State of Kerala and others vs N. Vijayakumar and Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram (W.A. No. 476 of 2020)

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR`** ## **`& THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 9[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WA NO. 476 OF 2020`** ## **`AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6251/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 22.7.2019 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1-4 IN WPC:`** ``` 1THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. ``` - **`2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU, TRIVANDRUM - 695 043.`** - **`3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU, TRIVANDRUM - 695 043.`** - **`4 THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER AND AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, TRIVANDRUM - 695 033.`** ``` BY SRI. S. RENJITH SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & 5TH RESPONDENT IN WPC:`** - **`1 N. VIJAYAKUMAR AGED 62 YEARS,S/O.PARAMESWARAN, LATHA VIHAR,TC 3/1981, NEAR LIC BUILDING,PATTOM P.O., TRIVANDRUM-695 004.`** - **`2 CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, CORPORATION BUILDINGS, VIKAS BHAVAN, TRIVANDRUM - 695 033, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.`** ``` BY ADVS. SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR FOR R1 SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.) SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,SC,TVPM CORPORATION ``` ``` THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` _WA..476/2020_ 2 ## J U D G M E N T ## Dated this the 9[th] day of March, 2022 ## Shaji P. Chaly, J. The State of Kerala and its officers, who were respondents 1 to 4 in W.P(C).No.6251 of 2019 have filed this appeal challenging the judgment dated 22.7.2019, whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the 1[st] respondent in the appeal, holding as follows:- “6. The petitioner submitted Ext.P3 application dated 06.12.2017 before the 3rd respondent, under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, as evidenced by Ext.P4 receipt dated 14.12.2017 for conversion of that property. By Ext.P5 judgment, this Court directed consideration of that application. Pursuant to the direction contained in Ext.P5 judgment, the 3rd respondent allowed Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner by Ext.P6 order dated 07.07.2018, which is one made invoking the provisions under sub-clause (2) of Clause 6 of Kerala Land Utilisation Order. The petitioner is feeling aggrieved by the condition imposed in Ext.P6 that he has to remit 50% of the fair value of the property in accordance with sub-section (3) of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 as inserted by Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017, i.e, Ordinance No.41 of 2017, followed by Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018, i.e, Act 29 of 2018. 7. The State Government made the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, with the prior approval of the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and clause (b) of subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Essential Commodities _WA..476/2020_ 3 Act, 1955, read with the notification dated 09.12.1957 of the Government of India, Ministry of Food and Agriculture. As per sub-clause (a) of Clause 2, unless the context otherwise requires, 'Collector' means the Collector of the district concerned and includes a Revenue Divisional Officer of the division concerned. As per sub-clause (b), substituted by S.R.O.No.240/86 published on 12.02.1986, 'food crops' includes paddy, fish, sugarcane, vegetables, tapioca, yam, tea, coffee, cardamom, pepper, groundnut, cocoa and banana plantain. 8. Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order provides that, land cultivated with any food crop not to be cultivated with any other food crop. Sub-clause (1) of Clause 6 provides that, no holder of any land, which has been under cultivation with any food crop for a continuous period of three years immediately before the commencement of Kerala Land Utilisation Order, shall convert or attempt to convert or utilise or attempt to utilise such land for the cultivation of any other food crop or for any other purpose except under and in accordance with the terms of a written permission given by the Collector. As per the Explanation, for the purpose of sub-clause (1) and sub-clause (2), removal of tree-growth, whether partial or total, on any land cultivated with cardamom shall be deemed to be an attempt to convert or utilise such land for a purpose other than cultivation of cardamom. 9. Sub-clause (2) of Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order provides that, no holder of any land who cultivates any land with any food crop for a continuous period of three years at any time after the commencement of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order shall, after the said period of three years, convert or attempt to convert or utilise or attempt to utilise such land for the cultivation of any other food crop or for any other purpose except under and in accordance with the terms of a written permission given by the Collector. The first proviso to sub-clause (2), substituted by S.R.O.No.240/86, provides that except in the case of lands under cardamom cultivation, no permission under sub-clause (1) or sub-clause (2), shall be necessary where the cultivation for which the land is converted or attempted to be converted or attempted to be converted or utilised or attempted to be utilised is paddy cultivation or fish culture. The 2nd proviso to subclause (2), inserted by S.R.O.No.240/86, provides further _WA..476/2020_ 4 that the lands under cultivation of paddy should not be converted or attempted to be converted or utilised or attempted to be utilised for fish culture permanently, but only seasonally. 10. The Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 was enacted to conserve the paddy land and wetland and to restrict the conversion or reclamation thereof, in order to promote growth in the agricultural sector and to sustain the ecological system, in the State of Kerala. Clause (iii) of Section 2 of the Act define the term 'conversion' to mean the situation whereby, land that has been under paddy farming and its allied constructions like drainage channels, ponds, canals, bunds and ridges are put to use for any other purpose. Clause (xii) of Section 2 defines the term 'paddy land' to mean all types of land situated in the State where paddy is cultivated at least once in a year or suitable for paddy cultivation but uncultivated and left fallow, and includes its allied constructions like bunds, drainage channels, ponds and canals; Clause (xviii) of Section 2 defines the term 'wetland' to mean land lying between terrestrial and aquatic systems, where the water table is usually at or near the surface or which is covered by shallow water or characterised by the presence of sluggishly moving or standing water, saturating the soil with water and includes backwaters, estuary, fens, lagoon, mangroves, marshes, salt marsh and swamp forests but does not include paddy lands and rivers. 11. Section 3 of the Act deals with prohibition of conversion or reclamation of paddy land. As per sub-section (1) of Section 3, on and from the date of commencement of this Act, the owner, occupier or the person in custody of any paddy land shall not undertake any activity for the conversion or reclamation of such paddy land except in accordance with the provisions of this Act. As per sub-section (2), nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall apply to the cultivation of any intermediary crops that are cultivated without changing the ecological nature of that paddy land or the strengthening of the outer bunds for protecting the cultivation. 12. Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, inserted by the Kerala Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017, i.e., Ordinance No.41 of _WA..476/2020_ 5 2017, followed by the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018, i.e., Act 29 of 2018, which deemed to have come into force on 30.12.2017 [in view of the provisions under subsection (2) of Section 1 of Act 29 of 2018], deals with change of nature of unnotified land. As per the proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 27A, if the area of such parcel of land where the application is allowed is more than 20.2 Ares, ten per cent of such land shall be set apart for water conservancy measures. As per sub-section (3) of Section 27A, if the application is allowed, the applicant shall be liable to pay a fee at such rate, as may be prescribed. As per the proviso to sub-section (3), no such fee shall be collected if the applicant proves that the land where the application is allowed is, filled up or naturally filled up before the 4th day of July, 1967, the date of commencement of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, after completing such procedure, as may be prescribed. Rule 27A reads thus; “27A. Change of nature of unnotified land.- (1) If any owner of an unnotified land desires to utilise such land for residential or commercial or for other purpose, he shall apply to the Revenue Divisional Officer for permission in such manner as may be prescribed. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, decree or order of any Court or Tribunal or any other authority, the Revenue Divisional Officer may, after considering the reports of the Village Officer concerned, pass such orders as deemed fit and and proper on such applications, ensuring that there is no disruption to the free flow of water to the neighbouring paddy lands, if any, through such water conservancy measures as is deemed necessary: Provided that, if the area of such parcel of land where the application is allowed is more than 20.2 Ares, ten per cent of such land shall be set apart for water conservancy measures. (3) If the application is allowed, the applicant shall be liable to pay a fee at such rate as may prescribed: Provided that, no such fee shall be collected if the applicant proves that the land where the application is allowed is, filled up or naturally filled up before the 4th day of July, 1967, the date of commencement of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, after completing such procedure, as may be prescribed. (4) If the application is allowed, the Revenue Divisional Officer shall ensure that the reclamation of the unnotified land shall not adversely affect the cultivation of paddy or any other crops, if any, in the adjoining land and shall specify such water conservancy measures as is necessary to ensure such cultivation: Provided that in specifying such water conservancy measures, the _WA..476/2020_ 6 Revenue Divisional Officer may, if he deems fit, refer to satellite maps of the area maintained by Government agencies. (5) No permission under this section shall be necessary where the purpose for which the unnotified land is converted or attempted to be converted or utilized or attempted to be utilized is for paddy cultivation. (6) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (13 of 1994) or in the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 (20 of 1994), no permission under this section shall be necessary for constructing a residential building having a maximum area of 120 square meters in a maximum extent of 4.04 ares of land or a commercial building having a maximum area of 40 square meters in a maximum extent of 2.02 ares of land: Provided that the construction of a housing complex or complexes or flats or multi-storied residential complexes shall not come within the meaning of residential building specified in this subsection: Provided further that this exemption shall be granted only once. (7) The exemption under sub-section (6) shall be applicable only to owners of unnotified lands under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018: Provided that if the area of the residential building or commercial building exempted under sub-section (6) is subsequently increased by new extension, the exemption under sub-section (6) shall cease to have effect and the owner of the land as on the date of detection of the new extension shall be liable to pay fee as per sub-section (3). (8) Where conversion of an unnotified land is required for any public purpose, the Revenue Divisional Officer shall submit a report to Government outlining the measures to be adopted to ensure that the reclamation shall not disrupt the free flow of water to the neighbouring paddy lands, if any, and shall suggest such water conservancy measures as is necessary to ensure this. (9) The Government may, on receipt of a report under subsection (8), issue permission to reclaim unnotified land for public purpose: Provided that where permission is granted, the Government may make necessary modifications to the recommendations of the Revenue Divisional Officer as deemed fit: Provided further that, if the area of such parcel of land where the application is allowed is more than 20.2 Ares, ten per cent of such land shall be set apart for water conservancy measures. (10) The order issued under sub-section (2) and (9) shall clearly indicate the survey number of the lands and the extent of the land in each survey number for which sanction has been accorded, the extent of the land in which water conservancy measures are to be adopted by the applicant and a sketch of such land indicating the aforementioned details shall be appended to the order. (11) The _WA..476/2020_ 7 Revenue Divisional Officer may, either suo motu or on the application of any aggrieved party, cancel any order issued under sub-section (2) if the conditions specified in the order issued therein are not complied by the applicant, either fully or partially. (12) No order of cancellation under sub-section (11) shall be made by the Revenue Divisional Officer unless the applicant thereof has been given an opportunity of being heard in the matter. (13) Any application received for the change of nature of unnotified land from the date of commencement of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018 shall be considered and disposed of only in accordance with the provisions of the Act.” 13. Clause (xviiA) of Section 2 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, inserted by Ordinance No.41 of 2017, followed by Act 29 of 2018, which deemed to have come into force on 30.12.2017, define the term 'unnotified land' to mean the lands within the area of jurisdiction of the Committee (i.e., the Local Level Monitoring Committee constituted under Section 5 of the Act) which have been included as paddy land or wetland in the basic tax register maintained in Village Offices, but are not notified as paddy land or wetland under sub-section (4) of Section 5 or where data-bank has not been published under the provisions of clause (i) of subsection (4) of Section 5, the lands which have already been filled up on the date of commencement of this Act and are not paddy land according to the report of the Kerala State Remote Sensing Centre and the Local Level Monitoring Committee or where the report of the Kerala State Remote Sensing Centre is not available, lands which are not paddy land according to the report of the Local Level Monitoring Committee. 14. Similarly, clause (i) of Section 2 of the Act inserted by Ordinance N.41 of 2017, followed by Act 29 of 2018, which deemed to have come into force on 30.12.2017, after re-numbering the existing clause (i) as clause (iA), define 'change of nature of unnotified land' to mean such act or series of acts whereby the nature of an unnotified land is changed or has been changed irreversibly and in such a manner that it cannot be reverted back to the original condition by ordinary means. 15. Sub-rules (1) to (17) of Rule 12 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008, as amended by the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Rules, 2018 _WA..476/2020_ 8 prescribe a detailed procedure for change of nature of an unnotified land under sub-section (2) of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, by the Revenue Divisional Officer. As per sub-rule (1) of Rule 12, an application submitted before the Revenue Divisional Officer, in respect of a property having an extent upto 20.23 Ares shall be in Form 6, and that in respect of a property having an extent above 20.23 Ares shall be in Form 7. The documents that have to be attached along with an application filed under Rule 12 is provided in sub-rule (2) and the requisite fee is prescribed in subrule (3). As per sub-rule (9) of Rule 12, if an application for change of nature of an unnotified land is allowed, the applicant shall pay the fee prescribed under the Schedule to the Rules and thereafter the Revenue Divisional Officer shall pass an order as provided under subrule (9), specifying the survey number and extent of the land permitted to be utilised for other purposes and the survey number and extent of the land set apart for water conservancy measures. A sketch of the property containing the aforesaid particulars shall also be enclosed along with that order. 16. Section 27B of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, inserted by Ordinance No.41 of 2017, followed by Act 29 of 2018, which deemed to have come into force on 30.12.2017, provides for appeal. As per sub-section (1) of Section 27B, any person aggrieved by an order of the Revenue Divisional Officer under subsection (2) of Section 27A may prefer an appeal to the District Collector within thirty days from the date of receipt of the order. As per sub-section (2), every appeal preferred under subsection (1) shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the order appealed against and an appeal fee of rupees five hundred. As per sub-section (3), the District Collector may, after giving an opportunity to the appellant to be heard, dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible. Subsection (4) provides that the order in appeal shall be final and shall not be challenged in any Civil Court. 17. Section 27C of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, inserted by Ordinance No.41 of 2017, followed by Act 29 of 2018, which deemed to have come into force on 30.12.2017, deals with changes in records. Sub-section (1) of Section 27C, which starts with a non obstante clause provides that, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time _WA..476/2020_ 9 being in force or in any judgment, decree or order of any Court, Tribunal or any other Authority, wherever a part of a survey number - or sub division is permitted to be converted under Sections 8, 9, 10 or 27A of this Act, a new sub-division shall be created for the extent for which such orders for conversion are issued. As per sub-section (2) of Section 27C, where the paddy land or unnotified land is duly converted as per the provisions of this Act, the Tahsildar shall reassess the land tax under Section 6A of the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 and make necessary entries in revenue records relating to such lands. Section 27C of the Act reads thus; 27C. Changes in records.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any judgment, decree or order of any Court, Tribunal or any other Authority, wherever a part of a survey number or subdivision is permitted to be converted under Sections 8, 9, 10 or 27A of this Act, a new subdivision shall be created for the extent for which such orders for conversion are issued. (2) Where the paddy land or unnotified land is duly converted as per the provisions of this Act, the Tahsildar shall reassess the land tax under Section 6A of the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 (13 of 1961) and make necessary entries in revenue records relating to such lands. (3) Where such changes are recorded in revenue records, the number and date of the order and the authority granting sanction, the survey number of the lands for which sanction has been accorded, extent of the land in each survey number for which sanction has been accorded and the revised land tax shall be clearly recorded ensuring that the old entries are legible. (4) Tahsildar shall conduct periodical inspection to ensure that changes in revenue records are in accordance with sub-section (3). (5) No attempt shall be made to alter or change or modify the revenue records relating to the paddy land or wetland or unnotified land otherwise than in accordance with sub-section (3).” 18. I **n Renji K.Paul and another v. Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Muvattupuzha and others [2019 (2) KHC 241]** this Court held that, applications submitted prior to 30.12.2017 seeking permission for conversion of a paddy land need to be considered in accordance with the provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 as the amended provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 [as inserted by the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017, i.e., Ordinance No.41 of 2017, followed by the Kerala _WA..476/2020_ 10 Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018, i.e., Act 29 of 2018] came into force only with effect from 30.12.2017. In the said decision, this Court was dealing with the challenge made against Ext.P10 order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, whereby the petitioners in that writ petition were granted permission under subclause (2) of Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, for conversion of their property to an extent of 7½ cents, on condition that the petitioners shall pay 50% of the fair value of such parcel of land for effecting changes in revenue records, in view of the provisions under sub-section (3) of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act. This Court held that the condition imposed in Ext.P10 order for payment of 50% of the fair value of such parcel of land to the Government is not legal or correct. Therefore, this Court set aside Ext.P10 order and the Revenue Divisional Officer was directed to reconsider the matter in accordance with law, considering it as one submitted prior to 30.12.2017, the appointed date from which the amended provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act came into force, and under the provisions of Kerala Land Utilisation Order, wherein there is no provision for imposing any condition for payment of fair value of such parcel of land to the State Government. This Court has made it clear that, if the petitioners are producing necessary enabling orders, the Secretary of the Municipality shall reconsider the application for building permit submitted by them [which was rejected on the ground that the property is included as converted land in the data-bank and remaining as paddy field in the village records as well as in the Basic Tax Register], in accordance with law, also taking into account the orders, if any, produced by the petitioners as directed above. Paragraphs 3 to 5 of the said decision read thus; “3. On a reading of Ext.P10 what I could gather is that, petitioners when appeared before the Revenue Divisional Officer submitted that, without set back permission may not be granted for 7½ cents. According to the petitioners, petitioners have sought permit for construction of 2650 sq.ft. building and if the entire area is not permitted to be utilised, petitioners will not be able to complete the construction in terms of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999. 4. It is also submitted that, the application submitted by the petitioner is dated 2.3.2017, which need to be considered in accordance with the provisions of Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 since the amended provisions of the Kerala Conservation of _WA..476/2020_ 11 Paddy land and Wetland Act, 2008 only came into force on and w.e.f. 30.12.2017. 5. I find force in the said contention advanced by the petitioners and therefore, the condition imposed for payment of 50% of the land value to the Government is not legal or correct. In that view of the matter, I quash Ext.P10 and direct the Revenue Divisional Officer to re-consider the matter in accordance with law, considering it as one submitted prior to 30.12.2017, the appointed date from only the amended provisions of Act, 2008 came into force and under the provisions of Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 wherein there is no provision for imposing any condition for payment of land value to the State Government. A decision shall be taken in accordance with law at the earliest possible time and at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say, if the petitioners are producing necessary enabling orders, the Secretary of the Municipality shall consider the application submitted by the petitioners, in accordance with law, also taking into account the orders, if any, produced by the petitioners as directed above.” (underline supplied) 19. In Shanmugam v. District Collector [2019 (2) KLT 45], a Division Bench of this Court held that, when the permission granted in the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer [Ext.P2 order dated 19.12.2017], whereby the petitioners therein, who are the owners of 75.60 Ares of land in Re. Survey Nos.487/2A/5, 522/11A/2, 522/7C, 522/11A/1 of Block No.13632 and 13633 of Punalur Village, were permitted to make construction of a commercial building on 70.66 Ares of their property, under the provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, subject to the conditions contained in Ext.P2, the direction issued by the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment, whereby the writ petitioners are directed to comply with the procedure under the amended provisions of Rule 27C of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act for getting the Basic Tax Register corrected, cannot be sustained. The Division Bench noticed that, Ext.P2 order was in pursuant to Ext.P1 judgment dated 13.9.2017 in W.P. (C)No.10034 of 2017, in which the learned Judge issued direction by adverting to a report to the effect that a substantial portion of the property has been converted prior to the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 and only a small portion is remaining as paddy land. Such finding in W.P. (C)No.10034 of 2017 was not challenged by the State in further proceedings and has therefore, attained finality. Only pursuant to _WA..476/2020_ 12 the above finding, Ext.P2 order was passed under sub-clause (2) of Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, permitting construction over a limited extent of land (70.66 Ares). In such backdrop, the Division Bench held that the learned Single Judge could not have directed re-consideration of the application in reference to the amended provisions [i.e., the provisions under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018]. The Division Bench found the impugned direction in the judgment of the learned Single Judge unmerited, and accordingly set aside the same. The Division Bench allowed the writ appeal by directing the Tahsildar to effect consequential correction in the Basic Tax Register concerning the land in question, based on the Ext.P2 order already passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, without referring to the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act. Paragraphs 2 to 5 of the said decision read thus; “2. The appellants are the owners of property having an extent of 75.60 Ares of land in the Re- Sy.Nos.487/2A/5, 522/11A/2, 522/7C, 522/11A/1 of Block No.13632 and 13633 of Punalur Village. They submitted application before the Tahsildar (LR), Punalur seeking additional entry in the Basic Tax Register in accordance with the current lie and nature of the property. The land owners projected that they had already secured favourable order on 19.12.2017 (Ext.P2) whereby, they were permitted to make construction of commercial building on 70.66 Ares of their land, by the Revenue Divisional Officer under the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967, subject to the following conditions: “ ................................................ 1. The flow of water in the land shall not be disturbed. It shall not cause flow of water in the canal on the southern side and boundary wall shall be constructed to protect it. 2. Steps shall be taken for waste management which shall not affect the agricultural activities being carried on in the neighbouring lands. 3. No concrete shall be used on the land other than the plinth area. Throughout the boundaries on all sides a three metre canal shall be constructed for collecting water and percolate it. 4. If any time any fees is prescribed for regularizing the conversion in future it has to be remitted by the applicant. ................................................ ” _WA..476/2020_ 13 3. The learned Judge, after due consideration of the projection made from the Writ Petitioner’s side, took note of the provisions of Section 27C of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 (hereinafter Paddy Act), as amended in 2018 and directed the Writ Petitioners to comply with the procedure under the amended provisions of the Paddy Act, for getting the Basic Tax Register corrected. Thus aggrieved, the present Appeal is filed by the Writ Petitioners. 4. What is relevant in the above context is that the order permitting construction of commercial building on the land was granted under the Ext.P2 order, which was in pursuant to the judgment dated 13.9.2017 in the W.P.(C)10034/17 (Ext.P1). The learned Judge issued direction by adverting to a report to the effect that a substantial portion of the property has been converted prior to the Paddy Act and only a small portion is remaining as paddy land. Such finding in the W.P.(C)10034/17 was not challenged by the State in further proceedings and has therefore, attained finality. Only pursuant to the above finding, the Ext.P2 order was passed under the Clause 2 of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 permitting construction over a limited extent of land (70.66 Ares). In such backdrop, the reconsideration of the application in reference to the 2018 amended provisions of the Paddy Act, could not have directed. 5. Since the impugned direction is found to be unmerited, we deem it appropriate to set aside the said order. The Writ Appeal is accordingly allowed by directing the Tahsildar to effect the consequential correction in the Basic Tax Register concerning the land in question, based on the Ext.P2 order already passed by the Sub Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer, without referring to the provisions of the Paddy Land Act. Necessary correction in this regard should be effected within four weeks from today. It is ordered so accordingly.” 20. As already noticed, in view of the provisions under subsection (2) of Section 1 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018, the provisions under Act 29 of 2018 shall deemed to have come into force on 30.12.2017. Section 27A deals with change of nature of unnotified land, as defined in clause (xviiA) of Section 2 of the Act and Section 27C deals with changes in records, i.e., revenue records, in relation to lands which are permitted to be converted under the provisions of Sections 8, 9, 10 or 27A of the Act. In view of the provisions under sub-section (2) of Section 1 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018 and also the law laid down by this Court in **Renji K.Paul's** case and that by the Division Bench in **Shanmugam's case** referred to supra, the conditions contained in the proviso to _WA..476/2020_ 14 - sub section (2) of Section 27A of the Act to set apart ten per cent of the land for water conservancy measures, if the area of the land where the application for change of nature of unnotified land is allowed is more than 20.2 Ares and also the condition regarding - payment of fee under sub section (3) of Section 27A of the Act, at the rate prescribed in sub-rule (9) of Rule 12 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, read with the Schedule to that Rules, for allowing such an application for change of nature of unnotified land, cannot be imposed while granting permission for the conversion of a paddy land (which was converted prior to the commencement of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 and not notified as paddy land in the data-bank or the draft data-bank; however noted as 'Nilam', 'Nanja', etc. in revenue records) based on an application submitted before the competent authority, prior to 30.12.2017 (invoking sub-clause (2) of Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order), the date on which the amended provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, as amended by the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Act, 2018, i.e., Act 29 of 2018 came into force. 21. In the instant case, as discernible from Ext.P5 judgment of this Court dated 02.03.2018 in W.P.(C) No.41041 of 2017, Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner invoking the provisions under subclause (2) of Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, is one dated 06.12.2018, which was directed to be considered by the 3 rd respondent, by that judgment of this Court dated 02.03.2018. Ext.P4 receipt produced along with this writ petition would show that the 3rd respondent Revenue Divisional Officer acknowledged the receipt of that application on 14.12.2017. In such circumstances, while granting permission for conversion of the property, based on an application submitted before the competent authority prior to 30.12.2017, invoking sub-clause (2) of Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, the conditions contained in the proviso to subsection (2) of Section 27A of the Act to set apart ten per cent of the land for water conservancy measures and also the condition regarding payment of fee under sub-section (3) of Section 27A of the Act, at the rate prescribed in sub-rule (9) of Rule 12 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, read with the Schedule to that Rules, cannot be imposed. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be directed to comply with the condition contained in the _WA..476/2020_ 15 proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 27A or payment of fee under sub-section (3) of Section 27A, at the rate prescribed in sub-rule (9) of Rule 12 of the Rules, read with the Schedule to that Rules, for conversion of the land in question. The conditions to that effect, as contained in Ext.P6 order of the 3rd respondent is liable to be set aside. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by setting aside Ext.P6 order of the 3rd respondent Revenue Divisional Officer to the extent indicated above and by directing the Tahsildar concerned to effect consequential correction in the basic tax register concerning the properties of the petitioner referred to in Ext.P6 order dated 07.07.2018 of the 3rd respondent, without referring to the provisions of Sections 27A or 27C of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.” 2. On a reading of the judgment of learned Single Judge, it is clear that the application seeking permission for utilisation of the paddy land, dated 6.12.2017 was filed on 14.12.2017, ie., before the cut off date of 30.12.2017 fixed, in order to make an application for utilisation of paddy field for other purposes as provided under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. It was taking note of the said aspect that the learned Single Judge had set aside Exr.P6 impugned order passed by the Sub Collector, Thiruvananthapuram dated 7.7.2018, whereby the conditions contemplated under Section 27A was directed to be complied with by the petitioner, without authority _WA..476/2020_ 16 and power. Further an application filed before 30.12.2017 seeking conversion of a paddy field for other purposes is to be considered as per clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order 1967, and therefore the conditions contained under Section 27A of the act 2008 and the rules thereto cannot be imposed when permission is granted. 3. Since various contentions are raised in the appeal with respect to the acceptance of the application dated 6.12.2017, we directed the learned Government Pleader to produce the original files relating to the application submitted by the writ petitioner/first respondent. Accordingly, the original files paginated from page 1 to page 141 are produced before us, and at page 29, the application submitted by the petitioner is located, which is dated 6.12.2017 and seal contained therein would make it clear that it was received in the office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvananthapuram on 14.12.2017. 4. Therefore, the sole question to be considered is whether any interference is required to the judgment of the learned Single Judge. 5. We have heard, Sri. S. Renjith, learned Special Government _WA..476/2020_ 17 Pleader appearing for the appellants and Sri.C.Y. Vinod Kumar appeared for the first respondent/writ petitioner and perused the pleadings and material on record. 6. Admittedly, Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 came into force on and with effect from 12.8.2008. However, as it originally stood, there was no provision for seeking permission for utilisation of paddy fields for other purposes and other agricultural activities. However, by way of an amendment, along with other provisions Section 27A was introduced into the Act 2008 as per Amendment Act 29 of 2018 on and with effect from 30.12.2017. It is also an admitted fact that till such time, the permission for utilisation of paddy field for other purposes and other agricultural activities, are guided by Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967. 7. Now, it is clear from the original files produced that the application was submitted by the writ petitioner before the statutory authority on 14.12.2017, before the cut off date of 30.12.2017, on which date Section 27A of Act 2008 has come into force. 8. In that view of the matter, we are of the considered and _WA..476/2020_ 18 clear opinion that appellants have not made out any case for interference with the judgment of learned Single Judge. In fact, this issue was considered by this Court in the judgment in **Tahsildar, Thodupuzha v. Renjith George [2020 (1) KHC 865]** and held that the provisions of Section 27A of Act 2008 has only force on and with effect from 30.12.2017 and the application submitted for utilisation of the paddy field for other purposes prior to that is governed by Clause 6 of Land Utilisation Order, 1967. Taking into account all the above aspects, we are of the opinion that appellants have not made out any case of jurisdictional error or other legal infirmities justifying our interference in an intra court appeal filed under Section 5 of Kerala High Court Act, 1958. Needless to say, appeal fails. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Sd/- S. Manikumar, Chief Justice Sd/- Shaji P. Chaly, Judge sou. _WA..476/2020_ 19 ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS ANNEXURE A1 ``` TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 18.12.2019 IN W.A.No.2516/2019