Tenetowl LogoTenetowl
High CourtDivision BenchError in earlier judgment corrected by factual ...

VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEY v. UNION OF INDIA&ANR.

Case / Petition Number:Civil Appeal No. 9043 of 2014
Neutral Citation:[2014] 13 S.C.R. 1265

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • J. Chelameswar
  • J. K. Sikri
Judgment Date
2014-09-24
Court Decision / Holding
Error in earlier judgment corrected.
Final Disposition
Error in earlier judgment corrected by factual amendment to paragraph 44.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Vijay Shankar Pandey

Respondents

  • Union of India
  • Anr.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Pallav Shishodia, Sr.Adv.
  • • Kamlendra Mishra, Adv.

Case Synopsis & Summary

The Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal No. 9043 of 2014, addressed an error correction in a judgment previously delivered in September 2014. The appeal arises from a challenge to a High Court order related to a writ petition (W.P. No. 87 (S/B) of 2014) from Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. In the judgment dated 22 September 2014, the Court noted that paragraph 44 contained a factual error: the name of a person was incorrectly recorded as Jasveer Singh. The correct name is Suneel Kumar. The Court explicitly states that the paragraph stands modified accordingly, and the correction is reflected in the order. The correction is presented as an administrative rectification rather than a reconsideration of the merits of the case. Pallav Shishodia, Senior Advocate, and Kamlendra Mishra, Advocate, represented the Appellant Vijay Shankar Pandey, while the Respondents’ counsel is not listed in this excerpt. The order, signed by the Court, indicates the need to preserve the integrity of the record and to ensure accurate identification of individuals involved in the proceedings. The document emphasizes procedural accuracy and a formal correction to the official record, maintaining consistency with the Supreme Court’s disposition on the matter.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEY v. UNION OF INDIA&ANR. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

A (2014] 13 S.C.R. 1265 ## VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEY v. ## UNION OF INDIA&ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 9043of2014) SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 **B** **.[J. CHELAMESWARANDA. K. SIKRI, JJ.]** - _Judgment/Orders Correction of factual error in earlier_ - _judgment passed by the Supreme Court Paragraph 44 of the judgement modified accordingly._ C CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 9043 of2014. From the judgment and order dated 03.04.2014 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in W.P. D No. 87 (S/B) of 2014. Pallav Shishodia, Sr.Adv., and Kamlendra Mishra, Adv. for the Appellant. The following Order of the Court was passed : **E** ## **ORDER** It is mentioned today by Mr. Pallav Shishodia, learned senior counsel that in the Judgement delivered on 22nd September, 2014 in this appeal, a factual error occured at F paragraph 44. In the said paragraph, the name of Mr. Jasveer Singh is mentioned whereas the correct name is Mr. Suneel Kumar. The paragraph stands modified accordingly. Nidhi Jain Error in earlier judgment corrected. 1265