W. P. (C) No. 23243/2023
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Mohammed Nias C. P.
- Judgment Date
- 2024-03-07
- Court Decision / Holding
- Till the finalisation of the Special Rules, appointments to the post of Lower Division Clerks in various departments in Palakkad District under direct recruitment shall be filled only from Ext.P-2 ranked list, even if the appointment is to be on temporary or contract basis. The writ petition is disposed of as above; the court also directed to finalise the Special Rules within six months from the date of the judgment.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- Abhijith P.
- Nitheesh P.C.
- Anil A.
Respondents
- State of Kerala represented by Chief Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
- Secretary to Government, Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Development Department, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
- Secretary to Government, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, North Block, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
- Director, Institute of Integrated Medical Sciences (Government Medical College, Palakkad)
- Institute of Integrated Medical Sciences (Government Medical College, Palakkad), represented by its Director
- Kerala Public Service Commission, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram
- District Officer, Kerala Public Service Commission, Palakkad
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • A. Aruna
- • Jisha Shaji
Counsels for Respondents
- • Premchand R. Nair
- • Latha Thankappan
- • Suman Chakravarthy
- • P.C. Sasidharan
Case Synopsis & Summary
This writ petition, filed by Abhijith P., Nitheesh P.C., and Anil A., challenges the respondents’ refusal to fill vacant clerical posts at the 5th respondent, the Institute of Integrated Medical Sciences (GMC Palakkad), under direct recruitment in Palakkad district. By Ext.P-4 (20 January 2021), the government declared the 5th respondent a society under the Kerala Public Service Commission (Additional Functions as Respects Certain Societies) Act, 1996, thus bringing its appointments under PSC purview. Draft Special Rules for non-teaching staff were prepared (Ext.P-10) but not finalised, delaying PSC recruitment. The petitioners seek a declaration that vacancies must be filled from Ext.P-2 ranked list and a direction to finalise and publish the Special Rules without further delay. The government counters that Special Rules are not finalised and the process—considering qualifications, age, experience—remains ongoing; hence the petition is premature. The petition relies on Government Circular dated 7 November 2001 based on this court’s O.P. No. 4261 of 2001 and on Biju C.V. v. Jashna K.J. The Division Bench’s 2022 decision in W.A. No. 764/2022 is cited to argue that Palakkad Medical Officers are state servants and that interim appointments may be made from the PSC list. The court ultimately directs that, until the Special Rules are finalised, direct recruitment appointments in Palakkad shall be made only from Ext.P-2, with a six‑month deadline to finalise the rules, and disposes of the petition accordingly.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The petitioners contend that Ext.P-4 brought the 5th respondent within PSC’s purview. They rely on Government Circular dated 7.11.2001, based on this Court’s O.P. No.4261/2001, and on Biju C.V. v. Jashna K.J. (2021) 2 KHC 550, to assert that vacancies should be filled from Ext.P-2 ranked list and that Special Rules for non-teaching staff be finalised without delay. They seek a declaration that respondents are liable to fill vacancies from Ext.P-2 and a direction to publish the Special Rules; the goal is to ensure PSC-led recruitment rather than ad hoc appointments.
Contentions of Respondents
The government counters that the Special Rules are not finalised and the process—considering qualifications, age, and experience—remains ongoing, making the petition premature. The 5th respondent has filed an affidavit outlining steps toward finalisation. The Division Bench in W.A. No.764/2022 is cited to support that the Medical Officers at Palakkad GMC are state servants, justifying interim PSC-based appointments until finalisation.
Cited Precedents (4)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| O.P. No. 4261/2001 | O.P. 4261/2001 | Mentioned Only | Government Circular dated 7 November 2001 was based on this Court’s judgment in O.P. 4261/2001. |
| Biju C.V. v. Jashna K.J. and Others | 2021 (2) KHC 550 | Positive | Cited for the proposition that even temporary appointments should prefer those in the current PSC-ranked list for regular posts. |
| W.A.No.764/2022 | W.A.No.764/2022 | Positive | Division Bench held Palakkad Medical Officers are Government Servants and the institution is State; supports interim PSC-based appointments from Ext.P-2. |
| OA(EKM) 1291/2018 | OA(EKM) 1291/2018 | Mentioned Only | Final order of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal is included as an exhibit; not discussed in reasoning. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against W. P. (C) No. 23243/2023 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.