State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretary v. State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government Public Works Department; A v. Siddaramaiah, Chief Minister, Government of Karnataka & Ors.
Case Details & Bench
- Court
- High Court
- Hon'ble Judges
- Dipak Misra
- Amitava Roy
- A. M. Khanwilkar
- Judgment Date
- 2018-02-16
- Court Decision / Holding
- Contempt Petition against the respondents not proceeded with; contempt petition closed in view of the disposal of Civil Appeal No. 2456 of 2007.
- Final Disposition
- Contempt Petition disposed of; contempt petition closed; no contempt against respondents.
Parties to the Case
Appellants / Petitioners
- State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government Public Works Department
Respondents
- State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretary
- Siddaramaiah, Chief Minister, Government of Karnataka & Ors.
Legal Representation & Advocates
Counsels for Petitioners
- • A Kunal Chattarjee
- • Saurabh Gupta
- • G. Umapathy
- • C. Paramasivam
- • K. V. Vijayakumar
- • B. Balaji
- • S. Wasim A. Qadri
- • Mrs. Madhavi Diwan
- • Ajay Sharma
- • Ms. Snidha Mehra
- • Hemant Arya
- • Ms. Saudamini Sharma
- • Ms. Kirti Dua
- • Ms. Somya Rathore
- • Sumit
- • D. S. Mahra
- • M. K. Maroria
- • R. Nedumaran
- • V. G. Pragasam
- • S. Prabu Ramasubramanian
- • P. K. Manohar
- • Ms. Shantha Vasudevan
- • Manu Sundaram
- • Ramesh Babu
Counsels for Respondents
- • Madhusudan R. Naik, Adv. Gen.
- • Fali S. Nariman
- • S. S. Javali
- • Jaideep Gupta
- • Shekhar Naphade
- • A. S. Nambiar
- • Rakesh Dwivedi
- • Subramonium Prasad
- • Sr. Advs.
- • Mohan V. Katarki
- • S. C. Sharma
- • Brijesh Kalappa
- • R. S. Ravi
- • V. N. Raghupathy
- • J. M. Gangadhar
- • Ranvir Singh
- • Abdul Azeem Kalebudde
- • G. Prakash
- • Jishnu M. L.
- • Mrs. Priyanka Prakash
- • Mrs. Beena Prakash
- • Vijay Shankar
Case Synopsis & Summary
This matter concerns the inter-state water disputes over the Cauvery river among Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala and the Union Territory of Puducherry. The dispute, previously adjudicated in Civil Appeal No. 2456 of 2007, was resolved by the Supreme Court in that appeal. The current proceeding is Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 225 of 2013 arising out of disobedience allegations by Tamil Nadu against the Chief Minister of Karnataka and others, alleging non-compliance with the disposal in the earlier appeal. The case before the Supreme Court was heard in its Inter-State Water Disputes jurisdiction under the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956, particularly Section 5(2), and relates to the order of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal dated 05.02.2007. The Court clarifies that since Civil Appeal No. 2456 of 2007 has been disposed of, there is nothing further to adjudicate in contempt; accordingly, the Court does not proceed against the respondents and closes the contempt petition. The judgment is delivered by Chief Justice Dipak Misra with Justices Amitava Roy and A. M. Khanwilkar concurring. The decision underscores the finality of the appellate resolution and terminates the contempt proceedings in light of the earlier disposal.
Provisions of Law Cited
Cited Precedents (1)
| Case Name | Citation | Treatment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government Public Works Department v. Siddaramaiah, Chief Minister, Government of Karnataka & Ors. | Civil Appeal No. 2456 of 2007 | Positive | The present judgment explicitly relies on and implements the decision in Civil Appeal No. 2456 of 2007, and disposes of the contempt petition in light of that appellate decision. |
Diagnostic Tool
Does this judgment govern your specific facts?
Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretary v. State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government Public Works Department; A v. Siddaramaiah, Chief Minister, Government of Karnataka & Ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.
Extracted Judgment Text
Exact text extracted from official judgment records.