W.P.(C) 33692/2022: The Managing Director, NCS Autocars Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala, Drug Disposal Committee, Vallikunnam Police Station and Others

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN** **FRIDAY, THE 18[TH] DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1944** **WP(C) NO. 33692 OF 2022** ## **PETITIONER:** THE MANAGING DIRECTOR NCS AUTOCARS PVT. LTD., VENPALAVATTOM, ANAYARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REPRESENTED BY POWER -OF -ATTORNEY BIJU K.R., PIN - 695029 BY ADVS. V.KRISHNA MENON P.VIJAYAMMA J.SURYA ## **RESPONDENTS:** 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 THE DRUG DISPOSAL COMMITTEE DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, CCSB ROAD, NEAR ALAPPUZHA LIGHT HOUSE, CIVIL STATION WARD, ALAPPUZHA., PIN - 688012 3 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ELIPPAKULAM P.O., PIN - 690503 ## **OTHER PRESENT:** GP. Sri P S Appu THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10.11.2022, THE COURT ON 18.11.2022 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(c). 33692/2022 2 ## **JUDGMENT** Dated this the 18[th] day of November, 2022 The petitioner is the Managing Director of M/s.NCS Autocars Pvt. Ltd, the authorized dealer for KIA Motors India Limited for Pathanamthitta, Kollam and Thiruvananthapuram Districts. On 29.03.2022, a customer named Jisha Manoj booked a Kia Sonnet G 1.25 MT HTE car from the NCS, KIA Showroom, Kollam. On 21.06.2022 the customer paid an amount of Rs.8,45,000/- and demanded for a loaner car. Acceding to her request, a test drive vehicle, registered in the petitioner's name and bearing Reg. No. KL 01 CQ 3215, was handed over to Jisha Manoj by the Deputy General Manager, NCS Autocars Pvt. Ltd under proper acknowledgement. On 22.08.2022 the car was seized by Vallikunnam Police in connection with Crime No. 441 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20b(ii)B and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('NDPS W.P.(c). 33692/2022 3 Act' for short). The vehicle was seized and crime registered on the following allegation; On 22.08.2022 at about 4.30 p.m. the police received information about a motor cycle accident and the rider of that vehicle being in possession of ganja. Immediately, police proceeded to the scene and seized the ganja from Atul, the 1[st] accused. Subsequently it was revealed that the 1[st] accused had purchased the ganja from accused Nos. 3 and 4, named Unni and Muneer. The 2[nd] accused, Bipin, who had accompanied the 1[st] accused for purchasing the ganja, had left in another motor cycle. The ganja weighing 2.080 kg., the motor cycle bearing Reg. No. KL 62 B 6897, and a mobile phone were seized under seizure mahazars. On 23.08.2022, the police filed a report before the jurisdictional court about seizure of the petitioner's vehicle in connection with the crime. Thereupon, the court directed to keep the petitioners Kia Sonnet car in the safe custody of the investigating officer. 2. According to the petitioner, neither the customer named Jisha Manoj nor the petitioner's car are involved in the alleged crime. There is nothing on record to show that the car W.P.(c). 33692/2022 4 was used as a conveyance vehicle. The contraband was seized from the 1[st] accused's possession while he was travelling in a motor cycle. As such, the petitioner's car is liable to be released to his custody. Even though petitioner submitted an application before the Drugs Disposal Committee, Alappuzha as provided under Section 60(3) of the NDPS Act, the Committee is not passing orders on the application. Hence this writ petition. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner having filed an application, the Drugs Disposal Committee is bound to pass orders. It is contended that the very purpose of constituting the Drugs Disposal Committee is to ensure timely release of vehicles and conveyances seized in connection with NDPS crimes. The petitioner cannot approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Sec. 451 Cr.P.C. in the light of the dictum laid down in **Shajahan v. Inspector of Excise** [2019 (4) KLT 507]. Reference is made to the observations of the Division Bench in W.A. No. 1304 of 2022, wherein, after taking note of the absence of provision for granting interim custody by the Drugs Disposal Committee, the W.P.(c). 33692/2022 5 Division Bench observed that the only remedy available to the owner or the person in possession is to move an application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. 4. Learned Government Pleader submitted that seizure of the petitioner's vehicle is not reported to the Drugs Disposal Committee and therefore, the Committee is presently not in a position to order release of the vehicle. Even otherwise, the Committee can order release only in the manner prescribed under Section 60(3) of the NDPS Act. It is submitted that the petitioner cannot also file an application before the jurisdictional court under Section 451 Cr.P.C. in the light of _**Shajahan**_ [2019 (4) KLT 507]. Being so, the petitioner will have to wait till the trial is completed. 5. As per the instructions received by the learned Government Pleader, the petitioner's vehicle was seized for the reason that the 3[rd] accused had taken accused Nos. 1 and 2 in the petitioner's car for meeting the 4[th] accused, from whom they purchased the ganja. There is no allegation that the car was used by any of the accused for carrying the contraband. The question therefore arises as to whether the petitioner's car W.P.(c). 33692/2022 6 can be considered as a conveyance used for committing the offence. The instructions also reveals that as no recovery was effected from the petitioner's car and the vehicle is not produced before the Drugs Disposal Committee, but was produced before the District and Sessions Court, Alappuzha under Form 151 (A). The Sessions Court accepted the same and returned the vehicle to the investigating officer for safe custody. 6. In the above circumstances, there is substantial merit in the contention that the application for release cannot be entertained by the Drugs Disposal Committee. Further, no application for interim release under Section 451 can also be filed in view of the decision in _**Shajahan** [2019 (4) KLT 507]_ . Being so, Section 451 Cr.P.C. will definitely come to the petitioner's aid. More so, since the investigating officer himself has stated that no recovery is effected from the petitioner's vehicle. It is pertinent to note that, almost similar view is expressed by the Division Bench in its order in W.A. No. 1304 of 2022. W.P.(c). 33692/2022 7 In the result, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit a petition under Sec. 457 Cr.PC, seeking release of the vehicle bearing Reg.No. KL 01 CQ 3215 before the jurisdictional court. On such petition being filed, the same shall be considered and appropriate orders passed expeditiously. ## **Sd/-** **V.G.ARUN JUDGE** sb 8 ## W.P.(c). 33692/2022 ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 33692/2022** PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A COPY OF THE ORDER BOOKING FORM SUBMITTED BY THE CUSTOMER ONLINE TOWARDS BOOKING OF THE KIA SONET G 1.2 5 MTHTE. Exhibit P2 A COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT GIVEN BY THE CUSTOMER ON 21.6.2022 ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A LOANER CAR. Exhibit P3 A COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE CAR BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL-01-CQ-3215 REGISTERED IN THE PETITIONER'S NAME. Exhibit P4 A COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 0441/2022. Exhibit P5 A COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 22.9,2022.