High Court of KeralaDivision BenchWrit appeals dismissed; RBI’s intra-court appea...

WA Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 v. State of Kerala & others

Case / Petition Number:WA Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
  • The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice C.S. Sudha
Judgment Date
2024-02-29
Court Decision / Holding
The appeals are dismissed. The High Court upheld the constitutionality of Sections 14A and 74H(1)(a) as amended, and the Registrar’s order amalgamating Malappuram District Co-operative Bank with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank. RBI’s intra-court appeal was rejected; all writ appeals challenging the amendments were dismissed. The court affirmed the balance of powers between Union/State legislatures and concluded that banking regulation can operate alongside cooperative regulation under a harmonious construction, without nullifying the de-layering policy or the RBI’s oversight where applicable.
Final Disposition
Writ appeals dismissed; RBI’s intra-court appeal dismissed; overall upholding of the common judgment and the amendments' constitutional validity.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • M. Saidalavi Master; Zubair P; A.P. Abdul Azeez; A.P. Ummar; M. Sidhique Master; Abdul Hameed A.K; E.K. Muhammed Kutty; Abdul Kareem; P.V. Moideen; Kutty Kammu; V.A. Basheer; Basheer V.P; K.M. Rasheed; K.P. Ali; Sakkeer Hussain T; Salmanul Faris C; A.K. Ali; C. MammiKutty; P.K. Mohammed Kutty; Abdurahiman; Abbas; Anee z. T; Yusuf Mechheri; M.K. Ummer; Mohamed Rashid; Fathima Fasni; Mohamed Ali M; Mahaboob Edakkot; K.K. Kalid; P. Muhammed; Mohammed Sathar M.P; C. Shoukathali; K. Mohammed; Kannian Muhammed Ali; M. Ahammedali; Ali Kalathil; Abdul Mahaboob Kurikkal; K.P. Muhammed; Moosakkutty M.; C. Abdul Kareem; Nasrudheen E; Basheer T; E.K. Ummer; Abdul Majeed; MoideenKutty M; V. Hamza; Makbool P; Subair E.M; Abida Ayyol i; Nalakath Hamza; M.P. Abdu Rahiman; Sihabudheen P.K; Raveendran; K. Kabeer; Mohammed Navas V; Alavi M; Adv. N.C Faizal; M.K Noushad; P.T Ajay Mohan; Pathil Ashraf; Kareem C; Unneedu Haji; P. Abdu; Abdul Razak; C.K Jaidev; P.P Koya Moideen; Mohammed Noushad; M. Abdulla Haji; C. Abdul Nasar; P.K Abduussalam; K.M Chekkutty; R. Mohammed Master; Sreedharan; V.P.O Mohammed Azgar; A.K Ahamed Kutty; Adv. A.P Nizar; Aryadan Shoukathali; V.P Abdul Kareem; A.U Sebastian; Prakas an C.R; Adv. Babu Mohana Kurup; Benny K.M; K.C Job Master; Vinod Kumar T; M.A Azeez; M.C Mohammed Ali; Mohammed Ashraf P; U Kunhi Mohammed; Basheerudheen M; Sidheek PantHAVOOR; Ibrahim M; C. Nazir Ahamed; Radhakrishnan; (additional appellants listed in annexure)

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary to Government, Department of Cooperation, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • Registrar of Co-operative Societies, D.P.I. Junction, Jawahar SahaKaran Bhavan, Thiruvananthapuram
  • Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Civil Station Road, Up Hill, Malappuram District
  • Reserve Bank of India, Central Office Building, Mumbai (Governor)
  • Malappuram District Co-operative Bank Ltd. (now Kerala Bank)
  • Government of India represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Cooperation
  • National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD)
  • BY ADVOCATES – GOVERNMENT OF KERALA–Adv. General K. Gopalakrishna Kurup and SPL. GP P.P. Thajudeen

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • George Poonthottam (Sr.)
  • • Nisha George
  • • A.L. Navaneeth Krishnan
  • • Adv. A.P Nizar
  • • Aryadan Shoukathali

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Advocate General - Sri. K. Gopalakrishna Kurup
  • • Sri. P.P. Thajudeen SPL. G.P.
  • • E.K. Nandakumar (Sr.)
  • • M. Gopikrishnan Nambiar
  • • K. John Mathai
  • • Joson Manaval an
  • • Kuryan Thomas
  • • Paulose C. Abraham
  • • Raja Kannan
  • • Akhila Nambiar

Case Synopsis & Summary

This batch of intra-court appeals challenges a common judgment of a Kerala High Court Single Judge upholding constitutional validity of key amendments to the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (notably Sections 14A and 74H(1)(a)) and the Registrar’s order for amalgamation of Malappuram District Co-operative Bank with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank. The petitions contested: (i) the 2019–2020 amendments relaxing the majority for amalgamation (from ¾ to simple majority) and later the 2020 amendments introducing Registrar-ordered amalgamation with RBI consultation; (ii) the delegation of banking-related merger powers to the Registrar; and (iii) the scope of central banking legislation vis-à-vis cooperative societies. The appellants argued that the change disrupts decentralised democratic governance of co‑operative societies, intrudes into the RBI-regulated banking field, and conflicts with Entries in List I/II of the Seventh Schedule, as well as the Banking Regulation Act’s regime (Section 44A, 56). The High Court rejected these contentions, held that the amendments are constitutionally valid, that the banking-regulation framework does not automatically override co‑operative law, and that RBI need not be consulted in every instance where Union‑state powers intersect. Ultimately, the court dismissed the appeals, keeping in place the Registrar’s amalgamation order and the broader de-layering objective.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 - Section 14Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 - Section 14AKerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 - Section 74H(1)(a)Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Section 44ABanking Regulation Act, 1949 - Section 56Seventh Schedule Entries: Entry 43 List-I, Entry 45 List-I, Entry 32 List-IIDICGC Act, 1961Article 246, Article 254(2) of the ConstitutionArticle 43B (97th Amendment)Liberal/construction principles: pith & substance; occupied field; rag-bag doctrine

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Rag-bag theory (legislation drawing sustenance from multiple Entries)
  • Generalia specialibus non derogant (general provisions do not derogate from special ones)
  • Doctrine of occupied field (conflict between Union and State fields)
  • Pith and substance approach to classification of legislation
  • Liberal construction in constitutional interpretation
  • Locus standi concept in challenge to appertain to co‑operative societies

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The appellants argued that the 2019–2020 amendments to the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (Sections 14A and 74H(1)(a)) were enacted to de-layer the cooperative structure, relaxing the two-thirds majority requirement to a simple majority for amalgamations with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank. They contended that Section 74H(1)(a) empowers the Registrar to order mergers only with sufficient checks and RBI consultation when the general body resolution is absent, and that the central Banking Regulation Act (as amended) cannot override the state Act, especially in respect of district cooperative banks engaged in banking, which remain subject to the State’s regulation unless the RBI sanctions a scheme. They argued that the absence of RBI consultation and the reliance on a backdated amendment undermine constitutional distribution of powers (List I/II) and contravene the principle of decentralised cooperative governance.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argued that the amendments were enacted to de-layer the governance, streamline the cooperative banking framework, and bring District Co-operative Banks into a uniform system under the Kerala State Co-operative Bank. They maintained that the Division of powers between Union and State lists permits such regulation, with the central Banking Regulation Act addressing banking-related aspects and not exclusive deposits or general cooperative regulation. They highlighted Article 246/254, the ‘occupied field’ doctrine, and that the RBI’s consultation is customary though not strictly indispensable in all cases. RBI’s position was that BR Act provisions would apply to banking entities and that the amendments are within the constitutional framework after 2020, validating the Registrar’s order and the de-layering objective.

Cited Precedents (9)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Abdurahiman P. and others v. State of Kerala and others2020 (1) KHC 507PositiveConstitutional validity of Section 14A and 74H(1)(a) upheld; relied upon to support the amendments' validity.
Jayant Verma and others v. Union of India and others(2018) 4 SCC 743PositiveCited for understanding the scope of Banking Regulation Act vis-a-vis List-I/II entries and the occupancy/overlap doctrine.
Ram Tawakya Singh v. State of Bihar and others(2013) 16 SCC 206PositiveUsed to define ‘consultation’ with RBI as requiring meaningful mind-to-mind engagement.
Fatehchand Himmatlal and others v. State of Maharashtra(1977) 2 SCC 670PositiveSupport for the occupied-field/dual-entry doctrine in constitutional allocation.
Pandurang Ganapathi Chaugule v. Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Limited(2020) 9 SCC 215PositiveDiscussions on SARFAESI applicability to co‑operative societies and the division of fields under List II/I.
Ujagar Prints (II) v. Union of India(1989) 3 SCC 488PositiveRecognised as precedential for the rag-bag approach and overlapping legislative entries.
Waverly Jute Mills Co. Ltd. v. Raymon and Company (India) Pvt. Ltd.AIR 1963 SC 90PositiveCited for the broad-reading principle in List I/II interpretations.
Sant Sadhu v. State of Punjab(AIR) 1970 P&H 528PositiveIllustrates the curial approach to State vs. central domain in banking/cooperative contexts.
Thalappalam Service Co-operative Bank Limited v. State of Kerala and others(2013) 16 SCC 82PositiveUsed to discuss maintainability of writ petitions against cooperative societies.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against WA Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 v. State of Kerala & others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# `IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM` ## `PRESENT` ## `THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL` ## `&` ``` THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA ``` ``` THURSDAY, THE 29[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945 ``` ## `WA NO. 1957 OF 2023` ``` AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.10.2023 IN WP(C) NO.12 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS: ``` ``` 1M. SAIDALAVI MASTER AGED 57 YEARS PRESIDENT, VETTATHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M. 397, VETTATHUR. P.O. - 679 326, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679326 2ZUBAIR P AGED 57 YEARS PRESIDENT, PALLIKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.D. 1936, PALLIKKAL. P.O. - MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 673634 3A.P. ABDUL AZEEZ AGED 61 YEARS PRESIDENT, ABDU RAHIMAN NAGAR SERVICE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 583, A.R. NAGAR. P.O. - MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676305 4A.P. UMMAR AGED 63 YEARS PRESIDENT, IRUMBUZHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1570, P.O. IRUMBUZHI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676513 5M. SIDHIQUE MASTER AGED 57 YEARS PRESIDENT, ANAKKAYAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F.880, ANAKKAYAM P.O. - 676 509, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676509 6ABDUL HAMEED A.K AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, KANMANAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 10585, KANMANAM. P.O. - 676 551, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 676551 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 2 ``` 7E.K. MUHAMED KUTTY AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, VENGARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK LTD., NO. F.1186, VENGARA. P.O. - 676 304, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676304 8ABDUL KAREEM AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, VALAVANNUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D.1959, VALAVANNUR. P.O. - 676 551, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676551 9P.V. MOIDEEN AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, THENHIPPALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D. 1969, THENHIPPALAM. P.O. - 673 636, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673636 10KUTTY KAMMU AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, PARAPPANANGADI CO-OPERATIVE SERVICE BANK LTD., NO. F. 2302, PARAPPANANGADI. P.O. - 676 303, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676303 11V.A. BASHEER AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, ANANTHAVUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.F 1545, ANANTHAVUR, P.O. - 676 301, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676301 12BASHEER. V.P AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, MOOTHEDAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M. 277, MOOTHEDAM .P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679331 13K.M. RASHEED AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, KOTTAKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D.1977, KOTTAKKAL. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676503 14K.P. ALI AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, KUTTIPPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M.729, KUTTIPPURAM P.O. - 679 571, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679571 15SAKKEER HUSSAIN. T AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, RAMAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F.1445, RAMAPURAM P.O. - 679 321, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679321 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 3 ``` 16SALMANUL FARIS. C, AGED 52 YEARS PRESIDENT, CHELEMBRA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.D.1953, CHELEMBRA. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673634 17A.K. ALI AGED 62 YEARS PRESIDENT, MARANCHERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M.28, MARANCHERY. P.O. - 679 581, PONNANI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679581 18C. MAMMIKUTTY AGED 53 YEARS PRESIDENT, PERINTALMANNA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.P-534, PERINTALMANNA P.O. - 679 322, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679322 19P.K. MOHAMMED KUTTY AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, THE PANG SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F 1410, PANG. P.O. - MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679338 20ABDURAHIMAN AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, KOTTAKKAL CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., NO. 1378, KOTTAKKAL .P.O. - 676 503, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676503 21ABBAS AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, ALIPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1653, ALIPARAMBA.P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679357 22ANEEZ. T AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, PANDALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F.1651, KADAMBODE. P.O., MANJERI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676121 23YOUSAF MECHERI AGED 50 YEARS PRESIDENT, TRIKKALANGODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1548, TRIKKALANGODE. P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676123 24M.K. UMMER AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, KALIKAVU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M.40, KALIKAVU. P.O. , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676525 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 4 ``` 25MOHAMED RASHID AGED 61 YEARS PRESIDENT, ATHAVANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D.1933, ATHAVANAD P.O. , VALANCHERY VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676301 26FATHIMA FASNI AGED 52 YEARS PRESIDENT, KURUMBATHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F.1769, PUNNATHALA. P.O., VALANCHERY VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676552 27MOHAMMED ALI. M AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, ARAKKUPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.F-1580, ARAKKUPARAMBA P.O. - MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679341 28MAHABOOB EDAKKOT AGED 59 YEARS PRESIDENT, KONDOTTY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.D 1937, KONDOTTY. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673638 29K.K. KALID AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, KARULAI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M. 30, KARULAI. P.O. - 679 330, NILAMBUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679330 30P. MUHAMMED AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, ELANKUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 1540, P.O. ELANKUR, MANJERI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676122 31MOHAMMED SATHAR M.P AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, EAST ERANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.D. 1946, EDAKKARA. P.O. , NILAMBUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679331 32C. SHOUKATHALI AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, KADANNAMANNA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD., NO. 10561, KADANNAMANNA. P.O. - 679 324, MANKADA VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679324 33K. MOHAMMED AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, KARUVARAKUNDU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1191, KARUVARAKUNDU. P.O. - 676 523, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676523 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 5 ``` 34KANNIAN MUHAMED ALI AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, MAMPAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.F 1865, MAMPAD. P.O., MANJERI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676542 35M. AHAMMEDALI AGED 53 YEARS PRESIDENT, TIRURANGADI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.F 1185, TIRURANGADI. P.O. - 676 306, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676306 36ALI KALATHIL AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, MANKADA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 937, MANKADA. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679324 37ABDUL MAHABOOB KURIKKAL AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, PAYYANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1590, P.O. PAYYANAD , MANJERI. VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676122 38K.P. MUHAMED AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, MANKADA PALLIPPURAM SERVICE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 2317, PADINHATTUMMURI. P.O. - 676 506, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676506 39MOOSAKKUTTY AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, KURUPPATHAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M. 495, KULATHUR. P.O. - 679 338, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679338 40C. ABDUL KAREEM AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, MELATTUR SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD., NO.F-1183, MELATTUR P.O - 679 326, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679326 41NASRUDHEEN. E AGED 61 YEARS PRESIDENT, CHERUKAVU PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD., NO. M. 285, KANNAMVETTIKKAVU. P.O. , PULIKKAL, AYIKKARAPPADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673637 42BASHEER T AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, ANAMANGAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 6 ``` LTD., NO.F.1182, ANAMANGAD P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679357 43E.K. UMMER AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, VETTIKKATTIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO. F. 1889, VALLUVANGAD SOUTH. P.O., PANDIKKAD VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676521 44ABDUL MAJEED AGED 44 YEARS PRESIDENT, MANJERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.M. 31, MANJERI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676121 45MOIDEENKUTTY. M AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, MORAYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.D. 1938, MORAYUR.P.O., KONDOTTY VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 673624 ``` ``` 46V. HAMZA AGED 63 YEARS PRESIDENT, THACHINGANADAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 10152, THACHINGANADAM P.O. - 679 325, PATTIKKAD VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679325 47MAKBOOL. P AGED 48 YEARS PRESIDENT, KALPAKANCHERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.1808, KALPAKANCHERY. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676551 48SUBAIR E.M AGED 55 YEARS THUVVUR PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.M 492, THUVVUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679327 49ABIDA AYYOLI AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, NEDIYIRUPPU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D. 1934, P.O. NEDIYIRUPPU - 673 638, KONDOTTY VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673638 50NALAKATH HAMZA AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, THAZHEKKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.P.413, THAZHEKODE WEST P.O., PERINTALMANNA VIA. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679341 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 7 ``` 51M.P. ABDU RAHIMAN AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, PULIKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERTIVE BANK LTD., NO. F 1892, PULIKKAL. P.O. , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673637 52SIHABUDHEEN P.K, AGED 50 YEARS PRESIDENT, CHEEKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE. BANK LTD., NO.F 1897, OMANUR P.O., CHERUVAYUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673645 53RAVEENDRAN AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, EDAPPAL PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., EDAPPAL. P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679576 54K. KABEER AGED 53 YEARS PRESIDENT, EDAPPATTA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M. 506, EDAPPATTA P.O. - 679 326, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679326 55MOHAMMED NAVAS. V, AGED 60 YEARS NANNAMMUKKU PANCHAYATH SERVICE SAHAKARANA BANK LTD, NANNAMMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679575 56ALAVI. M AGED 63 YEARS PRESIDENT, OTHUKKUNGAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1039, OTHUKKUNGAL P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676528 57ADV. N.C FAIZAL AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, MANJERI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. NO. 1726, MANJERI. P.O. - 676 121, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676121 58M.K. NOUSHAD AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, VAZHAKKAD PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D. 191, VAZHAKKAD. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673640 59P.T. AJAYMOHAN AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, ANDATHODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.F-1249, ERAMANGALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679587 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 8 ``` 60PATHIL ASHRAF AGED 57 YEARS PRESIDENT, VATTAMKULAM PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M. 481, VATTAMKULAM P.O. - 679 578, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679578 61KAREEM. C AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, MAKKARAPARAMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.P-576, MAKKARAPARAMBA P.O. - 676 507, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676507 62UNNEEDU HAJI AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, POOKKOTTUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1492, POOKKOTTUR. P.O. - 676 517, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676517 63P. ABDU AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, VALLUVAMBRAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1564, VALLUVAMBRAM.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673642 64ABDUL RAZAK AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, KODUR CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK LTD., NO. M. 665, WEST KODUR, P.O. KODUR - 676 504, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676504 65C.K. JAIDEV AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, TIRUVALI SERVICE CO-OPERTIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1403, TIRUVALI P.O. - 676 123, MANJERI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676123 66P.P. KOYA MOIDEEN AGED 59 YEARS PRESIDENT, VETTOM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 1823, VETTOM. P.O. - 676 102, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676102 67MOHAMMED NOUSHAD AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, MALAPPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1829, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676505 68M. ABDULLA HAJI AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, PULPATTA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD., NO. F 1521, P.O. PULPATTA - 673 641, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673641 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 9 ``` 69C. ABDUL NASAR AGED 68 YEARS PRESIDENT, VALANCHERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M. 728, VALANCHERY P.O - 676 552, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676552 70P.K. ABDUSSALAM AGED 61 YEARS PRESIDENT, PONMUNDAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 10820, PONMUNDAM. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676106 71K.M. CHEKKUTTY AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, CHERIYAMUNDAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., THALAKKADATHUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676103 72R. MOHAMMED MASTER AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, MANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 9701, MANGALAM. P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676561 73SREEDHARAN AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, PONNANI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., NO. M. 372, PONNANI P.O. , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679577 74V.P.O. MOHAMMED AZGAR AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, THANALUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.M-2, THANALUR P.O. - 676 307, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676307 75A.K. AHAMED KUTTY AGED 57 YEARS PRESIDENT, PARAPPUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D. 1987, PARAPPUR. P.O. - 676 503, KOTTAKKAL VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676503 76ADV. A.P. NIZAR AGED 59 YEARS PRESIDENT, OORAKAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1447, P.O. OORAKAM, MELMURI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676510 77ARYADAN SHOUKATHALI AGED 51 YEARS CHAIRMAN, THE NILAMBUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., NO.F 1043, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679329 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 10 - `78 V.P. ABDUL KAREEM AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, AMARAMBALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1099, POOKKOTTUMPADAM. P.O. - 679 332, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679332` - `79 A.U. SEBASTIAN AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, CHUNGATHARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F.1807, CHUNGATHARA. P.O.-679 334, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679334` - `80 PRAKASAN. C.R, AGED 57 YEARS PRESIDENT, POTHUKAL SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD., NO. M. 255, P.O. BHOODAN COLONY, CHUNGATHARA VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679334` - `81 ADV. BABU MOHANA KURUP AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, NILAMBUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.D. 1972, CHANDAKKUNNU. P.O. - 679 329, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679329` - `82 BENNY. K.M AGED 60 YEARS PRESIDENT, CHALIYAR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. M 330, ERANHIMANGAD P.O., NILAMBUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679329` ``` 83K.C JOB MASTER AGED 57 YEARS PRESIDENT, VAZHIKKADAVU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F. 1668, MANIMOOLY. P.O. - 679 333, NILAMBUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679333 84VINOD KUMAR. T, AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, VALLIKKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.M-4, VALLIKKUNNU P.O., KADALUNDI NAGARAM VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673314 85M.A .ASEEZ AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, VELIMUKKU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 7725, VELIMUKKU SOUTH. P.O., TIRURANGADI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676317 ``` ``` 86M.C. MOHAMMED ALI AGED 57 YEARS PRESIDENT, PERUVALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D.1979, PARAMBIL PEEDIKA P.O. - ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 11 ``` TIRURANGADI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676317 ``` ``` 87MOHAMMED ASHRAF. P AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, THENNALA PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. F.720, VALAKKULAM P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676508 88U. KUNHI MOHAMMED AGED 56 YEARS PRESIDENT, EDAVANNA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.9261, EDAVANNA P.O., MANJERI VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 676541 89ADV. BASHEERUDHEEN. M AGED 53 YEARS PRESIDENT, KAVANUR SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD., NO.10252, P.O. KAVANOOR, AREACODE VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673639 90SIDHEEK PANTHAVOOR AGED 61 YEARS PRESIDENT, CHANGARAMKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.9260, NANNAMUKKU P.O. 679 575, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679575 91IBRAHIM. M AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, KUZHIMANNA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. D.1899, KIZHISSERI, KUZHIMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673641 92C. NAZIR AHAMED AGED 54 YEARS PRESIDENT, TIRUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 10094, TIRUR P.O., EAST BAZAR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676101 93RADHAKRISHNAN AGED 58 YEARS PRESIDENT, ANGADIPPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.P.581, ANGADIPPURAM P.O.- MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679321 BY ADVS.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.) NISHA GEORGE ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 12 ## `RESPONDENTS:` - `1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001` - `2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES D.P.I. JUNCTION, JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014` - `3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CIVIL STATION ROAD, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 673505` - `4 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, C-7, 18TH FLOOR, SHAHID BHAGATH SINGH MARG, FORT, MUMBAI, REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNOR, PIN - 500001` - `5 THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 4329` - `HEAD OFFICE, P.B. NO. 8, MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER., PIN - 676505` - `6 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COOPERATION, ATAL AKSHAY URJA BHAWAN, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, BEHIND NIA BUILDING, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003` - `7 THE CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT` - `(NABARD), CENTRAL OFFICE, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BKC ROAD, BANDRA, MUMBAI., PIN - 400051` - `BY ADVS.` - `ADVOCATE GENERAL -SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP SHRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN SPL. G.P.` ``` THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.02.2024, ALONG WITH WA.1962/2023, 1975/2023, 1977/2023 & 2114/2023, THE COURT ON 29.02.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 13 # `IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM` ## `PRESENT` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA ``` ``` THURSDAY, THE 29[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945 ``` ## `WA NO. 1962 OF 2023` ``` AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.10.2023 IN WP(C) NO.4215 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA ``` ``` APPELLANTS: ``` - `1 U.A.LATHIF MLA AGED 71 YEARS FORMER PRESIDENT, THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 4329 AND DELEGATE, MANJERI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676121` - `2 P.T. AJAY MOHAN AGED 56 YEARS FORMER VICE PRESIDENT, THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 4329 AND DELEGATE, ANDATHODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, ANDATHODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 679564` ``` BY ADVS.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.) NISHA GEORGE ``` ## `RESPONDENTS:` - `1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001` - `2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES D.P.I. JUNCTION, JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014` - `3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CIVIL STATION ROAD, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673505` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 14 - `4 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, C-7, 18TH FLOOR, SHAHID BHAGATH SINGH MARG, FORT, MUMBAI - 400001, REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNOR, PIN - 400001` - `5 THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA BAKERY JUNCTION, P.B NO.6507, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033, PIN - 695033` - `6 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. RE-NAMED AS 'KERALA BANK', PB NO 6515, COBANK TOWERS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, PIN - 695033` - `7 KERALA BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION(KBEF) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT COMMITTEE, DILEEP MUKHARJEE BHAVAN ,MALAPPURAM P.O.MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676121 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY IS IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL R7 VIDE ORDER DATED 04/07/2023 IN IA 2/2023.` - `8 GOVINDA PRASAD P. S/O.NARAYANAN, PRESIDENT, ELAMKULAM SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.F1536, ELAMKULAM, PIN-678 340, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT PADINHARE PUZHIKKUTH, KUNNAKKAV P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 678340` - `9 THE THIRUNAVAYA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1910 THIRUNAVAYA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 301 RESIDING AT KALPAKAMCHERRY HOUSE P.O, ALATHIYUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY SURESH K.M, S/0.PARANGODAN NAIR., PIN - 676301` - `10 THE TRIPANGODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1890 TRIPANGODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 301, RESIDING AT KARATHAPARATHOTTATHIL HOUSE P.O, ALATHOOR, IIRUR2, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT, K.T. VELAYUDHAN, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR., PIN - 676301` - `11 THE PURATHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.D1902 PURATHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 108 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MALLIKKA, D/O.KUNHJALIKKAN., PIN – 676108` - `12 THE KURVAMBALAN SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F1638 KURUVAMBALAM,` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 15 ``` MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 338, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, M.B.RAJESH, S/O.M.B.BHASKARAN NAIR., PIN - 679338 ``` - `13 THE WANDOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.M387, WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 328 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.T.MUHAMMADALI, S/O.MUHAMMAD., PIN - 679328` - `14 THE OZHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. OZHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 307, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.T.SREENIVAS BABU, S/O. JANARDHANA MENON K., PIN - 676307` - `15 THE NIRAMARUTHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. M 612, P.O.NIRAMARUTHUR PIN-679 104, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, IBRAHIM K.P, S/O.MUHAMMAD., PIN - 679104` - `16 THE MARAKKARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.F.10738 MARAKKARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 10738, MARAKKARA, PIN-676 553 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.KRISHNAN, S/O.CHAKKAPPAN, PIN - 676553` - `17 THE VADAKKUMPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO., F1505 VADAKKUMBRAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 552 REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT, MOHANAN P.M, S/O.GOPALAN NAIR, PIN - 676552` - `18 THE CHOKKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.M602, P.O.CHOKKAD-679 332, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, P.K.UMMER, S/O.SULAIMAN., PIN - 679332` - `19 THE KOLKKALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.F 1073 CHENGOTTUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676503 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT K.U.IQBAL, S/O.K.U.UMMER, PIN - 676503` - `20 THE PERUMANNA KLARI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.F770 P.O.KUTTIPPALA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676501 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, HARIDASAN KIZHAKKINAKATH., PIN - 676501` - `21 THE VAZHAYOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,NO.D 1G9G P.O,` - `AZHINJILAM, PIN-676 632, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.SUBRAMANIAN MASTER, S/O. VERAYUDHAN K., PIN - 676632` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 16 - `22 THE CHEMBRASSERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.9151 CHEMBRASSERI,` - `MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-67652, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SANKARAN., PIN - 676652` - `23 THE AREACODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 1571 AREACODE,` - `MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 639 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, NASAR, S/.MAMMAD., PIN - 673639` - `24 THE MUTHUVALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.MG39` - `VILAYIL P.O, PIN-673 641, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ANILKUMAR K, S/O.K.DHAMODHARAN NAIR., PIN - 673641` - `25 THE PONNANI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.4841 PONNANI P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 577 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, T.P.UMMER, S/O.KUNHIBAVA., PIN - 679577` - `26 THE KEEZHUPARMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.M 396 KEEZHUPARAMBA,` - `P.O, VALILLAPUZHA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 577, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.V.MUNEER, S/O.ALI., PIN - 679577` - `27 THE PORUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK L;TD.NO.M357 P.O,` - `CHATHANGOTTUPURAM, PIN-679 325 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, U.C.NANDAKUMAR, S/O.VASUDEVAN NAMBOOTHIRI., PIN - 679325` - `28 THE URANGATTIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.6895 THERATTAMMAL, P.O.URANGATTIRI MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 639 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.M.KURIAKOSE, S/O.MATHAYI., PIN - 673639` - `29 THE EDAPAL REGIONAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.P515` - `EDAPAL, PIN-679 576, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, P.P.MOHANDAS, S/O.ACHUNNI., PIN - 679576` - `30 THE ARIYALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F7730 H.O ARIYALLUR, PIN-6763L2, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, C.M.ARUMUGHAN, S/O.THEYYUTTI, PIN - 676312` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 17 - `31 THE THAVANUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.P 516` - `THAVANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 573 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT JYOTHI, D/O. PRABHAKARAN NAIR., PIN - 679573` - `32 THE KALADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,` - `NO.M783 PARAPPURAM KADANCHERY P.O, PIN-679 572 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, E.P.CHANRAMOHANDAS, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, PIN - 679572` - `33 THE PUNNAPPALA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.F 928 MADUVATH P.O, PIN-679 328, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.P.BHASKARAN, S/O.KARUPPAN., PIN - 679573` - `34 THE PULAMANTHOLE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 1565 PULANTHOLE P.O,` - `PIN-679 323, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT , SANDEEP LALP.M, S/O.VASUDEVAN NAMBOOTHIRI, PIN - 679323` - `35 THE KURUVAMBALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 1523 P.O, KODUR,` - `PIN-676 504, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT V.P.ANIL KUMAR, S/O.KUNJIKUTTAN., PIN - 676504` - `36 THE KODUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO. F 1523` - `KODUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT V.P. ANIL KUMAR, S/O` - `KUNJIKUTTAN( ADDITIONAL R8 TO R36 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 11.08.2023 IN IA 3/2023), PIN - 676504` - `BY ADVS.SUMATHY DANDAPANI (SR.)(S-712) Millu Dandapani ATHUL SHAJI` ``` ADVOCATE GENERAL -SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP SHRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN SPL. G.P. ``` ``` THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.02.2024, ALONG WITH WA.1957/2023, 1975/2023, 1977/2023 & 2114/2023, THE COURT ON 29.2.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 18 ## `IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM` ## `PRESENT` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA ``` ``` THURSDAY, THE 29[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945 ``` ## `WA NO. 1975 OF 2023` ``` AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.10.2023 IN WP(C) NO.173 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA ``` ``` APPELLANTS: ``` - `1 U.A.LATHIF MLA AGED 72 YEARS PRESIDENT, THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 4329, HEAD OFFICE, P.B. NO. 8, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676505` - `2 P.T. AJAY MOHAN AGED 57 YEARS S/O. P.T. MOHANAKRISHNAN, VICE PRESIDENT, THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 4329, HEAD OFFICE, P.B. NO. 8, MALAPPURAM., PIN - 676505` ``` BY ADVS.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.) A.L.NAVANEETH KRISHNAN ``` ## `RESPONDENTS:` - `1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001` - `2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES D.P.I. JUNCTION, JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014` - `3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CIVIL STATION ROAD, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN – 673505` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 19 - `4 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, C-7, 18TH FLOOR, SHAHID BHAGATH SINGH MARG, FORT, MUMBAI, REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNOR., PIN - 400001` - `5 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COOPERATION, ATAL AKSHAY URJA BHAWAN, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, BEHIND NIA BUILDING, NEW DELHI., PIN - 110003` - `6 THE CHAIRMAN NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, (NABARD), CENTRAL OFFICE, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BKC ROAD, BANDRA, MUMBAI, PIN – 400051` ``` BY ADVS. ADVOCATE GENERAL -SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP SHRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN SPL. G.P. ``` ``` THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.02.2024, ALONG WITH WA.1957/2023, 1962/2023, 1977/2023 & 2114/2023, THE COURT ON 29.2.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 20 # `IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM` ## `PRESENT` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA ``` ``` THURSDAY, THE 29[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945 ``` ## `WA NO. 1977 OF 2023` ``` AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.10.2023 IN WP(C) NO.28650 OF 2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA ``` ``` APPELLANTS: ``` ``` 1U.A.LATHIF MLA AGED 71 YEARS PRESIDENT , THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.4329, HEAD OFFICE, P B NO.8, MALAPPURAM-676505., PIN - 676505 2P T AJAY MOHAN AGED 57 YEARS S/O P T MOHANAKRISHNAN, VICE PRESIDENT, THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.4329, HEAD OFFICE, P B NO.8, MALAPPURAM- 676505, PIN - 676505 BY ADVS.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.) NISHA GEORGE ``` ## `RESPONDENTS:` - `1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-692001., PIN - 695001` - `2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES D P I JUNCTION, JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014., PIN - 695014` - `3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CIVIL STATION ROAD, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673505., PIN - 673505` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 21 ``` 4THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, C-7, 18TH FLOOR, SHAHID BHAGATH SINGH MARG, FORT, MUMBAI-400001, REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNOR., PIN – 400001 ``` ``` BY ADVS. ADVOCATE GENERAL -SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP SHRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN SPL. G.P. ``` ``` THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.02.2024, ALONG WITH WA.1957/2023, 1962/2023, 1975/2023 & 2114/2023, THE COURT ON 29.2.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 22 ``` IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL ``` ``` & ``` ``` THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA ``` ``` THURSDAY, THE 29[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945 ``` ``` WA NO. 2114 OF 2023 ``` ``` AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.10.2023 IN WP(C) NO.4215 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA ``` ## `APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 4 & 5:` - `1 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, C-7, 18TH FLOOR, SHAHID BHAGATH SINGH MARG, FORT, MUMBAI - 400001, REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNOR, PIN - 400001` - `2 THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA BAKERY JUNCTION, P.B NO.6507, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.` ``` BY ADVS.E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)(N-23) M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR K.JOHN MATHAI JOSON MANAVALAN KURYAN THOMAS PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM RAJA KANNAN AKHILA NAMBIAR ``` ## `RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 1, 2,3 AND 6 TO 36:` ``` 1U.A.LATHIF MLA AGED 71 YEARS FORMER PRESIDENT, THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 4329 AND DELEGATE, MANJERI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676121 ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 23 - `2 P.T. AJAY MOHAN AGED 56 YEARS` - `FORMER VICE PRESIDENT, THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 4329 AND DELEGATE, ANDATHODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, ANDATHODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679564` - `3 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-, PIN - 682031` - `4 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES D.P.I. JUNCTION, JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014` - `5 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CIVIL STATION ROAD, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673505` - `6 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. RE-NAMED AS 'KERALA BANK', PB NO 6515, COBANK TOWERS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, PIN - 695033` - `7 KERALA BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION(KBEF) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT COMMITTEE, DILEEP MUKHARJEE BHAVAN ,MALAPPURAM P.O.MALAPPURAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY IS IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL R7 VIDE ORDER DATED 04/07/2023 IN IA 2/2023., PIN - 676504` - `8 GOVINDA PRASAD P. AGED 50 YEARS S/O.NARAYANAN, PRESIDENT, ELAMKULAM SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.F1536, ELAMKULAM, PIN-678 340, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT PADINHARE PUZHIKKUTH, KUNNAKKAV P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 678340` ``` 9THE THIRUNAVAYA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1910 THIRUNAVAYA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 301 RESIDING AT KALPAKAMCHERRY HOUSE P.O, ALATHIYUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY SURESH K.M, S/0.PARANGODAN NAIR., PIN - 676301 ``` ``` 10THE TRIPANGODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1890 TRIPANGODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 301, RESIDING AT KARATHAPARATHOTTATHIL HOUSE P.O, ALATHOOR, ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 24 ``` IIRUR-2, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT, K.T. VELAYUDHAN, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR., PIN - 676301 ``` ``` 11THE PURATHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.D1902 PURATHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 108 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MALLIKKA, D/O.KUNHJALIKKAN., PIN - 676108 ``` - `12 THE KURVAMBALAN SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F1638 KURUVAMBALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 338, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, M.B.RAJESH, S/O.M.B.BHASKARAN NAIR., PIN - 679338` - `13 THE WANDOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.M387, WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 328 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.T.MUHAMMADALI, S/O.MUHAMMAD., PIN - 679328` - `14 THE OZHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. OZHUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 307, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.T.SREENIVAS BABU, S/O. JANARDHANA MENON K., PIN - 676307` - `15 THE NIRAMARUTHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. M 612, P.O.NIRAMARUTHUR PIN-679 104, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, IBRAHIM K.P, S/O.MUHAMMAD., PIN - 679104` - `16 THE MARAKKARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.F.10738 MARAKKARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 10738, MARAKKARA, PIN-676 553 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.KRISHNAN, S/O.CHAKKAPPAN, PIN - 676553` - `17 THE VADAKKUMPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO., F1505 VADAKKUMBRAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 552 REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT, MOHANAN P.M, S/O.GOPALAN NAIR, PIN - 676552` - `18 THE CHOKKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.M602, P.O.CHOKKAD-679 332, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, P.K.UMMER, S/O.SULAIMAN., PIN - 679332` - `19 THE KOLKKALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.F 1073 CHENGOTTUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676503 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT K.U.IQBAL, S/O.K.U.UMMER, PIN - 676503` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 25 - `20 THE PERUMANNA KLARI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.F770 P.O.KUTTIPPALA,` - `MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676501 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, HARIDASAN KIZHAKKINAKATH.` - `21 THE VAZHAYOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,NO.D 1G9G P.O,` - `AZHINJILAM, PIN-676 632, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.SUBRAMANIAN MASTER, S/O. VERAYUDHAN K.` - `22 THE CHEMBRASSERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.9151 CHEMBRASSERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-67652, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SANKARAN.` - `23 THE AREACODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 1571 AREACODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 639 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, NASAR, S/.MAMMAD.` - `24 THE MUTHUVALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.MG39 VILAYIL P.O, PIN-673 641, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ANILKUMAR K, S/O.K.DHAMODHARAN NAIR.` - `25 THE PONNANI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.4841 PONNANI P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 577 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, T.P.UMMER, S/O.KUNHIBAVA.` - `26 THE KEEZHUPARMBA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.M 396 KEEZHUPARAMBA,` - `P.O, VALILLAPUZHA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 577, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.V.MUNEER, S/O.ALI., PIN - 679577` - `27 THE PORUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK L;TD.NO.M357 P.O,` - `CHATHANGOTTUPURAM, PIN-679 325 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, U.C.NANDAKUMAR, S/O.VASUDEVAN NAMBOOTHIRI.` - `28 THE URANGATTIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.6895` - `THERATTAMMAL, P.O.URANGATTIRI MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 639 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.M.KURIAKOSE, S/O.MATHAYI.` - `29 THE EDAPAL REGIONAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.P515, EDAPAL, PIN-679 576, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, P.P.MOHANDAS, S/O.ACHUNNI.` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 26 - `30 THE ARIYALLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F7730 H.O` - `ARIYALLUR, PIN-676312, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, C.M.ARUMUGHAN, S/O.THEYYUTTI` - `31 THE THAVANUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.P 516` - `THAVANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 573 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT JYOTHI, D/O. PRABHAKARAN NAIR.` - `32 THE KALADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,` - `NO.M783 PARAPPURAM KADANCHERY P.O, PIN-679 572 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, E.P.CHANRAMOHANDAS, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR.` - `33 THE PUNNAPPALA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.F 928 MADUVATH P.O, PIN-679 328, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.P.BHASKARAN, S/O.KARUPPAN.` - `34 THE PULAMANTHOLE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 1565 PULANTHOLE P.O, PIN-679 323, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT , SANDEEP LALP.M, S/O.VASUDEVAN NAMBOOTHIRI.` - `35 THE KURUVAMBALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 1523 P.O, KODUR,` - `PIN-676 504, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT V.P.ANIL KUMAR, S/O.KUNJIKUTTAN.` - `36 THE KODUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO. F 1523` - `KODUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676504 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT V.P. ANIL KUMAR, S/O KUNJIKUTTAN( ADDITIONAL R8 TO R36 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 11.08.2023 IN IA 3/2023)` ``` BY ADVS. ``` ``` ADVOCATE GENERAL -SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP SHRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN SPL. G.P. ``` ``` THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.02.2024, ALONG WITH WA.1957/2023, 1962/2023, 1975/2023 & 1977/2023, THE COURT ON 29.2.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 27 ## **AMIT RAWAL & C.S. SUDHA, JJ.** **----------------------------------------------------------------** W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 **----------------------------------------------------------------** Dated this the 29[th] day of February, 2024 ## **JUDGMENT** ## **Amit Rawal , J .** The question involved in all the intra-court appeals preferred against the common judgment rendered in four writ petitions preferred by former President, Vice President of erstwhile Malappuram District Co-operative Bank and 93 individuals stated to be the Presidents of Primary Agricultural Credit Societies and Urban Co-operative Banks whereby all the petitioners were not successful in laying challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 14A of Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (hereinafter called as 'Act, 1969'), Section 74H(1)(a) of the Act, 1969 and order passed by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies dated 12[th] of January, 2023 ordering amalgamation of Malappuram District Co-operative Bank with Kerala State Co-operative Bank. W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 28 2. The arguments raised in all the afore-mentioned writ petitions, which have been extensively dealt with by the Single Judge, were with regard to the Entry Nos.43, 45 of List-I and 32 of List-II of the 7[th] Schedule of the Constitution of India as well as amended provisions of Section 44A of the Indian Banking Regulation Act, 1949 effective from 26[th] of June, 2020. In other words, the pith and substance of the claim in the writ petitions was State Government by causing an amendment in Section 74H(1)(a) could not confer power on the Registrar, in the absence of the resolution either by simple majority or by ¾[th] majority as it was then in vogue, i.e., before amendment can order the amalgamation of the District Co-operative Society into State Co-operative. 3. The other question was since one of the functions of the District Co-operative Bank was ‘Banking’, amalgamation of banking company would be within the domain of Central legislation and not by the State. 4. Whether in the absence of consultation with the RBI, amalgamation as provided under Section 44A of the 1949 Act effective from 26.6.2020 providing ¾[th] majority W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 29 could have been done away with by the State legislation. 5. All these questions raised in the writ petitions have been answered against the appellants/petitioners. 6. There were fourteen (14) district co-operative societies in the State of Kerala. The provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, initially, envisaged amalgamation of the District Co-operative into State Cooperative by way of ¾[th] majority but later by simple majority and finally in the absence of the resolution either by simple or otherwise Registrar could order for amalgamation. The said amendment was caused by inserting Section 74(1)(a) of 1969 Act with effect from 11[th] of April, 2020 for the purpose of de-layering. 7. All the thirteen (13) Co-operative Societies had agreed to pass resolution and for the purpose of amalgamation/merging with the State Government except the Society in question, i.e., the Malappuram Co-operative Society. 8. The genesis of the arguments on behalf of the learned senior counsels representing the W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 30 appellants/petitioners before the Single Bench and this Court are summarised hereinbelow:- (i) Merger/amalgamation of Co-operative Society under the 1969 Act was provided under Section 14 and Rule 13 of the 1969 Act and the Rules framed thereunder. In the year 2019 amendment was caused by inserting Section 14A providing a distinct procedure for the purpose of merger by requiring a simple majority by deleting the provisions of ¾[th] for the purpose of amalgamation/merger with Kerala State Co-operative Bank. (ii) Two general body meetings of the Malappuram District Co-operative Society, after the incorporation of Section 14A of the Act, 1969, were held and the proposal for merger was defeated by 2/3[rd] and even simple majority. (iii) Chapter X(C) was incorporated in the Act, 1969 and Section 74H(1)(a) provided a different procedure for merger of District Co-operative Bank with State (Kerala) Cooperative Bank empowering the Registrar to merge the District Co-operative with the State Co-operative, in the absence of resolution. W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 31 (iv) Malappuram District Co-operative Society is covered under the provisions of Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the DICGC Act’) which extended a protection and guarantee to the depositors. The merger/amalgamation and winding up or re-construction of the arrangement of an insured Cooperative would only be made by previous sanction in writing of the Reserve Bank of India. 9. On the other hand, the stand of the State supporting the amendment has been as under:- (i) Section 74(1)(a) applies to insurance co-operative bank which would mean a bank insured under the DICGC Act. The condition under the DICGC Act was in respect of a insured bank with any other bank or entity with the sanction in writing of the RBI. In the absence of any permission from the RBI the only adverse consequence would be the bank may lose the status of insured Co-operative, nothing beyond. (ii) The petitioners had no _locus standi_ to file the writ petitions as they have no case by looking at the memo of W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 32 parties and also in the absence of any authorisation. (iii) Entry No.43 of List-I of seventh schedule relates to trading corporations, including ‘banking’, insurance and - financial corporations, but excludes ‘Co operative Societies’. Though 'Banking' is exclusively in List-I subject under Entry 45 of List-I, the power to make law regarding incorporation, regulation and winding up of Co-operative Societies would be within the competence of State Legislature under Entry No.32 of List-II. The Entries in the Seventh Schedule are not the power but fields of Legislation. 10. While impugning the vires of an enactment there is a presumption of its constitutionality and if there is any difficulty in ascertaining the limits of legislative power, the difficulty must be resolved as far as possible in favour of the legislature by adopting a liberal construction. Constitutional validity of Section 14A and Section 74H(1)(a) had already been upheld in **Abdurahiman.P. and others v. State of Kerala and others** [2020 (1) KHC 507] wherein all the contentions raised by the appellants/petitioners had been repelled. W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 33 11. The amendments under challenge were preceded by various ordinances as the matter could not be placed before the Legislature owing to the difficulties during the Covid-19 pandemic. 12. Amendments were challenged at the ordinance stage through Writ Petition No.33596 of 2019 and connected cases. This Court vide judgment dated 28[th] of April, 2021 in Writ Petition No.33596 of 2019 and connected cases had repelled the challenge to the constitutional validity of the ordinance. The matter was taken up before the Division Bench through Writ Appeal No.708 of 2021 and connected appeals. Writ Appeals were disposed of by common judgment dated 22[nd] of May, 2022, leaving it open to the appellants to challenge the provisions of the amending Act as the ordinance which was under challenge by that time had been replaced by amending Act. 13. Supreme Court in **Jayant Verma and others v. Union of India and others** [(2018) 4 SCC 743] while dealing with the proposition regarding the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 to the extent it encroaches W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 34 into the fields exclusively reserved to the State Legislature in List-II, held that it would not be operative. The Entries 43 - and 45 of List-I would not be applicable to the ‘Banking co ’ operative societies . 14. As regards the expression ‘consultation’ with Reserve Bank of India in support of the contention raised by the learned Advocate General reliance was laid to the ratio as culled out in the judgment of the Supreme Court in **Ram Tawakya Singh v. State of Bihar and others** [(2013) 16 SCC 206]. In the said judgment while dealing with the expression ‘consultation’ it was held that there must be conference of two or more minds or impact of two or more minds in respect of a topic/subject. 15. Counsel representing the Co-operative Society also adopted the arguments submitted by Advocate General. 16. Smt.Sumathi Dandapani, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri.Vishnu Sharesh on behalf of the Reserve Bank of India by relying upon the counter affidavit filed in Writ Petition No.4215 of 2023 contended that though RBI vide letter dated 3[rd] of October, 2018 had granted in- W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 35 principle approval of amalgamation of District Co-operative Banks with the State Co-operative Bank which were both licensed under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, therefore any order of amalgamation of the Malappuram District Cooperative Bank with the State Co-operative Bank could have only been in accordance with the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (hereinafter called as ‘Act, 1949’). The merger and amalgamation of a District Co-operative Bank with the State Co-operative Bank have to be sanctioned by the Reserve Bank of India in terms of the provisions contained in Section 44A read with Section 56 of the Act, 1949. 17. Registrar of the Co-operative Society even after incorporation of Section 74H(1)(a) had sought the approval of the RBI for merger of Malappuram District Co-operative Bank with State Co-operative Bank. 18. In rebuttal counsel representing the appellants in support of the contentions relied upon following case law: **Pandurang Ganpati Chaugule v. Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Limited** [(2020) 9 SCC 215] to W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 36 contend that the power to regulate the incorporation, winding up of the Co-operative Society though vests with the State Legislature in terms of Entry No.32 of List-II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, but when such Co-operative Society engages in a banking activity, any order regarding its winding up, amalgamation including division or re-organization can only be made with the permission in writing of RBI strictly as per provisions of Section 44A of the Act, 1949 which is amended with effect from 26[th] of June, 2020. 19. The order of the Registrar ordering the amalgamation did not notice the afore-mentioned case law but was swayed away with the amendment caused by the State Legislation. 20. **Thalappalam Service Co-operative Bank Limited and others v. State of Kerala and others** [(2013) 16 SCC 82] – dealt with maintainability of the writ petition against the Co-operative Society as per the provisions of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. It was contended that the State has no say to the function of the W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 37 Society dealing with banking. 21. Reserve Bank of India has also filed intra-court appeal bearing W.A.No.2114 of 2023 against the judgment of the Single Bench by seeking leave assailing inter alia on the following points:- (I) Vide 2021 Amendment, Section 74H(1)(a) of the Act, 1969 provided for amalgamation of District Cooperative Banks with Kerala State Co-operative Bank was amended by Act No.34 of 2021 and Section 74H(1)(a) was inserted which vested with the Registrar, a power, to order merger of a District Co-operative Bank with Kerala State Cooperative Bank in the event of general body of District Cooperative Bank do not pass resolution as specified under Section 14A of the Act, 1969. The said amendment went against the principle of decentralization and democratic administration of Co-operative Societies. (II) Banking is exclusively a subject in List-I of the seventh schedule of the Constitution of India. Therefore the State Legislature was denuded of the power to make provisions for amalgamation of a Co-operative Bank with W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 38 another Co-operative Bank. (III) Malappuram District Co-operative Society is an insured Co-operative Bank as defined under Section 2(i) of DICGC Act and thus guaranteed its depositors a protection in respect of the deposits maintained with them. The protection will extend to a bank only if the incorporating law, i.e., the KCS Act contains a provision of ‘eligible co-operative bank’ as defined in Section 2(gg) of DICGC Act. (IV) ‘Reserve Bank of India (Guidelines)’ on ‘amalgamation of Districts Central Co-operative Banks with State Co-operative Banks’ dated 24[th] of May, 2021 provides that the Reserve Bank of India will consider proposals for amalgamation if the scheme of amalgamation is approved by requisite majority of shareholders in accordance with the provisions of Section 44A read with Section 56 of the BR Act, 1949. Though the Bank did not have any objection for amalgamation as per the counter affidavit filed in the writ petitions but later on amendment was caused under Section 44A on 26.6.2020 providing an amalgamation of banking cooperative by 2/3[rd] of majority. Thus, in this view of the W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 39 matter, the amendment caused by the State under Section 74H(1)(a) cannot be put into force as has been done by the impugned order of the Registrar. In support of the contention relied upon following case law:- **M/s.Fatehchand Himmatlal and others v. State of Maharashtra** [(1977) 2 SCC 670] and various other judgments on similar proposition. Paragraphs 56, 62 and 63 of **M/s.Fatehchand** (supra) read as under:- _“56. Let us look at the basics of the legal situation before us, before examining the wealth of learning counsel has accumulated. Article 246 vests exclusive power in Parliament over matters enumerated in List I (Seventh Schedule) and the State Legislature enjoys like power over topics in List II, subject to clauses (1) and (2) of the Article. Plainly, therefore, the State can legislate upon any Entry in the State List. We may visualize situations where Parliamentary occupation may exclude the State Legislature. Where, for instance, Parliament while enacting on a matter in the Union List, makes as it is entitled to make, necessary incidental provisions to effectuate the principal legislation, such ancillary expansions may trench upon the State field in List II. In such a case, if the State makes a law on an Entry in its exclusive List, and such law covers and runs counter to what has already been occupied by Parliament, through incidental provisions, it may be argued that the State law stands pushed out on account of the superior potency of Parliament's power in our_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 40 _constitutional scheme. Again, there are certain tell-tale heads of legislation in the Lists where one may plausibly invoke the doctrine of occupied field. Examples may, perhaps, be furnished by Entries 52 and 54 of List I, Entries 23 and 24 of List II and Entry 33 of List III. Without fear of contradiction, we may assert that Art. 246(3) read with Entry 30 in List II, empowers the State to make the impugned law. Why then is it incompetent? Because, says Mr. Nariman, the field of gold industry is already occupied by Parliament and the State Legislature therefore stands excluded. Entry 52 in List I reads:_ _"Industries, the control of which by the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest."_ _Parliament, in the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (Act 65 of 1951) has made the necessary declaration contemplated in Entry 52 and has occupied the field of ‘gold industry', as is evident from reading Section 2 and item 1.B(2) of the First Schedule therein. This expression of Parliamentary intent to legislate upon the gold industry is enough to expel from that field the State Legislature. This is Shri Nariman's contention. But what is the sequitur ? Assuming the approprlation by Parliament of the power to legislate on gold, what follows? It can make laws directly on that industry and ancillarily on every allied area where effective exercise of the parliamentary power necessitates it. So much so, 'business in gold', licensing of gold merchants, regulation of making or pledging of gold ornaments, keeping of jewellery, disclosure of gold possessions and the like are_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 41 _incidental to the parliamentary power and purpose and the Gold Control Act, 1968 and the Rules made thereunder are valid (vide, for example, Bantha's Case: (1970) 1 SCR 479). Several sections of the Act, some rules and a few rulings were read before us to drive home the point that gold loans are already within the ken of the law made under Entry 52, List I. If so, what ? Does it spell death sentence on the Debt Act? Or maim it ? Or leave it intact ?_ _xxx xxx xxx_ _62. In the Canadian Constitution, the question of conflict and coincidence in the domain in which provincial and dominion legislation overlap has been considered. If both may overlap and co-exist without conflict, neither legislation is ultra vires. But if there is confrontation and conflict the question of paramountcy and occupied field may crop up. It has been held that the rule as to predominance of dominion legislation can only be invoked in case of absolutely conflicting legislation in pari materia when it will be an impossibility to give effect to both the dominion and provincial enactments. There must be a real conflict between the two Acts i.e. the two enactments must come into collision. The doctrine of Dominion paramountcy does not operate merely because the Dominion has legislated on the same subject matter. The doctrine of 'occupied field' applies only where there is a clash between Dominion Legislation and Provincial Legislation within an area common to both. Where both can co-exist peacefully, both reap their respective harvests (Please see; Canadian Constitutional Law by Laskin--pp. 52-54, 1951 Edn)._ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 42 _63. We may sum up the legal position to the extent necessary for our case. Where Parliament has made a law under Entry 52 of List I and in the course of it framed incidental provisions affecting gold loans and money-lending business involving gold ornaments, the State, making a law on a different topic but covering in part the same area of ‘gold loans', must not go into irreconcilable conflicts. Of course, if Art.254(2) can be invoked--We will presently examine it--then the State law may still prevail since the assent of the President has been obtained for the Debt Act. Thirdly, the doctrine of 'occupied field' does not totally deprive the State Legislature from making any law incidentally referable to gold. In the event of a plain conflict, the State law must step down unless, as pointed out earlier in the previous passage, Art.254(2) comes to the rescue.”_ 22. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and appraised the paper book. 23. It would be expedient to extract the provisions of Entry 43, Entry 45 and Entry 32 in tabular form as has been done by the Single Bench, the same reads as under:- |done by the Single|Bench, the same reads as under:-| |---|---| |**Entry 43, List-I (Union**<br>**List)**|Incorporation, regulation and winding up of trading<br>corporations, including banking, insurance and fnancial<br>corporations, but not including co-operative societies.| |**Entry 45, List-I (Union**<br>**List)**|Banking| |**Entry 32, List-II (State**<br>**List)**|Incorporation, regulation and winding up of corporations,<br>other than those specifed in List I, and universities;<br>unincorporated trading, literary, scientifc, religious and<br>other societies and associations, co-operative societies.| W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 43 24. Article 43B of the Constitution of India inserted by ninety-seventh amendment Act, 2011 with effect from 15[th] of February, 2012 envisages that the State shall endeavour to promote voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control and professional management of cooperative societies. 25. In **Jayant Verma and others** (supra) as per the facts revealed constitutional validity of Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 was assailed by public interest litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution of India envisaging that the rate of interest charged by the banking company would not be subject to scrutiny by courts. While dealing with such question raised in paragraphs 12, 13, 16, 40, 41 and 44 of judgment it has been observed by noticing provisions of Article 246 as well as the judgments cited by Mr.E.K.Nandakumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the RBI in W.A.No.2114 of 2023 that it is a common parlance to state that the “Legislative Heads” must receive large and liberal meaning and the sweep of the sense of the W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 44 rubrics must embrace the widest range. Banking Regulation Act deals with the subject ‘banking’ insofar as it licenses banking companies, as defined, and co-operative banks, to ensure proper regulation and nothing beyond. It is also noticed that if it is found that the Legislature as a whole is referable to Entry in List-I but it incidentally encroached upon an Entry in List-II there will be no reason for the doctrine of unoccupied field not to apply to federal legislation. The principle contained in Article 246, should be taken as a last resort in case of failure of harmonious construction, i.e., the entries qua in competing lists, i.e., once the legislation is referable to one list or the other, the doctrine of incidental trenching and unoccupied field would apply equally to both Parliamentary and State legislation. The Court must ascertain a true nature and character of challenged enactment, its 'pith and substance' and not the 'form’ alone. Where there has been an endeavour to give pre-eminence to the Central Legislature in cases of a conflict of powers, it is obvious that, in some cases where such conflict exists, the Legislature could not have intended that W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 45 power exclusively assigned to the Provincial Legislature and should be absorbed in those given to the Central Legislature and in the penultimate paragraph 61 it was held as under:- _“61. We declare Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act to be valid as it is part of an enactment which, in pith and substance, is relatable to Schedule VII List I Entry 45 to the Constitution. However, insofar as Section 21A incidentally encroaches upon the field of relief of agricultural indebtedness, set out in List II Entry 30 it will not operate only in States where there is a State Debt Relief Act which deals with the subject matter of relief of agricultural indebtedness, where the State Debt Relief Act covers debts due to “banks”, as defined in those Acts. In States where the State Debt Relief Act does not apply to banks at all, or applies only to certain specified banks, Section 21A will, in the former situation, apply in such States, and, in the latter situation, apply only in respect of loans made to agriculturists where such loans are given by banks other than the banks specified or covered by the State Debt Relief Act concerned, as the case may be.”_ From the analysis of the conclusion arrived at in the judgment cited (supra), it is clear that, if on causing of the amendment incidentally encroaches upon the relief of agricultural indebtedness, set out in List II of Entry 30, it will not operate only in State where there is a State Debt Relief Act which deals with the subject matter of relief of W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 46 agricultural indebtedness, which also covers debt due to “banks”. But in State where the State Debt Relief Act does not apply to banks at all, or applies only to certain specified banks, Section 21A will, in the former situation, apply in such States. 26. In the instant case an amendment was caused in Section 3 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 prior to the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 2020. In the post amendment, in order to rule out the ambiguity in respect of certain Co-operative Societies whose primary object and principal business was to provide only long term finance it was made clear that if such society does not use the part of its name with the bank it will consider to be only Cooperative Society but if the banking is also incidental and over and above the other work would exclusively use the word banking. 27. **Sant Sadhu v. State of Punjab** [AIR (1970) P & H 528] was a case where certain provisions of the Punjab Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 1969 were challenged on the ground that State Legislative did not have W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 **==> picture [15 x 10] intentionally omitted <==** competence to enact any law relating to Banking Corporations even if they were co-operative societies constituted under law made by the State Legislature. In paragraph Nos.8 and 13 of the afore-mentioned judgment while noticing Entry Nos.43, 45 and 32 of List-I and List-II of the seventh schedule as has been done in the instant case it was held that the co-operative society doing the banking business though are put on par so as far as Entry No.45 List-I is concerned, with other banking institutions, but while construing Entry No.45, it was observed that, the Entry must be limited to the laws which affect the conduct of the business of banks qua banks. Therefore, the co-operative societies were taken out from the ambit of Entry 43 and put in Entry No.32 of List-II. The word 'regulation' in Entry No.43 was held to be of a wide import which would also include how the Co-operative Society would work. In order to give harmonious construction to both the Entry Nos.43 and 44 it was held that only business of banking as such falls within the ambit of Entry No.45; whereas incorporation of the Corporations matters relating to them would fall within the W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 48 ambit of Entry 43, but, the constitution of the Societies their working would definitely fall in Entry No.32, List-II and they were strictly taken out of the purview of Entry No.43. 28. There may be confusion in respect of reading of the Entries in List-I and List-II and at some time it appears to be overlapping or may appear to be in direct conflict with each other. In such situation it is the duty of the Court to reconcile the entries to bring out a harmonious construction. If there is a 'general power' in one List and a 'particular power' in the other List which specific power could also be included in the general power of the first list then the general entry in first list must be read so as to 'exclude' the specific power from it so that the general power may cover or occupy all the fields 'excepting **'** the field under second list. 29. In **Pandurang Ganapathi Chaugule** (supra) the judgments rendered by Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh High Courts excluding the applicability of SARFAESI Act with regard to the Societies dealing with banking activity held - that in case Co operative Societies Act of a particular State W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 49 deals with incorporation, management and winding up and incidentally trenches upon banking, it would not take the legislation beyond the competence of the State Legislature. - For the proper fnancing and efective functioning of co - operative societies, there must also be co operative societies that do banking business to facilitate the working - of other co operative societies merely because they do - banking business, they do not cease to be co operative societies. (Emphasis supplied). While dealing with all the entries it was held that the provisions of the SARFAESI Act would be applied to the co-operative societies dealing with the banking activity. Thus, what is deducible in paragraphs 87 and 88 in **Pandurang Ganapathi** (supra) extracted by the learned Single Judge it is a clear authority on the proposition that while in all aspects of banking co-operative societies which are banks would specifically come within the purview of law made by the Union Parliament with Entry No.45 of List-I and in all other aspects they would be controlled and regulated by law made with reference to Entry No.32 of List-II. W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 50 30. No doubt Section 44A amended in the year 2020 and Section 74H(1)(a) amended later on but made effective from a back date provided different procedure that would be applicable for amalgamation. The pith and substance of the counter affidavit of the RBI is that, it had never opposed to the amalgamation by the Registrar except that consultation from it. We cannot lose sight of the fact that amendment of Section 74H(1)(a) was effective from 11[th] of April, 2020. To overcome the confusion and for the purpose of clarity it would also be an expedient to extract the provisions of Section 74H(1)(a) of the Co-operative Societies Act and Section 44A of the Banking Regulation Act. The same read as under:- _“_ _**74H. Amalgamation of District Co-operative Banks to the Kerala State Co-operative Bank.** (1)Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, the Registrar shall order the amalgamation of District Co-operative Banks in Kerala with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank on the basis of the resolution passed by the general body as provided under section 14A of this Act._ _(a) if the general body of a District Co-operative Bank has not passed the resolution under section 14A, the Registrar may, after consulting Reserve Bank of India, order merger of such_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 51 _District Co-operative Bank with Kerala State Co-operative Bank, on public interest. No order shall be passed under this clause unless,—_ _(i) a copy of the proposed order of merger has been sent to the member society or member societies concerned by registered post and published the same in two vernacular dailies having wide circulation in the district in which the society situates, for their objections or suggestions;_ _(ii) the Registrar shall consider the objections/suggestions, if any, received from the society or societies concerned or from any member or creditor of such society or societies within such period, being not less than fifteen days from the date of posting of the proposed order of merger, as may be specified by the Registrar in this behalf._ ## _**“44A. Procedure for amalgamation of banking companies**_ _(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force no banking company shall be amalgamated with another banking company, unless a scheme containing the terms of such amalgamation has been placed in draft before the shareholders of each of the banking companies concerned separately, and approved by the resolution passed by a majority in number representing two-thirds in value of the shareholders of each of the said companies, present either in person or by proxy at a meeting called for the purpose._ _(2) Notice of every such meeting as is referred to in subsection (1) shall be given to every shareholder of each of the banking companies concerned in accordance with the relevant articles of association, indicating the time, place and object of the meeting, and shall also be published at_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 52 _least once a week for three consecutive weeks in not less than two newspapers which circulate in the locality or localities where the registered offices of the banking companies concerned are situated, one of such newspapers being in a language commonly understood in the locality or localities._ _(3) Any shareholder, who has voted against the scheme of amalgamation at the meeting or has given notice in writing at or prior to the meeting to the company concerned or to the presiding officer of the meeting that he dissents from the scheme of amalgamation, shall be entitled, in the event of the scheme being sanctioned by the Reserve Bank, to claim from the banking company concerned, in respect of the shares held by him in that company, their value as determined by the Reserve Bank when sanctioning the scheme and such determination by the Reserve Bank as to the value of the shares to be paid to the dissenting shareholders shall be final for all purposes._ _(4) If the scheme of amalgamation is approved by the requisite majority of shareholders in accordance with the provisions of this section, it shall be submitted to the Reserve Bank for sanction and shall, if sanctioned by the Reserve Bank by an order in writing passed in this behalf, be binding on the banking companies concerned and also on all the shareholders thereof._ _xxx_ _(6) On the sanctioning of a scheme of amalgamation by the Reserve Bank, the property of the amalgamated banking company shall, by virtue of the order of sanction, be transferred to and vest in, and the liabilities of the said company shall, by virtue of the said order be transferred to,_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 53 _and become the liabilities of the banking company, which under the scheme of amalgamation is to acquire the business of the amalgamated banking company, subject in all cases to [the provisions of the scheme as sanctioned]._ _[(6A) Where a scheme of amalgamation is sanctioned by the Reserve Bank under the provisions of this section, the Reserve Bank may, by a further order in writing, direct that on such date as may be specified therein the banking company (hereinafter in this section referred to as the amalgamated banking company) which by reason of the amalgamation will cease to function, shall stand dissolved and any such direction shall take effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law._ _(6B) Where the Reserve Bank directs a dissolution of the amalgamated banking company, it shall transmit a copy of the order directing such dissolution to the Registrar before whom the banking company has been registered and on receipt of such order the Registrar shall strike off the name of the company._ _(6C) An order under sub-section (4) whether made before or after the commencement of section 19 of the Banking Laws (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1963 (55 of 1963) shall be conclusive evidence that all the requirements of this section relating to amalgamation have been complied with, and a copy of the said order certified in writing by an officer of the Reserve Bank to be true copy of such order and a copy of the scheme certified in the like manner to be a true copy thereof shall, in all legal proceedings (whether in appeal or otherwise and whether instituted before or after the commencement of the said section 19), be admitted as_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 54 _evidence to the same extent as the original order and the original scheme]_ _(7) Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this section shall affect the power of the Central Government to provide for the amalgamation of two or more banking companies (xxx) under section 396 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956):_ _PROVIDED that no such power shall be exercised by the Central Government except after consultation with the Reserve Bank.”_ 31. The apprehension of the RBI that, the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act in view of the finding of the Single Bench would not be applicable for the amalgamation, in our considered view, has already been taken care of by the Single Bench in paragraph 15, the same reads as ## under :- ## _15._ _**The ‘rag-bag’ theory:** - It has to be noted that_ _by virtue of Entries in List-I, the entire law relating to banking as well as the entire law relating to incorporation, regulation and winding up of Corporations including banking companies except Co-operative Societies is within the purview of the competence of the Union Parliament. It is settled from the decision of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in_ _**Ujagar Prints (II) v. Union of India, (1989) 3 SCC 488** that a legislative_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 55 _enactment could draw sustenance from two or more Entries in the same List and legislation need not be confined to or draw sustenance from a sin_ gle entry in any List contained in Seventh Schedule. It was held:- “53. If a legislation purporting to be under a particular legislative entry is assailed for lack of legislative competence, the State can seek to support it on the basis of any other entry within the legislative competence of the legislature. It is not necessary for the State to show that the legislature, in enacting the law, consciously applied its mind to the source of its own competence. Competence to legislate flows from Articles 245, 246, and the other articles following, in Part XI of the Constitution. In defending the validity of a law questioned on ground of legislative incompetence, the State can always show that the law was supportable under any other entry within the competence of the legislature. Indeed in supporting a legislation sustenance could be drawn and had from a number of entries. The legislation could be a composite legislation drawing upon several entries. Such a “ragbag” legislation is particularly familiar in taxation. 54. Bennion in his Statutory Interpretation (at p. 644) refers to such a composite legislation, though the observations must be understood in the context W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 56 of the supremacy of the British Parliament and one of unlimited powers and which is under no inhibitions, unlike a federal polity, of distribution of legislative powers. Learned author refers to: “Ragbag” Acts : Some Acts are “ragbag” Acts, covering many areas. The annual Finance Act is an extreme example. It is divided into Parts, dealing respectively with customs and excise duty, value added tax, income tax, capital gains tax, stamp duty, capital transfer tax and so on. Even within a Part of a Finance Act the various provisions have quite different aims.... In Hari Krishna Bhargav v. Union of India [(1966) 2 SCR 22 : AIR 1966 SC 619 : (1966) 59 ITR 243] , this Court said : (SCR p. 27) _There is no prohibition against the Parliament enacting in a single statute, matters which call for the exercise of power under two or more entries in List I of the Seventh Schedule. Illustrations of such legislation are not wanting in our statute book, and the fact that one of such entries is the residuary entry does not also attract any disability.”_ Therefore, insofar as the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 also provide for the regulation of amalgamation etc., of a banking company, it could be said that the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 could make provision for such measures as well on account of the W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 57 fact that both incorporation, regulation and winding up of Corporations including Banking Companies (but excluding Co-operative Societies) as well as the subject of banking are both within the competence of the Union Parliament by virtue of Entries 43 and 45 in List-I of the Seventh Schedule. However, insofar as the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 seek to regulate the incorporation, regulation or winding up (including amalgamation) of a Co-operative Society, it must be held that the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 to that extent cannot apply to Co-operative Societies as any other interpretation would mean that subjects specifically excluded from List-I would be controlled by a legislation made with reference to Entries in List -I. In other words, the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, in so far as it seeks to regulate activities of Cooperative Societies falling outside the scope of banking and falling within the scope of incorporation, regulation and winding up of Co-operative Societies cannot be held to be operative against Co-operative Societies which are engaged in the banking business. Viewed in that manner, the only conclusion can be that, while in every aspect of banking, Co-operative Societies engaged in the business of banking would be subject to the provisions in the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 in so far as it seeks to regulate the business of banking, the provisions in the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, which encroach into the aspects of incorporation, regulation and winding up of Co-operative Societies would have to be held inapplicable to Co-operative Societies. It cannot W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 58 be disputed that amalgamation by its very nature is an aspect of incorporation and/or regulation and cannot be an aspect of banking. Therefore, when amalgamation and regulation of Co-operative Societies is specifically excluded from Entry 43 of List-I and is specifically included in Entry 32 of List-II, it cannot be said that by virtue of law relating to banking (The Banking Regulation Act, 1949) under and with reference to Entry 45 of List-I any aspect of incorporation and regulation of Co-operative Societies could be brought under the control of Union Legislation referable to Entry 45 of ListI. In Waverly Jute Mills Co.Ltd. v. Raymon and Company (India) Pvt. Ltd., AIR 1963 SC 90, it was held:- _“11.It is next argued for the appellants that even if a law on Forward Contracts can be said to be a law on Futures Markets, it must be held to be legislation falling under Entry 26 in List II, and not Entry 48 in List I, because Forward Contracts form a major sector of modern trade, and constitute its very core, and to exclude them from the ambit of Entry 26 in List II, would be to rob it of much of its contents. Reliance was placed in support of this contention, on the rule of construction that the entries in the Lists should be construed liberally and on the decision in Bhuwalka Brothers Ltd. v. Dunichand Rateria, AIR 1952 Cal 740 (SB) which, on this point was affirmed by this Court in Duni Chand Rateria v. Bhuwalka Brothers Ltd. 1955-1 SCR 1071: (S) AIR 1955 SC 182. The rule of construction is undoubtedly well established that the entries in the Lists should be construed broadly and not in a narrow or pedantic sense. But there is no need for the appellants to call this rule in aid of their_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 59 _contention, as trade and commerce would, in their ordinary and accepted sense, include forward contracts. That was the view which was adopted in Bhuwalka Brothers Ltd. case, AIR 1952 Cal 740 (SB) and which commended itself to this Court in Duni Chand Rateria case., 1955- 1 SCR 1071: (S) AIR 1955 SC 182. Therefore, if the question were simply whether a law on Forward Contracts would be a law with respect to Trade and commerce, there should be no difficulty in answering it in the affirmative. But the point which we have got to decide is as to the scope of the entry “Trade and commerce” read in juxtaposition with Entry 48 of List I. As the two entries relate to the powers mutually exclusive of two different legislatures, the question is how these two are to be reconciled. Now it is a rule of construction as well established as that on which the appellants rely, that the entries in the Lists should be so construed as to give effect to all of them and that a construction which will result in any of them being rendered futile or otiose must be avoided. It follows from this that where there are two entries, one general in its character and the other specific, the former must be construed as excluding the latter. This is only an application of the general maxim that Generalia specialibus non derogant. It is obvious that if Entry 26 is to be construed as comprehending Forward Contracts, then “Futures Markets” in Entry 48 will be rendered useless. We are therefore of opinion that legislation on Forward Contracts must be held to fall within the exclusive competence of the Union under Entry 48 in List I.”_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 60 32. No doubt the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act will apply to the Co-operative Societies subject to the modifications specified in Section 56 but there is no provision regulating any aspect other than the banking. The reference of term 'banking company', Section 56 or 'the company' or 'such company' in the Banking Regulation Act shall be construed as references to the Co-operative Bank. Thus, the power of inspection, the power of Reserve Bank of India to issue directions in respect of stressed assets and further powers as set out in Section 36 providing control over the management and all other powers of the Banking Regulation Act permitting the Reserve Bank to intervene the affairs of a banking company would definitely extend to the Co-operative Banks with the aim to safeguard and insure that the Co-operative Banks engaged in banking activity are subject to the overall control of the RBI. Un-amended Section 14 and amended Section 14A read as under:- _14.Amalgamation, transfer of assets and liabilities and division of societies.-(1)A society may, 23 [xxx] by a resolution passed by a two-third majority of the members present and voting at a general body meeting_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 61 _of the society,- (a)transfer its assets and liabilities in whole or in part to any other society; (b)divide itself into two or more societies (2)Any two or more societies may, 23a[xxx] by a resolution passed by a two third majority of the members present and voting at a general body meeting of each such society, amalgamate themselves and form a new society. (3)The resolution of a society under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall contain all particulars of the transfer, division or amalgamation, as the case may be. (4)When a society has passed any such resolution, it shall give notice thereof in writing to all its members and creditors and, notwithstanding the provisions of section 24 or any bye-law or contract to the contrary, any member or creditor shall, within a period of two months from the date of service of the notice upon him, have the option of withdrawing his shares, deposits or loans, as the case may be. (5)Any member or creditor who does not exercise his option within the period specified in sub-section (4) shall be deemed to have given his assent to the proposals contained in the resolution. (6)A resolution passed by a society under this section shall not take effect until either— (a)the assent thereto of all the members and creditors has been given or deemed to have been given; or (b)all claims of members and creditors who exercise the option referred to in sub-section (4) within the period specified therein, have been met in full. (7)Where a resolution passed by a society under this section involves the transfer of any assets and liabilities, the resolution shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, be a sufficient conveyance to vest the assets and liabilities in the transferee without any assurance._ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 62 _14A.Provisions regarding transfer of assets and liabilities of District Co-operative Banks to the Kerala State Co-operative Bank. – (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, the District Cooperative Banks may by a resolution passed by a simple majority of the members present and voting at the special general body meeting of the members, transfer its assets and liabilities in whole to the Kerala State Co-operative Bank and such transfer shall take effect from the date on which the Registrar approves the resolution._ _(2) The resolution shall contain particulars of the assets and liabilities to be transferred._ _(3) When a District Co-operative Bank has passed any such resolution, under sub-section (1), it shall give notice thereof in writing to all its members within seven days from the date of resolution, notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Section 24 or any Rules or any bye-laws and subrules or any contract to the contrary, any member shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of issuance of the said notice, have the option of withdrawing his shares, deposits or closing loans, as the case may be:_ _Provided that any other debtor or creditor shall be informed of such a resolution through publication of notice in two leading daily newspapers in vernacular language within seven days from the date of resolution that they have the option to withdraw deposit, loans, as the case may be, within a period of thirty days from the date of publication of notice._ _(4) Any member or creditor or debtor who does not exercise_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 63 _his option within the period specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to have given his assent to the proposals contained in the resolution._ _(5) On and from the date of approval of transfer of assets and liabilities of each District Co-operative Bank by the Registrar, all the assets and liabilities as it stood immediately before the transfer shall without any further act, instrument or deed, stand transferred to and vested in the Kerala State Cooperative Bank._ _(6) On and from the date of approval of transfer of assets and liabilities of each of the District Co-operative Bank by the Registrar, all pending suits or legal proceedings by or against such Banks shall be continued by the Kerala State Cooperative Bank.”_ 33. In Section 14 there was a provision incorporated for amalgamation of the Co-operative Societies with ¾[th] majority but the co-operative societies were not opting to do the same. The Legislature brought in Section 14A by substituting ¾[th ] simple majority. But when that was also not followed the amendment was caused in Section 74H(1)(a) in 2020 with effect from 11[th] of April, 2020. It is a matter of record that all the societies in 13 districts had agreed to get amalgamated with State Co-operative Bank. The whole idea W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 64 was to have de-layering. The main objects for causing the amendment by the legislature in Section 14A and Section 74H(1)(a) were as under: ## _“STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS_ _As per section 14 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 two third majority of the members of the society is required for amalgamation and transfer of assets and liabilities of two or more co-operative societies. As far as District Co-operative Banks are concerned, as it created difficulty in complying with the transfer of assets and liabilities, the Act was amended incorporating a new section 14A, to relax the condition of two third majority as simple majority, in the case of merger of District Co-operative Banks along with provisions for protecting the interests of its members, creditors and depositors, as per the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2019 (Act 1 of 2019). In pursuance to the provisions of the said Act, out of 14 District Co-operative Banks, 13 have passed resolution in favour of amalgamation with the Kerala State Cooperative Bank, but one District Co-operative Bank, i.e., Malappuram District Co-operative Bank has not passed the resolution and not adopted the scheme of amalgamation as suggested by the Registrar._ _2. The spirit behind the amalgamation of District Co-_ _operative Banks with the State Co-operative Bank is that, on the existence of two higher tiers viz., KSCB at apex level and DCBs at middle level adds to the cost on interest without offering any significant benefit to the lowest tier, viz., Primary Agricultural Co-operative Societies (PACS). De-layering of one tier will help in_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 65 _unlocking these funds which can be put to more productive uses._ _3. As per the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2019 (1 of 2019) the District Co-operative Banks will cease to exist, and the members of the said banks i.e., primary co-operative societies will become the members of the Kerala State Co-operative Bank. There is no provision in the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 or any other law to control and regulate the functioning of the District Cooperative Bank which has not adopted the scheme of amalgamation. Moreover, the majority of the funds of the DCBs are the contributions of PACs and PACs became the members of the SCB. Since the DCBs have no existence, if the PACS withdraw their deposits from DCB, then the existence of DCB itself also will be under challenge._ _4. In the above circumstance, Government have decided to merge the District Co-operative Bank which has not passed resolution in favour of amalgamation, with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank by adopting a reasonable method by providing opportunities to its members, depositors and creditors, by an order of the Registrar in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India._ _5. As the Legislative Assembly of the State of Kerala was not in session and the said proposal had to be given effect immediately, the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 was promulgated by the Hon'ble Governor of Kerala on 14[th] January, 2020 and the same was published as Ordinance No.6 of 2020 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.109 dated 15[th] January, 2020._ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 66 _6. As a Bill to replace the said Ordinance by an Act of the State Legislature could not be introduced in and passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly during its session which commenced on the 29[th] day of January, 2020 and ended on the 12[th] day of February, 2020, the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 was promulgated by the Hon'ble Governor of Kerala on 17[th] February, 2020 and published as Ordinance No. 16 of 2020 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.555 dated 18[th] February, 2020._ _7. As a Bill to replace the said Ordinance by an Act of the State Legislature could not be introduced in and passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly during its session which commenced on the 2[nd] March, 2020 and ended on the 13[th] day of March, 2020, the Kerala Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 was promulgated by the Hon'ble Governor of Kerala on 31[st] March, 2020 and was published as Ordinance No.20 of 2020 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No. 1023 dated 1" April, 2020._ _8. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in its interim order, passed in certain Writ Petitions, directed the Reserve Bank of India not to proceed further as per the provisions of the Ordinance. Moreover, the recent scenario of lockdown introduced throughout the country, also affected the completion of merging process. Hence the merging process could not be completed within a period of 3 months from the date of commencement of the Ordinance. Hence Government decided to make suitable amendments._ _9. As the Legislative Assembly of the State of Kerala was not in session and as the said proposal had to be given effect immediately the Kerala Co- operative_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 67 _Societies (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 was promulgated by the Hon'ble Governor on the 9[th] day of April, 2020 and was published as Ordinance No.27 of 2020 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.1048 dated 11[th] April, 2020._ _10. As a Bill to replace the said Ordinance by an Act of the State Legislature could not be introduced in and passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly during its session which commenced on the 24[th] day of August, 2020 and ended on the same day and in order to keep alive the provisions of the said Ordinance, the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 was promulgated by the Hon'ble Governor of Kerala on the 28[th] day of September, 2020 and was published as Ordinance No.58 of 2020 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.2194 dated 28[th] September, 2020._ _11. Though Bill No.274 of 2021 of the Fourteenth Kerala Legislative Assembly was published to replace the said Ordinance by an Act of the State Legislature, the same could not be introduced in and passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly during its session which commenced on the 31[st] day of December, 2020 and ended on the same day and during its session which commenced on the 8[th] day of January, 2021 and ended on 22[nd] January, 2021 due to paucity of time._ _12. In order to keep alive the provisions of the said Ordinance, the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 was promulgated by the Governor of Kerala on the 9[th] day of February, 2021 and the same was published as Ordinance No.24 of 2021 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.649 dated 10[th]_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 68 ## _February, 2021._ _13. As a Bill to replace the said Ordinance by an Act of the State Legislature could not be introduced in and passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly during its session which commenced on the 24[th] day of May, 2021 and ended on the 10[th] day of June, 2021 and in order to keep alive the provisions of the said Ordinance, the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 (92 of 2021) was promulgated by the Hon'ble Governor of Kerala on 2[nd] day of July, 2021 and the same was published in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.1954 dated 3[rd] July, 2021._ _14. There exists two types of Primary Dairy Cooperative Societies, i.e., traditional Dairy Co-operative Societies and Anand Pattern Co-operative Societies (APCOS). As per G.O. (P) No.183/79/AD dated 27[th] April, 1979, it was directed to take necessary steps to amend the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 with regard to the establishment and functioning of Anand Pattern Dairy Co-operative Societies, Regional Co-operative Milk Producers' Unions and State Federation._ _15. The expert committee under the Chairmanship of former Dairy Development Commissioner Smt. Lida Jacob, IAS (Rtd.), constituted to conduct a comprehensive study on the three-tier Dairy Cooperative structure in the Kerala State recommended for limiting the term of members of the managing committee to a maximum of 3 terms, women participation etc. The same was reiterated in the report submitted by the High Level Committee consisting of experts from all fields of Animal Husbandry and Dairy_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 69 _Sectors._ _16. In the above circumstances, with a view to strengthen the functioning of the Primary Dairy Cooperative Societies and the Regional Co-operative Milk Producers' Union, to ensure that only the real dairy farmers can become the active members of the Dairy Co-operative Societies and its managing committees, to limit the term of the members of the managing committees of Regional Co-operative Milk Producers' Union to a maximum of three terms, to ensure women participation in these societies and to constitute recruitment committees to ensure fair recruitment process in the Regional Co-operative Milk Producers' Union, new provisions were needed to be incorporated in the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (21 of 1969) by amending sections 2, 8A, 16, 28, 28AB, 64 and by inserting new sections 16B and 80BB._ _17. As the Kerala Legislative Assembly of the State of Kerala was not in session and as the said proposals had to be given effect immediately, the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 was promulgated by the Governor of Kerala on the 12[th] day of February, 2021 and published as Ordinance No.32 of 2021 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.725 dated 12[th] February, 2021. Due to inadvertent omission, certain clerical errors were crept in certain provisions of the said Ordinance. Hence, the Government have decided to make necessary amendments in the relevant provisions to rectify the clerical errors. As the Legislative Assembly of the State of Kerala was not in session and as the said proposals had to be given_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 70 _effect immediately, the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Third Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 was promulgated by the Hon'ble Governor of Kerala on the 24[th] day of February, 2021 and published as Ordinance No.47 of 2021 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.945 dated 24[th] February, 2021._ _18. A Bill to replace the said two Ordinances by an Act of the State Legislature could not be introduced in and passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly during its session which commenced on the 24[th] day of May, 2021 and ended on 10[th] day of June, 2021._ _19. As the Legislative Assembly of the State of Kerala was not in session and as the said proposals had to be given effect immediately the Kerala Co-operative Societies (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 (93 of 2021) was promulgated by the Hon'ble Governor on 2[nd] day of July, 2021 and the same was published in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No. 1952 dated 3[rd] July, 2021._ _20. Though a Bill to replace the Ordinance Nos.92 of 2021 and 93 of 2021 by an Act of State Legislature was published as Bill No.9 of the Fifteenth Kerala Legislative Assembly by conjoining the provisions of Ordinances, same could not be introduced in and passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly during its session which commenced on the 22[nd] day of July, 2021 and ended on the 13[th] day of August, 2021 due to paucity of time._ _21. In order to keep alive the provisions of the said Ordinance, the Kerala Co-operative Societies_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 71 _(Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 was promulgated by the Governor of Kerala on the 23[rd] day of August, 2021 and the same was published as Ordinance No.117 of 2021 in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary No.2477 dated 25[th] August, 2021._ _22. The Bill seeks to replace the above said Ordinance No.117 of 2021 by an Act of State Legislature._ ## _FINANCIAL MEMORANDUM_ _The Bill, if enacted and brought into operation, would not involve any additional expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of the State._ _MEMORANDUM REGARDING DELEGATED LEGISLATION Sub-section (1)(a) of section 74H proposed to be inserted in the principal Act by clause 3 of the Bill seeks to empower the Registrar to issue order of merger._ _2. Sub-section (1) of section 80BB proposed to be inserted in the principal Act by clause 10 of the Bill empowers the Government to constitute Recruitment Committees for the entire selection and recruitment process of all permanent employees of the Regional Co-operative Milk Producers' Union._ _3. The matter in respect of which notifications or orders may be issued or rules may be made are matter of procedure and are of routine and administrative in nature. Further, the rules to be made are subject to the scrutiny of the Kerala Legislative Assembly. The delegation of Legislative power is therefore, of a normal character.”_ W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 72 34. Learned Single Judge very extensively dealt with in every arguments raised by the appellants/petitioners with regard to the domain of the Legislature and applicability of the Entries 43 and 45 of List-I of the seventh schedule and Entry 32 and on analysis of the case law, in our considered opinion, has rightly rejected the contention of the appellants. 35. We do not find any illegality, impropriety or perversity in the judgment of the Single Bench. We cannot lose sight of the fact that all the other thirteen district Cooperative Societies voluntarily agreed to amalgamate with the State Co-operative or with the intend of de-layering and permission granted by the RBI continue to exist. In these circumstances, it is fully intriguing under what circumstances the RBI filed a writ appeal by challenging judgment of the Single Bench. Perhaps it was under some confusion by that time the amendment under Section 44A was caused but in view of our findings there is no such confusion. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the RBI is dismissed. W.A.Nos.1957, 1962, 1975, 1977 & 2114 of 2023 **==> picture [15 x 10] intentionally omitted <==** Other writ appeals lack merit. Accordingly, all writ appeals are dismissed. Sd/- **AMIT RAWAL JUDGE** Sd/- **C.S. SUDHA JUDGE** skj