High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Att...

Ummu Habeeba v. Special Tahsildar (L.A and L.T), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.A. and L.T.), Attappadi, Mannarkkad, Palakkad-678582

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-26
Court Decision / Holding
The Land Tribunal, Attappadi is directed to dispose of S.M. No.474/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment, referred to supra.
Final Disposition
Disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Attappadi, to dispose of S.M.474/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Ummu Habeeba, aged 65 years W/o Majeed Haji, Kolathuran Parambil (H), Kumaramputhur P.O., Kumaramputhur Village, Palakkad.

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (L.A and L.T), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.A. and L.T.), Attappadi, Mannarkkad, Palakkad-678582

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. V.A. Johnson (Varikkappallil)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K.Amminikutty (Sr Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

Ummu Habeeba, a 65-year-old resident, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to compel the Special Tahsildar (LR and LT) to consider and pass orders in S.M. No. 474/2020 pending before the Land Tribunal, Attappadi. The suo motu proceedings under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, seek assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Rules, in respect of 18.52 acres in Re. Sy. No.113/4 of Kumaramputhur Village. The petitioner asserts her senior citizen status warrants expeditious disposal; the respondent argues substantial pendency (over 4,000 cases) and compliance with seniority-based disposal and prior directions. The court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and connected cases (2018), which urged disposal of cases in order of registration and prioritized senior citizens, including village officer reports where required. The court concludes the Land Tribunal can be directed to dispose of S.M. No.474/2020 in accordance with those directions, and disposes the petition directing the Tribunal to proceed strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri framework. It records no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (Sections 72 and 72K)Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 (Rule 14, Rule 5)Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (dated 22.02.2018)Suo motu proceedings under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Land Tribunal to consider and pass orders in S.M. No. 474/2020 promptly, highlighting her senior citizen status (65 years) and urging adherence to directions in this Court’s Narayanan Namboodiri decision for expeditious disposal on seniority. She argued that suo motu proceedings were validly instituted to vest rights and issue a certificate of purchase under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, and that reports and notices could be streamlined via Village Officers and other procedural flexibility to avoid unnecessary delays.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent argued that there is a large pendency before the Land Tribunal and that disposal must follow the seniority framework and the directions previously laid down by this Court, including prioritizing senior citizens. It suggested using Village Officers to obtain necessary reports and stated that service of notices should be carried out with cooperation from parties, and that such procedures must conform to law and the Tribunal’s queue, without bypassing due process.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as authority for expeditious disposal of Land Tribunal cases and prioritization of senior citizens, guiding the present judgment.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Ummu Habeeba v. Special Tahsildar (L.A and L.T), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.A. and L.T.), Attappadi, Mannarkkad, Palakkad-678582 and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **UMMU HABEEBA, AGED 65 YEARS W/O. MAJEED HAJI, KOLATHURAN PARAMBIL (H), KUMARAMPUTHUR P.O., KUMARAMPUTHUR VILLAGE, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A AND L.T), OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A. AND L.T.), ATTAPPADI, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678582.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.474/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Attappadi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Attappadi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 18.52 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.113/4 of Kumaramputhur Village in Mannarkkad Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special** W.P(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F) -3- **Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of W.P(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F) -4- the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is W.P(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F) -5- free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal W.P(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F) -6- shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kumaramputhur Village, the Land Tribunal, Attappadi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.474/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 23.10.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 65 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Attappadi is 4031. W.P(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Attappadi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.474/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Attappadi, to dispose of S.M.No.474/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.5057 OF 2021(F) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 23.10.2020.**