High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of

VESU v. Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-01-28
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.870/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment, and without any order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • VESU

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (LR) Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Pattambi, Palakkad - 679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri V.A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri Sunil Nath N.B. - Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed in the Kerala High Court by VESU challenging the suo motu proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi (S.M.No.870/2020), for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. The petition argues for expeditious disposal of the matter, highlighting the petitioner’s status as a senior citizen (71 years) and the practical needs for timely purchase certificates to secure bank loans. It recalls this Court’s earlier guidance in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases, 2018), which admonished tribunals to adhere to seniority and to expedite cases involving senior citizens, including the possibility of obtaining reports via Village Officers to avoid delays. The Court notes the overarching pendency of suo motu proceedings (approximately 11,078) and ultimately directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.870/2020 strictly in accordance with the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, within a lawful framework, and without costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 (Rule 14)Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 (Rule 5)Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases before Land Tribunals is imperative, especially for senior citizens.
  • Disposition of cases should follow seniority of registration; tribunals should not break seniority except as directed by this Court or higher authorities.
  • Use of Village Officers to obtain necessary reports can facilitate expeditious disposal.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends for an expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M.No.870/2020 by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, invoking the need for timely issuance of the certificate of purchase under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. Citing the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment, the petitioner seeks adherence to seniority principles and expedited processing, including utilizing Village Officers for reports to avoid delays. The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing prompt action within a timeframe to be fixed by the Court.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent pleader points to the enormous pendency of suo motu proceedings (over 11,000 cases) before the Land Tribunal and argues for adherence to due process and seniority, while acknowledging mechanisms to expedite (e.g., using Village Officers for reports). The respondent does not oppose expedited disposal but emphasizes compliance with law and established procedures, referencing GO 2018 RD and Rule 14/Rule 5 provisions.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveThe judgment relies on and directs compliance with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directives for expeditious disposal of land reform cases, especially prioritizing senior citizens and maintaining seniority-based processing.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against VESU v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 8TH MAGHA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **VESU, AGED 71 YEARS W/O.MANI, KAMMANTHARA, VANDAZHI, VANDAZHI-I VILLAGE, ALTHUR, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD - 679 104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SRI SUNIL NATH N.B- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.870/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0202 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.80/13 in Block No.48 of Vandazhi-I Village in Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Vandazhi-I, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.870/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 30.10.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 71 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi W.P(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T) -7- is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.870/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.870/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2153 OF 2021(T) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 30/10/2020.**