High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of with directions; No o...

Soudhabi v. Special Tahsildar (L.A and L.T.), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.A. and L.T.), Attappadi

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-26
Court Decision / Holding
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Attappadi, to dispose of S.M.No.472/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another; No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of with directions; No order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Soudhabi, aged 47 years, s/o Abdul Kareem, Padukundil House, Kumaramputhur, Kumaramputhur Village, Palakkad

Respondents

  • Special Tahsildar (L.A and L.T) Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.A. and L.T.), Attappadi, Mannarkkad, Palakkad-678582

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a mandamus directing the Special Tahsildar (LR) to decide S.M.No.472/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Attappadi. The suo motu proceedings were initiated under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 for assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14, in respect of 18.42 acres of land in Re.Sy.No.113/4, Kumaramputhur Village. The petitioner cites the 2018 Narayanan Namboodiri decision (W.P.(C) No. 28398 of 2017 and connected cases), stressing orderly disposal of cases by Land Tribunals on seniority, expeditious handling, and use of Village Officers to obtain reports where Revenue Inspectors are unavailable, with directions to prioritize senior citizens and to adhere to time limits (six months for senior citizens, 18 months for others) and to maintain seniority. The Court also notes Government Order G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD (22.02.2018) implementing these directions. The Court holds that the Land Tribunal can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.472/2020 following Narayanan Namboodiri’s directions, and disposes of the petition accordingly with no costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner submits that the delay in disposal of S.M.No.472/2020 before the Land Tribunal is prejudicial and seeks a mandamus to compel expeditious handling in line with the directions in Narayanan Namboodiri (2018). Relying on the Court’s earlier directions, the petitioner argues for prioritizing senior citizens, using Village Officers to obtain necessary reports, and ensuring disposal within the time frames indicated (six months for senior citizens, eighteen months otherwise) while preserving seniority. The petitioner also highlights the administrative mechanism established by G.O. 09/2018 to expedite such cases and contends that justice and efficiency require strict adherence to these guidelines.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondent contends that petitions seeking expeditious disposal are common before this Court and must be managed in accordance with the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, ensuring due process and proper notice. It emphasizes that the Land Tribunal’s workload (over 4000 suo motu cases) necessitates adherence to lawful procedures, time-bound disposal, and seniority-based ordering. The respondent asserts that the Government order (G.O. 09/2018) should be given due weight and that, while expeditious handling is desirable, it must not bypass the statutory procedures under Sections 72 and 72K and the Rules (5 and 14) governing vesting and purchase certificates. The respondents point to the need for orderly, lawful disposal within the framework of seniority and existing procedures, rather than arbitrary out-of-turn disposition.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C) No.28398 of 2017PositiveCourt relied on this decision for expeditious disposal and seniority-based directions, applying its principles to the disposal of S.M.No.472/2020.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Soudhabi v. Special Tahsildar (L.A and L.T.), Office of the Special Tahsildar (L.A. and L.T.), Attappadi and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1942** **WP(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SOUDHABI, AGED 47 YEARS W/O. ABDUL KAREEM, PADUKUNDIL HOUSE, KUMARAMPUTHUR, KUMARAMPUTHUR VILLAGE, PALAKKAD.** **BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A AND L.T) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A. AND L.T.), ATTAPPADI, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678582.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.472/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Attappadi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Attappadi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 18.42 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.113/4 of Kumaramputhur Village in Mannarkkad Taluk, Palakkad District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special** W.P(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I) -3- **Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of W.P(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I) -4- the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is W.P(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I) -5- free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal W.P(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I) -6- shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Kumaramputhur Village, the Land Tribunal, Attappadi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.472/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P1 receipt dated 23.10.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Attappadi is 4031. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land W.P(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I) -7- Tribunal, Attappadi can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.472/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Attappadi, to dispose of S.M.No.472/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.5087 OF 2021(I) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 23.10.2020.**