High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; Ext.P5 is appealable...

SIVASANKARAN K. v. Special Sale Officer Vilvattam SCB Group Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General), Ammadam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, Joint Registrar (General) Co-Operative Societies Collectorate, Thrissur, and Subhikumar.K.S

Case / Petition Number:WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024
Neutral Citation:2025:KER:23246

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Judgment Date
2025-03-19
Court Decision / Holding
The Court held that Ext.P5 is a final order capable of being appealed to the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 82, and that the petitioner may challenge Ext.P5 before the Tribunal. The writ petition is disposed of, with the court noting that the petitioner's period under Section 82(1)(e) shall be excluded, and that Ext.P4's direction to consider Ext.P3 within 30 days has been complied with by the arbitrator.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; Ext.P5 is appealable; petitioner may challenge Ext.P5 before the Co-operative Tribunal; period under Section 82(1)(e) excluded.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sivasankaran K.

Respondents

  • Special Sale Officer Vilvattam SCB Group Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Civil Line, Ayyanthole, Thrissur District, PIN-680003
  • Ammadam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd No.533, Ammadam P.O., Thrissur District, represented by its Secretary, PIN-680563
  • Joint Registrar (General) Co-Operative Societies Collectorate, Ayyanthole, Thrissur, PIN-680003
  • Subhikumar.K.S, S/O.Subrahmanyan, Korattiparambil House, Thrissur Taluk, Kodannur Village & Desom, Kodannur P.O, Thrissur District, PIN-680563

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • C.D. Dileep
  • • Shylaja Varghese
  • • M.L. Remya
  • • DheeraJ Pradeep C.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Ravi Sankar P.K.
  • • Sheeja C.S., SR.GP

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition arises from a loan dispute where the 4th respondent borrowed from the 2nd respondent bank; the bank invoked arbitration under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, resulting in an ex parte award (Ext.P1) dated 28.05.2022. The petitioner, as surety, sought to set aside the award by filing Ext.P3 under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The Arbitrator rejected Ext.P3 by Ext.P5. The petitioner contended that Ext.P5 cannot be treated as final and the remedy lay in an appeal against a final award under Section 82 of the Act; Respondents argued Ext.P5 is appealable under Section 82(1)(c) or 80(c). In WP(C) No.2341 of 2024 this Court had directed the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 within 30 days from receipt of judgment in light of Rema Devi v. Joint Registrar (General) of Co-operative Societies (2016 (3) KLT 50), a decision allowed by Ext.P4 dated 24.01.2024. Pursuant to Ext.P4, the Arbitrator passed Ext.P5. The High Court held that Ext.P5 is a final order and appealable to the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 82; consequently the writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to challenge Ext.P5 before the Tribunal. The period under Section 82(1)(e) shall be excluded. The decision clarifies that an order rejecting a set-aside application can be treated as final.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, Section 70(6)Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, Section 82Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, Section 80(c)Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, Section 14CPC Order 9 Rule 13

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

Counsel for the petitioner contends that an appeal under Section 82 is maintainable only against the final award, and Ext.P5, an order rejecting the application to set aside the ex parte award, cannot be treated as final; therefore an appeal to the Co-operative Tribunal is not available against Ext.P5. The remedy lies in challenging a final award; Ext.P3 is to be considered in light of the earlier decision in Rema Devi, upheld by Ext.P4. Respondents contend Ext.P5 is appealable under Section 82(1)(c) and the petitioner must approach the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 82.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents submit that Ext.P5 is appealable under Section 82(1)(c) and that the petitioner has to move the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 82.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Rema Devi v. Joint Registrar (General) of Co-operative Societies2016 (3) KLT 50PositiveCited to support the directive in Ext.P4 to consider Ext.P3; the decision was allowed by this Court by Ext.P4 judgment dated 24.01.2024.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against SIVASANKARAN K. v. Special Sale Officer Vilvattam SCB Group Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General), Ammadam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, Joint Registrar (General) Co-Operative Societies Collectorate, Thrissur, and Subhikumar.K.S and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 1 ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ## **`IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM`** ## **`PRESENT`** ## **`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN`** ``` WEDNESDAY, THE 19[TH] DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1946 ``` ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 ``` ## **`PETITIONER:`** ``` SIVASANKARAN K., AGED 77 YEARS ``` ``` S/O SARADHA EDOLAMMA, KAILATH HOUSE, PALLIPURAM VILLAGE & DESOM, PALLIPURAM.P.O, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680563 ``` ``` BY ADVS. C.D.DILEEP SHYLAJA VARGHESE M.L.REMYA DHEERAJ PRADEEP C. ``` ## **`RESPONDENTS:`** - **`1 THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER VILVATTAM SCB GROUP OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CIVIL LINE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680003`** ``` 2AMMADAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.533 AMMADAM P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 680563 ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 2 **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` ``` 3THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680003 ``` - **`4 SUBHIKUMAR.K.S`** ``` S/O.SUBRAHMANYAN, KORATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THRISSUR TALUK, KODANNUR VILLAGE & DESOM, KODANNUR P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680563 ``` ``` BY ADVS.RAVI SANKAR P.K. SHEEJA C.S., SR.GP ``` ``` THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON ``` ``` 19.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 3 **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` ## **`JUDGMENT`** ``` The 4[th] respondent had availed a loan from the 2[nd] respondent Society. The petitioner is the surety to the said loan. On default of payment of installments, the Society initiated arbitration proceedings under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 [for short, ‘the Act’]. Ext.P1 is the ex parte award. The petitioner filed Ext.P3 application to set aside Ext.P1 award. Aggrieved by the non- consideration of Ext.P3 application, the petitioner filed WP(C) No.2341 of 2024 for direction to consider Ext.P3 in the light of the decision in Rema Devi v. Joint Registrar (General) of Co-operative Societies (2016 (3) KLT 50), which was allowed by this Court vide Ext.P4 judgment dated 24.01.2024 directing the 1[st] respondent to consider Ext.P3 within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy the judgment. Pursuant to Ext.P4, the Arbitrator ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 4 **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` ``` passed Ext.P5 order rejecting Ext.P3 application stating that the award passed is final and the remedy of the petitioner is to file appeal before the Tribunal. Challenging Ext.P5, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. ``` ``` 2. Smt.Sheeja C.S., the learned Senior Government Pleader, submits that, Ext.P5 order passed by the Arbitrator rejecting the application to set aside the ex parte award is appealable under Section 82(1)(c) of the Act and the petitioner has to move the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 82 of the Act. ``` ``` 3. Sri.C.D.Dileep, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that, an appeal under Section 82 of the Act is maintainable only against the final award of the Registrar and that Ext.P5 order cannot be treated as a final award. ``` ``` 4. Section 82 of the Act reads as follows: ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 5 ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ``` “82. Appeals to Tribunal- (1) Any person aggrieved by- ``` ``` (a) an award of the Co-operative Arbitration Court, under subsection (1) of section 70; or ``` ``` (b) an order of the Registrar made under clause (ii) of sub-section (8) or clause (ii) of sub- section (9) of section 14; or (c) any decision of the Registrar made under - subsection (6) of section 70; or ``` ``` (d) any decision under sub-section (6) of section 70 of the person invested with powers in that behalf, by the Government; or ``` ``` (e) any award of the Arbitrator under sub- section (6) of section 70; ``` ``` may, within sixty days from the date of such decision or award, as the case may be, appeal to the Tribunal and the Tribunal, may pass such orders on the appeal, as it may deem fit.] ``` ``` [(1A) The Tribunal shall pass an order under sub-section (1) within six months with direction to communicate the copies thereof within fifteen days to the parties thereof] ``` ``` (2) An order passed by the Tribunal under ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 6 **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` ``` sub-section (1) shall be final.” ``` `5. Section 70 of the Act deals with award on` `disputes and sub-section (6) of Section 70 reads as follows:` ``` “70(6) : The Registrar or the person invested with powers in this behalf shall, decide the dispute or the arbitrator shall pass an award, in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the rules and the bye-laws and such decision or award shall, subject to the provisions of section 82, be final. Pending decision or award, the Registrar, such person or the arbitrator, as the case may be, may make such interlocutory orders as he may deem necessary in the interest of justice.” ``` ``` 6. Section 70(6) provides that the Registrar shall, decide the dispute in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the rules and the bye-laws and such decision shall, subject to the provisions ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 7 **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` ``` of Section 82, be final. Pending decision, the Registrar, may make such interlocutory orders, as he may deem necessary, in the interests of justice. Section 80(c) provides that an appeal lies to the Tribunal from any decision of the Registrar made under Section 70(6) of the Act. Since Section 80(c) does not distinguish between final and interlocutory decisions, any decision made by the Registrar under Section 70(6), whether final or interlocutory, would be appealable to the Tribunal. That apart, an order rejecting an application to set aside an ex parte award is not an interlocutory order; rather, it has to be treated as a final order confirming the ex parte award. Thus an appeal would lie to the Tribunal from Ext. P5 order passed by the Arbitrator. ``` ``` Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 8 **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` ``` challenge Ext. P5 appeal before the Co-operative Tribunal. Since the petitioner was bonafide prosecuting this writ petition, the period during which the writ petition was pending before this Court shall be excluded from the calculation of the period prescribed under Section 82(1)(e) of the Act. ``` ``` Sd/- ``` ``` MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN ``` ``` JUDGE ``` ``` sp/19/03/2025 ``` WP(C) NO.45713 OF 2024 9 **==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==** ``` 2025:KER:23246 ``` ## **`APPENDIX OF WP(C) 45713/2024`** ``` PETITIONER EXHIBITS ``` ``` Exhibit-P1 ``` ``` A TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN ARC NO.3353/2021 DATED 28.05.2022. ``` ``` Exhibit-P2 ``` ``` A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL COVER SHOWING THE RECEIPT OF AWARD ON 14.12.2022 ``` ``` Exhibit-P3 ``` ``` A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 OF THE CPC TO SET ASIDE THE EXT-P1 AWARD DATED 10/01/2023 ``` ``` Exhibit-P4A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.01.2024 OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.2341 OF 2024 ``` ``` Exhibit-P5A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.847/24 DATED 24.02.2024 OF THE ARBITRATOR ```