High Court of KeralaSingle JudgeDisposed of; directions to Land Tribunal to dis...

SASI.O v. State of Kerala & Ors.

Case / Petition Number:WP(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L)

Case Details & Bench

Court
High Court of Kerala
Hon'ble Judges
  • Anil K. Narendran
Judgment Date
2021-02-01
Court Decision / Holding
Disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Kozhikode, to dispose of S.M.No.1380/2020 strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and connected cases. No order as to costs.
Final Disposition
Disposed of; directions to Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.1380/2020 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions; no order as to costs.

Parties to the Case

Appellants / Petitioners

  • SASI.O

Respondents

  • State of Kerala represented by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
  • The Land Tribunal, Kozhikode
  • The Tahasildar, Wayanad Road, Eranhippalam, Kozhikode
  • The Village Officer, Puthiyangadi Village, Bhut Road, Chungam, West Hill (P.O), Kozhikode

Legal Representation & Advocates

Counsels for Petitioners

  • • C.N. Sreekumar
  • • Manju Paul
  • • Sabu P. Joseph
  • • Anil Prasad
  • • G. Ashwini

Counsels for Respondents

  • • Vidhya A.C. (Government Pleader)

Case Synopsis & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the suo motu initiation of S.M.C.No.1380/2020 by the Land Tribunal, Kozhikode, for assignment of the right, title and interest vested in the Government under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of a certificate of purchase under Section 72K read with Rule 14 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970. The petitioner seeks a mandamus commanding the Land Tribunal to consider and pass orders in the said case within a time limit fixed by the court. The Government Pleader notes the large pendency (over 7,800 suo motu proceedings) and argues for adherence to legal procedures and established timelines. The court recalls a prior decision in Narayanan Namboodiri v. Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and connected cases, which stressed that disposal must follow seniority, and that tribunals may obtain reports via Village Officers to expedite the process, without breaking seniority. The court’s discussion underscores expeditious disposal, prioritisation of senior citizens, and the use of village-level reporting to avoid delays. Ultimately, the writ petition is disposed by directing the Land Tribunal to dispose of S.M.No.1380/2020 strictly in accordance with law and the Narayanan Namboodiri directions, with no order as to costs.

Provisions of Law Cited

Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaSection 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Section 72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 (Rule 14)Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970 (Rule 5)G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD, dated 22.02.2018Section 99 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

Legal Doctrines & Maxims

  • Disposal of cases on seniority basis
  • Expeditious disposal of cases (priority to senior citizens)
  • Land Tribunal may obtain reports through Village Officers to expedite proceedings
  • Do not break the seniority of cases unless directed by higher authorities

Submissions & Arguments

Contentions of Appellants / Petitioners

The petitioner seeks a mandamus to compel the Land Tribunal to consider and pass orders in S.M.C.No.1380/2020 within a time limit fixed by the Court, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal of purchase certificates to facilitate loan arrangements and addressing delays by following the seniority-based disposal directions laid down in Narayanan Namboodiri and the Government order. The petitioner also urges reliance on the 2018 Government notification enabling faster information from Village Officers to assist Tribunals.

Contentions of Respondents

The respondents highlight the substantial pendency before the Land Tribunal and justify adherence to seniority-based disposal, with directions to obtain necessary reports through Village Officers where required. They reiterate that expeditious disposal must operate within due process and that the Government order and Rules provide a framework for the Land Tribunal to functioning efficiently, including prioritizing senior-citizen matters and using available reports to avoid delays.

Cited Precedents (1)

Case NameCitationTreatmentExplanation
Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and anotherW.P.(C).No.28398 of 2017 and connected casesPositiveThe judgment repeatedly cites and applies the Narayanan Namboodiri directions as controlling for expeditious disposal by seniority and for permissible methods of obtaining information/reports.

Diagnostic Tool

Beta

Does this judgment govern your specific facts?

Don't risk relying on a distinguishable precedent. Enter your facts or proposition below. We will test it against SASI.O v. State of Kerala & Ors. and instantly map out authorities that support, challenge, or govern your position.

Extracted Judgment Text

Exact text extracted from official judgment records.

## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM** ## **PRESENT** **THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN** **MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 12TH MAGHA,1942** ## **WP(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L)** ## **PETITIONER/S:** **SASI.O, AGED 49 YEARS SON OF LATE NARAYANAN NAIR, OTHAYOTH HOUSE, CHINGAPURAM, THIKKOTI, PIN-673529, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT FLAT NO.311, EAST HILL APARTMENTS, WEST HILL P.O., PIN-673005, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.** **BY ADVS. SRI.C.N.SREEKUMAR SMT.MANJU PAUL SRI.SABU P.JOSEPH SRI.ANIL PRASAD SMT.G.ASHWINI** ## **RESPONDENT/S:** **1 STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2 THE LAND TRIBUNAL, WAYANAD ROAD, CIVIL STATION, ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673020. 3 THE TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, WAYANAD ROAD, CIVIL STATION, ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673020. 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PUTHIYANGADI VILLAGE, BHUT ROAD, CHUNGAM, WEST HILL (P.O), KOZHIKODE, PIN-673005.** ## **OTHER PRESENT:** **SMT VIDHYA A.C- GOVERNMENT PLEADER** **THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:** W.P(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L) -2- ## **J U D G M E N T** The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders in S.M.C.No.1380/2020 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Kozhikode, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. The _suo motu_ proceedings initiated by the Land Tribunal, Kozhikode under Rule 5 of the Kerala Land Reforms (Vesting and Assignment) Rules, 1970, is one for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of 4.435 Ares of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.98/8 and 98/23 in Block No.1 of Puthiyangadi Village in Kozhikode Taluk, Kozhikode District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. W.P(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L) -3- 3. In **Narayanan Namboodiri v. The Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and another** [Judgment dated 14.03.2018 in W.P.(C)No.28398 of 2017 and connected cases] this Court noticed that in the writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal for obtaining purchase certificate, many of the petitioners realised the need for purchase certificate only when they approached the Bank to obtain a loan. Filing writ petitions seeking expeditious disposal of the applications pending before the Land Tribunal is a routine affair before this Court. Breaking the queue by directing the Land Tribunals to dispose of the cases out of turn would result in derailing the process of disposal of the cases pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the Land Tribunal is bound to dispose the cases in accordance with the seniority of registration of such cases. 4. In **Narayanan Namboodiri** , this Court noticed that by G.O.(P).No.09/2018/RD dated 22.02.2018 the Government of Kerala appointed the Village Officers coming within the jurisdiction of each Land Tribunal constituted under Section 99 of W.P(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L) -4- the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 for bringing to the notice of the Land Tribunal concerned any fact or information required by the Land Tribunal or for moving that Tribunal to take any action necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the said Act. Therefore, there may not be any difficulty to obtain the reports through the Village Officers concerned. Before this Court, the Government in principle agreed for speedy disposal of the cases filed by the senior citizens and addressed all the Land Tribunals to give priority to such cases. This Court noticed that in some of the cases, delay occurred on account of serving notice on the landlords, which can be averted if the applicant in such cases co-operate with the Land Tribunal in taking out notice to such persons. On consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of those writ petitions with certain directions. Paragraph 2 of the said judgment reads thus; “2. On consideration of the facts and circumstances as above, this Court is of the view that the following directions can be issued for expeditious disposal of the cases by the Land Tribunal: (i) If it is felt that there is delay in obtaining W.P(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L) -5- reports through the Revenue Inspectors on account of their shortage, the Land Tribunal is free to get the reports from the Village Officers concerned. It is the discretion of the Land Tribunal in what manner such reports should be obtained. - (ii) Utmost importance should be given for expeditious disposal of all the cases filed by the senior citizens. The Land Tribunal shall dispose such cases of senior citizens on seniority basis within six months. - (iii) In respect of all other cases, the Land Tribunal shall follow the seniority of such cases and dispose the same within the maximum outer limit of 18 months unless there is a stay passed by the higher authorities. The Land Tribunal shall not break the seniority of such cases except for any directions being issued by this Court or any higher authority. - (iv) The parties are given liberty to take out notice to the land owners in such a manner in which the Land Tribunal deems fit to do so, including publications. - (v) In respect of the matters which are pending before the Deputy Collector, he shall follow the same procedure as mentioned above. - (vi) In respect of the proceedings in which all the ## W.P(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L) -6- steps have been completed which are ripe for passing orders as on today, the Land Tribunal shall pass orders within two months and the directions issued in earlier paragraphs would not affect those matters. However, in all other cases, the directions shall be strictly followed. (vii) The Government order, G.O.(P).No.09/2018/ RD, dated 22.02.2018 will form part of this Judgment.” (underline supplied) 5. In the instant case, based on the report of the Village Officer, Puthiyangadi Village, the Land Tribunal, Kozhikode initiated _suo motu_ proceedings as S.M.C.No.1380/2020, as evidenced by Ext.P5 report dated 17.12.2020, for assignment of the right, title and interest of the landlord vested in the Government under Section 72 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 and for issuance of certificate of purchase under Section 72K of the said Act, read with Rule 14 of the said Rules, in respect of the property referred to hereinbefore. 6. The learned Senior Government Pleader would point out that the total pendency of _suo motu_ proceedings in the Land Tribunal, Kozhikode is 7806. W.P(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L) -7- 7. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides this Court finds that the Land Tribunal, Kozhikode can be directed to dispose of S.M.No.1380/2020 following the directions issued by this Court in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. 8. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Land Tribunal, Kozhikode, to dispose of S.M.No.1380/2020, strictly in accordance with law, following the directions issued by this Court in paragraph 2 of the judgment in **Narayanan Namboodiri** , referred to supra. No order as to costs. Sd/- **ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE.** bkn/- W.P(C).No.1112 OF 2021(L) -8- ## **APPENDIX** **PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:** **EXHIBIT P1** **TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.1486 OF 2017 OF WEST HILL SUB REGISTRY.** **EXHIBIT P2** **TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.27 OF 2018 OF WEST HILL SUB REGISTRY.** **EXHIBIT P3** **TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT NO.KL11014308008/2020 DATED 08.12.2020 ISSUED FROM VILLAGE OFFICE, PUTHIYANGADI.** **EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING NO.B310646/2019 DATED 27.11.2020 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.** **EXHIBIT P5** **TRUE COPY OF THE SUO MOTU REPORT NO.1171 OF 2020 DATED 17.12.2020 WITH RELEVANT DOCUMENT NUMBERED AS S.M.C.NO.1380 OF 2020 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.**