High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeWrit petition disposed of; no order as to costs.

Shihab v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi; Village Officer, Peruvallur Village

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment Date
2021-04-09
Court Decision / Holding
The writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.248/2021 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the Narayanan Namboodiri judgment referred to supra. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Writ petition disposed of; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Shihab, aged 44 years S/O Kunhimoideen kutty Haji, Chemban, Chembetti Kalathil House, Super Bazaar, Parambilpeedika P.O., Peruvallur, Malappuram District, PIN – 676 317

Respondents

  • The Special Tahsildar (LR), Land Tribunal-Tirurangadi, Tirurangadi P.O., Malappuram District, Kerala – 676 306
  • The Village Officer, Peruvallur Village, Malappuram District, Kerala – 673 638

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • Sri. P.T. Sheejish

Counsels for Respondents

  • • SMT A.C VIDHYA - Government Pleader

Case Synopsis & Summary

Shihab, a resident of Malappuram District, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to compel the Special Tahasildar (LR) to decide S.M. No. 248/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, regarding the assignment of the landlord’s right, title and interest vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. The petition explains that suo motu proceedings were initiated by the Land Tribunal under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 in respect of 0.0607 hectares in Re-Sy. No. 381/7, Peruvallur Village. The court recalls the Narayanan Namboodiri decision (W.P.(C) No. 28398 of 2017 and connected cases, 14.03.2018), which emphasised expeditious disposal and seniority-based disposition of cases, noting that tribunals should proceed in accordance with seniority and may obtain village officer reports to expedite processes. The petitioner contends for timely progress, while the respondents urge adherence to the established norms and the GO and procedural safeguards. The court ultimately directs disposition in line with the Narayanan Namboodiri directions and disposes of the petition.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms ActG.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Disposal of cases on seniority (seniority-based disposal) by Land Tribunals
  • Expeditious disposal of senior citizens' cases
  • Use of Village Officers reports when Revenue Inspectors are in shortage
  • No breaking of seniority of cases except as directed by this Court or higher authorities
  • GO 2018 (RD) to form part of the judgment

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner argues that Article 226 empowers the High Court to issue a mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on S.M. No. 248/2021 before the Land Tribunal’s file, as the suo motu proceedings involve assignment of the landlord’s right vested in Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14. He highlights the need to obtain a loan, making expedited resolution essential, and relies on the Narayanan Namboodiri framework to press for priority based on seniority, while acknowledging the current pendency and the importance of lawful procedure.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents urge adherence to the Narayanan Namboodiri framework, arguing that the Land Tribunal must dispose cases on seniority and within the timeframes set by the directions, refrain from out-of-turn hearings, and consider using Village Officer reports when Revenue Inspectors are scarce. They acknowledge the substantial pendency (2192 cases) and note that GO 09/2018 RD provides facilitation through Village Officers; the Tribunal must proceed strictly under law, with notices to landlords being issued in an approved manner.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017PositiveCited as controlling authority; the court applies its directions for expeditious disposal and seniority-based handling of Land Tribunal cases.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Shihab v. Special Tahsildar (LR) and Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi; Village Officer, Peruvallur Village and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

# **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** # **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943** ## **WP(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SHIHAB, AGED 44 YEARS S/O KUNHIMOIDEENKUTTY HAJI, CHEMBAN, CHEMBETTI KALATHIL HOUSE, SUPER BAZAR, PARAMBILPEEDIKA PO PERUVALLUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 676 317.** ## **BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** |**1**|**THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR (LR),**| |---|---| ||**LAND TRIBUNAL- TIRURANGADI,**| ||**TIRURANGADI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,**| ||**KERALA – 676 306**| |**2**|**THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PERUVALLUR VILLAGE,**| ||**MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,**| ||**KERALA, PIN – 673 638**| ## **OTHER PRESENT:** ## **SMT A.C VIDHYA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1[st] respondent Special Tahasildar (LR) to consider and pass orders in S.M.No.248/2021 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 0.0607 Hectares of land comprised in Re-Sy.No.381/7 of Peruvallur Village in Malappuram District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated W.P(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M) -3- 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by W.P(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M) -4- the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; - “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: - (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers W.P(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M) -5- concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the W.P(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M) -6- ## directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. - (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Peruvallur Village, the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.No.248/2021, as evidenced by Ext.P2 certificate dated 08.03.2021, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi is 2192. 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi can be directed to dispose of W.P(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M) -7- S.M.No.248/2021 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Tirurangadi, to dispose of S.M.No.248/2021, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.9730 OF 2021(M) -8- ## **APPENDIX** ## **PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:** **EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DTD. 05.03.2021.** **EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS DATED 08.03.2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.**