High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of writ petition with directions to th...

Sundaran v. Deputy Collector (LR), Palakkad

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-02-09
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of; Land Tribunal, Palakkad, directed to dispose of S.M.No.694/2015 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri (W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017) and related guidance, with priority to expeditious disposal for senior-citizen matters and proper use of Village Officers for reporting; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of writ petition with directions to the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.694/2015 strictly in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sundaran

Respondents

  • The Deputy Collector (LR), Palakkad Office of the Deputy Collector (LR), Collectorate, Palakkad, Palakkad District

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY, Advocate for the Applicant

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Smt K.Ammikkutty, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by Sundaran seeking a mandamus to compel the Deputy Collector (LR), Palakkad, to consider and pass orders in S.M. No.694/2015 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad. The suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 in respect of 0.2105 hectares of land in Re.Sy.No.258/6, Block 18, Parali-II, Palakkad District. The Court recalls the decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and connected matters (Judgment dated 14.03.2018) which held that the Land Tribunal must dispose cases in order of seniority, and may obtain reports through Village Officers to expedite proceedings, with priority to senior citizens. Paragraphs of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment were made part of the directions. The petition emphasizes the need for expeditious disposal because many applicants realize the necessity of purchase certificates only when seeking bank loans. The court also notes a large pendency in the Land Tribunal and directs disposal strictly in accordance with law and Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, without awarding costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaKerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 – Sections 72, 72K, 99Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 – Rule 5, Rule 14

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to compel the Deputy Collector (LR) to decide S.M. No.694/2015 on the Land Tribunal file and to issue the certificate of purchase under Section 72K, read with Rule 14. The applicant asserts that expeditious disposal is essential because the purchase certificate is frequently needed for securing bank loans and evidence of title. The petitioner relies on Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions that Land Tribunals dispose cases with regard to seniority and by expeditious means, including obtaining necessary village-report inputs to avoid delays. The petition advocates prioritizing expeditious disposal within the framework of seniority, and urges the court to fix a time limit, ensuring cooperation with Village Officers to obtain required reports.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that disposal must occur in accordance with due process and the established law. They highlight the significant pendency (3342 cases) and stress adherence to seniority while exploring expeditious disposal. They reference Government initiatives (GO 09/2018/RD) permitting Village Officers to report to the Land Tribunal to facilitate compliance. They endorse Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, including not breaking seniority and ensuring proper notices and reports. The respondents argue that any acceleration must still conform to lawful procedures and avoid prejudice to landowners or procedural requirements.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relied on and applied the directions established in Narayanan Namboodiri to manage expeditious disposal, seniority-based ordering, and use of Village Officers for reports.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sundaran v. Deputy Collector (LR), Palakkad and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 20TH MAGHA,1942** **WP(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SUNDARAN, AGED 52 YEARS S/O. DANDAPANI, VENKITESH NIVAS, PIRAYIRI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.** **BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), PALAKKAD OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 001.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY-SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.694/2015 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Palakkad under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.2105 Hectares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.258/6 in Block No.18 of Parali-II Village in Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. W.P(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Parali-II Village, the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.694/2015, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 06.11.2015, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Palakkad is 3342. W.P(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Palakkad can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.694/2015 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Palakkad, to dispose of S.M.No.694/2015, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.3257 OF 2021(F) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 6.11.2015 SHOWING THE SUO MOTO NO.694/2015 ISSUED FROM THE RESPONDENT.**