High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeRegular bail granted

Sinto v State of Kerala

Case / Petition Number:B.A.No.957/2023

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • A. Badharudeen Monday
Judgment Date
2023-02-27
Court Decision / Holding
Bail application allowed; the petitioner is to be released on regular bail on conditions as specified.
Final Disposition
Regular bail granted

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sinto

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam
  • SMT. T V Neema (Senior Public Prosecutor)

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Lindons C. Davis
  • • E. U. Dhanya Swathy
  • • A.P.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Public Prosecutor
  • • SMT. T V Neema (Senior Public Prosecutor)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This regular bail application concerns Sinto, the sole accused in Crime No.49/2023 of Kodakara Police Station, Thrissur. The applicant was arrested on 22.01.2023 and is charged under Section 439 CrPC with offences punishable under IPC Sections 324 (hurt by dangerous weapon) and 308 (attempt to commit culpable homicide). The prosecution case alleges that at about 11:30 hours on 21.01.2023 the accused stabbed the defacto complainant in the chest with a knife, causing deep lacerations, including an incised wound below the left clavicle. The prosecution further contends that the accused has criminal antecedents and involvement in two other offences (Crime Nos. 290/2014 and 96/2021) in separate police stations. Prosecution argues that release at the initial stage would hamper investigation given the seriousness of the injuries and potential for influencing witnesses. The petitioner contends that investigation is at a late stage and that continued custody is unnecessary. After perusing the case diary and wound certificate, the court notes prima facie satisfaction of offences and the accused's antecedents. Balancing factors, and the progress of investigation, the court grants bail with conditions, including bond Rs 50,000 with two sureties, non-interference with witnesses, cooperation with police, reporting to the IO weekly for two months, travel restrictions, surrender of passport, and prohibition from committing further offences. The bail is granted subject to these conditions, with a warning that violation will cancel bail.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 439 CrPCSection 324 IPCSection 308 IPC

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Prima facie

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner submitted that since the investigation requiring the petitioner’s presence is practically over and the accused has already been in custody since 22.01.2023, there are no compelling reasons to further detain him. It was argued that the offences are bailable and the applicant is ready to comply with conditions including reporting to the IO, not leaving the jurisdiction, and co-operating with the investigation. The defense highlighted the progress of investigation, lack of credible likelihood of tampering with witnesses while in custody, and the absence of any indication of flight risk once bail is granted.

Contentions of Respondents

The State opposed bail on grounds of seriousness of the injuries, likelihood of further criminal activity given antecedents, and potential interference with the investigation. It was argued that the accused is already facing multiple criminal cases (including 2014 and 2021 matters) and that release could hamper the ongoing investigation and affect witnesses.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Sinto v State of Kerala and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

**IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN MONDAY, THE 27[TH] DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 8TH PHALGUNA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 957 OF 2023 CRIME NO.49 OF 2023 OF KODAKARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR** ## **PETITIONER/ACCUSED:** SINTO AGED 25 YEARS S/O.JOHNSON, PUTHANANGADI HOUSE, KALLETTUKARA VILLAGE & DESOM, KALLETTUKARA.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680683. BY ADVS. LINDONS C.DAVIS E.U.DHANYA SWATHY A.P. ## **RESPONDENT/STATE:** STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682031. SMT.T V NEEMA (SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14.02.2023, THE COURT ON 27.02.2023 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No..957/2023 2 ## _**A.BADHARUDEEN, J.**_ ================================ _B.A.No.957 of 2023_ ================================ _Dated this the 27[th] day of February, 2023_ ## _**O R D E R**_ This regular bail application has been filed at the instance of the petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.49/2023 of Kodakara Police Station, Thrissur, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, wherein he alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 324 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary as such. 3. The prosecution case is that at 11.30 hours on 21.01.2023, the accused herein caused stab injury on the chest of the defacto complainant by using a knife with intention to commit culpable B.A.No..957/2023 3 homicide, not amounting to murder. On this premise, the prosecution alleges commission of the above offences by the petitioner. 4. While pressing for regular bail to the petitioner, who has been in custody, from 22.01.2023, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the investigation, requiring the presence of the petitioner in custody, is practically over, the petitioner is liable to be released on bail, taking note of his custody from 22.01.2023. 5. While opposing bail, the learned Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is having involvement in 2 more crimes, viz., (i) Crime No. 290/2014 of Kodakara Police Station alleging commission of offences punishable U/s 341, 323, 324, 294(b), 506 (ii) r/w 34 IPC; and (ii) Crime No.96/2021 of Aloor Police Station, alleging commission of offences punishable U/s. 447, 341, 323, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC. 6. The learned Public Prosecutor also would submit that B.A.No..957/2023 4 the defacto complainant sustained very serious injuries as could be read out from the wound certificate and, therefore, the prosecution case is well made out. Accordingly, it is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that release of the petitioner at the initial stage of investigation would hamper the investigation. 7. I have perused the case diary and the report of the Investigating Officer, which would suggest antecedents of the petitioner, as submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor. 8. On perusal of the copy of the wound certificate, it can be gathered that a deep lacerated would on the left side of chest with bleeding. Further an incised wound of 2 X 4 cm over the chest below left clavicle is noted. Thus the prosecution as to commission of the offences herein above referred is well established _prima facie_ . The criminal antecedents of the petitioner are also would aggravate disentitlement, when the petitioner seeks bail. However, in consideration of the progress of the investigation and custody of the petitioner from B.A.No..957/2023 5 22.01.2023, I am inclined to release him on bail on conditions and one among the conditions is that the petitioner shall not involve in any other offence during the currency of bail and any such event, if reported or came to the notice of this Court, the same shall be a reason to cancel the bail hereby granted. 9. In the result, this bail application is allowed and the petitioner can be released on bail on the following conditions: i. Accused/petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court concerned. ii. Accused/petitioner shall not intimidate the witnesses or tamper with evidence. He shall co-operate with the investigation and shall be available for trial. He shall visit the Investigating Officer on every Monday in between 9 a.m and 12 noon for a period of two months and also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed. B.A.No..957/2023 6 iii. Accused/petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the jurisdictional court. iv. The accused/petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, within 7 days from the date of his release, before the trial court. If he has no passports, he shall file an affidavit in this regard on the date of execution of the bond or within 3 days thereafter. v. Accused/petitioner shall not involve in any other offence during the currency of bail and any such event, if reported or came to the notice of this Court, the same shall be a reason to cancel the bail hereby granted. _Sd/-_ ## _**(A. BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE)**_ _rtr/_ B.A.No..957/2023 7 B.A.No..957/2023 8 ## **APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 957/2023** PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES Annexure A1 A COPY OF THE FIR DATED 22.01.2023 IN CRIME NO.49/2023 OF KODAKARA POLICE STATION Annexure A2 A COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25.01.2023 IN CRL.M.P. 763/2023 IN CRIME NO.49/2023, BY THE HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, IRINJALAKUDA