High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of with directions (provisional renewa...

SILA BRICKS AND GRANITES v State of Kerala and others

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.10582 of 2020(W)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Alexander Thomas, J.
Judgment Date
2020-05-29
Court Decision / Holding
Provisional renewal of the dealer’s licence and depot licence is to be considered by the District Geologist on a provisional basis, subject to applicable norms. If the land assignment cancellation is ultimately finalised, the provisional licences may be revoked. All issues regarding the legality of the cancellation proceedings are left open to challenge in appropriate proceedings. The petitioner must furnish a certified copy of this judgment and the memorandum before the District Geologist for necessary action. The petition is disposed of with liberty to pursue remedies in law.
Final Disposition
Disposed of with directions (provisional renewal ordered; final cancellation to be decided separately)

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Sila Bricks and Granites, Nalloornad Post, Thonichal, Mananthavady-670645, Wayanad District

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • The District Collector, Civil Station Complex, Kalpetta, Wayanad
  • The Sub Collector, Revenue Divisional Office, Mananthavady, Wayanad
  • The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Mananthavady, Wayanad
  • Director of Mining and Geology, Directorate of Mining and Geology, Thiruvananthapuram
  • The Geologist, District Office, Department of Mining and Geology, Wayanad

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • N. Anand
  • • George Poonthottam (Sr.)
  • • Nisha George

Counsels for Respondents

  • • S. Saigi Jacob Palatty

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition challenges the cancellation of a land assignment and the consequent denial of renewal of mineral licences for a crushing unit operated by the petitioner. The Sub Collector had directed cancellation of the land assignment, prompting the Tahsildar to proceed against the petitioner. Ext.P6 indicates that the Tahsildar contemplated cancellation, while Ext.P18 shows the District Geologist rejecting renewal of both the depot licence and the dealer’s licence on the ground that cancellation proceedings were pending. The petitioner asserts that the pending land assignment cancellation must be finalized in accordance with law and seeks quashing Ext.P5 (show-cause), Ext.P6, Ext.P18, and a direction to grant provisional renewal of licences under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015, so as to run the crusher unit. The respondents argue that renewal is prohibited while cancellation proceedings are pending and rely on the statutory framework to regulate mineral activities. After hearing, the Court found that the cancellation proceedings had not been finalized in the manner known to law and directed the District Geologist to consider renewal on a provisional basis, subject to norms, while keeping the right to revoke if the cancellation is ultimately finalised. The petition was disposed of with liberty to challenge the cancellation in due course, and a copy of the judgment and exhibits was to be furnished to the Geologist for action.

Provisions of Law Cited

Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015Kerala Minerals (Prevention of illegal Mining, Storage and Transportations Rules, 2015) Rules 9 & 12Land Assignment Act

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner contends that the cancellation of land assignment has not been finalized in the manner known to law. Ext.P6 shows a directive by the Tahsildar, and Ext.P18 indicates non-renewal based on pending cancellation. The petition seeks quashing Ext.P5, Ext.P6 and Ext.P18 and requests provisional renewal of the dealer’s licence and depot licence under the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015, with liberty to challenge cancellation later.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents contend renewal is dependent on finalisation of cancellation proceedings; the District Geologist’s stance in Ext.P18 reflects that renewal cannot be granted due to pending actions. They rely on statutory norms governing small-mineral operations and contend that finality of cancellation is a prerequisite for renewal or licence issuance.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Supreme Court in SLP (C) No.13030-13031/2016 and connected casesSLP (C) No.13030-13031/2016Mentioned OnlyExhibit P7 contains a Supreme Court order; referenced for background; not pivotal to the order.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against SILA BRICKS AND GRANITES v State of Kerala and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** ## **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS** ## **FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2020 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1942** ## **WP(C).No.10582 OF 2020(W)** ## **PETITIONER :** **SILA BRICKS AND GRANITES, NALLOORNAD POST, THONICHAL, MANANTHAVADY-670645, WAYANAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER.** **BY ADVS. SRI.N.ANAND SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.) SMT.NISHA GEORGE** ## **RESPONDENTS:** - **1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.** - **2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION COMPLEX, KALPETTA, WAYANAD-673121.** - **3 THE SUB COLLECTOR, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MANANTHAVADY-670645, WAYANAD DISTRICT.** - **4 THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MANANTHAVADY-670645, WAYANAD DISTRICT.** - **5 THE DIRECTOR OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DIRECTORATE OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004.** - **6 THE GEOLOGIST, DISTRICT OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, PBM BUILDING, MEENANGADI, WAYANAD673571.** **SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, SR.GOVT.PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.05.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 2 ## **ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.** **=========================== W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 ===========================** Dated this the 29[th] day of May, 2020 ## **JUDGMENT** The case set up in this Writ Petition (Civil) is as follows: On the directions of the Sub Collector, the Tahsildar has initiated proceedings to cancel the assignment of lands now under the possession of the petitioner. Assignment is sought to be cancelled on the ground that lands were used for a purpose for which it was not assigned. The Sub Collector has by Ext.P4 directed the Tahsildar to cancel the assignment of lands under the possession of the petitioner. The Tahsildar has himself by Ext.P6 stated that at the conclusion of proceedings, assignment will be cancelled. Thus the continuation of proceedings before the Tahsildar is meaningless. On the basis of the directions issued by the Sub Collector to the Geologist vide Ext.P4 and P13, the latter vide Ext.P18 has rejected the application for renewal of depot registration and dealers licence, solely on the ground that proceedings for cancellation of assignment is pending. It is in the light of these averments and contentions, the petitioner has filed the instant Writ Petition (Civil) with the following prayers: - _“i. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction quashing Ext.P5 and P6 and all further proceedings consequent thereto._ W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 3 - _ii. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction quashing Exhibit-P18._ - _iii. Issue a Writ, Order or direction declaring that there is no prohibition in using lands assigned under the Land Assignment Act for setting up a crusher unit._ - _iv. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction directing Respondent No.6 to grant registration for sales depot and issue dealers licence under Rules 9 & 12 of the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of illegal Mining, Storage and Transportations Rules, 2015)_ - _v. Issue such other Writ, Order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”_ 2. Heard Sri.George Poonthottam, learned Senior Counsel instructed by Sri.N.Anand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. After hearing both sides, it is seen that the impugned proceedings for cancellation of the land assignment grant has not been finalized in the manner known to law, which crucial aspect is disclosed by Ext.P-6 letter dated 05.05.2020 issued by the 4[th] respondent-Tahsildar. Ext.P-6 letter dated 05.05.2020 issued by the 4[th] respondent-Tahsildar reads as follows: " വ�ഷയ� : ക��റ�/കഷർ – ശ�ല ബ�ക� കഷർ പവർതന� സ�ബന�ച� . സചന : 1) സബ� കളക�ർ മ�നനവ�ട�യടട 20/02/2020 ടല RDOMDY/2960/2019-c നമർ കത�. 2) ജ�യയ�ളജ�സ� വയന�ട�ട% 29/04/2020 ടല നമർ W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 4 **==> picture [44 x 11] intentionally omitted <==** **==> picture [277 x 17] intentionally omitted <==** യമൽ വ�ഷയതയലക� ശദ കണ�കന. നലർന�ട� വ�യലജ4ൽ കനമ�ഗല� യ8ശത� റ4 സർട9 നമർ 17/1 ൽ ത�ങളടട ഉടമസതയ�ലള ശ�ല ബ�ക� & ഗ�നനറ�സ� എന കഷർ പവർത�കന സല� DK/236/68F നമർ *ടയ� 1964 ടല യകരള . ഭ*ത�വ� ചടത�ടല വFവസകൾ പക�ര� ക�ർഷ�ക ആവശFതന�യ� *ത�ച നൽക�യത�ണ� *ടയ വFവസകൾ ല�ഖ�ചത�ന�ൽ *ടയ� റദ ടചയനത�ന നട*ട�കൾ സ�4കര�ക�ൻ സചന 1 പക�ര� സബ� കളക�ർ മ�നനവ�ട� നൽക�യ കത�ൽ സ�4കര�ച നട*ട�കൾ അറ�യ�കനത�ന� 2 സചന പക�ര� ജ�യയ�ളജ�സ� വയന�ട� ആവശFടOടത�യ� ആയത�ൽ ഈ ക�രF�ലയത�ൽ ന�ന� സ�4കര�ച നട*ട�കൾ അറ�യ�കനത�ന� സചന 3 പക�ര� ത�ങൾ അയ*ക സമർO�ച�രന. യമൽ വ�ഷയത�ൽ c5-2145/2020 നമർ ഫയൽ പക�ര� ഈ ക�രF�ലയത�ൽ നട*ട�കൾ സ�4കരചവരനത�ണ�. ഈ ക�രF�ലയത�ൽ ന�ന� ആവശFടOടത� പക�ര� നലർന�ട� വ�യലജ� ഓഫ4സർ 05/03/2020 ന� 56/2020/NLD നമർ പക�ര� റ�യO�ർട� സമർO�ചത�ണ�. പസത *ടയ� റദ� ടചയ�ത�ര�ക�ൻ ത�ങൾക� എടനങ�ല� യബ�ദ�O�കവനടVങ�ൽ 17/03/2020 ന� യനര�ട� തഹസ�ൽ8�ർ മൻ*�ടക ഹ�ജര�കനത�ന� യന�ട4സ� നൽക�യ�രനത�ണ�. എന�ൽ യക�വ�ഡ� 19 (ടക�യറ�ണ നവറസ�) ബ�ധയടട *സച�തലത�ൽ ത�ങൾക� യനര�ട� ഹ�ജര�കവ�ൻ കഴ�ഞ�ല. യക�വ�ഡ� 19 (ടക�യറ�ണ നവറസ�) മലമള യല�ക� ഡ ൺ *�ൻവല�കന മറയ� വ�ച�രണ നട*ട�കൾ നടത� *ടയ� റദ� ടചയ ഉതരവ� നൽകനത�ണ�.” A reading of Ext.P-6 would make it clear that the proposed action for cancellation of the land assignment grant, may be taken up for consideration, only after the lifting of the lockdown, etc. The immediate grievance of the petitioner is that pursuant to Ext.P-13 communication dated 29.03.2020 issued by the 3[rd] respondent-Sub Collector to the 6[th] respondent-District Geologist, the latter is taking steps for cancellation or non-renewal of the depot licence earlier granted to the petitioner for W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 5 running his crusher unit in terms of the provisions contained in the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015. In consequence thereof, the 6[th] respondent-District Geologist has taken the stand in the impugned Ext.P-18 notice dated 20.05.2020 that he is not in a position to renew the both the dealer's licence and the depot licence for the running of the petitioner's crushing unit in the subject property. 4. After hearing both sides, this Court is of the view that the stand taken by the respondents, more particularly, the 6[th] respondent that even the existing dealer's licence and the depot licence of the petitioner will not be renewed, on account of the proposed proceedings for cancellation of the land assignment grant, is not reasonable and proper. Indisputably, the proposed proceedings for cancellation of the land assignment grant has not been finalized in the manner known to law. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 6[th] respondent-District Geologist shall ensure that the plea of the petitioner for renewal of the dealer's licence and depot licence may be considered and the same could be granted on a provisional basis, provided the petitioner fulfills all other norms and eligibility conditions for such renewal. In other words, the mere fact that the proposed land assignment cancellation proceedings is now pending against the petitioner shall not be a ground for even refusing the renewal of the depot licence and dealer's licence atleast on a provisional basis. W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 6 5. Needless to say, the said the aspect regarding the grant of such provisional licence is to be determined with reference to the applicable norms in terms of the provisions contained in the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules and such other guidelines. However, it is made clear that immediately after the land assignment cancellation proceedings are finalized in the manner known to law and if the land assignment grant is so cancelled etc., then it is certainly open to the 6[th] respondent-District Geologist to revoke such provisionally granted dealer's licence and depot licence to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, further it is ordered that all issues raised by the petitioner regarding the legality and correctness of the impugned land assignment cancellation proceedings, are left open to be raised separately in appropriate proceedings in the manner known to law. Sri.George Poonthottam, learned Senior Counsel instructed by Sri.N.Anand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is being advised to move a separate Writ Petition (Civil), so as to exclusively challenge the legality and correctness of the impugned land assignment cancellation proceedings. Needless to say, liberty is accorded to the petitioner to work out his remedies in the manner known to law. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment as well as the copy of this memorandum of this W.P(C) along with with all the exhibits before W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 7 the 6[th] respondent-District Geologist, for necessary information and further action. With these observations and directions, the above Writ Petition (Civil) will stand finally disposed of. **Sd/-** **ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE** vgd W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 8 ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA DATED 22/07/1967.** **EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 01/10/2018 ISSUED BY NALLOORNAD VILLAGE, WAYANAD DISTRICT.** **EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 26/04/2019 ISSUED FROM NALLOORNAD VILLAGE OFFICE.** - **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 20/02/2020 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 TO RESPONDENT NO.4.** **EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 09/03/2020 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY RESPONDENT NO.4.** - **EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 05/05/2020 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4.** - **EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 20/01/2020 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN SLP (C) NO.13030-13031/2016 AND CONNECTED CASES.** - **EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 19/06/2019 PASSED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WA NO.1453/2019.** - **EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 13/01/2020 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.685/2020.** - **EXHIBIT P10 COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 24/02/2020 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.6.** - **EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF DEALER'S LICENCE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.6 DATED 27/02/2020.** **EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 06/02/2020 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.5 TO RESPONDENT NO.6. EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 29/03/2020 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 TO RESPONDENT NO.6.** W.P(C) No.10582 of 2020 9 **EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR RENEWAL OF DEPOT REGISTRATION IN FORM A DATED 23/02/2020. EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR RENEWAL OF MINERAL DEALERS LICENCE IN FORM E DATED 27/04/2020. EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 29/04/2020 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.6. EXHIBIT P17 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 12/05/2020 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.6 TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P18 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE/ORDER DATED 20/05/2020 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.6.**