W.P.(C). No. 15287 of 2021: Dr. Syed Faizel C. v. State of Kerala & Others
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- P. V. Kunhikrishnan
- Judgment Date
- 2021-11-03
- Court Decision / Holding
- The court disposed the writ petition noting the absence of a settled position to issue concrete orders. It directed the petitioner to pursue settlement with the contesting respondents; if a settlement is reported to the authorities, the agency will act in accordance with law. No substantive order on merits was issued.
- Final Disposition
- Petition disposed; no order on merits; matter to be settled between parties; authority to act upon settlement if reported to the court/authorities.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Dr. Syed Faizel C., aged 41 years S/O. Chemban Assan Mohammed, Kizhakke Thottiyil, Parambilpeedika, Malappuram-676 317
Respondents
- State of Kerala represented by the Principal Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Thiruvananthapuram
- State Health Agency Kerala (SHA) represented by its Director
- District Medical Officer (Health), Malappuram
- Station House Officer, Nilambur Police, Malappuram District
- Dr. Nader Shah Abdulrahiman
- Rafeeq M.K.
- The Manager, South Indian Bank, Nilambur Branch
- The Manager, Catholic Syrian Bank, Nilambur
- Anil Kumar
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • V. John Mani
- • S. Jayant
- • Jackson Johny Varghese
- • Sabu
- • Sethulakshmi K.K.
- • Gayathri Menon
Counsels for Respondents
- • Shri. M. Ajay, SC
- • Abraham P. Meachinkara
- • Sunil Shanker Joy
- • Joyce Paul
- • Margaret Maureen Drose
- • P.R. Jayakrishnan
- • Vidya Gangadharan
- • C.A. Joy
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ petition, filed in the Kerala High Court, concerns disbursement of funds relating to BM Hospital, Nilambur, purportedly for free treatment of COVID-19 patients. The petitioner seeks mandamus to release the withheld amount into the official BM Hospital account in South Indian Bank (Nilambur), and to bar transfers to other accounts (e.g., Catholic Syrian Bank). He also seeks access to the hospital portal and timely consideration of his Exhibit P17 request, along with quashing Exhibit P20 and related permissions for operating the hospital’s official account. The petitioner relies on a purported settlement evidenced by Ext.R5(a) and contends that funds should be disbursed to the account identified by the parties. Respondents 5 and 6 contend ongoing disputes about disbursement to the requested account. The learned Judge notes a lack of a conclusive order and states that the court cannot pass orders in the given circumstances; the petitioner should settle with the contesting respondents and approach the authority. If such settlement is reported before the authority, it will act in accordance with law.
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioner’s counsel contended that the entire dispute with other contesting respondents is settled as per Ext.R5(a), and the amount should be disbursed to the account designated by the parties (official BM Hospital account in South Indian Bank). He urged for release of funds to the official account, access to the hospital portal, and timely consideration of requests (Exhibit P17). He also sought quashing of Exhibit P20 and asked the authority to permit operation of the official account.
Contentions of Respondents
Counsel for respondents 5 and 6 argued that disputes persist regarding disbursement to the account mentioned by the petitioner, and that the court should not pass orders in this unsettled matter. They urged the court to allow the parties to settle and approach the authority for appropriate action once settlement is reported."
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W.P.(C). No. 15287 of 2021: Dr. Syed Faizel C. v. State of Kerala & Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.