High Court of KeralaDivision BenchDisposed of

W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019

Case / Petition Number:W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • S. Manikumar
  • Shaji P. Chaly
Judgment Date
2022-03-08
Court Decision / Holding
Thus, the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms of the abovesaid judgment.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • B.S.SYAMKUMAR AGED 38 YEARS S/O BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, KSRA233, MUDIPPURAMLANE, AVANAVAN CHERRY VILLAGE, CHITTATTINKARA DESOM, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695101

Respondents

  • 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001
  • 2 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001
  • 3 ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
  • 4 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001
  • 5 THE MEMBER SECRETARY, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PATTOM.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003
  • 6 ADDL.R6 M/S.SIGN PRINTING INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION 41/2795, C2 FIRST FLOOR, NORTH AVENUE, PARAMARA ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682018, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT OUSEPHACHAN P.P. (ADDL.R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 05/04/2018 IN IA.NO.01/2019)
  • 7 ADDL.R7 T.A.WAHID PROPRIETOR, SURYA SIGNS, R.R.BUILDING, IRON BRIDGE POST - 688 011, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
  • 8 ADDL.R8 MUHAMMED MUNEER V PARTNER, FINEX PRINTING SOLUTIONS, 2ND FLOOR, MALABAR PLAZA BUILDINGS, MATTANNUR POST-670702, KANNUR DISTRICT

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • ADV M.KANNAN

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SRI.V. TEKCHAND, SENIOR GP
  • • SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN
  • • SRI.T.NAVEEN SC
  • • PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU
  • • SRI.V.A.SATHEESH
  • • SMT.ANEY PAUL
  • • SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, B.S. Syamkumar, an environmentalist and public-spirited citizen, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to implement a ban on the manufacture, storage, transportation, import, use and sale of PVC Flex in Kerala and to ensure that only eco-friendly materials are used in election campaigns in the state. He argues PVC Flex is highly environmentally hazardous: its production emits toxic gases, it is non-biodegradable and non-recyclable, and its disposal (burning) releases carcinogenic chlorine, dioxins and furans, while burial risks water contamination through leaching. After submitting a detailed representation to the Chief Secretary, with no substantive response, he invoked Article 226 of the Constitution. The court recalls a 2021 Kerala High Court judgment in W.P. (C) No. 5218 of 2012 and connected petitions that directed removal of unauthorised arches, hoardings and banners and mandated state agencies to enforce road-safety and environmental norms, while requiring related authorities to act against nuisances and promote safer, pollution-free advertising. It also notes a similar issue before the Supreme Court in W. Edwin Willson v. Union of India (Civil Appeal No. 9677 of 2019) with a pending SLP. The bench holds that the 2021 directions are squarely applicable and disposes of the petition accordingly, directing authorities to remove unauthorised outdoor advertisements and to pursue eco-friendly advertising and road-safety measures.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Highway Protection Act, 1999Section 22 of the Kerala Highway Protection Act, 1999Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994Section 275 of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994Section 209C of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994Kerala Road Safety Authority Act, 2007Section 9 of the Kerala Road Safety Authority Act, 2007Sections 44 and 15(2) of the Kerala Highway Protection Act, 1999Environment Protection Act, 1986Policy on Roadside Advertisements (Indian Road Congress, 1992)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that PVC Flex is the most environmentally hazardous consumer material due to its non-biodegradable nature and non-recyclability; its production releases toxic gases; disposal by burning emits chlorine, dioxins and furans; burial risks leaching of toxins into water. He lodged a detailed representation to the Chief Secretary but received no adequate response, and thus approached this Court under Article 226 seeking a ban on PVC Flex and the use of eco-friendly materials in election campaigning.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents point to a pending Supreme Court SLP on a similar issue noted in Civil Appeal No. 9677 of 2019 and vouch for awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision. They rely on earlier directives issued in the 2021 judgment in W.P. (C) No. 5218 of 2012 and connected petitions, arguing for a consistent approach pending higher court guidance.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
W.P. (C) No. 5218 of 2012 and connected writ petitionsW.P. (C) No. 5218 of 2012PositiveThe court relies on the 2021 judgment’s directions issued in W.P. (C) No. 5218 of 2012 and connected petitions, applying those directions to the present case.
W. Edwin Willson v. Union of India and OthersCivil Appeal No. 9677 of 2019Mentioned OnlySupreme Court matter cited as having a similar issue; SLP pending; the present court does not decide on this issue but notes it for context.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -1- ## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR** **&** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY** **TUESDAY, THE 8[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 7193 OF 2019** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **B.S.SYAMKUMAR AGED 38 YEARS S/O BALAKRISHNA PILLAI,KSRA233,MUDIPPURAMLANE,AVANAVAN CHERRY VILLAGE, CHITTATTINKARA DESOM,ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-695101.** **BY ADV M.KANNAN** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** - **1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.** - **2 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.** - **3 ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.** - **4 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.** - **5 THE MEMBER SECRETARY, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,PATTOM.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.** - **6 ADDL.R6 M/S.SIGN PRINTING INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION 41/2795, C2 FIRST FLOOR, NORTH AVENUE, PARAMARA ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682018, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT OUSEPHACHAN P.P. (ADDL.R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 05/04/2018 IN IA.NO.01/2019)** W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -2- **7 ADDL.R7 T.A.WAHID PROPRIETOR, SURYA SIGNS, R.R.BUILDING, IRON BRIDGE POST - 688 011, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 8 ADDL.R8 MUHAMMED MUNEER V PARTNER, FINEX PRINTING SOLUTIONS, 2ND FLOOR, MALABAR PLAZA BUILDINGS, MATTANNUR POST-670702, KANNUR DISTRICT. (ADDL.R7 AND R8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 24/06/2019 IN IA.NO.02/2019) BY ADVS. SRI.V. TEKCHAND, SENIOR GP SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN SRI. T.NAVEEN SC, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU SRI.V.A.SATHEESH SMT.ANEY PAUL SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -3- ## **J U D G M E N T** ## S. Manikumar, C.J. ## Petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:- “i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction compelling and commanding the respondents for the implementation of ban on the manufacture, storage, transportation, import, use and sale of PVC Flex in the State. ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the respondents to ensure that only eco-friendly materials are used for the purpose of advertisement and during the election campaigning in the State.” ## 2. Brief facts leading to filing of the writ petition are as hereunder:- a) According to the petitioner, he is an environmentalist, social worker and a public spirited citizen. Petitioner is aggrieved by the omission, rather inaction on the part of the respondents, in taking effective measures to prohibit the manufacture, storage, sale and usage of PVC Flex. W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -4- b) Petitioner has submitted that Poly Vinyl Chloride, commonly known as the PVC Flex, is the most environmentally hazardous consumer material ever produced. In the process of its manufacture, toxic gases are produced. It is a non biodegradable material, cannot be recycled, and therefore, of no resale value. c) Petitioner has further submitted that the two sources for putting an end to the used PVC Flex are either to burn or to bury underneath the soil. If it is burnt, it will release highly toxic chlorine, dioxins and furan, which are carcinogenic, means any substance, radionuclide, of radiation that is an agent directly in causing cancer. On the other hand, if it is buried to the soil, the toxins will enter into the water by leaching. d) In the above circumstances, petitioner submitted a detailed representation to the Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram, the 1[st] respondent. Since there is no positive response from the 1[st] respondent, the petitioner has approached this Court invoking the original jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. By inviting the attention of this Court to the record of W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -5- proceedings in Civil Appeal No. 9677 of 2019 in W. Edwin Willson v. Union of India and Others dated 12.08.2021, Mr. Deepu Lal Mohan, learned Standing Counsel for the Election Commission of India, submitted that on a similar issue, an SLP is pending on the file of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 4. Earlier, when W. P. (C) No. 5218 of 2012 and connected writ petitions were heard on the issue of use of plastics / flex boards in the State of Kerala, after considering the statutory provisions, pleadings and submissions, this Court by judgment dated 14.01.2021, issued the following directions:- “A) All the unauthorised arches, display boards, hoardings, placards, and banners with poles or frames, etc., fixed to and/or dug into the ground, which abuts the highways, public streets, and pedestrian pavements, shall forthwith be removed. No poles or frames or structures for arches, boards, placards, hoardings, display boards or banners shall be erected on any highway, public road, public passage or pedestrian pathway or pavement. Holes caused on pavements and roads, by reason of erection of frames, poles, structures, placards, hoardings, displaying boards, banners, etc., shall forthwith be repaired. B) The Secretaries to the Government, LSGD, PWD, State Highways and Heads of Departments, under the respective Acts, extracted above, shall issue appropriate instructions for effective W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -6- implementation of the above said directions. C) The District Collectors and the Secretaries of the aforementioned departments shall oversee the implementation of the directions issued by this Court, issue suitable orders, and take appropriate action against the erring officers. D) The Principal Secretaries to the Government, Public Works Department, Local Self Government Institutions, Government of Kerala, are directed to issue appropriate instructions to the field officers, to remove the nailing, in other words, de-nailing, make trees nail free and thereby, remove all the unauthorised signboards, advertisements, pamphlets etc. The District Collectors shall act in accordance with the orders issued in that regard. E) The Executive Engineer (Roads) or Executive Engineer (National Highways) of the Public Works Department, who are designated as Highway Authorities as per the provisions of the Kerala Highway Protection Act, 1999, are directed to identify those structures, hoardings, advertisement boards and displays etc., endangering road safety, and take immediate steps for removal thereof, under Section 22 of the said Act. F) The Project Directors / National Highways Authority of India are directed to take appropriate action, to effectively implement the directions. G) The Secretaries of Municipal Corporations and Municipalities in the State, under Section 275 of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994, are directed to take steps, to identify and remove W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -7- unauthorised hoardings, banners, flex boards, temporary arches, posters etc. H) Likewise, the Secretaries of the Panchayats are directed to take steps to identify and remove unauthorised hoardings, banners, flex boards, temporary arches, posters, and other similar structures. I) The concerned Secretaries are directed to supervise dismantling of outdoor billboards, unauthorised hoardings etc., which causes inconvenience to the commuters. J) The Secretaries of the concerned Panchayat under Section 209C of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, shall provide necessary assistance to the NHAI for removal of illegal hoardings, banners, flexes, temporary arches, posters etc. K) In the event, the Municipal Authorities/officials, who come across the cases of breaches, not attracting any of the Municipal Laws, shall forthwith report the same to the District Collectors. On such information, being received by the District Collectors, necessary action for removal of such nuisance shall be taken in a time bound manner. L) Since, in the State of Kerala, certain notified portions of the National Highways are maintained by the National Highways Authority of India the outdoor advertising boards which cause distraction to traffic on such stretches of the Highways shall be identified by the concerned Project Director of NHAI and appropriate remedial action be taken, in accordance with law. M) The Kerala State Road Safety Authority, constituted under the W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -8- provisions of Kerala Road Safety Authority Act, 2007, to coordinate action on areas related to road safety among various departments, advice the Government on road safety policy, prescribe and enforce road safety standards and procedures, formulate and implement schemes / projects and programmes relating to road safety and is directed to conduct a detailed study, with the help of various District Road Safety Councils in the State, as regards the harmful effects caused on account of the outdoor hoardings / billboards, installed at various National/ State Highways and elsewhere, and submit a report to the Chief Secretary, to facilitate the State Government to regulate the hazardous outdoor hoardings / billboards. N) The Road Safety Commissioner/Transport Commissioner, who is the ex officio under Section 9 of the Kerala Road Safety Authority Act, 2007, is directed to look into the damaging effect of roadside advertisements in the light of 'Policy on Roadside Advertisements' published by the Indian Road Congress, 1992. O) Cluster of wires on trees and electrical poles, be regulated by the statutory authorities and the District Collectors are directed to take appropriate action for removal as per the existing rules. P) The Commissioner of Police or the Superintendent of Police, as the case may be, shall issue directions to the concerned police personnel, who are entrusted with the job of night patrolling, including the beat marshals, to keep a constant vigil, for preventing the activity of erection/display of illegal hoardings, banners, flexes, temporary arches, posters etc., during night time. Q) The Commissioner of Police/District Police Chief, shall W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -9- provide necessary assistance to the Highways Authority under Sections 44 and 15(2) of the Act, 1999 for removal of the unauthorised structures, hoardings, advertisement boards and displays, endangering road safety. R) Whenever an action is proposed to be taken by the authorities, as stated above, the concerned Assistant Commissioner / Deputy Superintendent of Police shall extend adequate police protection and police help to the local authorities, in the process. S) Report regarding removal of the above-mentioned unauthorised structures, outdoor hoardings / billboards, be submitted by the competent authorities under the respective enactments, to the District Collectors, every month.” 5. Said directions are squarely applicable to the case on hand. Thus, the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms of the abovesaid judgment. **Sd/-** **S. MANIKUMAR CHIEF JUSTICE** **Sd/SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE** Eb ///TRUE COPY/// P. A. TO JUDGE W. P. (C) No. 7193 of 2019 -10- ## **APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7193/2019** ## **PETITIONER EXHIBITS** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.FEE 17 EPC 2012 DATED 11.03.2016,ISSUED UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL (PROTECTION) ACT,1986 BY GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.F 0588/2014/32 DATED 27.9.2017 ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.COMM./PR/774/2016-17 DATED 04.05.2016 ISSUED BY BANGALORE METROPOLITAN CITY. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO/.PPCB/HO/PLA/GEN/2010 DATED 02.05.2013 ISSUED BY KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.PCB/HO/PLA/GEN/2010 DATED 14.07.2015 OF KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT PUBLISHED B YTHE "SUCHITWA MISSION"LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.**