High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; no order as to costs.

Thomas M.V. v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and another

Case / Petition Number:W.P.(C) No.2834 of 2021 (D)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-04
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Agali, to dispose of S.M.No.279/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Thomas M.V.

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LA and LT), Office of the Special Tahsildar, Agali, Palakkad-678581
  • The Village Officer, Mannarkadu-I Village, Mannarkadu, Palakkad District-678582

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • N.A. Retheesh
  • • Prasun S
  • • K.M. Sreekanth

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt Vidhya A.C. (Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

Thomas M.V. filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to compel the 1st respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.279/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Agali. The suo motu proceedings were initiated under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for the assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The land involved is 1.1150 hectares in Sy.No.70/1-180 of Mannarkad-I Village, Mannarkad Taluk, Palakkad District. The petitioner contends that the delay in disposal inhibits access to credit and that expeditious disposal is essential, particularly for senior citizens; he argues that notices for owners can be issued via the Village Officers to expedite matters. The Court recalls its Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) decision, which directed expeditious disposal on seniority rules and allowed obtaining reports through Village Officers, and it endorses those directions. It also notes the Government Order G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 to facilitate reports and speedy processing. It notes the Land Tribunal’s pendency (3951 items) and directs disposal strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.279/2020 before the Land Tribunal, and to dispose expeditiously in accordance with the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri. It is argued that the suo motu proceedings under the Kerala Land Reforms Act are for vesting and assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Sections 72 and 72K, read with Rules 14. The petitioner highlights the need for speed, citing delays and potential benefits of obtaining notices through Village Officers and ensuring seniority-based disposal; contends the Land Tribunal should adhere to the priorities laid down by the Court.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents emphasize adherence to law and the earlier Narayanan Namboodiri directions for expeditious disposal, noting the overall pendency of suo motu proceedings at the Land Tribunal (3951 cases) and the requirement to follow seniority and lawful procedures; they support directing expeditious disposal in line with the Court’s guidance.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as controlling authority for expeditious disposal directions; the Court follows the directions laid down in that judgment.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Thomas M.V. v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and another and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 15TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **THOMAS.M.V, AGED 54 YEARS S/O.VARKEY, MULLAPPALLI HOUSE, HILLVIEW NAGAR PERIMBADARI DESOM, PERIMBADARI P.O, MANNARKADU VILLAGE, MANNARKADU TALUK, PALAKKADU-678762.** **BY ADVS. SRI.N.A.RETHEESH SRI.PRASUN.S SRI.K.M.SREEKANTH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA AND LT), OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, AGALI, PALAKKAD-678581. 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANNARKADU-I VILLAGE, MANNARKADU, PALAKKADU DISTRICT-678582.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT VIDHYA A.C- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.279/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Agali, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Agali under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 1.1150 Hectares of land comprised in Sy.No.70/1-180 of Mannarkad-I Village, Mannarkad Taluk in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land ## W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D) -5- Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D) -6- cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Mannarkkad-I Village, the Land Tribunal, Agali, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.279/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P5 receipt dated 19.06.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Agali is 3951. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Agali can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.279/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D) -7- 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Agali, to dispose of S.M.No.279/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2834 OF 2021(D) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.5653/2019 DATED 27.12.2019 OF MANNARKADU SRO.** **EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 13.01.2020.** **EXHIBIT P3** **THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEARING NO.100/2020 DATED 18.06.2020.** **EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19.06.2020 ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT NO.E1 CLERKBA(28667)/2020 DATED 07.12.2020.**