High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of the writ petition with directions t...

Thanka v. Special Tahsildar (LR)

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M)
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-17
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M. No.17/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017) and the related paras, with no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of the writ petition with directions to the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.17/2021 in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • THANKA

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Special Tahsildar (LR), Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Pattambi, Palakkad-679 104

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the suo motu initiation of S.M. No.17/2021 by the Land Tribunal Pattambi for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. The petitioner seeks an expeditious enquiry and a timely decision on the file, contending that as a 74‑year‑old senior citizen she should not be kept waiting in a long queue. The court recalls Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and connected matters (W.P.(C). No.28398 of 2017, 14.03.2018), which cautions against out‑of‑turn disposal and lays down directions to ensure senior citizens’ cases are prioritized and disposed on seniority within six months for senior citizens and within 18 months for others, subject to stays. It also notes the use of Village Officers to facilitate reports and the GO 09/2018 RD for speedy disposal. In the instant case, the court directs the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M.No.17/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, and holds that there shall be no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 14Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 5G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Section 99

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argues that, being a 74-year-old senior citizen, she is entitled to expeditious disposal of S.M.No.17/2021 and seeks a mandamus directing the Land Tribunal to complete the enquiry and issue a final decision promptly, relying on the Narayanan Namboodiri decision which directs expeditious disposal and prioritization of senior citizens’ cases while preserving the seniority of registered cases.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent contends that the Land Tribunal must dispose of suo motu proceedings in accordance with the established seniority system, noting total pendency (around 11,078 cases) and the need to obtain necessary reports, including through Village Officers as per GO 09/2018/RD. The Tribunal should not break seniority, and matters ripe for passing orders should be resolved within prescribed timeframes; the government supports expeditious disposal within lawful procedures.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt follows the Narayanan Namboodiri decision which directed expeditious disposal and seniority-based processing of Land Tribunal cases; the present judgment adopts those directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Thanka v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **THANKA, AGED 74 YEARS W/O.LATE KRISHNAN, PAKKANJI, THOLANUR P.O., KUTHANNUR II VILLAGE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LR), MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679 104.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.17/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.4500 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.107/8 in Block No.11 of Kuthanur-II Village, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on W.P(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M) -5- account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for ## W.P(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M) -6- passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kuthannur-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.17/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 03.01.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. W.P.(C).No.2133 of 2021 filed by the petitioner, seeking early disposal of S.M.No.17/2021, even before the expiry of one month period from the date of Ext.P1 report, was dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach this Court again in case there is delay on the part of the respondent in taking a final decision in W.P(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M) -7- ## S.M.No.17/2021. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 74 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.17/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M. No.17/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.4121 OF 2021(M) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 03.01.2021.** **EXHIBIT P2** **TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.2133 OF 2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 28.01.2021.**