High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; Land Tribunal direct...

Sundaran v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Hon. Justice Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-01-28
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.814/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017) as stated in the cited judgment. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M.No.814/2020 following Narayanan Namboodiri directions; No costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • SUNDARAN, AGED 62 YEARS S/O.LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, ELAYAPURACKAL, KAKKATHARA, KANNADI II VILLAGE, THIRUVALATHUR, KODUMBU, PALAKKAD

Respondents

  • SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.) OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD P.O., PALAKKAD 678 001

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SRI SUNIL NATH N.B- GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by Sundaran, seeks a mandamus directing the respondent Special Tahsildar (LR) to conduct an expeditious enquiry and dispose of S.M.No.814/2020 before the Land Tribunal, Palakkad. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, for the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K, in respect of 0.2045 hectares in Re.Sy.No.806/1, Kannadi-II Village. The petitioner, a 62-year-old senior citizen, argues that delay in disposal adversely affects his rights and his ability to obtain loans. The respondent counters by noting a large pendency (3342 cases). The Court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri decision, which directs expeditious disposal of senior citizen cases and lays down procedural directions for obtaining reports (via Village Officers) and prioritizing senior citizens on seniority, with specified timeframes. The High Court ultimately directs the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.814/2020 strictly in accordance with law and in line with Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Constitution of India Article 226Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 72KKerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 5Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 - Rule 14G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 99

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner submits that he is a senior citizen who seeks expeditious disposal of S.M.No.814/2020 and a mandamus directing the Land Tribunal to proceed promptly, noting the significant pendency before the Tribunal and the necessity of timely access to the purchase certificate; he relies on the principle of expedited disposal for senior citizens and the goal of ensuring timely resolution of land reform applications.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent emphasizes adherence to the principle of seniority in disposal of cases, the substantial pendency (3342 cases) before the Land Tribunal, and the procedural framework enabling expedited reports via Village Officers. The Government pleader indicates an understanding of prioritizing senior citizens and cites the Government Order (G.O.) 2018 guidelines as part of the mechanism to accelerate disposal.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relied on Narayanan Namboodiri for expeditious disposal of senior citizen cases and to follow the directions laid out in paragraph 2 of that judgment.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sundaran v. Special Tahsildar (LR), Office of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 8TH MAGHA, 1942** **WP(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SUNDARAN, AGED 62 YEARS S/O.LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, ELAYAPURACKAL, KAKKATHARA, KANNADI II VILLAGE, THIRUVALATHUR, KODUMBU, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.) OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD P.O., PALAKKAD 678 001** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SRI SUNIL NATH N.B- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.814/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Palakkad under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.2045 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.806/1 in Block No.50 of Kannadi-II Village in Palakkad Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kannadi-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Palakkad initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.814/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 10.11.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 62 years. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Palakkad is 3342. W.P(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Palakkad can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.814/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.814/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.2229 OF 2021(C) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 10.11.2020**