Travancore Devaswom Board - Sabarimala Special Commissioner Report (SSCR No. 45 of 2023)
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court of Kerala
- Hon'ble Judges
- Anil K. Narendran
- G. Girish
- Judgment Date
- 2023-12-22
- Court Decision / Holding
- With the above directions, this SSCR is disposed of.
- Final Disposition
- Disposed of; directions issued for continued inspections by Food Safety Officers at Sannidhanam, Pamba and Nilakkal, and by the Vigilance Wing of Travancore Devaswom Board, with stringent action for violations; SSCR disposed of with ongoing monitoring during the festival season.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- SUO MOTU
Respondents
- State of Kerala, represented by the Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue (Devaswom) Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram - 695001
- The Commissioner of Food Safety, Commissionerate of Food Safety, Department of Health Services, Thiruvananthapuram - 695014
- The Chief Analyst, Government Analysts' Laboratory, Thiruvananthapuram - 695035
- Deputy Director Kerala State Audit Department, Travancore Devaswom Board Audit, Nanthancode, Thiruvananthapuram - 695003
- Travancore Devaswom Board represented by its Secretary, Nanthancode, Kawdiar Post, Thiruvananthapuram - 695003
- Devaswom Commissioner Travancore Devaswom Board, Devaswom Buildings, Nanthancode, Thiruvananthapuram - 695005
- Executive Officer Sabarimala, Sabarimala P.O., Pathanamthitta - 689662
- Addl. R8 Chief Vigilance and Security Officer (Superintendent of Police), Travancore Devaswom Board Headquarters, Nanthancode, Kawdiar Post, Thiruvananthapuram - 695003
- Addl. R9 Food Safety Officer, Sannidhanam, Sabarimala, Pathanamthitta - 689713
- Addl. R10 Food Safety Officer, Pamba, Pathanamthitta - 689662
- Addl. R11 Food Safety Officer, Nilakkal, Pathanamthitta - 689645
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • Sri S. Rajmohan - Senior Government Pleader
Counsels for Respondents
- • Sri G. BijU - SC - Travancore Devaswom Board
- • Sri N. Raghuraj - Amicus Curiae for Spl. Commissioner, Sabarimala
Case Synopsis & Summary
This High Court of Kerala (Ernakulam) heard SSCR No. 45 of 2023, a Suo Motu matter arising from a judgment in WP(C) Nos. 29371 and 29762 of 2023. The Special Commissioner, Sabarimala, was directed to file a report on regulatory measures by the Food Safety Department for the Mandala-Makaravilakku festival season of 1199 ME (2023-24), focusing on hotels, light refreshment stalls, fruit and juice stalls, and other food outlets serving pilgrims. The present report details proactive arrangements by the Commissioner of Food Safety, including the establishment of food testing labs at Nilakkal and Erumeli, preliminary testing of prasadam ingredients, regular water sampling for analysis at the Government Analyst’s Laboratory, and FoSTaC training for vendors to promote proper hygiene. It notes toll-free complaint numbers displayed at eateries and a system to quickly address concerns, with photographs of the numbers on record. The court cites Centre for Public Interest Litigation v Union of India (2013) 16 SCC 279 and Swami Achyutanand Tirth v Union of India (2016) 9 SCC 699 to underscore the constitutional obligation to protect life and health through food safety regulation under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The bench directs continued inspections by Food Safety Officers and the Vigilance Wing, with stringent action for violations, and disposes of the SSCR with these directions.
Provisions of Law Cited
Legal Doctrines & Maxims
- Right to life under Article 21 read with Article 47 – state obligation to protect health and life by regulating food safety (Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. UOI, 2013 (16 SCC 279))
- Food safety management systems and food safety audits to realise the goal of safe and wholesome food (Swami Achyutanand Tirth v. UOI, 2016 (9 SCC 699))
Submissions & Arguments
Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners
The Suo Motu petition seeks strict adherence to food safety standards during the Mandala-Makaravilakku season at Sannidhanam, Pamba and Nilakkal. The Special Commissioner’s report demonstrates the Food Safety Department’s extensive measures—lab facilities for prasadam materials, water testing, regular inspections, FoSTaC training for vendors, and a robust complaint mechanism through toll-free numbers displayed at stalls. Given the Pilgrims’ demographic, including a substantial share of women and children, the argument emphasizes safeguarding health and ensuring safe, wholesome food. The court’s earlier directions require ongoing monitoring, accountability, and swift action for violations, with transparency in execution and reporting to uphold public health during the festival.”,
Contentions of Respondents
Respondents contend that proactive steps already align with statutory duties under the Food Safety Act and constitutional guarantees. They highlight the establishment of testing labs, routine inspections at key locations (Sannidhanam, Pamba, Nilakkal), vendor training, and the role of the Vigilance Wing in enforcing safety norms. They argue that the measures satisfy regulatory requirements, prioritizing safe prasadam and consumer health during Mandala-Makaravilakku 1199 ME, and call for continued, strengthened oversight with stringent action against violations to maintain pilgrims’ confidence.
Cited Precedents (2)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India and others | (2013) 16 SCC 279 | Positive | The judgment held that hazardous food articles threaten the fundamental right to life under Article 21, guiding the Court to require protective food-safety measures. |
| Swami Achyutanand Tirth v. Union of India | (2016) 9 SCC 699 | Positive | The judgment outlines objectives of the FSS Act and supports regulatory mechanisms like food-safety management systems as essential to safeguarding public health. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Travancore Devaswom Board - Sabarimala Special Commissioner Report (SSCR No. 45 of 2023) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.