WA 1674 of 2020
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Hon. Justice Anu Sivaraman
- Hon. Justice C. Jayachandran
- Judgment Date
- 2023-09-18
- Court Decision / Holding
- In result, the writ appeal is allowed. The judgment of the learned Single Judge is set aside. The appellants must consider the pension issue strictly in accordance with the Apex Court’s directions and taking into account any options submitted by the employees. The matter leaves open the question of those employees drawing higher pensions and the applicability of the circular dated 25 January 2023.
- Final Disposition
- Writ appeal allowed; Single Judge’s order set aside; pension issue to be decided in line with Apex Court directions and employee options; open questions on higher pension and circular 25.01.2023.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), Bhavishanidhi Bhavan, Pattom, Palace, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004
- Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Office of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, EPFO, Bhavishanidhi Bhavan, Eranhipalam, Kozhikode – 673 006
- Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-1 (Pension), Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, 14 Bhikaji Cama Palace, New Delhi – 110 066
Respondents
- A.K.NALAN PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- ABDUL KADAR C.P PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- ABHIJITH MR DATA ENTRY OPERATOR, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- ANTONY K.J, MACHINIST, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- ASHADEVI C.M SECRETARY, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- DEVASSIA P.T PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- BENOY AUGUSTINE, PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- JISHA ANAND JUNIOR CLERK, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- JOM VARGHESE, PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- LASAR A.K PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- M.V THOMAS PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- MANIKANDAN PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- MANOJKUMAR M.K PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- N. CHANDRAN, PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- P.V BABU, PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- SEBASTIAN C.J PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- T.C. LUKOSE, PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- THANKACHAN N.A TYPIST/JUNIOR CLERK, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- THOMAS C.T LAB ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- UMMER K SENIOR CLERK, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- V.D. SHAJU JUNIOR CLERK, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- V.J SUNNY PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- V.T. RAMAN PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT, AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD
- VASANTHAKUMARI P.C. GREESHMAM, MEENANGADI, WAYANAD
- RAHIM N.M. EDAVILA, NARIKUNDU P.O, WAYANAD
- GEETHA GOPALAN DIVIYA NIVAS, AMBALAVAYAL, WAYANAD
- VASUDEVAN K.K. KUTTADANDIYIL, AMBALAVAYAL P.O, WAYANAD
- SCARIA K.J. KUTHUKALLINGAL, NELLARACHAL P.O, WAYANAD
- SASI M. G MAMPULLI, AMBALAVAYAL P.O, WAYANAD
- BABY M.V MOKKUVAMTHARA, KUMBALERY P.O, WAYANAD
- KUNHIRAMAN P.C. KAIKULATHIL, KUMBALERY P.O, WAYANAD
- UNION OF INDIA (UOI) REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI -110 001
- EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEE, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING TRUSTEE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, WAZIPUR, NEW DELHI-110 052
- AMBALAVAYAL KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM LTD, NO.D 1961(APCOS) REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, P.O.VADUVANCHAL – 673 581, WAYANAD DISTRICT
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Sajeev Kumar K. Gopal
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ appeal, filed by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), challenges a learned Single Judge’s order in WP(C) 4667/2020 directing re-determination of pension payable to the writ petitioners (respondents 1 to 31 in this appeal). The Division Bench of this Court in P. Sasikumar and others v. Union of India and others (ILR 2019 (1) Ker. 614) had previously laid down directions that inform the scope of pension determinations under the Employees’ Provident Fund scheme. The respondents’ case further contends that the matter now stands governed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Employees Provident Fund Organization and Another v. Sunil Kumar B. and Others (2022 (6) KLT 234 (SC)), particularly Paragraph 44, which upheld the 22 August 2014 notification as legal and valid and provided directions regarding employees’ option submissions. The appellants contend that the issue should be resolved strictly in accordance with the Apex Court’s directions, taking into account any options submitted by employees, and that the earlier Division Bench framework remains the relevant backdrop. The High Court ultimately allows the appeal, setting aside the Single Judge’s order and directing computation in line with Apex Court directions, while leaving open the questions concerning higher pension petitions and the applicability of the circular dated 25 January 2023.
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The EPFO contends that the central issue is already resolved by the Supreme Court in Sunil Kumar B. and Others (2022) and by prior Division Bench jurisprudence; Paragraph 44 of the Sunil Kumar B. decision upholds the 22 August 2014 notification as legal and valid and provides directions regarding employees’ option submissions. The issue, therefore, should be decided strictly on the basis of the Apex Court’s directions, with due regard to any options submitted by employees. The appeal argues for setting aside the Single Judge’s order which directed re-determination of pension and for applying the Apex Court’s directives to determine pension entitlement, while keeping open questions relating to higher pension claims and the 25 January 2023 circular.
Contentions of Respondents
The respondents petitioners contend for re-determination of pension in line with the Division Bench’s guidance in P. Sasikumar and others v. Union of India and others, ILR 2019 (1) Ker. 614, and seek adherence to the framework established there. They rely on the writ petition (WP(C) 4667/2020) and the earlier Division Bench’s directions to secure pension re-determination consistent with the statutory scheme. They emphasize that the notified rules and circulars should be applied to determine the pension, and that the Apex Court’s decision in Sunil Kumar B. does not alter their entitlement under the Division Bench framework.”},
Cited Precedents (2)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| P. Sasikumar and others v. Union of India and others | ILR 2019 (1) Ker. 614 | Mentioned Only | Cited as background Division Bench authority informing the earlier directions but not treated as the controlling rule; the court instead anchors on the Apex Court directions. |
| Employees Provident Fund Organization and Another v. Sunil Kumar B. and Others | 2022 (6) KLT 234 (SC) | Positive | Cited and relied upon to uphold the validity of the 22.08.2014 notification and to outline the Apex Court directions governing options and pension computation. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against WA 1674 of 2020 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.