High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeAllowed; quashed the Final Report and all furth...

Shaji K.M. and others v. State of Kerala and others

Case / Petition Number:Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • C.S. Dias
Judgment Date
2021-04-27
Court Decision / Holding
The petition is allowed. Annexure-2 Final Report and all further proceedings in S.C. No. 151 of 2016 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court-I, Kasaragod, as against the petitioners are quashed.
Final Disposition
Allowed; quashed the Final Report and all further proceedings in SC 151/2016 against the petitioners.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • Shaji K.M.
  • Orkool Gangadharangan
  • N.K. Krishnan
  • Kavuthiyan Valappil Upendan
  • Malappacherry Rajan
  • Deepesh Pallathuvayal
  • Sathyan V.T
  • M. Rajan
  • Rathnakaran V.T
  • C.K. Krishnan
  • Narappokan
  • P.R. Balakrishnan
  • Ananthhan
  • A.V. Balakrishnan
  • Maiyankode Andi
  • Vannapurakkal Venu
  • Ranjith K.M
  • Praveen @ Pravi
  • Sreejith
  • Rameshan.K
  • Vijayadas P.V
  • Rameshan
  • Edakkoman Sukumaran
  • Neethu @ Nidhin
  • Kanunda Sukumaran
  • Pradeepan K
  • Sudheesh Kanathadam
  • Prakashan K

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Kochi
  • C. Balakrishnan
  • K. Bineesh
  • Bilsha
  • Usha (W/o. Balakrishnan)
  • R2-5 by Advocate

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • SMT.K.A.Sanjeetha
  • • Sri.Balu Tom
  • • Shri. Bejoy Joseph P.J.

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Bonny Benny
  • • Sri. Santhosh Peter

Case Synopsis & Summary

This is a criminal miscellaneous case (Crl.MC No.515 of 2021) filed before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam by the accused-petitioners challenging the order in SC No.151/2016, pending before the Additional District Court & Sessions Court-I, Kasaragod. The petition contends that the dispute between the petitioners and respondents 2 to 5 has been settled amicably with no subsisting grievance, supported by affidavits (Annexures A3 to A6) and verified by the investigating officer, who confirmed the genuineness of the settlement. The respondents 2 to 5 affirm they no longer desire to pursue the matter. The State, through the Public Prosecutor, indicates no serious objection, and the matter has reference to offences under IPC Ss. 143, 147, 148, 452, 427, 323, 324, 326, 354, 308 r/w 149. The learned court references Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat, which lay down that in suitable circumstances, where the settlement is amicable and the offence not serious, the inherent power under CrPC Sec. 482 may be invoked to quash criminal proceedings to secure ends of justice. After due consideration, the court quashes the Final Report and all further proceedings in SC No.151 of 2016 against the petitioners, thereby allowing the Crl.MC.

Provisions of Law Cited

Section 482 of CrPCIndian Penal Code: Ss. 143, 147, 148, 452, 427, 323, 324, 326, 354, 308 r/w 149

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Ends of justice
  • Inherent power of High Court under Section 482 CrPC to quash
  • Amicable settlement as a basis to quash criminal proceedings
  • Not serious offences justifying quashing when public interest is not involved

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioners submit that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties with no subsisting grievance, supported by affidavits (A3–A6) and verified as genuine by the law-enforcement authorities. They contend that the offences, though alleged under IPC several sections, are not of a serious nature and do not involve mental depravity; quashing the proceedings would conserve judicial time and promote harmony. Relying on Gian Singh and Parbatbhai Aahir, they urge the court to exercise its inherent power under CrPC Section 482 to quash SC No.151/2016 in the interest of justice and to finalize the dispute amicably.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents acknowledge the amicable settlement and state they have no ongoing grievance; affidavits attesting to the settlement are filed, and the state and respondents do not oppose quashing where ends of justice require it. They rely on the cited Supreme Court principles that settlement and non-serious offences may warrant quashing under the inherent powers of the High Court to secure ends of justice, provided public interest is not involved and conviction is unlikely.

Cited Precedents (2)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab2012 (10) SCC 303PositiveCited as authority that amicable settlements and non-serious offences can justify quashing criminal proceedings in the interest of ends of justice.
Prabhatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another2017 (9) SCC 641PositiveCited to support quashing where amicable settlement exists and the offence is not serious; ends of justice would be served.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against Shaji K.M. and others v. State of Kerala and others and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS** **TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 7TH VAISAKHA, 1943** **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D)** **AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 151/2016 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - I, KASARAGOD** **CRIME NO.286/2010 OF Nileswar Police Station , Kasargod** ## **PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :** - **1 SHAJI K.M. AGED 41 YEARS SARNGADHARAN, KOYANMOOLA HOUSE, PULIKKAL, MADIKAI-671 314** - **2 ORKOOL GANGADHARAN, AGED 60 YEARS S/O. AMBU, KOLIKKUNNU, ORKOOL, MADAIKAI GRAMAM, 671 314.** - **3 N.K. KRISHNAN, AGED 66 YEARS S/O. CHANDAN (LATE), CHARTHANGAL, KORAVANTHALA, MADIKAI-671 314** - **4 KAVUTHIYAN VALAPPIL UPENDRAN, AGED 48 YEARS S/O. KUNHAMBU, ERIKKULAM, MADIKAI, 671 314.** - **5 MALAPPACHERRY RAJAN, AGED 51 YEARS S/O.KELU NAIR, MALAPPACHERY, MADIKAI -671 314** - **6 DEEPESH PALLATHUVAYAL, AGED 33 YEARS S/O. DAMODARAN, KAKKAD, PALLATHUVAYAL, MADIKAI-671 314** - **7 SATHYAN V.T, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.KOTTAN, KAKKAD, PALLATHUVAYAL, MADIKAI GRAMAM-671 314** - **8 M. RAJAN, AGED 50 YEARS** ## **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 2** **S/O. KUNHIKANNAN, KARUVALAPPU, P.O, KANHIRAPOYIL, AMBALATHARA GRAMAM-671 314** - **9 RATHNAKARAN V.T, AGED 51 YEARS S/O. KOTTAN, VADAKKANTHOTTAM, KAKKAD, BANKALAM,MADIKARI-671 314** - **10 C.K. KRISHNAN, AGED 71 YEARS** - **S/O. RAMAN, CHEMBAKATHIL KEEZHIL HOUSE, ERIKKULAM, MADIKAI 11 GRAMAM 671 314.** - **11 NARAPOKKAN, AGED 62 YEARS S/O. KORAN, NARA, ALAKKALAM, ERIKKULAM, MADIKAI-671 314** - **12 P.R. BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 52 YEARS S/O. RAMAN, PILANKU HOUSE, PERALATHU, KANHIRAPOYIL, MADIKAI-671 314** - **13 ANANTHAN, AGED 52 YEARS S/O. PONNAN KUNHIRAMAN, ITHIKUNDU HOUSE, ALAKKULAM, ERIKKULAM-682 035** - **14 A.V. BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 65 YEARS S/O. KELU NAIR, MANIYARA HOUSE, NARA, ERIKKULAM-682 035** - **15 MAIYANKODE ANDI, AGED 78 YEARS** - **S/O. KARUTHAMBU, MAIYANKODE HOUSE, KOLIKKUNNU, MADIKAI-671 314** - **16 VANNAPURAKKAL VENU AGED 53 YEARS S/O. RAMAN, VANNAPURAKKAL HOUSE, KANHIRAPOYIL, AMBALATHARA, 671 314** - **17 RANJITH K.M, AGED 34 YEARS** - **S/O. LEELA, KUNDENMOOLA, PULIKKAL,** **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 3** ## **MADIKAI GRAMAM-671 314** - **18 PRAVEEN @ PRAVI, AGED 34 YEARS S/O.NANDINI, KUNDENMOOLA, PULIKKAL, MADIKAI-671 314** - **19 SREEJITH, AGED 42 YEARS S/O. SADANANDAN, PALLATHUVAYAL ROAD, ERIKKULAM, MADIKAI-671 314** - **20 RAMESHAN. K, AGED 39 YEARS S/O. MADHAVI, KODATHANVALLI HOUSE, UMICHI, MALAPPANCHERY, MADIKAI-671 314** - **21 VIJAYADAS P.V, AGED 36 YEARS S/O. NARAYANI, PADINJARE VEEDU, NANDANKUZHI, ERIKKULAM-671 314** - **22 RAMESHAN, AGED 48 YEARS S/O. KUNHIKANNAN @ PULLANKANNAN, KANATHADAM HOUSE, MALAPPACHERRY, MADIKAI-671 314** - **23 EDAKKOMAN SUKUMARAN, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. KUNHIRAMAN, EDAKKOMAN HOUSE, PALLATHUVAYAL, MADIKAI GRAMAM -671 314** - **24 NEETHU @ NIDHIN, AGED 33 YEARS S/O. KANNOTH THAMBAN, MOONNU ROAD, ERIKKULAM, MADIKAI-671 314** - **25 KANUNDA SUKUMARAN, AGED 59 YEARS** - **S/O. KRISHNAN, PAYANGAPADAN HOUSE, KANUNDA, PULIKKAL, 673 637** - **26 PRADEEPAN K, AGED 39 YEARS** - **S/O. K.KRISHNAN, KARANAKKAI HOUSE,** ## **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 4** **PULIKKAL, MADIKAI-671 314.** - **27 SUDHEESH KANATHADAM, AGED 30 YEARS S/O. PRAPHULLA KUMARI AND KUMARAN, MANIYARA HOUSE, MALAPPANCHERRY, KANATHADA, MADIKAI-671 314** - **28 PRAKASHAN K, AGED 38 YEARS S/O. BALAN (LATE), MOONU ROAD, ERIKKULAM, MADIKAI-671 314** - **BY ADVS. SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA SRI.BALU TOM SHRI. BEJOY JOSEPH P.J.** ## **RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE :-** - **1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI 682 031.** - **2 C.BALAKRISHNAN AGED 71 YEARS** - **S/O. KOTTAN, RETIRED SUB INSPECTOR, RESIDING AT SASTHAMKAVU, MADIKAI VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. ERIKKULAM, KASARGOD DISTRICT-671 314** - **3 K.BINEESH AGED 30 YEARS** - **S/O BALAKRISHNAN, CIVIL POLICE OFFICER, RESIDING AT SHASTHAMKAVU, MADIKAI VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. MADIKAI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT-671 314** - **4 BILSHA AGED 27 YEARS D/O. BALAKRISHNAN, RESIDING AT NARAYAN NIVAS, KARICHERY, THAKKIL VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK-671 319** - **5 USHA** ## **W/O. BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 54 YEARS,** ## **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 5** **SHASTHAMKAVU, MADIKAI VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. MADIKAI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT-671 314** **R2-5 BY ADV. BONNY BENNY SRI. SANTHOSH PETER, PP** **THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:** ## **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 6** ## **ORDER** This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code. 2. The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.286 of 2010 of the Nileshwaram Police Station pending as SC No.151 of 2016 before the Additional Sessions Court-I, Kasaragod. The petitioners are alleged to have committed the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 427, 323, 324, 326, 354, 308 r/w Section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Annexure-A1 is the First Information Report and Annexure-A2 is the Final Report filed in Crime No.286 of 2010. 3. The prosecution allegation as against the petitioners is that on 27.4.2010 the petitioners trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant and caused injuries to the de facto complainant - the 2[nd] respondent and others. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the ## **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 7** petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1[st] respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 5. Perused the records. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that with the intervention of well-wishers, the subject matter in dispute between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 5 has been settled out of court. 6. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 5 submitted that the respondents have filed AnnexuresA3 to A6 affidavits, inter alia, stating that they have no subsisting grievance against the petitioners and are no longer desirous of pursuing the matter any further. The learned counsel vouched for the signatures of the respondents 2 to 5. 7. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instruction, submitted that the investigating officer has ascertained the genuineness of settlement and has found that the respondents 2 to 5 have admitted the execution of Annexures A3 to A6 affidavits. The State has no serious objection in the ## **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 8** petition being allowed. 7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in _**Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab [2012 (10) SCC 303] and Prabatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another [(2017) 9 SCC 641]**_ has held that in facts and circumstances of a case and to secure the ends of justice, where the High Court is satisfied that an amicable settlement has been arrived between the parties and the offence is not serious in nature involving mental depravity, criminal proceedings may be quashed. 8. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on being convinced that ends of justice would justify the exercise of the inherent power of this Court, particularly since the alleged offences are not serious in nature, no public interest is involved, the chances of conviction is remote, the continuation of the proceeding would only be wastage of judicial time and the settlement would augur harmony, I am satisfied that the petition is to be allowed. ## **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 9** In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. Annexure-2 Final Report and all further proceedings in S.C. No. 151 of 2016 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court-I, Kasaragod, as against the petitioners are quashed. **Sd/-** **C.S.DIAS, JUDGE** pm **Crl.MC.No.515 OF 2021(D) 10** ## **APPENDIX** ## **' - PETITIONER S/S ANNEXURES :** |**ANNEXURE A1**|**TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO. 286/2020**| |---|---| ||**OF NILESHWARAM POLICE STATION DATED**| ||**27.4.2010.**| |**ANNEXURE A2**|**CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN**| ||**CRIME NO. 286/2010 OF THE NILESHWARAM**| ||**POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT DATED**| ||**11.03.2013.**| |**ANNEXURE A3**|**ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT GIVEN BY THE**| ||**2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.01.2021.**| |**ANNEXURE A3 (A)**|**ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT GIVEN BY THE**| ||**2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.01.2021.**| |**ANNEXURE A3(B)**|**ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT GIVEN BY THE**| ||**3RD RESPONDENT DATED 11.01.2021.**| |**ANNEXURE A3(C)**|**ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT GIVEN BY THE**| ||**4TH RESPONDENT DATED 11.01.2021.**|