High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petitions disposed of with directions to L...

U. Suresh v. Local Level Monitoring Committee for Kottayi Grama Panchayat

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No. 37151 of 2017 (T)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • P.B. Suresh Kumar
Judgment Date
2017-11-21
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petitions disposed of directing the Local Level Monitoring Committees to consider and pass orders on the petitioners’ applications for correction of the Data Bank after obtaining reports from KSRSEC regarding the position of the properties at the time of Act commencement. If the petitions’ requests are allowed, petitioners may pursue permissions under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order to use their properties for other purposes, and, where applicable, obtain building permits or building numbers. Reclassification or fresh assessment under the Kerala Land Tax Act may be sought as garden lands per Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayat v. Mariumma. The LLMCs must comply within three months from receipt of the judgment, and the directions operate untrammelled by Circular No.46848/P1/2016. The judgment also cites relevant precedents (Puthan Purakkal Joseph v. Sub Collector; Revenue Divisional Officer v. Jalaja Dileep) to guide the corrective process and permission pathways.
Final Disposition
Writ petitions disposed of with directions to Local Level Monitoring Committees to consider and pass orders on corrections of Data Bank entries after obtaining KSRSEC reports, within three months. If allowed, applicants may seek permissions under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order to use properties for other purposes, potentially receive building permits or numbers, and pursue fresh garden-land reassessment under the Kerala Land Tax Act, guided by cited precedents. The directives are to be given effect untrammelled by Government Circular No.46848/P1/2016.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • U. Suresh

Respondents

  • Local Level Monitoring Committee for Kottayi Grama Panchayat

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. Binoy Vasudevan
  • • Smt. K.J. Anitha

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sri. K.J. Manuraj

Case Synopsis & Summary

The writ petitions challenge entries in the Data Bank under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, alleging that several properties originally paddy lands were converted into garden lands long before the Act, yet remain listed in the Data Bank. Petitioners contend that the Act should not apply to properties converted prior to its introduction and seek correction of Data Bank entries and related revenue records, as well as expeditious consideration of building permits and assignment of building numbers. The court notes that whether conversions occurred prior to the Act is a factual question to be determined by Local Level Monitoring Committees (LLMCs), which have authority to correct Data Bank entries. It cites the Apex Court’s position via Revenue Divisional Officer v. Jalaja Dileep to support the view that pre-Act conversions may fall outside the Act’s remit, while acknowledging the LLMCs’ mandate to decide on corrections after due verification, including reports from KSRSEC. The judgment directs LLMCs to consider and pass orders on applications for correction of Data Bank entries after obtaining KSRSEC reports, and to issue such orders within three months, with potential relief under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order if permissions are granted. If granted, petitioners may obtain building permits or numbers and seek fresh land-tax assessments as garden lands, as guided by subsequent Kerala case law. These orders are to operate untrammeled by Government Circular No.46848/P1/2016.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008Kerala Land Utilization Order (Clause 6)Kerala Land Tax ActCircular No.46848/P1/2016 dated 22.12.2016 issued by the Government

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Petitioners contend that properties converted prior to the 2008 Act should not be governed by the Act and seek correction of Data Bank entries, along with permission to use land for other purposes, building permits, and building numbers. They rely on LLMCs to correct Data Bank entries after due process, including obtaining KSRSEC reports and, where applicable, remedies under the Kerala Land Utilization Order.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondents urge adherence to the Act and related orders, with LLMCs tasked to determine corrections based on factual data, and to facilitate building permissions under applicable orders after verification; they emphasize compliance with Government directives and existing case law to balance development with land-use conservation.

Cited Precedents (3)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Revenue Divisional Officer v. Jalaja Dileep2015(1) KLT 984PositiveCited to support the proposition that properties converted prior to the Act may not fall within the Act’s purview; used as authority for pre-Act non-applicability.
Puthan Purakkal Joseph v. Sub Collector2015(3) KLT 182PositiveCited to justify the mechanism for obtaining permission under the Kerala Land Utilization Order for using property for other purposes.
Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayat v. Mariumma2015(2) KLT 516PositiveCited to support consideration of fresh assessments under the Kerala Land Utilization Order in light of permissions granted.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against U. Suresh v. Local Level Monitoring Committee for Kottayi Grama Panchayat and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT:** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR** **TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/30TH KARTHIKA, 1939** **WP(C).No. 37151 of 2017 (T) ----------------------------** **PETITIONER:** **-----------** **U.SURESH, S/O.SETHUMADHAVAN, AGED 51 YEARS, SURAKSHA, PUTHUR P.O., PALAKKAD - 678 001.** **BY ADVS.SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.K.J.ANITHA** **RESPONDENT:** **------------** **THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE FOR KOTTAYI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, KOTTAYI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 572.** **BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.J.MANURAJ** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-11-2017 ALONG WITH WPC.37188/2017 & CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** **mbr/** ## **WP(C).No. 37151 of 2017 (T) ----------------------------** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:** |**EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE**|**COPY OF DOCUMENT NO. 6610/12 OF S.R.O**| |---|---| |**KOTTAYI.**|| |**EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE**|**COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1865/14 OF S.R.O**| |**KOTTAYI.**|| |**EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE**|**COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1866/14 OF S.R.O**| |**KOTTAYI.**|| |**EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE**|**COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE IN**| |**RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.**|| |**EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE**|**COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT**| |**DATED 23.6.2017 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER'S**|| |**PROPERTY.**|| |**EXHIBIT P6 : TRUE**|**COPY OF THE APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE**| |**PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.**|| |**EXHIBIT P7 : TRUE**|**COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ISSUED BY THE**| |**OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT ACCEPTING THE**|| |**APPLICATION.**|| |**RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS**<br>**:**<br>**NIL.**|| **//TRUE COPY//** **P.S. TO JUDGE** **mbr/** ## **P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.** **-------------------------------------------W.P.(C).Nos.37151, 37188, 37205, 37220, 37221, 37326 & 37341 of 2017** **---------------------------------------------------------------** **Dated this the 21[st] day of November, 2017** ## **JUDGMENT** The case of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is that the properties owned by them as referred to in the writ petitions were originally paddy lands, but converted as garden lands several years prior to the introduction of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 ('the Act'). It is alleged by the petitioners that though the properties were converted as garden lands prior to the introduction of the Act, the properties are included in the Data Bank prepared under the Act and as such, they are unable to make use of the W.P.(c).No.37151 of 2017 & con. cases : 2 : properties for other purposes including construction of buildings. It is alleged in some of the writ petitions that the building permits applied for by the petitioners therein are not being considered for the aforesaid reason. In some other writ petitions, it is alleged that the buildings constructed by the petitioners therein are not being numbered on account of the said reason. According to the petitioners, since the properties were converted prior to the Act, the same should not have been shown in the Data Bank. The petitioners have preferred applications before the Local Level Monitoring Committees concerned for correction of the entries relating to their properties in the Data Banks and the applications preferred by the petitioners for the said purpose are part of the records. The petitioners seek directions in these writ petitions to the Local Level Monitoring Committees concerned to correct the entires in the Data Bank in relation to their properties. They also seek orders for correction of the entry relating to their properties in the revenue records. Some of the petitioners, among others, W.P.(c).No.37151 of 2017 & con. cases : 3 : seek directions to the local authorities concerned to grant building permits applied for by them and some others seek directions to the local authorities concerned to assign numbers to the buildings constructed by them on the strength of the building permits issued to them. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. If the properties of the petitioners are converted prior to the Act, the provisions of the Act would not apply to the same, as held by the Apex Court in **Revenue Divisional Officer** v. **Jalaja Dileep** (2015(1) KLT 984). But, the question whether the properties are converted prior to the Act as claimed by the petitioners is a matter to be considered by the Local Level Monitoring Committees at the first instance. It is all the more so since the Local Level Monitoring Committees are empowered to correct the mistake, if any, in the Data Bank. True, if the provisions of the Act would not apply to the properties of the petitioners, they are entitled to make use of the properties for other W.P.(c).No.37151 of 2017 & con. cases : 4 : purposes including construction of buildings, after obtaining permission of the competent authority under the Kerala Land Utilization Order [See **Puthan Purakkal Joseph** v. **Sub Collector** (2015(3) KLT 182)]. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the Local Level Monitoring Committees concerned to consider and pass orders on the applications preferred by the petitioners for correction of the Data Bank, after obtaining reports from the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre (KSRSEC) as to the position of the properties at the time of commencement of the Act. The petitioners shall pay the fees stipulated by the KSRSEC for issuing their report if directed so by the Conveners of the Local Level Monitoring Committees. Needless to say that in cases where reports have already been called for from the KSRSEC at the expense of the petitioners pursuant to the interim orders passed in the writ petitions, orders shall be passed on the strength of the said reports. The direction aforesaid shall be complied with, W.P.(c).No.37151 of 2017 & con. cases : 5 : within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the requests made by the petitioners are allowed, they are entitled to prefer applications invoking Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order before the competent authority viz, the District Collector/the Revenue Divisional Officer for permission to make use of the properties for other purposes, in cases where applications have not been filed by the petitioners for the said purpose and in that event, the competent authority under the Kerala Land Utilization Order shall pass orders on those applications within one month from the date of production of the decision of the Local Level Monitoring Committee and the application under the Kerala Land Utilization Order, wherever applicable, along with a copy of the writ petition, in the light of the decision of this Court in **Puthan Purakkal Joseph** _(supra),_ untrammelled by Circular No.46848/P1/2016 dated 22.12.2016 issued by the Government. If the requests of the petitioners under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order are granted, the petitioners shall be issued building W.P.(c).No.37151 of 2017 & con. cases : 6 : permits or assigned building numbers, as the case may be, if they are otherwise entitled for the same, by the local authorities concerned. Needless to say that if the requests of the petitioners under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order are granted, they will also be entitled to move the authorities under the Kerala Land Tax Act for fresh assessment of the lands as garden lands and if such requests are made by the petitioners, the same shall also be considered by the said authorities, in the light of **Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayat v. Mariumma** (2015(2) KLT 516), within one month from the date of their respective requests. Sd/- **P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE** rsr