High CourtDivision BenchAppeals dismissed

State of Haryana v. Abdul Gaffar Khan

Case / Petition Number:Civil Appeal Nos. 4447/2006 and 4456/2006
Neutral Citation:SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2006] Sl.PP. 7 S.C.R.

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court
Hon'ble Judges
  • Dr. A.R. Lakshmanan
  • Al Tamas Kabir
Judgment Date
2006-10-11
Court Decision / Holding
Appeals dismissed. The High Court’s order directing appointment of the respondents to the posts of Unani Dispenser within one month is affirmed. No costs.
Final Disposition
Appeals dismissed

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • State of Haryana

Respondents

  • Abdul Gaffar Khan
  • Anr.

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Manjit Singh
  • • A.A.G.
  • • Balwant S Malik
  • • Harikesh Singh
  • • T.V. George

Counsels for Respondents

  • • M.Z. Chaudhary
  • • Ranjeet Kumar
  • • Shoaib Ahmad Khan
  • • Rameshwar Prasad Goyal
  • • B.K. Satija

Case Synopsis & Summary

This matter concerns appointment to the post of Unani Dispenser under the Haryana Ayurvedic/Homeopathic and Unani Technical Group (C) Service Rules, 1997. The Haryana Staff Selection Commission issued an advertisement for Unani Dispenser posts specifying qualifications: (i) Unani Dispenser from a recognized university/institution/board or Up-Vaidya of Indian System of Medicine with Urdu knowledge; (ii) Matric or equivalent; (iii) Knowledge of Hindi and English up to Matric standard. Respondent No. 1 in both appeals, holding a Bachelor of Unani Medicine and Surgery (BUMS) from Kanpur University, applied and was selected but denied appointment on the ground that a Diploma in Unani Dispenser or Up-Vaidya was required. The State justified the denial by relying on the service rules, which preface the diploma/up-vaidya qualification, and contended that the degree did not meet the express requirement. The High Court allowed writ petitions, directing appointment of the respondents. The State appealed to the Supreme Court. The Court held that the rules do not expressly exclude the degree in Unani Medicine and Surgery for the post of Unani Dispenser. It observed that the advertisement itself did not require a Diploma as a qualification. Since the respondents possess qualifications from a recognized university and the degree is not expressly barred, they are eligible. The Court affirmed the High Court’s order and directed the State to appoint the respondents within one month, with no costs. The appeals were dismissed.

Provisions of Law Cited

Haryana Ayurvedic/Homeopathic and Unani Technical Group (C) Service Rules, 1997

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The State contends that the post of Unani Dispenser is governed by the Haryana Ayurvedic/Homeopathic and Unani Technical Group (C) Service Rules, 1997, which prescribe Diploma in Unani Dispenser or Up-Vaidya from a recognized source, together with Urdu knowledge and Matric-level language requirements; the advertisement mirrors these prerequisites and does not spell out a degree in Unani Medicine and Surgery. The State argues that the respondents, possessing only a Bachelor’s degree, do not meet the express requirements, and hence were rightly denied appointment; the High Court’s order directing appointment is contrary to the terms of the Rules and the advertisement.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that their Bachelor of Unani Medicine and Surgery is a recognized qualification from a University. The Rules do not expressly exclude such a degree, and the advertisement did not specify Diploma as a compulsory qualification. They argue that denying appointment on the basis of absence of a Diploma would misconstrue the genuine intent of the qualifications and the advertisement, contravening equality of opportunity and the admissible interpretation of the recruitment criteria.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against State of Haryana v. Abdul Gaffar Khan and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

A STATE OF HARY ANA AND ANR. _v._ ## ABDUL GAFF AR KHAN AND ANR. ## OCTOBER 11, 2006 ## B [DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN AND AL TAMAS KABIR, JJ.] _Service Law:_ C _Haryana Ayurvedic!Homeopathic and Unani Technical Group (C) Service Rules, I 997:_ _Unani Dispenser-Appointment-Educational qualificationCandidates having degree of Bachelor of Unani Medicine and Surgery denied appointment on the ground that they did not possess Diploma in Unani_ D _Dispenser-Held, the Rules do not expressly exclude the degree in Unani Medicine and Surgery-The advertisement also did not stipulate Diploma as the required qualification-Respf:!ndents possessing required qualification from a recognized University, were eligible for appointment._ The appellant-State issued an advertisement for the post of Unani E Dispenser. Respondent no. I in both the appeals, having degree of Bachelor of Unani Medicine and Surgery, applied for the post. The State Staff Selection Commission declared the result recommending the selected candidates. Both the respondents were amongst the selected candidates, but they were denied appointment on the ground that they did not possess'Diploma in Unani F Dispenser or Up-Vaidya. However, their writ petitions were allowed by the High Court. Aggrieved, the State Government filed the present appeals. ## Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: The High Court has rightly pointed out that Haryana Ayurvedic/ G Homeopathic and Unani Technical Group (C) Service Rules, 1997 do not expressly exclude the degree in Unani Medicine and Surgery for the post of Unani Dispenser. Admittedly, the contesting respondents possess required qualifications from a recognized University/Institution or Board and are, thus, eligible for appointment to the posts of Unani Dispenser. A close scrutiny of H the advertisement issued shows that it does not anywhere stipulate the Diploma 198 STATEOFHARYANAv. ABDULGAFFARKHAN [LAKSHMANAN . .I.) 199 as the required qualification. Therefore, the order passed by the High Court A is affirmed and the appellant-State is directed to appoint the respondents to the post of Unani Dispenser.1201-B-DJ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4447 of2006. From the Judgment and final Order dated 11.4.2005 of the High Court B of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No. 15043/2004. ## WITH ## C.A. No. 4456 of2006. c Manjit Singh, A.A.G. Balwant S Malik, Harikesh Singh and T.V. George for the Appellants. M.Z. Chaudhary, Ranjeet Kumar, Shoaib Ahmad Khan, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal and B.K. Satija for the Respondents. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ## DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, J. Leave granted. Civil Appeal No.444 7 /2006 arising out of SLP (C) No.13987 /2005 was filed by the State of Haryana against the judgment and final order dt.11.04.2005 E passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in CWP No.15043/2004. Likewise, the State of Haryana has also filed Civil Appeal No.4456/2006 arising out of SLP(C) No.14004/2005 against the judgment and order dt.11.04.2005 passed by the said High Court in CWP No.20279/2004. We have heard learned senior counsel for the State of Haryana and the F learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents in both the Civil Appeals. We have also perused the order impugned in these appeals and the advertisement issued by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission. The advertisement reads as under :- "Haryana Staff Selection Commission S.C.O.No. I 14-115, Sector-8/C, G Chandigarh Advertisement No.7/2003 Last Date of Submission of the Applications 7.11.2003 Category No.14-20 Posts of Unani Dispenser (General-9,SC-A 2,SC-B !,BC-A 2,BC-B 2,ESM (General) 2, ESM SC-B I, ESM BC-B I. H 200 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2006] Sl.PP. 7 S.C.R. A Educational Qualification B (i) Unani Dispenser from any recognized University/ Institution or Board or Faculty of Indian System of Medicine establish by law in India or Up-Vaidya of any recognized University/Institution or Board or Faculty of Indian System of Medicine established by law in India having the knowledge of Urdu; (ii) Matric or its equivalent. (iii) Knowledge of Hindi and English upto Matric standard. c The Respondent No. I who is possessing the qualification of Bachelor of Unani Medicine and Surgery from Kanpur University apart from Matric with Hindi and IO+ 2 with Science, applied in response to the abovementioned advertisement against one of the posts reserved for backward class category." D Haryana Staff Selection Commission declared the result on 27.07.2004 recommending names of selected candidates including two candidates in the reserved category of Backward Class-B. The respondents in both these appeals were amongst the selected candidates. The respondents in both these appeals were denied appointment for the reason that they were not possessing Diploma E in Unani Dispenser or Up-Vaidya from a recognized University/Institution of Board which was the prescribed qualification for the post of Unani Dispenser under the Haryana Ayurvedic/Homeopathic and Unani Technical Group (C) Service Rules, 1997. According to the learned senior counsel for the appellants, the qualifications prescribed for the post of Unani Dispenser in these service F Rules i.e. Haryana Ayurvedic/Homeopathic and Unani Technical Group (C) Service Rules, 1997 read as under :- G "(i) Unani Dispenser from any recognized University/Institution or Board or Faculty of Indian System of Medicine established by law in India or Up-Vaidya of any recognized University/Institution or Board of Faculty of Indian System of Medicine established by law in India having the knowledge of Urdu. (ii) Matric or its equivalent. (iii) Knowledge of Hindi and English upto Matric standard." H Aggrieved against the order passed by the State, the respective STA TE OF HARY ANA _v._ ABDUL GAFF AR KHAN [LAKSHMANAN. J.] 20] respondents filed Writ Petitions in the High Court to quash the action of the A State to deny the appointment to them as Unani Dispenser. The High Court by its order dt. 11.04.2005 allowed the Writ Petitions filed by the respective respondents and directed the State to offer appointment to both the contesting respondents in these Civil Appeals on the posts of Unani Dispenser within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. B Aggrieved by the said order, the State of Haryana has preferred the above appeals in th is Court. We have perused the order passed by the High Court. As rightly pointed by the High Court and as per Haryana Ayurvedic/Homeopathic and Unani Technical Group (C) Service Rules, I 997, they do not expressly exclude C the degree in Unani Medicine and Surgery for the post of Unani Dispenser. Admittedly, the respective contesting respondents in these appeals possess required qualifications from a recognized University/Institution or Board and are thus, in our opinion, eligible for appointment to the posts of Unani Dispenser. A close scrutiny of the advertisement issued does not anywhere stipulate the diploma as the required qualification. We, therefore, affirm the D order passed by the High Court and direct the appellant-State of Haryana to appoint the respective respondents to the posts of Unani Dispenser within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order from this Court or on production of the same by the respective respondents herein whichever is earlier. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. R.P. Appeal dismissed.