High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with declaration of e...

Thulasibai v. State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:W.P.(C). No.10132/2010-N

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Antony Dominic
Judgment Date
2010-05-28
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of: the court declares the petitioner eligible for the post of Joint Chemical Examiner and directs the State/Respondents to convene a Review DPC expeditiously, on production of a copy of this judgment, to consider the petitioner for promotion.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with declaration of eligibility and direction to convene a Review DPC expeditiously.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Thulasibai, W/o Late K. Suresh Babu, aged 52 years, Petitioner

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • Chief Chemical Examiner, Chemical Examiner's Laboratory, Thiruvananthapuram
  • B. Ajayakumar, Asst. Chemical Examiner, Regional Chemical Examiner's Laboratory, Kakkanad, Ernakulam
  • Dr. N. Jayasree, Asst. Chemical Examiner, Regional Chemical Examiner's Laboratory, Kakkanad, Ernakulam

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. SMT. A. G. Aneetha, Adv. M. Soloman, Adv. M. Kabani Dinesh

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sr. Govt. Pleader Sri. P. Nandakumar
  • • Adv. Sri. Peter Jose Christo, Adv. Sri. S. P. Aravindakshan Pillay, Adv. N. S. Santha, Adv. S. A. Anand

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Thulasibai, a longstanding employee in the Chemical Examiner’s Laboratory, seeks inclusion in the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for consideration for promotion to Joint Chemical Examiner. Having joined as a Technical Assistant in 1982 and advanced to Assistant Chemical Examiner, she completed an M.Sc. Chemistry through the Madurai Kamaraj University via distance education in 2007. She contends that the Special Rules governing Kerala Chemical Examiner's Laboratory Service do not distinguish between regular and distance-education master’s degrees and that government recognitions and prior judicial decisions support treating such degrees as valid qualifications for the higher post. The petition relies on Mohanan Nair v. State of Kerala; Mujeeb Rahman v. State of Kerala; State of Kerala v. Suja Kumari; Public Service Commission v. Abdul Rasheed; and Ani G. Mattathil v. State of Kerala, arguing that the government’s recognition of degrees obtained through distance education or correspondence is sufficient if recognized by any statutory university. The respondents do not file a counter-affidavit. The court cites government orders GO(MS) 526 (1965, 1965) and subsequent orders (27.6.1990; 13.12.2002; GO 406/02) to support a broader interpretation of qualification recognition and ultimately holds that the petitioner is eligible for promotion and should be considered by a Review DPC expeditiously, on production of this judgment.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Special Rules for Kerala Chemical Examiner's Laboratory Service (Ext.P1)G.O.(MS) No.526, dated 17-02-1965G.O.(MS) No.526, dated 17-07-1965 (Ext.P4)G.O dated 27-06-1990G.O(P) No.406/02/G.Edn., dated 13-12-2002

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argues that the Special Rules do not distinguish between regular and distance-education Master's degrees. Since the degree from Madurai Kamaraj University was recognised by government authorities and the University is statutory, it should be treated as a valid qualification for eligibility to the post of Joint Chemical Examiner. Citing Mohanan Nair, Mujeeb Rahman, Suja Kumari, Abdul Rasheed, and Ani G. Mattathil, she contends that education obtained through distance education should be recognised if recognised by a state/statutory university, as per Ext.P4 and prior government orders, and that there is no basis to exclude her on the grounds of the mode of study. The aim is to secure inclusion in the field of choice for the DPC; the government should recognize her qualification and consider her in the forthcoming DPC (review).

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents did not file counter-affidavits but urge caution about practical implementation. They rely on existing rules and government orders recognizing qualifications from statutory universities; they note government recognitions and historical shifts (e.g., orders initially restricting to regular courses but later rescinded). They emphasize that the government may recognise degrees irrespective of Kerala University recognition and point to Ext.P4 and related orders to justify broader recognition, ultimately consenting to the petitioner’s eligibility for consideration but leaving the timing of the DPC to be expeditiously arranged after the judgment is produced.

Cited Precedents (5)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Mohanan Nair v. State of Kerala1994(2) KLT 537PositiveJudgment supports recognition of distance-education degrees for government service eligibility, aligning with the petitioner’s argument.
Mujeeb Rahman v. State of Kerala2005(1) KLT 680PositiveCase held no distinction between degrees obtained via regular vs. distance education; government recognition suffices.
State of Kerala v. Suja Kumari2006(1) KLT 846PositiveJudgment followed the same principle of qualification recognition regardless of mode of study.
Public Service Commission v. Abdul Rasheed2007(3) KLT 881PositiveSupportive precedent for recognition of distance-education degrees for employment opportunities.
Ani G. Mattathil v. State of Kerala2009(1) KLT 917PositiveFurther reaffirmation of recognizing distance-education qualifications for government positions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Thulasibai v. State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** **PRESENT :** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC** **FRIDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2010 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1932** **WP(C).No. 10132 of 2010(N)** **---------------------------------------** **PETITIONER:** - **-------------------** **THULASIBAI, W/O.LATE K. SURESH BABU, AGED 52 YEARS, ASST. CHEMICAL EXAMINER, CHEMICAL EXAMINER'S LABORATORY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,RESIDING AT TX 31/603(3), SRUTHI, S.N.N.R.A - 75, SREENARAYANANAGAR, PETTAH TRIVANDRUM - 695 024.** **BY ADVS. SMT.A.G.ANEETHA, SRI.MANU SOLOMAN, SMT.M.KABANI DINESH.** **RESPONDENTS:** **------------------------** **1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.** **2. CHIEF CHEMICAL EXAMINER, CHEMICAL EXAMINER'S LABORATORY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.** ## **3. B. AJAYAKUMAR,** **ASST. CHEMICAL EXAMINER, REGIONAL CHEMICAL EXAMINER'S LABORATORY, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM.** **4. DR. N. JAYASREE, ASST. CHEMCIAL EXAMINER, REGIONAL CHEMICAL EXMINER'S LABORATORY, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM.** ## **W.P.(C). NO.10132/2010-N:** **5. V.C. THANKAMONY,** **ASST. CHEMICAL EXAMINER, REGIONAL CHEMICAL EXAMINER'S LABORATORY, MEDICAL COLLEGE CAMPUS, CALICUT - 673 008.** **R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NANDAKUMAR, R3 BY ADVS. SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO, SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY, SMT.N.SANTHA, SRI.S.A.ANAND.** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/05/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** ## **W.P.(C). NO.10132/2010-N:** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:** ## **EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE KERALA CHEMICAL EXAMINER'S LABORATORY SPECIAL RULES.** **EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ADVERTISEMENT PUBLISHED IN MADHYAMAM DAILY IN ITS TRIVANDRUM EDITION DT. 09/05/2006.** **EXT.P.3.A: COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 06/12/2007 FROM THE MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY.** **EXT.P.3.B: COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 12/09/08 FROM THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND INDIRA GANDHI OPEN UNIVERSITY.** **EXT.P.4; COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DT. 17/07/1965.** **EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE PETITIONER.** **EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST DTD. 01/05/2009.** **EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 01/10/2009.** **EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE REPLY DT. 20/11/09.** **EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE NEWSPAPER REPORT IN MADHYAMAM ON 19/11/2006.** ## **RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.** ## **//TRUE COPY//** **P.A. TO JUDGE.** **Prv.** ## **ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 10132 OF 2010 (N) =====================** ## **Dated this the 28[th] day of May, 2010** ## **J U D G M E N T** Petitioner entered service in the Chemical Examiner's Laboratory Department as a Technical Assistant on 10/2/82. She was promoted as Junior Scientific Officer w.e.f. 6/10/85 and as Assistant Chemical Examiner w.e.f. 18/4/91. The next higher post to which she is aspiring for promotion is that of Joint Chemical Examiner. 2. Though the petitioner joined service as a Graduate in Chemistry, while continuing in service, she acquired M.Sc Chemistry, under the Distant Education Programme of the Madurai Kamaraj University and passed the examination in 2007. She apprehends that she will not be considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee for the reason that the Post Graduate Degree in M.Sc Chemistry possessed by the petitioner is only under the Distant Education Programme. It is with this grievance, this writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondents to include the petitioner in the field of choice to be considered by the DPC for inclusion in the select list. **WPC No. 10132/10** **:2 :** 3. Special Rules concerning Kerala Chemical Examiner's Laboratory Service has been produced as Ext.P1. The qualification prescribed for the post of Joint Chemical Examiner to be filled up by promotion is Masters Degree with atleast 50% marks in Chemistry or Forensic Science or Bio-Chemistry of a recognised University and two years experience as Assistant Chemical Examiner in Chemical Examiner's Laboratory. 4. The case set up by the petitioner is that so long as Special Rules do not make a distinction between a regular Post Graduate Degree or a Post Graduate Degree acquired in the Distant Education Programme, both categories are equally eligible, and that therefore, she should be held eligible for the higher post. 5. In support of this contention, counsel for the petitioner has relied on the judgments of this Court in _**Mohanan Nair v. State of Kerala**_ (1994(2) KLT 537), _**Mujeeb Rahman v. State of Kerala**_ (2005(1) KLT 680), _**State of Kerala v. Suja Kumari**_ (2006 (1) KLT 846), _**Public Service Commission v. Abdul Rasheed**_ (2007(3) KLT 881) and _**Ani G. Mattathil v. State of Kerala**_ (2009 (1) KLT 917). In **Mohanan Nair's** case, (1994(2) KLT 537), in para 6 an 8, it has been held thus: 6. As already stated the Government of Kerala **WPC No. 10132/10** **:3 :** by its order G.O(MS) 526 dated 17.2.1965 which was specifically on the subject of recognition of qualifications, has recognised all degrees and diplomas awarded by statutory Universities established by an Act of State or Central legislatures. The Annamalai University is a statutory University established by the Statute of the Madras Legislature. The qualifications prescribed for higher secondary schools in Kerala make no distinction between degrees obtained by regular attendance in colleges and those obtained by correspondence study. That is why the Government's order dated 27.6.90 prescribes “a Master's Degree” and not “a Master's degree by attending regular college”. The Government's order dated 17.2.1965 reorganising various qualifications also does not make a distinction based on attendance or regular classes. 8. The recognition of the qualification by the Kerala University- a fact which entered the making of the impugned orders-is not relevant for the recognition of qualifications by the Government. The Government may, consistently with its needs recognise educational qualifications irrespective of whether the Kerala University recognises them or not. The Government of Kerala in fact did so. Again, the fact that the Kerala University has not recognized the M.Sc.Degree of Annamalai University does not mean that the Kerala University has rejected the degree. The degree of the Directorate of Correspondence Courses and Continuing Education of the Annamalai University, never came before the Kerala University for consideration of recognition. In any event, the Government of Kerala, has, for the purpose of appointment of teachers in Higher Secondary Schools, recognised the degree of M.Sc(Chemistry) from the statutory Annamalai University. 6. Similarly in **Mujeeb Rahman's case** (2005(1) KLT 680), it has been held thus in para 6: **WPC No. 10132/10** **:4 :** Writ petitioners took up the stand that the rule making authority has not made any distinction between persons who have acquired M.A.Degree after undergoing regular course of study and those who have acquired the M.A.Degree after undergoing course of study through distance education or correspondence course. Counsel submitted wherever rule making authority thought that the degree obtained must be through regular course of study the same has to be specified in the rules. Counsel referred to B.Ed Degree which has to be acquired through regular course of study unlike M.A.Degree where there is no such stipulation. Counsel submitted that the only stipulation is that Master's Degree obtained by the candidate must be recognised by any of the Universities in the State of Kerala. Petitioners satisfy those conditions and therefore, counsel submitted that, there is no justification in rejecting their application overlooking the statutory rules. Petitioners have produced eligibility certificate from the University certifying that the Master's Degree obtained by them from various Universities have been recognised as equivalent qualification in the respective subject by the Universities in Kerala. Rule making authority in their wisdom, has not made any distinction between Master's Degree obtained through correspondence course and the one acquired through regular course of study. Similar issue arose when the recruitment was made to the post of High School Assistant. Public Service Commission noticed that several persons who have acquired the degree through correspondence course had applied for the post of High School Assistant. Commission then addressed a letter to the State Government to clarify whether candidates who have applied to the post of High School Assistant having the qualification acquired through distance educational course or correspondence course are eligible for holding the post. Request was also made by the P.S.C to the Government to amend the qualification of the teaching post so as to make ineligible the degrees which are obtained through distance education system without undergoing the stipulated regular course of study. **WPC No. 10132/10** **:5 :** Government at that time accepted the request of the P.S.C. and passed an order on 6.11.2002 stating that the qualification obtained through regular course of study alone shall be considered for appointment to the post of High School Assistant, Government later rescinded the said order, vide G.O(P) No.406/02/G.Edn. dt 13.12.2002. Rule making authority therefore made no distinction between the degree obtained by correspondence course as well as through regular course so far as appointment to the post of High School Assistants are concerned. Rule making authority, it is seen, has taken the same stand for the post of Higher Secondary School Teacher as well. State Government have also not filed counter affidavit in these cases. Consequently, they are not contradicting the stand of the writ petitioners that Master's Degree obtained by candidates through correspondence course if it is recognised by any of the Universities in Kerala would be sufficient qualification for the post of Higher Secondary School Teachers. 7. These judgments have been followed in the subsequent judgments mentioned above. Thus, the law laid down by this Court in the aforesaid judgments fully supports the case canvassed by the petitioner. Added to this is Ext.P4, the Government Order GO(MS) No.526 dated 17[th] of July 1965, where the Government have ordered that Degrees and Diplomas awarded by statutory Universities established by an Act of the Central or State Legislature or by other institutions of higher learning recognised as Universities by the Central University Grants Commission should be recognised in the State. There is no dispute that Madurai Kamaraj University will not come within the scope of this order **WPC No. 10132/10** **:6 :** 8. In the light of the judgments and the Government Order referred to above, the contention that the petitioner is eligible for the post of Joint Chemical Examiner deserves acceptance, and there will be a declaration to that effect. 9. It is pointed out by the petitioner that the DPC for filling up the two existing vacancies in the cadre of Joint Chemical Examiner is to meet tomorrow and on that basis, petitioner seeks a direction for her consideration. But now that the judgment has been delivered only today, learned Government Pleader points out that it will be impractical to consider the case of the petitioner. Having regard to the above, I do not propose to direct consideration of the case by tomorrow itself, but however, it is directed that the 1[st] respondent shall take steps for convening the review DPC, as expeditiously as possible, on the production of a copy of this judgment for considering the case of the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ## **ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE** Rp