High Court of KeralaSingle JudgePetition disposed of; no order as to costs

Sundaran v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) & The Village Officer, Thenkurussi I Village, Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K. NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-02-11
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M. No.262/2019 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another, and no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Petition disposed of; no order as to costs

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sundaran, aged 69 years S/O. Late Chamu, Poolakkade House, Vilayanur P.O. Thenkurussi, Alathur Taluk, Palakkad 678671

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar, (LR), Land Tribunal Pattambi, Mini Civil Station, Ottapalam, Palakkad 679101
  • The Village Officer, Thenkurusi I Village, Palakkad 678671

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri A.R. Gangadas

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K. Amminikutty - Sr Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Sundaran, a 69-year-old petitioner, approached the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Special Tahsildar (LR) to expeditiously conduct an enquiry and dispose of S.M. No.262/2019 before the Land Tribunal, Pattambi. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petition highlights the pendency before the Tribunal (over 11,000 cases) and the petitioner’s senior status (69 years) to urge priority in disposal. The respondents rely on established norms and prior judgments, notably Narayanan Namboodiri, to ensure seniority-based disposal and adherence to the procedures for obtaining village-level reports. The Court reiterates Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, emphasizing expeditious disposal without breaking seniority, the use of Village Officers for reports when needed, and time-bound disposal for senior citizens (six months) and others (up to 18 months) unless stayed. In the instant case, the Court directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M. No.262/2019 strictly in accordance with law and in line with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Expeditious disposal of cases
  • Seniority-based disposal of cases before Land Tribunals
  • Priority to senior citizens in the disposal process
  • Suo motu proceedings under the Kerala Land Reforms Act framework
  • Co-operation with the Land Tribunal to facilitate notices and reports

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner submitted that the expeditious disposal of his case is essential given his old age and the long pendency before the Land Tribunal. He urged adherence to the directions from Narayanan Namboodiri to ensure seniority-based disposal, utilize Village Officers for reports if needed, and dispose of senior-citizen petitions within six months, with others within 18 months, subject to higher authorities’ stays. The writ petitions seek a mandamus directing the Special Tahasildar (LR) to proceed with the enquiry and finalize S.M. No.262/2019.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents argued that although expeditious disposal is desirable, the Land Tribunal must follow the established seniority principle and the directions laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri. They noted that reports can be obtained from Village Officers and that urgency should not undermine due process and the preservation of seniority. They pointed to the Government order and existing procedural safeguards to ensure orderly disposal without disrupting the queue of pending cases.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveThe judgment relies on Narayanan Namboodiri for expeditious disposal directives and to guide the Land Tribunal’s approach; the present decision adopts those directions.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sundaran v. The Special Tahsildar (LR) & The Village Officer, Thenkurussi I Village, Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 22ND MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SUNDARAN, AGED 69 YEARS S/O. LATE CHAMU, POOLAKKADE HOUSE, VILAYANUR P.O. THENKURUSSI, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD 678 671. BY ADV. SRI.A.R.GANGADAS** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (L.R.)**| |---|---| ||**LAND TRIBUNAL PATTAMBI, MINI CIVIL STATION,**| ||**OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD 679 101.**| |**2**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER,**| ||**THENKURUSI I VILLAGE, PALAKKAD 678 671.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P) -2- ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.262/2019 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Pattambi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0176 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.71/1 of Thenkurissi-I Village, Alathur Taluk in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Thenkurissi-I, the Land Tribunal, Pattambi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.262/2019, as evidenced by Ext.P2 receipt dated 12.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 69 years. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total W.P(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P) -7- pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Pattambi is 11078. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Pattambi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.262/2019 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Pattambi, to dispose of S.M. No.262/2019, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.3547 OF 2021(P) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION AND MAHAZAR SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 10.10.2019** **EXHIBIT P2** **TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN SM NO. 262/2019 DATED 12/12/2020 TO THE PETITIONER.**