High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; writ petition disposed with direct...

Smile M. Anto S/o Antony v. Union of India and Others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Justice Amit Rawal
Judgment Date
2020-01-23
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of with directions mirroring those in the cited precedents: (a) The Government of Kerala shall open a file in the petitioner’s name, including the mining lease, and forward it to the MoEF, recording that EC has not been obtained due to the pre-2012 lease, within 15 days; (b) The Government shall forward environmental clearances and necessary papers to MoEF within 15 days, and, if any documents are missing, may obtain them from SEIAA to avoid delay; (c) On receipt, MoEF shall place the files before the Standing Committee within one week to enable a decision as per interim Supreme Court directions, not later than two months; (d) The Standing Committee shall process and forward recommendations within two months; (e) The stop memos will remain in force only for the fixed period; if a final notification under the Environment (Protection) Act is issued, interdiction is vacated; (f) The directions apply only to the petitioner’s quarrying activities, and not to the stone crushers, provided other conditions are met; Online access to submit mining lease applications is to be provided, without equating to license grant until proceedings conclude.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; writ petition disposed with directions as above.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Smile M. Anto S/o Antony

Respondents

  • 1 The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India; represented by its Director
  • 2 National Board of Wildlife, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; represented by its Member Secretary
  • 3 The Director of Mining and Geology Department, Government of Kerala
  • 4 The Geologist, Department of Mining and Geology, Kozhikode
  • 5 State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Kerala; represented by its Director
  • 6 State of Kerala, represented by its Secretary, Forest Department
  • 7 State of Kerala, represented by its Principal Secretary, Industries (A) Department
  • 8 State of Kerala, represented by the Chief Secretary to Government

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Adv. Philip J. Vettickattu

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Sr GP Rajasekharan Nair

Case Synopsis & Summary

The petitioner, Smile M. Anto, challenges Ext.P5, a stop memo dated 21.10.2019 issued by the 4th respondent (District Geologist, Kozhikode), directing him to obtain Environmental Clearance (EC) for quarrying activities. The petitioner asserts he holds a mining lease predating 18.05.2012 and contends he is not obligated to obtain EC. The court places the petition within the framework of earlier writ petitions and directions, citing Goa Foundation v. Union of India (2011) 15 SCC 793 and Goa Foundation v. Union of India and others (2014) 6 SCC 590, and proceeds to issue directions to prevent delay in processing environmental clearances while respecting existing leases. The judgment directs the Government of Kerala to open a file in the petitioner’s name, including the mining lease, and forward it to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF), noting that any missing documents may be sought from SEIAA to avoid delay. On receipt, MoEF must place the file before the Standing Committee within a week; the Committee should process and make recommendations within two months, as per the Supreme Court’s interim orders. The stop memos will remain in force only for the fixed period; if a final notification under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 is issued, the interdiction shall stand vacated. The directions apply only to the petitioner’s quarrying activities, not to stone crushers, and online access for submitting mining lease applications is to be provided, without equating to license grant until proceedings are complete.

Provisions of Law Cited

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argues that he holds a mining lease prior to 18.05.2012, which allegedly exempts him from obtaining Environmental Clearance. He challenges Ext.P5 stop memo as an overreach and seeks a directive to forward his lease and related documents to the MoEF, arguing that there should be no undue delay in processing ECs and that online access be provided for submitting the mining lease application. He seeks liberty to present papers before the Secretary, Environment Department, and asserts that there should be a mechanism to avoid unnecessary delays while complying with statutory requirements.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend that environmental clearance is required for quarrying activities and that proper procedure must be followed. They urge that documents be placed before the MoEF and Standing Committee in accordance with judicial directions and interim orders issued by the Supreme Court in Goa Foundation cases. They emphasize adherence to environmental laws, timely processing of files, and that the stop memos remain in force only during the fixed interim period, until the necessary clearances and recommendations are obtained.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Goa Foundation v. Union of India(2011) 15 Supreme Court Cases 793PositiveThe judgment explicitly relies on Goa Foundation (2011) and issues directions in terms of the interim orders and judgments in that case.
Goa Foundation v. Union of India and others(2014) 6 Supreme Court Cases 590PositiveThe directions are stated to follow the parameters laid down by the Goa Foundation decisions (2014).

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Smile M. Anto S/o Antony v. Union of India and Others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL** **THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 3RD MAGHA, 1941** ## **WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SMILE M. ANTO S/O.ANTONY,MANGALASSERRY HOUSE, MARUTHONKARA.P.O,KAVILUMPARA VIA, KOZHIKODE-673513.** **BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** - **1 THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE,JORBAGH ROAD, NEW DELHI-110003,REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.** - **2 NATIONAL BOARD OF WILD LIFE, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT,FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE,JORBAGH ROAD,NEW DELHI-110003, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY.** - **3 THE DIRECTOR OF MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,KESAVADASAPURAM,PATTOM.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.** - **4 THE GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,DISTRICT OFFICE,CIVIL STATION,KOZHIKODE-673020.** - **5 STATE LEVEL ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY(SEIAA KERALA),** - **REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE, PALLIMUKKU,PETTAH.P.O, TRIVANDRUM-695024.** - **6 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,FOREST DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM-695001.** - **7 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES (A)DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.** **WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)** **2** **8 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM-695001.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SR GP SRI RAJASEKHARAN NAIR** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** **WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)** **3** ## **JUDGMENT** The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P5 stop memo dated 21.10.2019 issued by the 4[th] respondent, calling upon the petitioner to obtain the Clearance from the Standing Committee for National Board for Wild Life. Similar kind of memos were challenged in this Court in various other writ petitions No.28014/2019 and other connected petitions and vide order dated 18.12.2019, this Court issued certain directions. The directions contained therein were issued in terms of the interim orders as well as judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in **Goa Foundation v. Union of India** [(2011) 15 Supreme Court Cases 793] as well as **Goa Foundation v. Union of India and others** [(2014) 6 supreme Court cases 590] and the case of the petitioner is also falling within the aforementioned parameters. Accordingly, I dispose of the writ petition with similar directions as contained in the judgment of this Court cited supra, which is as under:- “a) Since the petitioner asserts that he is in **WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)** **4** possession of a mining lease prior to 18.05.2012 and therefore, not being obligated to obtain an Environmental clearance, the Government is directed to open a file in his name containing all other relevant documents, including the Mining Lease; and forward it to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Changerecording therein that the petitioner has not obtained an Environmental Clearance for this reason-within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If, for any reason, any other germane documents are found wanting, the Government will be at liberty to ask the petitioner to make available all such before the Secretary, Environment Department, so that there will be no delay in forwarding the same by the Government within the period granted above without seeking further extension of time. b) The Government of Kerala will forthwith and within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment forward the Environmental Clearances, along with all other necessary papers, to the MoEF. If, for any reason, the necessary papers are found wanting, the Government will be at liberty to seek such from the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), who will make **WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)** **5** the same available without any delay. I also leave liberty to the petitioner to make available his papers before the competent authority of the Government, which is stated to be the Secretary, Environment Department, for such purpose. I make it clear that the intent of this Court is that there shall be no delay in forwarding the papers and that the Government will be obligated to do so within the period granted herein, without seeking any further extension of time. c) On the files as ordered above reaching the MoEF, they will be obligated to place it before the Standing Committee within a period of one week from the date on which it is received, so as to enable the said authority to take a decision in terms of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. d) The Standing Committee, on receiving the files as per the afore directions, will immediately process the files and make their recommendations, as per the interim order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Goa Foundation ((2011) 15 SCC 793) and this shall be done not later than two months from the date on which they receive the files from the MoEF. e) The afore directions having been issued, I must also clarify that the stop memos issued by **WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)** **6** the Geologists will remain in force only during the period that I have fixed above and if there is any delay by any authority, be that the Government of Kerala or the MoEF or the Standing Committee, in complying with the afore directions, on the expiry of the cumulative period mentioned above, the said memos issued by the Geologists will become inoperative and the petitioner will, thereupon, be entitled to commence his activities as per the Environmental Clearances and the Mining Leases obtained by him. Needless to say, if, during the aforementioned period, the final notification is issued by the MoEF under the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 with respect to the Eco Sensitive Zones in Kerala, the interdiction as ordered above will stand vacated from that date and the petitioner will be entitled to operate his quarries depending upon the said notification and as per the stipulations therein. f) By way of a further clarification, I order that the afore directions and the operation of the stop memos will be only with respect to the petitioner's quarrying activities and that the operation of the stone crusher units, if any, as long as they are done in compliance with all necessary imperative and statutory conditions and as long as **WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)** **7** the raw material for the same is from other sources and not from the quarries in question, will not be covered by him, thereby to mean that he can continue to operate them, notwithstanding the stop memos issued by the Geologists, subject to further orders to be issued by the Standing Committee.“ In addition to the directions already issued by the Court, I also direct the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for granting permission to online access to submit the application, for the purpose of mining lease and quarrying permit. I direct the competent authority to process the said application, after giving access to the petitioner. But it do not tantamount to granting of the mining licence until the proceedings as aforesaid is completed or the period fixed as above expires. ## **Sd/-** ## **AMIT RAWAL** sab **JUDGE** **WP(C).No.1884 OF 2020(I)** **8** ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF THE QUARRYING LEASE EXECUTED IN RESPECT OF THE QUARRY OF THE PETITIONER DT.26-72017** - **EXHIBIT P2** - **TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY DT.17-6-2017** - **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY DT.12-3-2018** - **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF QUARRYING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT DT.10.12.2018.** - **EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DT.21-10-2019 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST,KOZHIKODE AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION** - **EXHIBIT P5(A) TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DT.21-10-2019 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST,KOZHIKODE AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION** - **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM DATED 8.8.2019 ,REFERRED TO IN EXT.P4** - **EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PROPOSAL OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT TO FIX THE DISTANCE CRITERIA AS I KM RADIUS FROM THE BOUNDARY OF NATIONAL PARK AND WILD LIFE SANCTUARIES.**