High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions; no costs.

Unnikrishnan v. Deputy Collector (LR) and The Village Officer

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-04-07
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the 1st respondent to dispose of S.M.No.147/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017) — i.e., expeditious disposal on seniority, obtaining necessary reports via Village Officers, and completing proceedings within prescribed timelines; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Unnikrishnan

Respondents

  • Deputy Collector (LR), Collectorate, Malappuram District, Kerala
  • Village Officer, Cheriyamundam Village, Malappuram District, Kerala

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • P. T. Sheejish

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty

Case Synopsis & Summary

Unnikrishnan filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the suo motu proceedings initiated by the Deputy Collector (LR) under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 14.46 acres of land in Re.Sy. Nos. 199/9-6 and 199/9-18 of Cheriyamundam Village, Malappuram. The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.147/2021 within a time limit fixed by the Court. The judgment recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017) for the principle that Land Tribunals must dispose cases in the order of seniority and expeditiously, and notes the Government’s G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (22.02.2018) enabling Village Officers to assist the Land Tribunals. The Senior Government Pleader highlights a large pendency (8514) of suo motu proceedings. The Court ultimately directs the 1st respondent to dispose of S.M.No.147/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, thereby emphasizing expedited disposal while preserving seniority. The petition is disposed of with no costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India, Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.147/2021 on the file within a time limit to be fixed by the Court, for expeditious disposal of the suo motu land-reform proceedings and prompt issuance of purchase rights.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents’ counsel highlighted the substantial pendency of suo motu matters (8514) and argued for adherence to established procedures and precedents, including the Narayanan Namboodiri framework, and permitting reports to be obtained through Village Officers to streamline disposal.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveDirected expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases and adherence to seniority, which the present Court applies to S.M.No.147/2021.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Unnikrishnan v. Deputy Collector (LR) and The Village Officer and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 45 YEARS S/O.GOPALAN, KONIKKAL, CHERIYAMUNDAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 103.** **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**DEPUTY COLLECTOR(LR)**| |---|---| ||**COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,**| ||**KERALA, PIN - 676 505.**| |**2**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER**| ||**CHERIYAMUNDAM VILLAGE,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 676 505.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY -SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.147/2021 on the file of the 1[st] respondent, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the 1[st] respondent under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 14.46 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.199/9-6 and 199/9-18 of Cheriyamundam Village, Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the 2[nd] respondent Village Officer, the 1[st] respondent initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.147/2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings before the 1[st] respondent is 8514. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the 1[st] W.P(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A) **==> picture [17 x 8] intentionally omitted <==** respondent can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.147/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 1[st] respondent to dispose of S.M.No.147/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.8807 OF 2021(A) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 04/02/2021.** **EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SUO MOTO REPORT IN SM NO.147/2021 DATED 12/02/2021.**