseph K. A. v. District Collector, Kottayam and others2019 (1) KLT 1034PositiveCited to endorse that orders to deposit weapons during elections must comply with Ext.P14 Circular.
WP(C) No.8228/2021 (Judgment dated 29/3/2021)WP(C) No.8228/2021Mentioned OnlyExhibit-P14 references this judgment; the current text cites it as background, but does not rely on its specific holding.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against WP(C) No.13768 of 2024 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH`** ``` THURSDAY, THE 4[TH] DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 13768 OF 2024 ``` ## **`PETITIONERS:`** - **`1 VARGHESE CHACKO AGED 69 YEARS S/O. CHACKO, VETTATHUKUNNEL HOUSE, AREEKAMALA P.O., NADUVIL VIA, KANNUR DISTRICT -., PIN - 670582`** - **`2 V.D. THOMAS AGED 69 YEARS S/O. DEVASSYA, VADAKKEPARAMBIL HOUSE, PULIKURUMBA P.O, NEW NADUVIL, KANNUR, PIN - 670582`** - **`3 V.C. JOSEKUTTY AGED 66 YEARS S/O. CHACKO, VALANATH HOUSE, VEMBUVA, PAYYAVOOR P.O., KANNUR, PIN - 670633`** - **`4 K. THANKAPPAN AGED 69 YEARS S/O. KUNHAN, KOLLIKKUNNEL HOUSE, POTTENPLAVU, PONADUVIL VIA, KANNUR, PIN - 670582`** - **`5 P.K. PHILIP AGED 68 YEARS S/O. JOSEPH, PUTHENKANDATHIL HOUSE, PULIKURUMBA P.O, NEW NADUVIL, KANNUR, PIN - 670582`** - **`6 SAJI O.M. AGED 56 YEARS S/O. MATHEW O.V., OLIKKAL HOUSE, OOMALA, EDAVARAMBA POST, CHERUPUZHA VIA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN – 670511`** ## **`BY ADV THOMSTINE K.AUGUSTINE`** ``` WP(C) No.13768 of 2024 ``` ``` 2 ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001`** - **`2 THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER.`** - **`3 THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER VIKAS BHAVAN, LEGISLATIVE COMPLEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001`** - **`4 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KANNUR, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670001`** - **`5 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE, KANNUR, PIN - 670002`** - **`6 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL) OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TALAP, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670002`** - **`7 THE SATION HOUSE OFFICER KUDIYANMALA POLICE STATION, KUDIYANMALA P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670582`** - **`8 THE SATION HOUSE OFFICER CHERUPUZHA POLICE STATION, CHERUPUZHA P.O., KANNUR, PIN – 670511`** ``` BY ADV DEEPU LAL MOHAN, STANDING COUNSEL SRI.SREEJITH V.S., GOVERNMENT PLEADER ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C) No.13768 of 2024 ``` ``` 3 ``` ## JUDGMENT Dated this the 4[th] day of April, 2024 The writ petition is filed by the petitioners aggrieved by the direction issued to deposit the licensed arms held by the petitioners prior to the impending Lok Sabha Elections, 2024 without any specific reasons. 2. The petitioners submit that the licences are issued for the purpose of their protection of life and crops from wild animals. Once deposited, the same could be reclaimed only after the declaration of the election results which would come only after a span of at least two months. Such deposit would destroy the very purpose of issuance of the valid arms licence. The petitioners submit that the petitioners were forced to surrender their guns on 26.03.2024. 3. As per Ext.P14 Circular, the Election Commission of India has issued guidelines to be complied with, prior to directing a valid arms licence holder to deposit their arms ``` WP(C) No.13768 of 2024 ``` ``` 4 ``` during the period of elections. However, in the case of the petitioners, no procedures laid down thereunder have been followed while directing them to surrender their arms. 4. This Court has categorically held in Joseph K. A. v. District Collector, Kottayam and others [2019 (1) KLT 1034] that in the context of depositing of weapons during the period of election, orders can be passed for such depositing only after complying with the clauses in Ext.P14 Circular. 5. The petitioners apprehend that depositing their validly held arms during such a long period will prevent them from protecting their life in the event they encounters any mishaps. The direction of the respondents to the petitioners to deposit their arms during the period of election dehors any legally tenable reason and dehors any finding to that effect by the Screening Committee, is untenable and is liable to be interfered with by this Court, contended the petitioners. 6. Standing Counsel representing the Election Commission filed a statement and submitted that a Screening ``` WP(C) No.13768 of 2024 ``` ``` 5 ``` Committee has been constituted and the Screening Committee will be considering the issues in detail. However, if any licensee wants the arms to be retained during the election period, such licensees are entitled to seek exemption from the orders of the Government and Election Commission. 7. Taking into consideration the facts of the case, I am of the view that detailed consideration of the legal issues projected by the counsel for the petitioners would require completion of pleadings by the parties, which may render the writ petition infructuous due to time constraints. For the time being, it will be sufficient that the petitioners submit an application for exemption before the Screening Committee. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of permitting the petitioners to approach the Screening Committee seeking exemption from surrendering of arms. If the petitioners submit an application within two days from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment, the Screening Committee shall pass appropriate orders. If the petitioners file application for ``` WP(C) No.13768 of 2024 ``` ``` 6 ``` exemption within two days, the Screening Committee shall pass orders thereon within a further period of seven days. Respondents 7 and 8 shall release the fire arm depending upon the decision of the Screening Committee. Sd/- N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk ``` WP(C) No.13768 of 2024 ``` ``` 7 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13768/2024`** ## **`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`** ``` Exhibit-P1TRUE COPY OF THE ARMS LICENSE NO. 1173/TPBA ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KANNUR TO THE 1ST PETITIONER ``` ``` Exhibit-P2TRUE COPY OF THE ARMS LICENSE NO. 1145/TPBA ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KANNUR TO THE 2ND PETITIONER ``` - **`Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ARMS LICENSE NO. 1369/TPBA ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KANNUR TO THE 3RD PETITIONER`** - **`Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ARMS LICENSE NO. 1161/TPBA ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KANNUR TO THE 4TH PETITIONER`** - **`Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ARMS LICENSE NO. 1512/TPBA ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KANNUR TO THE 5TH PETITIONER`** - **`Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ARMS LICENSE NO. 1621/TPBA ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KANNUR TO THE 5TH PETITIONER`** - **`Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY RECEIPT DATED 26.3.2024 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER`** - **`Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY RECEIPT DATED 21.3.2024 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER`** - **`Exhibit-P9 TRUE COPY RECEIPT DATED 19.3.2024 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER`** - **`Exhibit-P10 TRUE COPY RECEIPT DATED 27.3.2024 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH PETITIONER`** - **`Exhibit-P11 TRUE COPY RECEIPT DATED 27.3.2024 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE 5TH PETITIONER`** ``` WP(C) No.13768 of 2024 ``` ``` 8 ``` ``` Exhibit-P12 ``` ``` TRUE COPY RECEIPT DATED 26.3.2024 ISSUED BY THE 8TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER ``` ``` Exhibit-P13TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05/3/2024 ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE NADUVIL GRAMA PANCHAYATH ``` ``` Exhibit-P14 ``` ``` Exhibit-P15 ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 1.9.2009 ISSUED BY THE ELECTION COMMISSION ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29/3/2021 IN WP(C ) NO.; 8228/2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT ``` ## **`RESPONDENT ANNEXURES`** ``` ANNEXURE R2(A) ``` ``` ANNEXURE R2(B) ``` ``` ANNEXURE R2(C) ``` - **`THE PHOTOCOPY OF LETTER NO.464/INST/2022/EPS DATED 26-04-2022 ISSUED BY THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA TO THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICERS OF STATES AND UNION TERRITORIES`** - **`THE PHOTOCOPY OF PROCEEDING NO. DCKNR/4406/2024-D1 DATED 18-03-2024 OF THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR`** ``` THE PHOTOCOPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 20-03- 2024 IN WP(C)NO.11254/2024 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT ```