High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeTransfer of O.P.(G&W) No.830/2022 from the Fami...

Tr.P.(C) No. 352 of 2022 (In OPGW 830/2022, Family Court, Mavelikkara)

Case / Petition Number:TR.P.(C) NO. 352/2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C. S. Dias
Judgment Date
2022-09-19
Court Decision / Holding
The transfer petition is allowed. O.P.(G&W) 830/2022 is to be transferred from the Family Court, Mavelikkara, to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. The parties may seek consolidation and joint trial in Thiruvalla. The Registry shall transmit the records, including Annexure-A1 and A2, to Thiruvalla. If the first respondent raises the question of ordinary residence, it shall be considered in Thiruvalla in accordance with the law. The Family Court, Thiruvalla, is to post the records promptly and proceed accordingly.
Final Disposition
Transfer of O.P.(G&W) No.830/2022 from the Family Court, Mavelikkara to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. Consolidation and joint trial permitted; records to be transmitted; ordinary residence to be adjudicated lawfully in Thiruvalla.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • M.C. Mathew

Respondents

  • Daniel Rajan
  • Baby Mathew
  • Sara Mathew

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Abraham Samson
  • • Lovely Samson

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Rinny Stephen Chamaparampil
  • • Asha Elizabeth Mathew

Case Synopsis & Summary

This transfer petition, filed under Section 24 CPC, seeks to move O.P.(G&W) 830/2022 from the Family Court, Mavelikkara, to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. The petitioner, M.C. Mathew, is the father of the third respondent and also holds a power of attorney for the third respondent. The second respondent is his wife, while the first respondent is the husband of the third respondent. The third respondent has filed related petitions in Thiruvalla seeking a divorce and related relief, and a child, Aiden Daniel, is the subject of custody proceedings. The core grievance is that the seven-year-old child currently resides with the third respondent at Vennikulam (within Thiruvalla jurisdiction) and studies there; transferring to Mavelikkara would impose severe hardship on the child. The first respondent counters that the child was originally within Mavelikkara's jurisdiction and was moved by the third respondent, arguing that jurisdiction would not be ousted by transfer. The High Court relies on a line of Supreme Court decisions emphasizing the priority of the convenience and welfare of the mother and child in custody/transfer matters. After considering the pleadings, evidence, and the child’s residence, the Court exercises its discretionary power under Section 24 CPC and directs transfer to Thiruvalla for consolidation and to avoid conflicting decisions, while leaving room for the court below to decide issues of ordinary residence in accordance with law.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Convenience and welfare of the wife and child have to be given due priority in transfer of cases (as per Supreme Court decisions cited).
  • Discretionary power under Section 24 CPC can be exercised to transfer proceedings to a Court having closer nexus and to avoid hardship to the child.
  • Best interests of the child as a guiding principle in custody/transfer matters.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that the seven-year-old child resides with the maternal side in Vennikulam, Thiruvalla, and studies there; transferring the case to Thiruvalla would consolidate related proceedings and avoid frequent travel and conflicting orders. Since he holds a Power of Attorney for the third respondent, he can contest the proceedings before the Thiruvalla court. The Court is urged to exercise its discretion under Section 24 CPC to transfer O.P.(G&W) 830/2022 to the Thiruvalla Court, considering the child’s welfare and convenience.

Contentions of Respondents

The first respondent contends that the child was originally within the Mavelikkara jurisdiction and was taken by the third respondent to Vennikulam; removal from Mavelikkara does not deprive that court of jurisdiction. The petition for transfer should be dismissed on the ground that the child’s ordinary residence and custody are issues that can be resolved in the Mavelikkara court.

Cited Precedents (6)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sumitha Sing v. Kumar Sanjay and another(2001) 10 SCC 41PositiveThe court cites this and other decisions to emphasize that the convenience of the mother and child weighs in transfer decisions.
Mona Aresh Goel v. Aresh Satya Goel(2000) 9 SCC 255PositiveSupports prioritizing the child’s and mother’s convenience in custody/transfer issues.
Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap v. Shridhar Vishwanath JagtapAIR 2016 SC 3584PositiveAffirms preference for convenience and welfare of the woman and child in such orders.
Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh2017 (4) KLT 415 (SC)PositiveReinforces the principle that the convenience of women and children impacts transfer/custody outcomes.
N.C.V. Aiswarya v. A.S. Sharavana Karthik Sha2022(5) KHC 185PositiveKerala High Court emphasizes prioritizing the child’s/woman’s convenience in related matters.
Valsal Nisha v. Rajesh Soman Nair2020(8) KLR 475PositiveSupports weighting the child’s convenience in transfer proceedings.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Tr.P.(C) No. 352 of 2022 (In OPGW 830/2022, Family Court, Mavelikkara) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## `IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM` ## `PRESENT` ## `THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS` ``` MONDAY, THE 19[TH] DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 28TH BHADRA, 1944 ``` ## `TR.P(C) NO. 352 OF 2022` ``` IN OPGW 830/2022 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA ``` ## `PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT NO.2` ``` M.C.MATHEW, AGED 64 YEARS S/O. CHACKO, MEMALA AALUNKAL HOUSE, PURAMATTAM PANCHAYAT VENNIKKULAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. ``` ``` BY ADVS.ABRAHAM SAMSON LOVELY SAMSON ``` ## `RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER-RESPONDENT NO.3& RESPONDENT NO.1:` - `1 DANIEL RAJAN, S/O. KURIAKOSE, AGED 41 YEARS, KUNDATHIL VEETTIL, CHENNITHALA, KIZHAKKEVAZHI MURI, THRIPERUMTHARA VILLAGE, CHENNITHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690105.` - `2 BABY MATHEW, AGED 60 YEARS W/O. MATHEW, MEMALA AALUNKAL HOUSE, PURAMATTAM PANCHAYATH VENNIKULAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT698534.` - `3 SARA MATHEW, AGED 34 YEARS D/O. M.C. MATHEW, MEMALA AALUNKAL HOUSE, PURAMATTAM PANCHAYATH VENNIKULAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT698534.` ``` BY ADVS. RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW ``` ``` THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` Tr.P.(C)No.352/2022 ``` ``` -:2:- ``` Dated this the 19[th] day of September,2022 ## **O R D E R** The transfer petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908(in short, 'C.P.C.'), to transfer O.P.(G&W) No.830/2022 (Annexure-A1), from the Family Court, Mavelikkara to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. 2. The petitioner’s case, in brief, in the memorandum of transfer petition is that, he is the father of the third respondent. The second respondent is his wife. The first respondent is the husband of the third respondent. The marital relationship between the respondents 1 and 3 is strained. The said respondents have a child born in their wedlock named ‘Aiden Daniel’. The first respondent has filed O.P.No.830/2022 (Annexure-A1) before the Family Court, Mavelikkara, for the custody of the child. The third respondent has filed O.P.No.265/2022 ``` Tr.P.(C)No.352/2022 ``` ``` -:3:- ``` (Annexure-A2) and O.P.No.266/2022 (Annexure-A3) against the first respondent before the Family Court, Thiruvalla, for a decree of divorce and a decree for return of money and other ancillary reliefs, respectively. Due to the matrimonial cruelty that was meted out on the third respondent by the first respondent, she was constrained to leave the matrimonial home. She and the child are permanently residing in her parental home at Vennikulam, within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Thiruvalla. The child is presently pursuing his studies in the II[nd] standard in Mar Theophilos Bathany Convent Public School, Vennikulam. The third respondent has executed a power of attorney in favour of the petitioner and he is contesting the proceedings on behalf of the third respondent before the Family Courts. It would cause severe inconvenience and hardship to the child to travel all the way from ``` Tr.P.(C)No.352/2022 ``` ``` -:4:- ``` Vennikulam to Mavelikkara, to contest Annexure-A1. Hence, the transfer petition. 3. The first respondent has filed a counter affidavit refuting the allegations in the transfer petition. He has contended that the child was originally studying within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Mavelikkara. The child was snatched away by the third respondent from his residence and taken to her parental home at Vennikulam. The removal of the child from the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Mavelikkara, will not oust the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Mavelikkara. Hence, the transfer petition may be dismissed. 4. Heard; Sri. Abraham Samson, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Rinny Stephen Chamaparampil, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent. Service is complete on the second respondent. Since the petitioner is the power of attorney holder of the third ``` Tr.P.(C)No.352/2022 ``` ``` -:5:- ``` respondent, I dispense with notice to her. 5. Admittedly, the third respondent has already filed Annexures-A2 and A3 before the Family Court, Thiruvalla. Annexure-A4 certificate substantiates that the child is pursuing his studies in Mar Theophilos Bathany Convent Public School at Vennikulam. It is undisputed that the child is residing with the petitioner and the second respondent, within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Thiruvalla. The first respondent is contesting Annexures-A1 and A2 before the Family Court, Thiruvalla. Annexure-A1 is filed for the custody of the child. Therefore, necessarily, the child will have to be produced before the Family Court, Mavelikkara, which would cause severe inconvenience and hardship to the child, who is hardly seven years of age. 6. It is well settled in a catena of decisions by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in **Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and another** [(2001)10 SCC 41)], ``` Tr.P.(C)No.352/2022 ``` ``` -:6:- ``` **Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh Satya Goel** [(2000) 9 SCC 255], **Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap** [AIR 2016 SC 3584], **Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh** [2017 (4) KLT 415 (SC)], **N.C.V. Aiswarya v. A.S. Sharavana Karthik Sha** [2022(5) KHC 185] and **Valsal Nisha v. Rajesh Soman Nair** [2020(8) KLR 475], that the convenience of the woman and children has to be given due preference and weightage, while ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another. 7. In the light of the law laid down in the afore-cited decisions, the pleadings and materials on record and the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the seven year old child is residing within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Thiruvalla, I am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this Court under Section 24 of the C.P.C. and order the transfer of Annexure-A1, so ``` Tr.P.(C)No.352/2022 ``` ``` -:7:- ``` that the cases can be consolidated and jointly tried, which would save judicial time and avoid conflict of decisions. Nonetheless, I make it clear that the transfer of Annexure-A1 will not stand in the way of the first respondent raising the question regarding the ordinary residence of the minor child before the Family Court, Thiruvalla. In the result, I pass the following orders: In the result, - (i) The transfer petition is allowed, by ordering the transfer of O.P.(G&W)No.830/2022 from the Family Court, Mavelikkara to the Family Court, Thiruvalla. - (ii) The parties would be at liberty to move the Family Court, Thiruvalla, to seek for consolidation and joint trial of the proceedings between them. - (iii) The Registry shall forthwith forward a copy of the order to the Family Court, Mavelikkara with instructions to transmit the records in O.P. (G&W)No.830/2022 to the Family Court, ``` Tr.P.(C)No.352/2022 ``` ``` -:8:- ``` ## Thiruvalla. - (iv) The Family Court, Thiruvalla shall, immediately on receipt of the records in O.P. (G&W)No.830/2022, post the case along with Annexure-A1 and A2. - (v) If the question of the ordinary residence is raised by the first respondent before the Family Court, Thiruvalla, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law dehors this order. Sd/- ## **C.S.DIAS,JUDGE** DST/19.09.22 //True copy/ P.A.To Judge ``` Tr.P.(C)No.352/2022 ``` ``` -:9:- ``` ## `APPENDIX` ## `PETITIONER ANNEXURES` ``` ANNEXURE A1TRUE COPY OF OP (G&W) 830/2022 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30/05/2022. ``` ``` TRUE COPY OF OP (DIV) 265/2022 FOR DIVORCE FILED IN FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLAANNEXURE A2 DATED 26/05/2022 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. ``` ``` ANNEXURE A3TRUE COPY OF OP 266/2022 FOR DIVORCE FILED IN FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA DATED 26/05/2022 FILED BY RESPONDENT NO.3. ``` ``` ANNEXURE A4TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY MAR THEOPHILOS BETHANY SCHOOL DATED 09/06/2022. ANNEXURE A5TRUE COPY OF NOTICE RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER IN FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA DATED 03/06/2022, OP(GW)830/2022. RESPONDENTS’ ANNEXURES ``` ``` ANNEXURE R1(a)A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION IN O.P. (DIV.) NO.831/2022 OF THE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA. ANNEXURE R1(b) A TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED TO AIDEN DANIEL FROM INFANT JESUS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL, MAVELIKARA ANNEXURE R1(c)A TRUE COPY OF THE FEE PAYMENT RECEIPT DATED 03.06.2020 OF AIDEN DANIEL ISSUED FROM INFANT JESUS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL, MAVELIKARA FOR CLASS UKG ANNEXURE R1(d)A TRUE COPY OF FEE PAYMENT RECEIPT DATED 12.04.2022 OF AIDEN DANIEL ISSUED FROM INFANT JESUS ENGLISH MEDUM SCHOOL, MAVELIKARA FOR CLASS I ANNEXURE R1(e)A TRUE COPY OF FEE PAYMENT RECEIPT DATED 04.05.2022 OF AIDEN DANIEL ISSUED FROM INFANT JESUS ENGLISH MEDUM SCHOOL, MAVELIKARA FOR CLASS II ANNEXURE R1(f)A TRUE COPY OF THE BAPTISM CERTIFICATE OF AIDEN DANIEL ISSUED FROM MALANKARA MARTHOMA SYRIAN CHURCH, CHENNITHALA ANNEXURE R1(g)A TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAAR CARD OF AIDEN DANIEL ```