W.P.(C) No. 17778 of 2004 (N)
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- KURIAN JOSEPH
- Judgment Date
- 2007-12-07
- Court Decision / Holding
- Writ petition dismissed.
- Final Disposition
- Dismissed by the Court, on the basis of precedential authority.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- PADMAKUMAR
- DASAPPAN
- SALAM
- UNNIKRISHNAN
- PRAVEEN KUMAR K.R.
- HARIPRASAD K.S.
- HARI V.A.
- BABU P.S.
- SHAJU M.A.
- RAJENDRAN
- POLY M.P.
- RAMESH
- ANSAR U.E.
- RAMESAN.P.A.
- SAJEEV N.
- TOMY K.A.
- KURIACHAN
- MANIYAN N.
- PRADEEP
- SUDHI M.K.
- JOHNSON K.Y.
- SATHYAN P.B.
- RAMACHANDRAN.P.
- WILSON V.P.
- SAJI JOHN
- BIJU MATHEW
- ROJI GEORGE
- MADHUSOODHANAN
- ANILKUMAR
- SALIM.P.K.
- KALESHKUMAR
- AUGUSTINE VARGHESE
- MURALI
- JOSHY PAUL
- PRAKASH C.R.
- VIJAYAKUMAR
- AJAYAKUMAR
- ELDO KURIAKOSE
- ASOK K.G
- NAZZAR
- POLACHAN
- SHAJI K.J.
- SUDHEER T.V.
- KAILAS NATH
- SIVAPRASAD S.
- HAMSA C.P.
- BABURAJ P.
- ABDUL JABBAR
- JIBY PAULOSE
- VINAYAKAN P.T.
- SHAJAHAN N.P.
Respondents
- THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM RURAL, ALUVA
- THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, (SPL. CELL), VIGILANCE, S.R.M. ROAD, ERNAKULAM
- THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, COCHIN CITY, ERNAKULAM
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • SRI. C.A. CHACKO
- • SMT. C.M. CHARISMA
- • SMT. SONIYA M.
Counsels for Respondents
- • SMT. K.R. DEEPA
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ petition (WP(C) 17778/2004-N) was filed by a large group of police personnel challenging actions affecting their service status, salary, or postings. The petitioners, listed with their police station affiliations, appear to challenge a governmental order or policy impacting their service conditions, as evidenced by the inclusion of pay slips (EXT.P.1–P.2), representations (EXT.P.3), and orders (EXT.P.4–EXT.P.5) in the petition. The respondents are the State of Kerala, the Superintendent of Police (Ernakulam Rural), the Special Cell Vigilance unit, and the Commissioner of Police (Cochin City). The judgment, authored by Justice Kurian Joseph and delivered on 7 December 2007, records that the issue is covered against the petitioners by a prior decision of the High Court in State of Kerala and others v. Thirumeni M.S. and others (2007(4) ILR Kerala 374). Consequently, the court dismisses the writ petition. The respondents’ counsel appeared for the government, while the petitioners’ side is represented by C.A. Chacko, C.M. Charisma, and Soniya M., as cited in the proceedings. The exhibit list suggests reliance on prior orders rather than new factual adjudication. The decision reflects a adherence to precedent rather than grant of relief on the merits, leading to dismissal of the petition.
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
Not stated in the document. The judgment records only a brief note that the issue was resolved by citing a prior decision, with no detailed argument from the petitioners’ side in the text.
Contentions of Respondents
Not stated in the document. The judgment indicates that the respondents relied on State of Kerala v. Thirumeni M.S. and others (2007(4) ILR Kerala 374) to contend that the petition should be dismissed.
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| State of Kerala and others vs. Thirumeni M.S. and others | 2007(4) ILR Kerala 374 | Positive | The judgment expressly relies on this decision to hold that the issue is covered against the petitioners, thereby supporting dismissal. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W.P.(C) No. 17778 of 2004 (N) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.