High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of

Vijayalakshmi v. State of Kerala and Land Tribunal (LR), Tirurangadi

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-08
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.No.169/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (cited supra). No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • VIJAYALAKSHMI, aged 59 years w/o N.C.BALAKRISHNAN, N.C.House, Ariyallur, Malappuram District, PIN-676312

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram-695001
  • Land Tribunal/Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), Tirurangadi, Malappuram District, PIN-676306

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. K.P. Sudheer
  • • Smt. C.K. Sherin

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt. K. Amminikutty, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Vijayalakshmi filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the 2nd respondent, the Special Tahasildar (LR), to consider and pass orders in S.M. No.169/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi. The petition concerns a suo motu proceeding initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14, in respect of 18.60 acres of Re.Sy.No.53/6 in Ariyallur Village, Tirurangadi Taluk, Malappuram District. The petitioner argues that expeditious disposal is essential because many applicants discover the need for a purchase certificate only when approaching banks for loans, and delays frustrate loan funding and access to land benefits. The judgment refers to Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (2018) for guidance on expeditious disposal and maintaining seniority of cases, noting the court’s directions to dispose senior citizen cases on priority and to obtain village officer reports when revenue inspectors are short. It also notes G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (22.02.2018) forming part of the judgment. The court ultimately disposes the petition by directing the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.169/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Seniority of registration of cases to govern disposal sequence
  • Expeditious disposal of cases, especially senior citizen petitions
  • Living principle that Government reports may be obtained through Village Officers when revenue inspectors are short (as per Narayanan Namboodiri directives)

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.169/2021 on the Land Tribunal file, arguing for expeditious disposal in line with the court’s prior directions for senior citizen cases and for maintaining the seniority of pending matters. It relies on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision to insist on strict adherence to seniority and to expedite processing, including obtaining necessary reports via Village Officers when revenue inspectors are unavailable, and to implement the GO 2018 RD framework within the present matter.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents highlighted the pendency and administrative constraints of the Land Tribunal (noted as 2192 suo motu proceedings) and urged adherence to the procedural framework established in Narayanan Namboodiri and theGO 2018 RD for speedy and orderly disposal, including obtaining reports from Village Officers where necessary and respecting final orders in accordance with law, while not prejudicing the rights of other pending cases.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as controlling precedent establishing the principle that Land Tribunals should dispose cases in order of seniority and follow expeditious-disposal directives, which the present court adopts to guide disposal of S.M.No.169/2021.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Vijayalakshmi v. State of Kerala and Land Tribunal (LR), Tirurangadi and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **VIJAYALAKSHMI, AGED 59 YEARS W/O. N.C.BALAKRISHNAN, N.C.HOUSE, ARIYALLUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676312.** **BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER SMT.C.K.SHERIN** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.** **2 LAND TRIBUNAL/SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND REFORMS), TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676306.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY, SENIOR GP** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.169/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the PGovernment under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 18.60 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.53/6 of Ariyallur Village in Tirurangadi Taluk, Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the ## W.P(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Special Revenue Inspector, Tirurangadi, the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.169/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P6 report, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi is 2192. W.P(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.169/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.No.169/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.5853 OF 2021(F) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED DATED 9.2.2000 REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NO.396/2000 OF TIRURANGADI SRO.** **EXHIBIT P2** **TRUE COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 27.11.2018 ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER, ARIYALLUR VILLAGE.** **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 11.1.2021 ISSUED BY SPECIAL SALE OFFICER ATTACHED TO VALLIKKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK TO THE PETITIONER.** **EXHIBIT P4** **TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 11.1.2021 ISSUED BY SPECIAL SALE OFFICER ATTACHED TO VALLIKKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND.** **EXHIBIT P5** - **TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 11.1.2021 ISSUED BY SPECIAL SALE OFFICER ATTACHED TO VALLIKKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK TO THE PETITIONER'S SON.** **EXHIBIT P6** **TRUE COPY OF SUO MOTO REPORT ISSUED BY THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, LAND TRIBUNAL, TIRURANGADI IN S.M.NO.169/2021.**