High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; Land Tribunal direct...

Sumesh v. Deputy Collector (Land Reforms) and Village Officer, Killannur, Thrissur District

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-03-30
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Thrissur, to dispose of S.M. No.214/2015 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another; no order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; Land Tribunal directed to dispose of S.M. No.214/2015 in accordance with Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sumesh, aged 37 years s/o Vasudevan, Kunathully House, Door No 10/356/5, Thrissur Corporation, Chiyyaram Post, Thrissur-680026

Respondents

  • Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Office of the Deputy Collector (L.R), Civil Station, Ayyanthole, Thrissur-680003
  • Village Officer, Killannur Village, Mullagunnathukavu Post, Thrissur District-680581

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri.R. Sreehari, Advocate

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT REKHA C NAIR, Senior Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Sumesh, a resident of Thrissur, challenged the delay in disposal of a suo motu proceeding initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. He seeks a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution to compel the Deputy Collector (LR) to expeditiously conduct an enquiry and to dispose of S.M. No.214/2015 on the Land Tribunal’s file. The subject matter concerns assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and the issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14, in respect of 0.1037 hectares of land in Sy.No.259 Pt, Killannur Village, Thrissur District. The petition relies on the Court’s Narayanan Namboodiri decision, which emphasized that disposal by Land Tribunals should proceed in seniority order and should not be derailed by out-of-turn directions; it provides guidelines for expeditious disposal, including using Village Officers for reports and prioritizing senior citizens’ cases with defined timeframes. The Court noted the Government’s GO and the role of village authorities, and directed that the Land Tribunal dispose of the pending matter strictly in accordance with the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, considering the substantial pendency. The petition is thus disposed without costs, guiding future handling of similar matters.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 (Rules 5, 14)Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RDSection 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to compel expeditious enquiry and disposal of S.M. No.214/2015 on the Land Tribunal’s file. Relying on Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) (W.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases), the petitioner argues that expeditious disposal is necessary to prevent delays caused by procedural bottlenecks, ensure junior owners obtain purchase certificates, and enable access to bank financing. The petitioner also points to the Government Order and urges prioritizing senior citizens’ petitions while maintaining statutory timelines; he seeks disposal within a reasonable period and in strict accordance with law.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents’ submissions, advanced by the Senior Government Pleader, emphasize adherence to the statutory framework and seniority-based disposal as advised by the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment. They acknowledge pendency but argue that expeditious disposal must occur within the legal process. They rely on rules governing Land Tribunal undertakings and the involvement of Village Officers to provide required information, consistent with the GO 2018 directive.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveThe judgment explicitly follows and applies the directives from Narayanan Namboodiri regarding expeditious disposal on seniority and the role of Village Officers in expediting reports.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sumesh v. Deputy Collector (Land Reforms) and Village Officer, Killannur, Thrissur District and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SUMESH, AGED 37 YEARS S/O VASUDEVAN, KUNNATHULLY HOUSE, DOOR NO 10/356/5, THRISSUR CORPORATION, CHIYYARAM POST, THRISSUR-680 026.** **BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEHARI** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND REFORMS)**| |---|---| ||**OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (L.R),**| ||**CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THIRSSUR-680 003.**| |**2**|**VILLAGE OFFICER,**| ||**KILLANNUR VILLAGE, MULAGUNNATHUKAVU POST,**| ||**THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 581.**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT REKHA C NAIR- SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Deputy Collector (LR) to conduct expeditious enquiry and to dispose of S.M.No.214/2015 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Thrissur, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Thrissur under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.1037 Hectares of land comprised in Sy.No.259 Pt of Killannur Village in Thrissur District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the W.P(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Killannur Village, the Land Tribunal, Thrissur initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.214/2015, as evidenced by Ext.P4 communication dated 09.03.2018, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Thrissur is 10800. W.P(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Thrissur can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.214/2015 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Thrissur, to dispose of S.M. No.214/2015, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.8299 OF 2021(J) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 PHOTO COPY OF DOCUMENT NO 4624/2014 OF SRO THRISSUR DATED 10.10.2014 EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOCOPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 15.7.2020 EXHIBIT P3 PHOTO COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.1.2015 EXHIBIT P4 PHOTO COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 9.3.2018 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 PHOTO COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 5.4.2018 EXHIBIT P6 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO 283 98/2017 ETC DATED 14.3.2018 OF THIS COURT EXHIBIT P7 PHOTO COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO 7143/2021 DATED 19.3.2021 OF THIS COURT**