U.P. Roller Flour Mills Association and Ors. v. Govt. of India and Ors.
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court
- Hon'ble Judges
- Dr. Arijit Pasayat
- P. Sathasivam
- Judgment Date
- 2007-10-05
- Court Decision / Holding
- The writ petition is disposed of with directions on five modalities: (1) Associations/Gram Panchayats/Local bodies shall assess the need of wheat for the intended beneficiaries and convey the need to the State Government; (2) They shall indicate the quantum of wheat to be converted into Atta based on beneficiaries’ option, and convey the requirement to the State Government; (3) The quantity converted into Atta shall be given to mills, which will mill and supply Atta to FPS for distribution to beneficiaries at rates fixed by the Government; (4) State Governments shall ensure that the actual requirement is projected and that supplies reach the FPS and then the consumer; (5) State Governments shall quarterly submit data to the Central Government to monitor and ensure implementation of the object. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- U.P. Roller Flour Mills Association
Respondents
- Government of India
- State of West Bengal
- State of Assam
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Dinesh Kumar Garg
- • V.K. Biju
- • M.L. Lahoty
- • Paban K. Sharma
- • Himanshu Shekhar
Counsels for Respondents
- • C.A. Sundaram
- • Riku Sharma
- • Tara Chandra Sharma
- • Neelam Sharma
- • Rajeev Sharma
- • Kishan Datta
- • H. G. Prakash
- • Sunil Roy
- • R.C. Kathia
- • V.K. Verma
Case Synopsis & Summary
The case concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging alleged diversion of subsidized wheat stocks allocated for the Public Distribution System (PDS) by the Central Government. The petition contends that heavily subsidized wheat stocks procured by the Central Government from the Food Corporation of India are diverted to rolling flour mills across states, notably West Bengal and the North-East, for sale in the open market rather than distribution to the intended beneficiaries, resulting in substantial loss to the public exchequer. The respondents—state governments—denied the allegations and asserted that all possible measures have been taken to ensure that foodgrains reach the intended recipients. The matter highlights that the scheme of custom milling was extended until 31 October 1997 and then withdrawn, with Assam reporting that beneficiaries preferred Atta and that milling Above Poverty Line (APL) into Atta for distribution might be more effective. The Court, after considering the program’s objective, laid down modalities to reconcile the distribution framework with beneficiary needs: (i) local bodies assess wheat requirements; (ii) beneficiaries’ option to receive Atta or wheat, conveyed to the State; (iii) milled Atta supplied to Fair Price Shops (FPS) for consumer purchase at fixed rates; (iv) States ensure accurate projection of requirements; (v) quarterly data to the Central Government for monitoring. The petition is disposed of with these directions to safeguard the intended beneficiaries while curbing diversion.
Provisions of Law Cited
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
Applicants contended that subsidized foodgrains meant for the PDS are diverted to rolling mills in various States, especially West Bengal and the North-East, for sale in the open market, causing a significant loss to the public exchequer. They cited data suggesting extensive diversion and argued for safeguards, accountability, and adherence to PDS objectives. They opposed decentralised milling as lacking transparency and proposed direct delivery through FPS with proper monitoring. They stressed that any continuance or expansion of milling schemes should ensure beneficiaries receive wheat or Atta as per their choice.
Contentions of Respondents
Respondents refuted the allegations, stating that measures have been taken to ensure beneficiaries receive benefits; they note that the custom milling scheme was withdrawn following government notices. The Assam Government’s experience—beneficiaries’ preference for Atta over whole grain—and the central government’s suggestion to distribute via Gram Panchayats indicate a shift toward Atta distribution through FPS. The Government argued for modalities to ensure actual requirements are projected and monitored, with quarterly reporting to the Central Government to achieve the intended objectives.
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against U.P. Roller Flour Mills Association and Ors. v. Govt. of India and Ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.