High CourtDivision BenchDisposed of

U.P. Roller Flour Mills Association and Ors. v. Govt. of India and Ors.

Case / Petition Number:Civil Original Writ Petition (Civil) No. 274 of 2005
Neutral Citation:[2007] 10 SCR 569

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • Dr. Arijit Pasayat
  • P. Sathasivam
Judgment Date
2007-10-05
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of with directions on five modalities: (1) Associations/Gram Panchayats/Local bodies shall assess the need of wheat for the intended beneficiaries and convey the need to the State Government; (2) They shall indicate the quantum of wheat to be converted into Atta based on beneficiaries’ option, and convey the requirement to the State Government; (3) The quantity converted into Atta shall be given to mills, which will mill and supply Atta to FPS for distribution to beneficiaries at rates fixed by the Government; (4) State Governments shall ensure that the actual requirement is projected and that supplies reach the FPS and then the consumer; (5) State Governments shall quarterly submit data to the Central Government to monitor and ensure implementation of the object. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Final Disposition
Disposed of

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • U.P. Roller Flour Mills Association

Respondents

  • Government of India
  • State of West Bengal
  • State of Assam

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Dinesh Kumar Garg
  • • V.K. Biju
  • • M.L. Lahoty
  • • Paban K. Sharma
  • • Himanshu Shekhar

Counsels for Respondents

  • • C.A. Sundaram
  • • Riku Sharma
  • • Tara Chandra Sharma
  • • Neelam Sharma
  • • Rajeev Sharma
  • • Kishan Datta
  • • H. G. Prakash
  • • Sunil Roy
  • • R.C. Kathia
  • • V.K. Verma

Case Synopsis & Summary

The case concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging alleged diversion of subsidized wheat stocks allocated for the Public Distribution System (PDS) by the Central Government. The petition contends that heavily subsidized wheat stocks procured by the Central Government from the Food Corporation of India are diverted to rolling flour mills across states, notably West Bengal and the North-East, for sale in the open market rather than distribution to the intended beneficiaries, resulting in substantial loss to the public exchequer. The respondents—state governments—denied the allegations and asserted that all possible measures have been taken to ensure that foodgrains reach the intended recipients. The matter highlights that the scheme of custom milling was extended until 31 October 1997 and then withdrawn, with Assam reporting that beneficiaries preferred Atta and that milling Above Poverty Line (APL) into Atta for distribution might be more effective. The Court, after considering the program’s objective, laid down modalities to reconcile the distribution framework with beneficiary needs: (i) local bodies assess wheat requirements; (ii) beneficiaries’ option to receive Atta or wheat, conveyed to the State; (iii) milled Atta supplied to Fair Price Shops (FPS) for consumer purchase at fixed rates; (iv) States ensure accurate projection of requirements; (v) quarterly data to the Central Government for monitoring. The petition is disposed of with these directions to safeguard the intended beneficiaries while curbing diversion.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 32 of the Constitution of India

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Applicants contended that subsidized foodgrains meant for the PDS are diverted to rolling mills in various States, especially West Bengal and the North-East, for sale in the open market, causing a significant loss to the public exchequer. They cited data suggesting extensive diversion and argued for safeguards, accountability, and adherence to PDS objectives. They opposed decentralised milling as lacking transparency and proposed direct delivery through FPS with proper monitoring. They stressed that any continuance or expansion of milling schemes should ensure beneficiaries receive wheat or Atta as per their choice.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents refuted the allegations, stating that measures have been taken to ensure beneficiaries receive benefits; they note that the custom milling scheme was withdrawn following government notices. The Assam Government’s experience—beneficiaries’ preference for Atta over whole grain—and the central government’s suggestion to distribute via Gram Panchayats indicate a shift toward Atta distribution through FPS. The Government argued for modalities to ensure actual requirements are projected and monitored, with quarterly reporting to the Central Government to achieve the intended objectives.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against U.P. Roller Flour Mills Association and Ors. v. Govt. of India and Ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

A _J_ ## U.P. ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION AND ORS. _v._ GOVT. OF INDIA AND ORS. ## OCTOBER 5, 2007 B ## {DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND P. SATHASIV AM, JJ.) _Constitution of India, 1950-Article 32-Allocation of subsidized wheat stocks by Government of India through Public Distribution_ C _System-State of West Bengal and Assam diverting the same to open market on subsidized rates instead of intended beneficiaries, causing loss of several crores-Writ Petition before Supreme Court-Held: Directions issued to the concernedAssociations/Gram Panchayats/ Local bodies to assess the need of wheat/atta for the intended beneficiaries which would be conveyed to the State Government who_ D _would then supply it to the Fair Price Shop to be finally supplied to_ . _the consumer._ The instant writ petition has been filed to highlight that the State of West Bengal and North-East States are diverting highly subsidized E wheat stocks supplied by the Central Government for distributicm through Public Distribution System under several schemes, to rolling flour mills of different States depriving the needy consumers and the intended beneficiaries and causing loss of several crores to the public F exchequer. F Different states refuted the allegations. However, the Government of Assam was directed to work out the modalities to ensure that the beneficiaries are not affected. The Government of Assam found that the beneficiaries were not interested in taking the whole grain and G instead wanted Atta and wanted continuation of milling Above Poverty Line into wholemill Atta for distribution through PDS. Disposing of the writ petition, the Court 569 H t 570 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2007] 10 S.C.R. \. A HELD: Considering the intention behind the programme, the following modalities are directed to be adopted: (1) The concerned Associations/Gram Panchayats/Local bodies shall assess the need of wheat for the intended beneficiaries. The need B shall be indicated to the State Government. (2) They shall indicate the quantum of wheat which is to be converted into Atta to be given to the beneficiaries on the basis of their option. On the basis of such intimation, Associations/Gram Panchayats/Local bodies shall convey the requirement to the State Government. c (3) The quantity indicated for conversion into Atta shall be given to the Mills, who after converting wheat into Atta, shall supply it to the Fair Price Shop so that the intended beneficiaries can get them from the FPS at rates fixed by the concerned Governments. D E F ~ (4) The State Governments shall ensure that the actual requirement is being projected by the Associations/Gram Panchayats/Local bodies and similarly whether after milling the supply is made to the FPS to be supplied finally to the consumer. (5) The State Governments shall quarterly submit the necessary data for the information of the Central Government who shall also ensure that all possible steps are being taken by the State Governments to fulfil the intended objectiv.es. [Para 7] [572-F, G; 573-A, B, C, D] CIVIL ORIGINAL ruRISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 274 of2005. \ (Under Alticle 32 of the Constitution oflndia). Dinesh Kumar Garg and V.K. Biju for the Petitioners. G M.L. Lahoty, Paban K. Sharma and Himanshu Shekhar for the Applicant. C.A. Sundaram, Riku Sharma, (for Mis. Corporate Law Group), Tara Chandra Sharma, Neelam Sharma, Rajeev Sharma, Kishan Datta, H G. Prakash, Sunil Roy, R.C. Kathiaand V.K. Verma for the Respondents. A ## U.P. ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION _v._ GOVT. 571 OF INDIA [PASAYAT, J.] The Judgment of the Court was delivered by · **DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.** L In this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (in short the 'Constitution') the petitioners have highlighted that that there has been alarming increase in diversion of food stocks meant to be supplied under the Public Distribution System B (in short 'PDS'). It is stated that highly subsidized wheat stocks supplied by the Central Government for distribution through PDS under several schemes are being diverted to rolling flour mills of different States. These stocks have been procured b)L the Central Government from Food Corporation oflndia (in short 'FCI'). Special reference has been made c to the State of West Bengal and North-East States. It is alleged that instead of supplying them to the needy consumers and the intended beneficiaries they are being diverted to the open market. Several statistical data have been furnished. The States of Assam and West Bengal have filed counter affidavits and have denied the allegations and have submitted D that all possible measures have been adopted to ensure that the foodgrains reach the intended beneficiaries. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners have referred to some newspaper reports indicating that foodgrains wo1th more than rupees thirty one thousand crores have been siphoned off from public distribution E system. 3. These allegations have been refuted by the learned counsel for the different States. It is to be noted that the Government of India, Ministiy of Food and Consun1er Affairs, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, F by letter dated 13th December, 1997 brought to the notice of the Food Secretaries of all State Governments and Union Temtories Administration that the scheme of custom milling was extended for a period of one year upto 31.10.1997 on the express conditions stipulated by letter dated 4th November, 1996. It was stated that the scheme was further reviewed G and it was decided not to extend it further. The scheme of custom milling of PDS wheat stood withdrawn/discontinued. 4. The Government of Assan1, it is urged by learned counsel for the State, took follow up action on the basis of the aforesaid letter. A writ H [2007] 10 S~C.R. 572 ## SUPREME COURT REPORTS A petition was filed before the Gauhati High Court questioning the action taken by the Assam Government in terms of aforesaid letter of the Government of India. The impugned annexures were quashed by a learned Single Judge. The matter was carried in writ appeals before the Division Bench which set aside the orders of the learned Single Judge. However, B direction was given to work out the modalities to ensure that the beneficiaries are not affected. 5. It appears that the Government of Assam found that the beneficiaries were not interested in taking the whole grain and instead C wanted Atta This aspect was also examined by the Central Government. It was noted that the workers in the tea gardens had shown reluctance to take whole grain and instead preferred Atta. The Government of India also took note of the request of the Assam Government for continuation of milling Above Poverty Line (in short 'APL') into wholemill Atta for D distribution through PDS. It was suggested by learned counsel for the Government of Assam that the distribution can be made through Gram Panchayats who in turn can get the wheat converted into Atta for supply to the beneficiaries. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners on the other hand submitted E that it would .not be desirable to adopt such a course as there is possibility of manipulations and lack of accountability. It is undisputed that the distribution under the PDS is done through the Fair Price Shops (in short 'FPS'). F 7. Considering the intention behind the programme, we direct following modalities to be adopted: - ( 1) The concerned Associations/Gram Panchayats/Local bodies shall assess the need of wheat for the intended beneficiaries. The need shall be indicated to the State Government. G - (2) They shall indicate the quantum of wheat which is to be converted into Atta to be given to the beneficiaries on the basis of their option. In other words, those beneficiaries who want to take wheat shall indicate to them and those who want to take Atta shall similarly indicate their option. On the basis of H _I_ U.P. ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION _v._ GOVT. 573 OF INDIA [PASAYAT, J.] such i?timat!on as noted above, Associations/Gram A Panchayats/Local bodies shall convey the requirement to the State Government. - (3) The quantity indicated for conversion into Atta shall be given to the Mills, who after conv~g wheat into Atta, shall supply B it to the FPS so that the intended beneficiaries can get them from the FPS at rates fixed by the concerned governments. - ( 4) The State Governments shal'i ensure that the actual requirement is being projected by the Associations/Gram Panchayats/Local bodies and similarly whether after milling the supply is made C to the FPS to be supplied finally to the consumer. - (5) The State Governments shall quarterly submit the necessruy data for the information of the Central Government who shall also ensure that all possible steps are being taken by the State D Governments to fulfil the intended objectives. 8. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. N.J. Writ Petition disposed of.