High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions (Writ petition disp...

W.P.(C) No. 26706 of 2017 (K) - UMMERU and RAMLA v. STATE OF KERALA and CHERPULLASSERY MUNICIPALITY and OTHERS

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No. 26706 of 2017 (K)
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • K. Vinod Chandran
Judgment Date
2017-08-30
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of with directions: LLMC to conduct site inspection; KSREC to report; Agricultural Officer to obtain KSREC report and map; LLMC to decide Ext. P11; if permissible, 6th respondent to consider Ext. P9 for conversion; parties to pursue change of land categorisation as per law; no costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions (Writ petition disposed with no costs)

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • UMMERU
  • RAMLA

Respondents

  • STATE OF KERALA represented by Government Local Self Government, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram-695001
  • CHERPULLASSERY MUNICIPALITY represented by its Secretary, CHERPULLASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD-678001
  • THE SECRETARY, CHERPULLASSERY MUNICIPALITY, CHERUPULLASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD-678001
  • THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHERPULLASSERY VILLAGE, CHERUPULLASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD-678001
  • THE CONVENER, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, CHERUPULLASSERY VILLAGE, CHERUPULLASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD-678001
  • THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPALAM TALUK, OTTAPALAM P.O., PALAKKAD-678001

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. Praisheel Prakasam

Counsels for Respondents

  • • GOVT. PLEADER SMT.VINEETHA HARIRAJ

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioners, UMMERU and RAMLA, landowners in Cherpullassery Village, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District, challenge the erroneous classification of their land (about 9 ares 70 sq m) as ‘paddy land’ in the data bank prepared under the Paddy Land Act, 2008. Village records show the land as nilam, but the data bank entry marks it as paddy land under Section 5(4)(1) of the Act. The petition seeks deletion from the data bank (Ext. P11) and conversion of land use under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 (Ext. P9). The petition argues that the amendment through G.O.(P) No.34/2017/Revenue dated 30.05.2017 directs the LLMC to inspect the land and determine its status as on the date of enforcement, with KSREC reporting. The court directs the 5th respondent LLMC to conduct site inspection, obtain KSREC reports, and decide Ext. P11; if warranted, the 6th respondent is to consider Ext. P9 after KSREC/LLMC reports. The Agricultural Officer is to secure KSREC maps/reports and coordinate with LLMC. The judgment also cites M.K. Shivadasan v. RDO and Kizhakkambalam v. Mariumma as guiding authorities before disposing of the petition with no costs, effectively directing a follow-up process in accordance with law.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 5(4)(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008Kerala Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (Rule 4(6))Kerala Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967G.O.(P) No.34/2017/Revenue dated 30.05.2017

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners contend that their land is nilam and not paddy land, yet it is shown as paddy land in the data bank under the Paddy Land Act. They seek removal from the data bank (Ext. P11) and conversion of use (Ext. P9) under the Kerala Land Utilization Order. They rely on the amended rules and GO 34/2017 to require site inspection and KSREC reporting, and request timely consideration of Exts. P11 and P9, with possible fresh classification before land tax authorities.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents submit that the amendment GO 34/2017 empowers LLMC to conduct inspections and obtain KSREC reports. They argue that Exts. P9 and P11 must be examined in accordance with law after proper site inspection and reports, and that the matter requires due process and following the KLU Order 1967 provisions.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
M.K. Shivadasan v. Revenue Divisional Officer2017 (3) KLT 822PositiveCited by the court to guide the process for conversion of land use under the Kerala Land Utilization Order and related procedures.
Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayath v. Mariumma2015(2) KLT 516Mentioned OnlyCited as a precedent for change of land categorisation but not a controlling ruling in this case.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W.P.(C) No. 26706 of 2017 (K) - UMMERU and RAMLA v. STATE OF KERALA and CHERPULLASSERY MUNICIPALITY and OTHERS and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT:** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/8TH BHADRA, 1939** ||**WP(C).No. 26706 of 2017 (K)**| |---|---| ||**---------------------------**| |**PETITIONERS:**|| |**-----------**|| |**1.**|**UMMERU,**| ||**AGED 47 YEARS, W/O.IBRAHIM,**| ||**ANQEKKARA HOUSE, MARAYAMANAGALAM POST,**| ||**NELLEYA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.**| |**2.**|**RAMLA,**| ||**AGED 42 YEARS, W/O.MUTHAFA,**| ||**PARAKKAL HOUSE, MARAYAMANGALAM POST,**| ||**NELLAYA, OTTAPALAM TALUK,**| ||**PALAKKAD DISTRICT.**| ||**BY ADV. SMT.PRAISHEEL PRAKASAM**| |**RESPONDENTS:**|| |**------------**|| |**1.**|**STATE OF KERALA,**| ||**REPRESENTED BY TO THE GOVERNMENT,**| ||**LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT,**| ||**GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,**| ||**THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.**| |**2.**|**THE CHERPULLASSERY MUNICIPALITY,**| ||**REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY**| ||**CHERPULLASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM,**| ||**PALAKKAD - 678 001.**| |**3.**|**THE SECRETARY,**| ||**CHERPULLASSERY MUNICIPALITY,**| ||**CHERUPULLASSERY P.O, OTTAPALAM,**| ||**PALAKKAD-678 001.**| |**4.**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER,**| ||**CHERPULLASSERY VILLAGE,**| ||**CHERUPULLASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM,**| ||**PALAKKAD - 678 001.**| **--2--** **--2--** **WP(C).No. 26706 of 2017 (K) --------------------------** |**5.**|**THE CONVENER,**| |---|---| ||**LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,**| ||**CHERUPULLASSERY VILLAGE,**| ||**CHERPULLASSSERY P.O, OTTAPALAM,**| ||**PALAKKAD - 678 001.**| |**6.**|**THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,**| ||**REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,**| ||**OTTAPALAM TALUK, OTTAPALAM P.O,**| ||**PALAKKAD - 678 001.**| **R1, R4 TO R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.VINEETHA HARIRAJ** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-08-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** **mbr/** ## **WP(C).No. 26706 of 2017 (K) ----------------------------** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1: THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.4659 DATED 24/11/2015. EXHIBIT P1(A): THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LATEST TAX RECEIPT DATED 14/12/2016. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF RATION CARD NO.1948168236. EXHIBIT P2(A): TRUE COPY OF RATION CARD NO.1948181299. EXHIBIT P3: THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 9.3.2017. EXHIBIT P4: THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 9/3/2017 RECEIVED FROM THE RESPONDENT NO.2. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 15/4/2017. EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 15.4.2017. EXHIBIT P7: THE TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS. EXHIBIT P8: THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 29/6/2017. EXHIBIT P8: THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT DATE 29/6/2017. EXHIBIT P10: THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P9. EXHIBIT P11: THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 17.8.2017. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE** **mbr/** ## **K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.** ## **===================== W.P.(C) No.26706 of 2017- K =========================== Dated this the 30[th] day of August, 2017** ## **Judgment** The petitioners are aggrieved with the fact that the land, owned by the petitioners, having an extent of 9 ares and 70 sq.m in R.S No.193/13 (old Sy.No.122/1) of the Cherppullassery Village in Ottapalam Taluk in Palakkad District, is shown as 'nilam' in the village records. The said property of the petitioner is said to be included in the data bank prepared under Section 5(4)(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 (for brevity 'the Paddy Land Act') as 'paddy land'. The petitioner filed Ext.P11 application, before the 5[th] respondent, for removal of entry in respect of their properties from the draft data bank and Ext.P9; an application filed under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967, (for brevity “KLU Order”) before the 6[th] respondent for conversion of use of W.P.(C)No.26706/2017 2 land, which are pending consideration. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the 5[th] and 6[th] respondents herein, to consider and dispose of Exts.P11 and P9 applications respectively, within a reasonable time. 2. In such circumstance, since, the petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition seeks a direction to the 5[th] respondent to delete the property of the petitioner from the data bank and declare that the property of the petitioner is not liable to be included in the data bank. Such a relief can be appropriately sought before the Local Level Monitoring Committee as per the amendment brought to the Paddy Land Act by the amended Rule 4(6) of the Kerala Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. Hence the 5[th] respondent is directed to consider the request under the amendment G.O.(P) No.34/2017/Revenue dated 30.05.2017 for removing the property from the data bank after conducting site inspection and ascertaining the nature of land as on the date of enforcement of the Paddy Land Act and with report received from the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center W.P.(C)No.26706/2017 3 (KSREC), if the application is filed in original and pending before the authority. 3. Since the land is included in the draft data bank and the description is shown as 'nilam' in the village records, it is only proper that a report is received from the Local Level Monitoring Committee (LLMC) and Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC) before consideration of Ext.P9 application by the 6[th] respondent, if the same is filed in original and pending before the authority. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition before the Agricultural Officer, the Convener of the Local Level Monitoring Committee, along with the copy of the Field Measurement Book and Survey and Sub-division numbers with respect to the property obtained from the concerned Village Officer. The Agricultural Officer, shall seek a report of the lie and nature of the property as it remained on the date of coming into force of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, from the Director, Kerala State Remote Sensing and W.P.(C)No.26706/2017 4 Environment Center (KSREC), Vikas Bhavan, C-Block, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 033. On the direction of the Agricultural Officer so to do, the petitioner shall remit the required fees in the name of the petitioners, C/o. the concerned Agricultural Officer (showing the full address) before the KSREC for obtaining such report and produce such receipt before the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer shall then obtain the report and map from the KSREC, who shall issue the same on the strength of the receipt produced by the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer, on receipt of the report, shall require the LLMC to conduct physical inspection of the property and then the LLMC shall consider the application at Ext.P11 in accordance with law. If the LLMC permits it, the 6[th] respondent shall consider Ext.P9 application to obtain conversion of user under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 and also in accordance with **M.K.Shivadasan v. Revenue Divisional Officer [2017 (3) KLT 822].** The petitioner could also seek change of categorisation before the land tax authorities and seek fresh assessment of the W.P.(C)No.26706/2017 5 land as 'garden land', as has been declared in **Kizhakkambalam** . **Grama Panchayath V. Mariumma - 2015(2) KLT 516** The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- **K . VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE** SB/30/08/2017 // true copy // P.A to Judge