High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeTransfer petitions allowed; annexures A1 and A2...

Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022, In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam

Case / Petition Number:Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C.S. Dias
Judgment Date
2022-08-30
Court Decision / Holding
Transfer of OP(Div) No.1669/2021 (Tr.P(C) 184/2022) and OP No.1672/2021 (Tr.P(C) 183/2022) from Family Court, Mavelikkara to Family Court, Pathanamthitta is allowed. The parties may seek consolidation and joint trial in Pathanamthitta. The Registry shall transmit the records to Pathanamthitta, which shall post the cases along with MC No.239/2021. The orders/orders for consolidation may be pursued as required.
Final Disposition
Transfer petitions allowed; annexures A1 and A2 transferred to Pathanamthitta; consolidation and joint trial may be pursued; records to Pathanamthitta; Pathanamthitta to post along with MC 239/2021.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Bini Johnson

Respondents

  • Johnson T

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Manu Ramachandran
  • • M.Kiranlal
  • • R.RAJESH (VARKALA)
  • • T.S.SARATH
  • • SAMEER M NAIR
  • • GEETHU KRISHNAN
  • • HARSH SUSAN SAM

Case Synopsis & Summary

These transfer petitions, heard together as common components of two matrimonial proceedings, seek to shift OP (Div) Nos.1669/2021 and 1672/2021 from the Family Court, Mavelikkara, to the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. The petitioner-wife, Bini Johnson, asserts that she and her three daughters (aged 19, 15, and 6) reside with her parents in Pathanamthitta, and she has been compelled to leave the matrimonial home due to alleged cruelty. She has already filed MC No.239/2021 in Pathanamthitta for maintenance. The respondent, Johnson T, has not appeared. The Court acknowledges that transfer of matrimonial disputes is governed by settled law, notably that the primary consideration is the convenience of the wife and children, a principle underscored by several Supreme Court decisions cited in the judgment (Sumitha Sing v. Kumar Sanjay; Mona Aresh Goel v. Aresh Satya Goel; Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap v. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap; Santhini v. Vijaya Venkatesh; N.C.V Aishwarya v. A.S Saravana Karthik Sha). On analyzing pleadings, the court finds that the wife and children are within Pathanamthitta’s jurisdiction and that Annexure A3 (maintenance) is before Pathanamthitta Court; consolidating A1 and A2 with A3 avoids conflicting decisions and saves judicial time. Under Section 24 CPC, the court transfers Annexures A1 and A2 to Pathanamthitta, with liberty to consolidate and try jointly."

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Convenience of the wife and children in transfer of matrimonial disputes should govern the court's exercise of discretion, as established by Sumitha Sing v. Kumar Sanjay and others; Mona Aresh Goel v. Aresh Satya Goel; Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap v. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap; Santhini v. Vijaya Venkatesh; N.C.V Aishwarya v. A.S Saravana Karthik Sha.
  • The law on transfer of matrimonial disputes is no longer res-integra and proceeds on the totality of circumstances, prioritizing the convenience of the complainants in the preferred jurisdiction.

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner-wife seeks transfer of OP(Div) No.1669/2021 and OP No.1672/2021 from Mavelikkara to Pathanamthitta on grounds that she and three children reside within Pathanamthitta, and MC No.239/2021 for maintenance is already there. She submits that consolidation and joint trial would prevent conflicting decisions and conserve judicial time; Pathanamthitta would be a convenient forum given the family’s location and the maintenance proceedings.

Contentions of Respondents

Respondent did not appear; no response filed. The court notes the respondent’s non-appearance but relies on pleadings and law to determine that transfer is warranted based on convenience for the wife and children and to consolidate proceedings.

Cited Precedents (5)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Sumitha Sing v. Kumar Sanjay and another2002 KHC 1889PositiveCited for the principle that convenience of the wife and children governs transfer of matrimonial disputes.
Mona Aresh Goel v. Aresh Satya Goel2000 KHC 1835PositiveCited as authority reinforcing the convenience doctrine in transfer cases.
Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap v. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap2016 KHC 6489PositiveCited as part of the line of decisions on convenience-based transfer.
Santhini v. Vijaya Venkatesh2017 (5) KHC 48PositiveCited to support transfer considerations in matrimonial matters.
N.C.V Aishwarya v. A.S Saravana Karthik Sha2022 (5) KHC 182PositiveRecent authority reinforcing convenience-based transfer approach.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022, In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

1 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS ``` ``` TUESDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 8TH BHADRA, 1944 TR.P(C) NO. 183 OF 2022 ``` ## **`TO TRANSFER OP 1672/2021 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA PETITIONER/S:`** ``` BINI JOHNSON AGED 41 YEARS W/O JOHNSON, KONNETHARAYIL (H), POOZHIKKADU P.O, PANDALAM VILLAGE,ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689501 BY ADVS. MANU RAMACHANDRAN M.KIRANLAL R.RAJESH (VARKALA) T.S.SARATH SAMEER M NAIR GEETHU KRISHNAN HARSHA SUSAN SAM ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` JOHNSON T AGED 46 YEARS S/O THANKACHEN, THOPPIL HOUSE, ERAMATHOOR P.O.,THRIPPERUMTHURA VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT , PIN - 689622 ``` ``` THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ALONG WITH TRPC 184/2022 ON 30.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` 2 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ``` THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS ``` ``` TUESDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 8TH BHADRA, 1944 TR.P(C) NO. 184 OF 2022 ``` ## **`TO TRANSFER OPDIV 1669/2021 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA PETITIONER/S:`** ``` BINI JOHNSON AGED 41 YEARS W/O JOHNSON, KONNETHARAYIL (H), POOZHIKKADU P.O, PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689501 BY ADVS. MANU RAMACHANDRAN M.KIRANLAL R.RAJESH (VARKALA) T.S.SARATH SAMEER M NAIR GEETHU KRISHNAN HARSHA SUSAN SAM ``` ## **`RESPONDENT/S:`** ``` JOHNSON T AGED 46 YEARS S/O THANKACHEN, THOPPIL HOUSE, ERAMATHOOR P.O.,THRIPPERUMTHURA VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 689622 ``` ``` THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ALONG WITH TRPC 183/2022 ON 30.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` 3 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 ## **C.S DIAS,J.** **---------------------------** ## **Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 ----------------------------Dated this the 30[th] day of August, 2022.** ## **COMMON ORDER** As the transfer petitions are between the same parties, they are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The transfer petitions are filed by the petitioner/wife, seeking transfer of OP (Div) No.1669/2021 (Annexure A1) and OP No.1672/2021 (Annexure A2) from the Family Court, Mavelikkara, to the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. 3. The petitioner’s case, in brief, in the memorandum of transfer petitions is that, she is the wife of the respondent. They have three daughters born in their wedlock, who are aged 19, 15 and 6 years, respectively. Due to the matrimonial cruelty that was meted out on the petitioner by the respondent, she was constrained to leave the matrimonial home along with three children. She is presently residing in her parental 4 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 home at Pathanamthitta. Since the Family Court at Mavelikkara is a Court of competent jurisdiction, the petitioner was constrained to file Annexures A1 and A2, seeking a decree of divorce and a decree for return of patrimony and other ancillary reliefs. The petitioner and three children are residing at Adoor, which is within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. The petitioner has now filed MC No.239/2021 (Annexure A3) before the said Court, seeking an order of maintenance. The respondent is contesting Annexure A3 before the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. Therefore, no inconvenience would be caused to the respondent, if Annexures A1 and A2 are transferred to the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. Hence, the transfer petition. 4. Heard; Sri.Manu Ramachandran, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/wife. Even though notice has been served on the respondent, there is no appearance for him. 5 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 5. The law with respect to transfer of proceedings, particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res-integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in **Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and another** [2002 KHC 1889], **Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh Satya Goel** [2000 KHC 1835], **Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap** [2016 KHC 6489], **Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh** [2017 (5) KHC 48] and **N.C.V Aishwarya vs. A.S Saravana Karthik Sha** [2022 (5) KHC 182]. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that it is the convenience of the woman and children that has to be looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another. 6. In the light of the law laid down in the aforecited decisions, the uncontroverted pleadings and materials on record, the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the petitioner and three children are residing within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Pathanamthitta and 6 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 Annexure A3 is already pending before the said Court, I am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and order the transfer of Annexures A1 and A2, so that the cases can be consolidated and jointly tried, which would avoid conflict of decisions and save precious judicial time. In the result, I allow the transfer petitions as follows: (i) Tr.P(C) No.183/2022 is allowed by ordering transfer of O.P No. 1672/2021 from the Family Court, Mavelikkara to the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. (ii) Tr.P(C) No.184/2022 is allowed by ordering transfer of O.P (Div) No.1669/2021 from the Family Court, Mavelikkara to the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. (iii) The parties would be at liberty to move the Family Court, Pathanamthitta and seek for 7 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 consolidation and joint trial of all the cases between them. (iv) The Registry shall forward a copy of the common order to the Family Court, Mavelikkara with instructions to forthwith transmit the records in Annexures A1 and A2 to the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. (v) The Family Court, Pathanamthitta, shall, immediately on the receipt of the records in the above cases, post the cases along with Annexure A3. sd/- Sks/30.8.2022 **C.S.DIAS, JUDGE** 8 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 ## **`APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 183/2022`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1THE TRUE COPY OF THE O.P(DIV) NO. 1669/2021 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA BY THE PETITIONER WIFE SEEKING DIVORCE Annexure A2THE TRUE COPY OF THE O.P NO. 1672/2021 FILED BEFORE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA BY THE PETITIONER WIFE FOR THE REALIZATION OF PATRIMONY, DECLARATION OF RIGHT, GOLD AND DAMAGES ``` ``` Annexure A3THE TRUE COPY OF M.C NO.239/2021 ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, PATHANAMTHITA FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PETITIONER AND HER TWO MINOR CHILDREN ``` 9 Tr.P (C) Nos.183 and 184 of 2022 ## **`APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 184/2022`** ``` PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1THE TRUE COPY OF THE O.P(DIV) NO. 1669/2021 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA BY THE PETITIONER WIFE SEEKING DIVORCE Annexure A2THE TRUE COPY OF THE O.P NO. 1672/2021 FILED BEFORE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA BY THE PETITIONER WIFE FOR THE REALIZATION OF PATRIMONY, DECLARATION OF RIGHT, GOLD AND DAMAGES ``` ``` Annexure A3THE TRUE COPY OF M.C NO.239/2021 ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, PATHANAMTHITA FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PETITIONER AND HER TWO MINOR CHILDREN ```