High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions to erase post‑mortg...

State Bank of India Asset Recovery Management Branch v Sub Registrar Edappally & Others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.30751 of 2023
Neutral Citation:/

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Justice Murali Purushothaman
Judgment Date
2023-12-06
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of. The 1st respondent Sub Registrar is directed to efface the entry regarding all attachments after 23.02.2011 in respect of the mortgaged property from Book No.1 maintained under Section 51 of the Registration Act, 1908, and the 2nd respondent Village Officer is directed to mutate the property de hors the aforementioned attachments, if the mutation application is otherwise in order. The court notes the attachments post‑dating the mortgage have no effect on the SARFAESI sale and directs their removal to secure marketability of the property under sale.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions to erase post‑mortgage encumbrances and mutate the property accordingly

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • State Bank of India Asset Recovery Management Branch

Respondents

  • The Sub Registrar Edappally, Office of the Sub Registrar, Edappally
  • The Village Officer Edappally South Village, Edappally
  • Thomaskutty Eapen Kochupurackal House, Athirampuzha, Kottayam
  • M/S. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd, Ernakulam, represented by its Authorised Officer
  • K.A. Joy Pra-12, Mahatma Road, Near Campion School, Ponekkara, Edappally, Ernakulam
  • M/S. BRD Securities Limited, Thrissur Road, Kunnamkulam

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • M. Jithesh Menon
  • • P. G. Maheshkumar
  • • R. Brijesh
  • • K. Indu (Pournami)
  • • KURIAN T. VADAKKEL

Counsels for Respondents

  • • S. Gopakumar
  • • Anil Kumar P.V.
  • • T. M. Binitha
  • • Smt. Deepa V. (GP)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition, filed by the State Bank of India Asset Recovery Management Branch ( secured creditor under SARFAESI), seeks deletion of encumbrance entries against its mortgaged property. Razia Fazal executed a housing loan in favor of the bank on 23 February 2011 by depositing title deeds creating an equitable mortgage over 1.39 ares with building CC XLVIII/1823 in Edappally South. After default, the Bank undertook proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, culminating in Ext. P5 sale certificate dated 29 July 2023. During due diligence for an encumbrance certificate, the bank found several attachments on the property arising from court orders; Ext. P6 shows that these attachments (entries 3–8) were created after the mortgage. The Bank contends that attachments post-dating the mortgage cannot affect its right to sell under SARFAESI and the borrower’s right to redeem under SARFAESI is extinguished upon sale. Relying on Madhan S. v. Sub Registrar, Kollam and Others and Keechery Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Sajitha Nizar alias Sajitha P.M. and Others, as well as Ali Asharaf M.M. v. Sub Registrar, Thrissur, the petitioner seeks effacement of post‑mortgage attachments from the encumbrance register and mutation of the property. The court directs effacement of post‑mortgage attachments and mutation, disposing of the petition.

Provisions of Law Cited

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act)Section 13(2) of SARFAESI ActSection 13(4) of SARFAESI ActSection 51 of the Registration Act, 1908

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner bank contends that encumbrances attached after creation of the equitable mortgage (23.02.2011) cannot affect its right to sell the mortgaged property under the SARFAESI Act. Relying on Madhan S. v. Sub Registrar, Kollam and Others (2014) and Keechery Service Co‑operative Bank Ltd. v. Sajitha Nizar alias Sajitha P.M. and Others (2020), and reaffirmed by Ali Asharaf M.M. v. Sub Registrar, Thrissur, the bank argues that post‑mortgage attachments recorded in Ext. P6 are not enforceable against the bank’s sale; hence they must be effaced from the encumbrance register and mutation effected to reflect the bank’s title. The Ext. P5 sale under SARFAESI is free from those encumbrances; the borrower’s right to redeem is extinguished upon sale.

Contentions of Respondents

Not explicitly stated in the document.

Cited Precedents (3)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Madhan S. v. Sub Registrar, Kollam and Others2014 (1) KHC 249; ILR 2014 (1) Ker.586; 2014 (1) KLJ 483; AIR 2014 Ker.54PositiveThe court relies on Madhan’s ruling that attachments after the creation of the equitable mortgage do not affect the sale under SARFAESI and should be wiped off.
Keechery Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Sajitha Nizar alias Sajitha P.M. and Others2020 (5) KHC 231; ILR 2020 (4) Ker.249; 2020(6) KLT 68; 2020(4) KLJ 970PositiveDivision Bench affirmed the Madhan principle; the present case follows the same rationale that post‑mortgage attachments do not impede SARFAESI sales.
Ali Asharaf M.M. v. Sub Registrar, ThrissurW.A. No.612/2015PositiveAffirmed the Madhan doctrine; supports the notification that post‑mortgage attachments do not affect sale or title transfer under SARFAESI.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against State Bank of India Asset Recovery Management Branch v Sub Registrar Edappally & Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN`** ``` WEDNESDAY,THE 6[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2023/15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 30751 OF 2023 ``` ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` STATE BANK OF INDIA ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH R.S. BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER, PIN – 682 011. ``` ``` BY ADVS. M.JITHESH MENON P.G.MAHESHKUMAR R.BRIJESH K.INDU (POURNAMI) KURIAN T. VADAKKEL ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 THE SUB REGISTRAR EDAPPALLY, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 024.`** - **`2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER EDAPPALLY SOUTH VILLAGE, EDAPPALLY, PIN – 682 024.`** - **`3 THOMASKUTTY EAPEN KOCHUPURACKAL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 562.`** - **`4 M/S.SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD ERNAKULAM, JOS JUNCTION, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, PIN – 682 011.`** - **`5 K.A. JOY PRA-12, MAHATMA ROAD, NEAR CAMPION SCHOOL, PONEKKARA, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 024.`** - **`6 M/S. BRD SECURITIES LIMITED THRISSUR ROAD, KUNNAMKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PIN – 680 503.`** ``` WP(C).No.30751 OF 2023 ``` ``` 2 ``` ``` 7G. PRASAD S/O. LATE GOPALAN, THANNIKKAL HOUSE, NEAR THANNIKKAL CHURCH, ELAMAKKARA, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 026. 8MUJEEB S/O. HASSAINAR, PUTHUVEL PARAMBIL, MUPPATHADAM, ERAMAM P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 683 110. BY ADVS. S. GOPAKUMAR ANIL KUMAR P V T.M. BINITHA SMT. DEEPA V. - GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` ``` WP(C).No.30751 OF 2023 ``` ``` 3 ``` ## **`JUDGMENT`** The petitioner, a nationalised Bank, has filed this writ petition for a direction to the 1[st] respondent Sub Registrar and the 2[nd] respondent Village Officer to delete the entry of attachment in the encumbrance register in respect of its secured asset. 2. One Razia Fazal availed a housing loan from the petitioner Bank by creating equitable mortgage on 23.02.2011 by deposit of title deed in respect of the property having an extent of 1.39 Ares, with a building numbered as CC XLVIII/1823, comprised in Sy. No.200/4 of Edappally South Village. The borrower defaulted payment of installments and the Bank initiated proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and the mortgaged property was sold in auction. Ext.P5 is the sale certificate dated 29.07.2023. 3. When the petitioner applied for encumbrance certificate with respect to the mortgaged property, it ``` WP(C).No.30751 OF 2023 ``` ``` 4 ``` was found that there are certain attachments over the property pursuant to orders of courts. The petitioner submits that from Ext.P6 encumbrance certificate, it can be seen that all the attachments referred to therein obtained by respondents 3 to 8 are subsequent to the creation of the equitable mortgage by the borrower in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner, therefore, contends that the attachments at the instance of respondents 3 to 8 cannot affect the right of the petitioner to sell the property under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and that the borrower has lost the right to redeem the property as per the provisions of the SARFAESI Act. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the decision of this Court in **Madhan S. v. Sub Registrar, Kollam and Others [2014 (1) KHC 249:** ``` WP(C).No.30751 OF 2023 ``` ``` 5 ``` **2014 (1) KLT 406: ILR 2014 (1) Ker.586: 2014 (1) KLJ 483: AIR 2014 Ker.54]** and the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Secretary, **Keechery Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v.Sajitha Nizar alias Sajitha P.M. and Others [2020 (5) KHC 231: ILR 2020 (4) Ker.249: 2020(6) KLT 68: 2020(4) KLJ 970]** and contends that the attachment effected subsequent to the creation of equitable mortgage will not affect the right of the petitioner to sell the mortgaged property and the attachments have to be effaced from the encumbrance register. 6. In Madhan's case (supra), this Court held in paragraph 9 as follows:- **“** 9. The preponderance of judicial opinion leads to the irresistible conclusion that the sale of the mortgaged property in favour of the petitioner under Ext. P5 sale certificate under the Act is free of all encumbrances. The attachments effected subsequent to the mortgage created in favour of the bank do not affect the title and ownership of the ``` WP(C).No.30751 OF 2023 ``` ``` 6 ``` petitioner over the subject property. Such attachments have no impact on the sale conducted under the Act and the same ceases to have any effect or fall to the ground the moment the sale is petitioner. The confirmed in favour of the declaration so sought by the petitioner is therefore granted and I further direct the Sub-Registrar and the Village Officer to efface the attachments effected subsequent to the mortgage from the relevant records. Otherwise those attachments would remain as a permanent taboo prejudicial affecting the marketability and title to the property even though they ceased to have any legal efficacy. The needful in relation to the property bought by the petitioner shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.” 7. A Division Bench of this Court in **Ali Asharaf** **M.M. and Another v. Sub Registrar, Thrissur (Judgment dated 24.7.2015 in W.A. No.612/2015)** has affirmed the law laid down in Madhan's case (supra). In Keechery Service Cooperative Bank case (supra), another Division Bench of this Court also affirmed the law laid down in ``` WP(C).No.30751 OF 2023 ``` ``` 7 ``` Madhan's case (supra) and held in paragraph 7 as under:- “7. …. We do not find any reason to disagree with the declaration of law in Madhan's case (supra) which was virtually affirmed by the Division Bench in Ali Asharaf's case (supra). In the said circumstances and taking note of the fact that the orders of attachment of the property in question were after the creation of equitable mortgage of the same with Federal Bank we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the learned Single Judge following the dictum in Madhan's case (supra), carrying the directions to effect mutation of the property as also to efface all encumbrance over the property effected after 27/06/2014, the date on which the property in question was mortgaged with Federal Bank”. 8. Thus it is trite law that attachment effected subsequent to the creation of equitable mortgage does not have any effect on the sale conducted by the Bank under the SARFAESI Act and has to be effaced from the encumbrance register. It can be seen from Ext.P6 ``` WP(C).No.30751 OF 2023 ``` ``` 8 ``` Encumbrance Certificate that all the attachments referred to therein are obtained by respondents 3 to 8 after the creation of equitable mortgage in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1[st] respondent to efface the entry regarding all attachments after 23.02.2011 in respect of the mortgaged property from Book No.1 maintained under Section 51 of the Registration Act, 1908 and a further direction to the 2[nd] respondent to mutate the property de hors the aforesaid attachments, if the application for mutation is otherwise in order. The writ petition is disposed of. ## **`Sd/-`** ``` MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE ``` SPR ``` WP(C).No.30751 OF 2023 ``` ``` 9 ``` ## **`APPENDIX`** ## **`PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :-`** ``` EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF CONFIRMATION FOR CREATION OF MORTGAGE BY DEPOSIT OF TITLE DEEDS EXECUTED BY SMT.RAZIA FAZAL, WHO IS THE BORROWER, DATED 23-2-2011. EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 13[2] OF THE SARFAESI ACT TO THEBORROWERS/GUARANTORSDATED 02.11.2022. EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 13[4] OF THE SARFAESI ACT DATED 18.01.2023. EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 31-5-2023. EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE CERTIFICATE DATED 29-7-2023. EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION DATED 9-2-2023. ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.`**